November 14, 2025 | 12:00am
George, along with his brother Ronie, attended the birthday party of his girlfriend, Rica. Also present were Luna, Rica’s friend, as well as Rica’s mother, Rosa, and aunt, Erin. Gino was also there, an enemy of George due to a fistfight that occurred before the party.
As the night grew darker, George and Ronie’s behavior became noticeable. They acted like hawks circling Gino, waiting for the right moment. At around 1:30 a.m., when Ronie threw away his cigarette as a signal, George suddenly pulled out a .38 caliber gun and shot Gino. However, his first shot hit Erin and Rosa instead. Only on the second shot did Gino get hit. Gino and Rosa died, while Erin was injured.
Because of this incident, George and Ronie were charged with two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. After the trial, the lower court found both brothers guilty, ruling that there was conspiracy, even though only George fired the gun. Was the lower court correct?
The lower court was correct in convicting the brothers for the killing of Gino. There was indeed a conspiracy to kill him. Even if Ronie did not fire a shot, his participation as an accomplice made him equally liable, since in conspiracy, the act of one is the act of all.
However, Ronie cannot be held liable for the death of Rosa and the injury to Erin. Only George is responsible for those, as he is accountable for all the consequences of his wrongful act, even those not part of the original plan.
On the other hand, an accomplice cannot be held liable for acts not included in the conspiracy. Therefore, Ronie is not criminally responsible for the killing of Rosa and the wounding of Erin. (People of the Philippines vs. Floro et al., G.R. No. 125909, June 23, 2000)
* * *
Email: [email protected]