Comelec seeks Congress answer on barangay elections as filing date nears

The Commission on Elections urged Congress to decide before the filing of candidacies begins on September 28 whether the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections will proceed as scheduled in November.

Comelec Chairman George Garcia said Wednesday, Aug. 26, that an early decision would give the poll body and prospective candidates clarity as lawmakers consider proposals to postpone the elections and extend the terms of barangay and youth officials.

“Kaya po dapat bago po mag-filing, maging maliwanag kung may eleksyon ba o wala,” Garcia said in an interview with dzMM. (“That is why, before the filing, it should be clear whether there will be an election or not.”)

Certificates of candidacy for barangay and SK posts are scheduled to be filed from September 28 to Octcober 5.

Under the current law, the BSKE is scheduled for November 2.

Postponement, five-year term proposals

Lawmakers are considering proposals that could change both the election date and the terms of barangay and SK officials.

Senate Bill 2067, filed by Sen. Imee Marcos, proposes moving the November 2026 BSKE to October 2027.

A separate measure, Senate Bill 2387 by Sen. Chiz Escudero, seeks to establish a fixed five-year term for barangay and SK officials.

The Senate committee handling the measures has since advanced a proposal that would move the upcoming BSKE to November 2028 and hold succeeding elections every five years.

Garcia has said a five-year term could instead be applied to officials elected in November, allowing the scheduled 2026 elections to proceed.

P8 billion already spent

Despite the pending proposals, Garcia said Comelec continues preparing for the November 2 elections because that remains the schedule under existing law.

“Tuloy-tuloy pa rin po kami sapagkat ang batas sa kasalukuyan, may eleksyon tayo sa November 2,” Garcia said. (“We are continuing because, under the law as it stands, we have an election on Nov. 2.”)

Comelec has already spent about P8 billion of the P19.57-billion budget for the elections, including for ballot printing, 40,000 ballot boxes, pens and indelible ink.

Garcia said the materials could be stored and used for a later election if this year’s polls are postponed.

Impeach court subpoenas VP, husband’s bank records

More banks have been ordered to present before the Senate impeachment court the financial records of Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband Manases Carpio.

Impeachment court presiding officer Francis Escudero announced the decision at the tail-end of yesterday’s trial, noting that the court is adopting exactly the same parameters and limitations established in its July 20 ruling that originally authorized an examination of the couple’s financial history.

‘The chair will simply adopt and apply its ruling last July 20, 2026 concerning the subpoena issued to banking institutions involving the same subject matter, and the same limitations will apply accordingly,’ Escudero stated.

The supplemental subpoena covers peso-denominated accounts held by the Duterte couple as well as by 20 corporate entities where they hold interests.

Escudero reiterated that foreign currency deposits remain off-limits under the law.

‘It is clear that the subpoena does not include foreign currency. It is limited only to peso-denominated accounts and not of foreign currency deposits, as these are excluded without the written consent of the depositor,’ Escudero pointed out.

The Senate clerk of court was directed to immediately issue and serve the subpoenas to the concerned banks and financial institutions.

The institutions, which were not named, were given exactly seven calendar days – until Sept. 2 – to produce the required documents to the court.

The latest directive builds upon the House prosecution’s major legal victory last month when the impeachment court first allowed subpoenas for the couple’s banking, tax and Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) records in connection with unexplained wealth allegations under Article II of the Articles of Impeachment.

In its July 20 ruling, the court rejected the Duterte camp’s claim that the requests amounted to a ‘fishing expedition.’ The impeachment court said the records are ‘reasonably described, readily identifiable, prima facie relevant and material’ to the charges.

At the resumption of the impeachment trial next week, the prosecution team of the House of Representatives is expected to summon defense panel spokesman Michael Poa to the witness stand, as he was an education undersecretary when Duterte was concurrently department chief.

The prosecution has also moved to subpoena Marizza Grande, assistant national statistician of the Philippine Statistics Authority, to stand as witness on Sept. 2.

At yesterday’s proceedings, Office of the Vice President’s assistant chief of staff Lemuel Ortonio said Duterte and her former security chief Col. Raymund Dante Lachica were the only people who knew how and where her confidential funds were spent.

Escudero pointed out that Ortonio’s testimony was consistent with the one made by OVP chief of staff Zuleika Lopez.

Ortonio said he understood that Duterte, as head of the agency, would know how the activities bankrolled by the confidential funds were implemented.

He also confirmed that Lachica knew how the funds were used because he headed the OVP’s security. ‘Yes, as head of the security of the OVP,’ Ortonio said.

‘In your office, only VP Sara, as head of the agency, knows. You, as assistant chief of staff, and the chief of staff have no knowledge. Colonel Lachica also has knowledge,’ Escudero said.

Ortonio, however, got a tongue-lashing from Sen. Raffy Tulfo for ‘playing dumb’ while being questioned about the use of confidential funds for the purchase of medicines and medical supplies.

Tulfo argued that Ortonio, as a signatory to the Audit Observation Memorandum (AOM), should have questioned the massive expenses.

Ortonio maintained he had ‘no personal knowledge’ of the transactions and merely trusted Lachica.

‘What a waste of education. The schools you attended might be feeling ashamed because you speak like you’re playing dumb,’ Tulfo said.

Ortonio immediately pushed back: ‘Your honor, I take offense at that personal comment. I just did my duty at the time.’

Tulfo responded, reminding the official of his accountability.

House prosecution spokesman Ace Barbers said Ortonio appeared to be speaking from a ‘template’ just like the previous witness Gina Acosta, the Vice President’s former disbursing officer.

‘Perhaps they should also have aliases. Maybe they can be called ‘Ka-Limot,’ because they seem to forget everything they did and the people they worked with,’ Rep. Paolo Ortega said, referring to Ortonio and Acosta.

Meanwhile, Palace press officer Claire Castro said last Tuesday’s hearings showed evidence that Duterte was aware of the withdrawal and use of confidential funds.

Duterte told: Why say no evidence if you don’t attend impeachment trial?

Lawmakers have asked Vice President Sara Duterte how she was able to conclude that the prosecution has failed to present any evidence in her impeachment trial, despite the proceedings having gone on for eight weeks, while she has been absent.

In an ambush interview on the sidelines of Duterte’s trial on Wednesday, public prosecutor and Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon said that if Duterte had attended some of the hearings, she would have seen the magnitude of evidence presented by the prosecution.

‘Maybe if our vice president had shown up to her trial from the start, she would know the state of the evidence laid down by the prosecution,’ Ridon told reporters.

‘And I think it is very important to remind (the public) that it has been weeks, I think this is the eighth week of the trial, but the vice president chose not to show up to this trial,’ he added.

In a separate press briefing, Deputy Speaker Jefferson Khonghun said that Duterte’s statements will be a good test of how the Senate Impeachment Court will implement Rule 18, the sub judice rule, which bars comments and disclosures on the merits of the case.

‘It doesn’t look good that the presiding officer is reading the ruling on sub judice and then the vice president is discussing the case. She has not attended her trial, and yet she chooses to say a lot of things outside,’ he added.

On Wednesday morning, while her trial was ongoing, Duterte released a statement calling out the prosecution and some members of the impeachment court.

Duterte said that the prosecution has been relying on ‘theatrics’ and ‘insults,’ while saying that a senator-judge called a witness ‘stupid.’

She also claimed that the prosecution has been fishing for evidence in an attempt to ‘legitimize the two impeachment complaints,’ which she said were ‘filed without a shred of evidence.’

When asked whether he thinks Duterte will follow Rule 18, Khonghun said ‘no.’

‘Ever since, she has not behaved well. You saw how she acted outside the court, so we do not expect the vice president to follow the court’s orders. She hasn’t even shown up yet,’ he added.

Earlier, prosecution spokesperson and impeachment adviser Robert Ace Barbers said that they would seek clarification from the impeachment court on the matter.

Eventually, House lead prosecutor and Batangas Rep. Gerville Luistro asked Escudero if she could make a manifestation on the matter. Escudero stopped Luistro, saying that he was well on his way to addressing the matter.

Escudero said that since Duterte’s statements were made while the ruling was being discussed, they fell under the principle of prospectivity. However, he asked the defense panel, particularly lead defense lawyer Sheila Sison, to remind her client about the matter.

Lawmakers have previously called out Duterte’s absence from the trial. On Aug. 3, Ridon questioned why she could travel abroad but not attend the trial.

Duterte is not required to attend the trial, as she is represented by her counsel. However, last August 17, Manila Rep. Bienvenido Abante Jr. – one of the endorsers of the fourth impeachment complaint – said Duterte should show up and answer the allegations herself, instead of having her staff face tough questions from the parties and senator-judges.

According to Abante, if Duterte can attend the proceedings for her perjury charge against ex-aide Ramil Madriaga and the arraignment of her brother Davao City Rep. Paolo Duterte for his grave threats case, the vice president should also make time for the impeachment court and not let staffers alone be grilled.

Aide: Only Sara Duterte, Lachica knew where OVP’s CFs went

Only Vice President Sara Duterte and her former security chief knew how millions of pesos in confidential funds of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) were spent, a top OVP official testified on Wednesday, raising fresh questions from senator-judges over who was accountable for the secretive expenditures.

Lemuel Ortonio, OVP assistant chief of staff, said that apart from Duterte, former Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group (VPSPG) commander Col. Raymund Lachica knew how the confidential funds were implemented.

‘The way I understand it, Sir, as the head of agency, I would understand that she knows the implementation,’ Ortonio replied to presiding officer Francis Escudero’s question on whether Duterte knew how the funds were spent.

Escudero pressed the witness, who had been declared hostile by the prosecution, on whether Lachica also knew how the activities funded by the confidential funds were carried out.

‘Yes, sir, as the security officer,’ Ortonio said.

‘So, you as assistant chief of staff, and the chief of staff herself [referring to Zuleika Lopez], doesn’t know; and Colonel Lachica, who is not part of the OVP, [knows]?’ Escudero asked further.

‘Yes, sir,’ Ortonio answered.

The exchange came on the 19th day of Duterte’s impeachment trial and despite Ortonio’s confirmation that Duterte, Lopez and he, as assistant chief of staff, were the office’s three highest-ranking officials.

Defense objections overruled

Escudero took over the questioning after prosecution lawyer Mae Divinagracia sought to establish whether Duterte alone among the OVP’s top officials knew how the confidential funds were used.

Defense lawyer Kristine Ferrer objected, arguing that the question was misleading and vague and that Lopez had not testified before the impeachment court on the confidential funds.

Escudero overruled the objection, saying the court had taken judicial notice of the 2024 House proceedings, during which Lopez testified, and that the transcript contained statements along those lines.

Ortonio repeatedly told the court that he had no participation in the implementation, disbursement, recording or preparation of liquidation reports involving the confidential funds.

Asked by Divinagracia whether he knew where the money went or which OVP programs received it, Ortonio said he had no personal knowledge of how the funds were implemented.

The defense again objected, but Escudero allowed the questioning, saying it involved an issue that was also on the minds of the senator-judges.

No personal knowledge

‘So if you have no personal knowledge where the funds were spent, you also do not have the knowledge if the funds were used for the OVP’s regular programs?’ Escudero asked.

‘I don’t have personal knowledge how the confidential funds were implemented,’ Ortonio replied.

‘At all? Where it went, you don’t know? Whether it ended up right or wrong, dirty or clean, you don’t know.?’ Escudero asked in mixed English and Filipino.

‘I would have no personal knowledge, Sir,’ the witness said.

Duterte ‘most responsible’

Senator-judge Risa Hontiveros then asked whether every major action involving the confidential funds-from the request for the money and the amounts sought to the justification, use and responses to auditors-was decided and approved by Duterte.

Ortonio said he furnished Duterte, as head of the agency, with copies and information and that the documents submitted to the Commission on Audit carried her final sign-off.

Asked whether Duterte was therefore ‘the most responsible for all of it,’ Ortonio answered: ‘Based on that, ma’am, being the head of agency, ma’am, I would say so, ma’am.’

Lachica’s employment status

Senator-judge Vicente Sotto III, meanwhile, questioned Ortonio about Lachica’s employment status in the OVP.

Ortonio said Lachica, as commander of the VPSPG, was not an OVP employee but was designated by the Armed Forces of the Philippines to head the security unit.

‘Therefore, he is not employed? He does not have any employment status in the Office of the Vice President?’ Sotto asked.

Ortonio answered in the affirmative, underscoring the questions over why an officer outside the OVP’s regular personnel structure appeared to have knowledge of the confidential funds while its two other highest-ranking officials did not.

Lacson seeks fund records

Senator-judge Panfilo Lacson raised another unresolved issue, saying senator-judges were still wondering whether the unusual names appearing in documents represented real people who actually received reward money as informants.

Lacson suggested that the impeachment court subpoena documents relating to the OVP’s programs, projects and activities (PAPs), physical and financial plans (PFPs), and expected outcomes so the senator-judges could examine the underlying records themselves.

‘There is a presumption the funds were used properly, but there’s still that doubt that we cannot remove because there are so many issues that came out during the trial,’ Lacson said, stressing that the court needed to be satisfied before deciding the case on the basis of evidence.

Escudero said the court could exercise that power at the appropriate time. He said the general rule was for the impeachment court to remain a passive body and leave it to the prosecution and defense to seek the evidence they considered necessary.

But after both sides have presented their evidence in chief, Escudero said, the court may call or recall witnesses, summon a person not named by either party and issue subpoenas for relevant documents.

‘Copy-paste’ budget plans

Lacson also assailed what he described as ‘copy-paste’ descriptions in the OVP’s regular budget and confidential and intelligence funds plans.

Citing the 2022 and 2023 General Appropriations Acts and the OVP’s PFPs, Lacson noted that the office received P621.6 million under its regular budget and P125 million in confidential funds in the fourth quarter of 2022, while in 2023 it received P2.21 billion in regular funds and P500 million in confidential funds.

He said virtually identical program descriptions and physical targets appeared in the regular and confidential fund documents, including targets involving areas under surveillance and the implementation of activities without security-related incidents.

Lacson said the descriptions could at least have been differentiated, calling the apparent ‘copy-paste’ practice an insult to common sense.

He later clarified that when he described the practice as ‘stupid,’ he was referring to the descriptions and nomenclatures of the PAPs, PFPs and physical targets, not to any individual.

FG charges varsities to transform research into businesses, employment

The Federal Government has challenged Nigerian universities and the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI) to bridge the gap between academic research and the marketplace by transforming innovations into viable businesses, jobs, and practical solutions to Nigeria’s economic challenges.

Minister of Education, Dr Olatunji Alausa, gave the charge while addressing vice-chancellors, directors of academic affairs, directors of postgraduate studies, and officials of the Federal Ministry of Education’s Directorate of University Education on the prospect of strengthening collaboration between universities and NASENI through the NASENI Campus.

Alausa said the initiative offered a strategic opportunity to connect university researchers with advanced laboratories, prototyping facilities, industry, and investment, thereby creating a pathway for promising ideas to move from the laboratory to the marketplace.

He stressed that Nigeria must deliberately shift from research production to research commercialisation if the country is to maximise the potential of its human capital, adding that research outputs should not end as academic publications or prototypes, but should be patented, developed into marketable products, and commercialised through partnerships with investors and industry.

While drawing lessons from the innovation ecosystem around Cambridge, Massachusetts, the minister said Nigerian researchers should be given the opportunity to protect their inventions, develop market-ready products, and work with investors to establish viable companies.

He said such an approach would help transform human capital into human development through the creation of enterprises, employment, and wealth.

To achieve this, Alausa urged NASENI to establish stronger affiliations with universities located around its development centres, noting that the institutions have a vast pool of researchers, lecturers, and students whose expertise could complement the agency’s activities.

He said NASENI could serve as a critical link between academic research and commercial success by supporting patent registration, connecting researchers with venture capital, and facilitating the establishment of university spin-off companies.

Alausa also challenged the agency to explore opportunities in lithium processing and battery manufacturing as Nigeria seeks to expand its renewable energy and industrial capabilities.

Earlier, the Chief Executive Officer of NASENI, Mr Khalil Suleiman Halilu, outlined the agency’s efforts to bridge the gap between research and production in line with President Bola Tinubu’s directive to move beyond prototypes and ensure that innovations reach the production stage.

Halilu said the proposed NASENI Campus, located within a 100-hectare free trade zone, was being developed as an integrated ecosystem where researchers, professors, prototyping facilities, industries, and commercialisation opportunities could operate together.

He noted that several factories and industrial facilities had already been established within the zone, providing opportunities for researchers to connect their innovations with production and investment.

The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Abuja, Professor Hakeem Babatunde Fawehinmi, said the university’s existing partnership with NASENI demonstrated the potential of the model being advocated by the Minister.

He said the collaboration had resulted in facilities including an integrated agriculture incubation centre, greenhouse facilities, automated poultry systems, and tissue culture laboratories, which support undergraduate and postgraduate research.

Fawehinmi added that the university was prepared to deepen its partnership with NASENI in areas including dairy science and renewable energy.

Similarly, the Vice-Chancellor of Bayero University, Kano, Professor Haruna Musa, said the institution was exploring expanded collaboration with NASENI in nanotechnology, vaccinology, toxinology, and mathematical modelling.

He disclosed that two BUK research projects had reached the final stage of NASENI’s research commercialisation grant process. The projects include a reusable sanitary pad initiative and the commercial production of sweet potato-based starch derivatives, highlighting the potential of university research to produce commercially viable solutions.

Alausa reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to the initiative, saying his Ministry would continue to work with NASENI, universities, and other stakeholders to establish a functional pathway linking research and innovation with investment, production, and job creation.

He stressed that under President Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, the objective was not merely to increase research output, but to ensure that Nigeria’s knowledge, skills, and innovations translated into products, enterprises, employment opportunities, and sustainable prosperity for Nigerians.

Osun election violence: A postmortem

ACCORDING to reports, more than 30 people lost their lives during the build-up to the governorship election held in Osun State on August 15. Only on Monday, two people were confirmed killed in Ikire during a shooting incident linked to a motor park takeover bid. Last week, a gun attack erupted around the palace of the Ataoja of Osogbo shortly after Governor Ademola Adeleke visited the traditional ruler on a courtesy visit after receiving his Certificate of Return from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). These attacks show that the violence in the state has not abated. They reflect the cataclysmic nature of politics in Nigeria. They are an inglorious reminder that the culture of violence, cultism, and political intimidation has acquired an audacity that should alarm every responsible citizen.

Preliminary findings by the Osun State Police Command indicate that the target of last week’s attack in Osogbo was music star David Adeleke, popularly known as Davido, who accompanied the governor, his uncle, to the palace. According to the police, one Adebayo Taoreed, also known as ‘Small Rugged’, allegedly attempted to gain access to the singer but was prevented by members of his security team. The confrontation reportedly drew other suspected members of the Eye Confraternity, who obstructed the governor’s convoy and precipitated the gun battle. Whatever the motive, one fact remains deeply disturbing: armed men felt sufficiently emboldened to confront a governor’s convoy in the heart of Osogbo, the state capital. That is not an ordinary criminal episode, but a direct assault on public order and an ominous challenge to the authority of the state.

The security personnel deserve commendation for responding swiftly and preventing what might have become an even greater catastrophe. Yet, praise for the security response cannot substitute for the harder task of dismantling the criminal networks that made such an incident possible. The reported death of 60-year-old Tajudeen Yusuf, allegedly shot while the assailants fled, makes the matter all the more grievous. It is a reflection of the heartlessness of men who have apparently mistaken the streets for a theatre of impunity. As Shakespeare reminds us in Macbeth, ‘Blood will have blood.’ A society that permits violence to go unanswered should not be surprised when yesterday’s gunshot becomes tomorrow’s funeral procession. The Ikire and Osogbo incidents reflect the disturbing violence surrounding the governorship election. Reports of widespread violence, threats, and fatalities during the electoral period have cast a dark shadow over what should have been an exercise in democratic choice.

The fact that 30 souls were lost to pre-election violence cannot be swept under the carpet. Every death deserves an investigation. Every credible allegation of murder deserves prosecution. Every video in which threats were issued should be examined. Every individual suspected of sponsoring, facilitating, or participating in violence must face the law, irrespective of political affiliation, social standing, or proximity to power. ‘Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown,’ Shakespeare wrote. But in a constitutional democracy, the unease of political office must never become an excuse for the insecurity of the citizenry. Those who govern must understand that power is a trust, not a private estate. And those who contest for power must understand that political victory purchased with blood is a poisoned inheritance. The police therefore owe Osun State, and indeed Nigeria, a thorough and transparent account of what happened. Investigations should not stop at identifying those who pulled the trigger in all the reported cases of violence. The authorities must establish who financed, armed, encouraged, or directed the violent actors. Criminal gangs do not suddenly materialise when elections approach; they flourish where political interests, money, and impunity create fertile soil. The Nigerian political class should remember that where political power becomes an instrument for settling scores, intimidating opponents, or commandeering the machinery of the state, democracy becomes little more than an elaborate costume draped over naked coercion. This is why the Osun violence must not be treated as an isolated disturbance. It is part of a larger national pathology in which politics is too often conducted as warfare.

Silence, selective justice and official indifference are not neutral responses; they are invitations to further disorder. And Wole Soyinka’s enduring observation that ‘the man dies in all who keep silent in the face of tyranny’ acquires particular resonance here. Silence may appear convenient when violence is directed at an opponent, but impunity has no permanent political allegiance. The gun that is tolerated today because it serves one faction may tomorrow be turned against another. Notably, Osun people are not inherently violent. The state has a rich history, a proud cultural heritage, and a population capable of remarkable communal solidarity. What frequently inflames the atmosphere is the behaviour of politicians who turn legitimate political competition into a contest of personal hatred, coercion, and domination.

Democracy does not confer upon anyone the right to impose his or her will upon others. Political opponents are not enemies of the state, and disagreement is not a license for violence. Politics must not be a dirty game. No electoral slogan, party affiliation, or political grievance can sanctify murder. No politician should have the moral authority to demand peace from the people while tolerating violence among his followers. The government must therefore act with firmness, but also with fairness. Cultism must be confronted relentlessly. Criminal gangs must be dismantled. Those convicted of murder must face the full consequences prescribed by the law. Deterrence is indispensable, but deterrence without justice becomes vengeance.

There is also a lesson here for the political class. Abraham Lincoln’s simple proposition that ‘a house divided against itself cannot stand’ is as relevant to Osun as it is to any democracy. A state cannot flourish when its political actors continually manufacture enemies among their own people. Elections end, but communities remain. Politicians depart office, but the people remain to inherit the consequences of the passions that politicians have inflamed. Governor Adeleke’s administration now faces a defining test. The ball is firmly in its court. It must demonstrate that Osun belongs not to gunmen, cultists, or political thugs, but to law-abiding citizens. The police must investigate. Prosecutors must prosecute. Courts must adjudicate without fear or favor. The government must publish what it can legitimately disclose about the violence, and demonstrate that no influential individual will receive immunity from accountability.

The words of Martin Luther King Jr. should also haunt every custodian of public power: ‘The time is always right to do what is right.’ This is the time for Osun to choose justice over expediency, accountability over silence, and the rule of law over political convenience. The lesson must not be lost in the noise of politics. When criminality acquires the confidence to confront the symbols of state authority, every citizen’s security is diminished. Nigeria has suffered too long from the politics of impunity. Osun must now choose a different path.

The kind of violence that preceded the Osun election should never recur. The Nigerian people deserve peace. The dead deserve justice. The innocent deserve protection. And the political class must remember the wisdom of Edmund Burke: ‘Justice is itself the great standing policy of civil society.’

Trump revokes 200,000 U.S. immigrants visas

These are not the best for times for asylum seekers in the United States (U.S.) following plans by the Donal Trump administration to revoke visas of foreigners who came to the country for tourism or businesses, but chose to stay longer by applying for asylum.

The State Department confirmed the planned crackdown yesterday.

The crackdown marked another step in the Trump administration’s signature drive to reduce immigration into the U.S.

The government has also paused all immigrant visa applications worldwide as the Trump administration moves to tighten restrictions on applicants it considers likely to rely on U.S. public assistance.

A State Department official confirmed the pause on Tuesday, saying the agency launched the initiative at all U.S. embassies and consulates in early August.

The Guardian quoted the official yesterday, saying visa appointments had to be adjusted to accommodate ‘in-depth training’.

The State Department added that the move is ‘to ensure all consular officers are fully equipped to evaluate every visa applicant comprehensively and consistently.’

The administration said it is now working with the Department of Homeland Security to identify and revoke the visas of people who, it said, came to America, billing themselves as temporary visitors but then applied for asylum so they could stay permanently.

‘Obtaining a visa in order to seek asylum is fraud – which is grounds for visa revocation,’ State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott, said in a statement that confirmed press reports about the new policy.

The White House, in a post on X, suggested ‘up to two hundred thousand visas’ would be affected and claimed it would be the ‘largest mass visa revocation in history.’

The State Department neither confirmed nor denied that number.

Pigott said:’The number of revocations remains dynamic and will be done on a rolling basis.’

Early this month, the department said that since President Trump returned to power in January 2025, some 175,000 foreigners had seen their U.S. visas revoked on grounds ranging from criminal offenses, including driving under the influence, to praising the killing of the right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.

The administration also recently revoked the visas of Mexican officials, including the son of the former president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.

This prompted a complaint from the current president, Claudia Sheinbaum.

Trump, whose reelection was largely on his promise to fight illegal immigration, has expelled huge numbers of people who were in the country without proper residence papers.

Fed Govt rolls out electric vehicles for civil servants

The Federal Government has begun deploying 100 electric mass transit buses for federal civil servants.

It has also taken delivery of the first batch of electric vehicles (EVs) promised to workers, as part of a broader push to cut transportation costs and promote cleaner energy use across the country.

The first batch of 37 buses was commissioned yesterday at Eagle Square, Abuja, by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Mrs Didi Esther Walson-Jack, under the Federal Civil Service Electric Mass Transit Programme. The initiative, approved by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) under the Renewed Hope Mass Transit Scheme, is meant to provide federal workers with safer, more affordable and reliable transportation along designated routes within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

Separately, the Director-General, National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), Oluwemimo Joseph Osanipin, who disclosed that the government had taken delivery of the first batch of EVs promised to civil servants, described it as the beginning of a wider rollout under the administration’s clean energy transportation drive.

He spoke while briefing journalists after meeting President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at the State House.

Speaking at the bus inauguration, Walson-Jack, described the intervention as central to workers’ welfare and productivity.

‘For many civil servants, the daily commute shapes their finances, their safety, their punctuality and ultimately their productivity,’ she said.

The retiring HoCSF said the launching was a fitting close to her tenure. ‘This commissioning is providentially my parting gift to my dearly beloved federal servants. In a little under 24 hours, my time as Head of the Civil Service of the Federation comes to an end,’ she said, adding that the buses would keep working long after she had left office.

Walson-Jack said the buses were acquired through the Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund and linked the programme to other government interventions, including the minimum wage review, the wage award following the fuel subsidy removal, digitalisation of the public service, and reforms in pensions, promotions and health insurance. ‘Each is a thread in the same commitment that reform must be felt, not merely announced,’ she said.

The Minister of State for Industry, Senator John Owan Enoh, said the buses programme was an investment in workers’ welfare and local industrial development. He said each bus could carry up to 200 passengers and travel a minimum of 200 kilometres on a full charge, and that the scheme would ease pressure on workers’ household incomes while supporting Nigeria’s automotive sector.

The buses, approved by NADDC, are expected to run on designated routes linking residential corridors with the Federal Secretariat and other government offices in the FCT, with the first deployment serving as a testing phase ahead of a wider rollout.

On the electric vehicle scheme, Osanipin said the government had also deployed EV-related infrastructure in about 16 universities to build the ecosystem needed to support the transition to alternative energy vehicles. He said policies promoting EVs and Compressed Natural Gas required complementary investment in filling stations, mobile refilling units and gas production before their benefits could be fully felt.

He disclosed that the number of companies licensed to retail gas had risen to about 81, from about four previously, citing it as evidence of growing private sector investment in the CNG initiative.

He said the expansion was already cutting costs for motorists and fleet operators, citing a traveller whose fuel expenditure on a trip fell from over N200,000 to about N40,000 after switching to CNG, refilling in Kano.

Osanipin, however, said some fleet operators benefiting from cheaper CNG had yet to pass on the savings to commuters through reduced fares, adding that ensuring this happens would form the next phase of government intervention once infrastructure and fuel availability are sufficiently developed.

He said his meeting with President Tinubu also covered ongoing investments in the automotive sector and progress on draft legislation to strengthen the industry’s regulatory environment

NIGERIA DAILY: Why Are Young Nigerians’ Kidneys Failing?

Kidney disease is often associated with old age. But increasingly, concerns are being raised about younger Nigerians presenting with serious kidney problems.

Kidney disease is often associated with old age. But increasingly, concerns are being raised about younger Nigerians presenting with serious kidney problems.

And how can young Nigerians protect their kidneys?

Today on Nigeria Daily, we are looking at why young Nigerians are developing kidney problems.

Choosing a car that fits your needs and budget

Can you afford the car you want to buy or can you only afford to buy it?

For many motorists, the distinction becomes clear only after the purchase. A car may fit the budget at the dealership or vehicle bond, but fuel, insurance, servicing, tyres, repairs and loan repayments can quickly turn it into a financial burden.

In Uganda, where used imported vehicles make up a significant part of the market, buyers have plenty of choices. But instead of asking which car looks better or carries more prestige, experts advise motorists to first consider what they need the vehicle to do and what it will cost to keep it on the road.

Alvon Nkini, a car enthusiast and researcher, says the first question should be about the vehicle’s purpose.

‘For example, you may find a Mercedes-Benz SUV and a Toyota Land Cruiser on the market, but if you regularly travel to the countryside, the Land Cruiser may be more suitable because it can be adapted to different road and usage conditions,’ Nkini says.

He says income, road conditions, frequency of use, environment and family size should all influence the decision.

Start with how you will use it

A motorist who mainly drives between home, work and other destinations in Kampala may have little need for a large four-wheel-drive vehicle. A smaller, fuel-efficient car could be easier and cheaper to run.

The calculation changes for someone who regularly travels upcountry, particularly on rough or seasonal roads. Such a driver may need a vehicle with adequate ground clearance, suitable suspension and enough room for passengers and luggage.

Some motorists also need a vehicle for both family and business use. Station wagons and multipurpose vehicles such as the Toyota Probox, Fielder, Sienta and Wish can provide useful luggage space, while a pick-up may be more appropriate for farming or work involving bulky loads.

Whatever the model, buyers should check its recommended passenger and payload limits. Carrying more weight than the manufacturer allows can affect braking, handling, suspension and tyre performance and increase the risk of losing control.

Road conditions should, therefore, be considered alongside the intended use. A vehicle that performs well on smooth tarmac may not be the best choice for someone who frequently drives on poorly maintained or unpaved roads.

Think about your family

Passenger space matters, but bigger is not always better. A large family that frequently travels upcountry may find a properly specified seven-seater such as a Toyota Noah more practical than a small car, particularly when passengers have luggage.

For a parent whose main use is taking children to school and commuting around the city centre, however, a smaller vehicle may make more financial sense. Older models such as the Toyota Raum, Spacio and Ractis may appeal to buyers seeking compact vehicles, but their condition, fuel economy, age and availability of spare parts should be assessed.

Fred Kaboggoza, a car dealer, says buyers should consider more than the number of seats.

‘A Raum or Sienta may be suitable for town driving, but the buyer should consider the vehicle’s condition, engine capacity, passenger load and the roads on which it will be used,’ he says.

Do not buy to impress

A neighbour’s SUV, colleague’s luxury sedan or friend’s new German car can easily influence a purchase. But a vehicle that impresses people outside may create financial pressure at home.

Joel Tumwine, who works in the car-rental business, says motorists should be honest about their circumstances.

‘If your workplace is in Nakasero or Kololo and you live in Kisaasi, you may not need a V8 with a 4,500cc engine or a Mercedes-Benz 4Matic. When you prepare a monthly budget, you may realise that the vehicle is taking up a disproportionate share of your income through fuel and maintenance costs,’ he says.

The issue is not whether expensive cars are worthwhile. It is whether the owner can comfortably sustain the costs.

‘When you divide your income between housing, food and transport, you must also provide for healthcare, education, savings and other essential needs. Living within your means may require you to choose practicality over luxury,’ Tumwine says.

Calculate the real cost

The purchase price is only the beginning of car ownership. Before committing to a vehicle, buyers should estimate the monthly cost of fuel, insurance, loan repayments, servicing, parking and an allowance for unexpected repairs. Tyres and other wear-and-tear items should also be included.

Albert Mwesige, a financial adviser, says prospective buyers should calculate the total monthly ownership cost rather than looking only at the purchase price or loan instalment.

Fuel consumption varies according to engine size, vehicle weight, traffic, driving habits and vehicle efficiency. Even a small-engine car can consume significant fuel if it spends long hours in Kampala traffic.

Similarly, a vehicle that is cheap to purchase may prove expensive to maintain, while a more expensive model may offer better fuel economy or easier access to spare parts.

Saeed Bilal, sales manager at Yuasa Investments Limited, says prices vary depending on the model, year of manufacture, mileage, specifications and condition. He gives the example of a 2017 Toyota Premio, which he says costs about Shs65m, compared with about Shs50m for a Fielder of the same year.

These prices can change with market conditions and the specific vehicle, so buyers should compare current listings before deciding.

Servicing costs also depend on the model and what needs replacing. Paul Kaganzi, a mechanic at Duke’s Garage, says a routine service may involve engine oil, an oil filter and an air filter, while other fluids may only require inspection or replacement according to the manufacturer’s schedule.

‘Engine oil costs between Shs140,000 and Shs160,000. If you have Shs200,000, it will only cater for the engine service, including the oil, oil filter and air filter,’ he says.

Buyers should establish the manufacturer’s recommended service intervals rather than assuming every vehicle should be serviced at the same mileage.

Check parts and resale value

A car’s popularity can make ownership easier. Alex Kadoli, a mechanic in Bunga, advises buyers to find out whether spare parts are readily available and whether qualified technicians can work on the model.

‘If you have to import most spare parts or search extensively for a mechanic with the expertise to repair the vehicle, it may be expensive to maintain. Some people buy cars because of the impression they create, only to sell them soon afterwards when they realise they cannot afford the fuel, parts or repairs,’ Kadoli says.

Resale value should also form part of the decision. A popular vehicle, economical to run and supported by a reliable supply of spare parts may be easier to sell later. Buyers should, therefore, ask not only, ‘Can I afford this car today?’ but also, ‘Will I still want and be able to afford it three years from now?’

Inspect before paying

Before paying, buyers should have the vehicle independently inspected for mechanical faults, accident damage, excessive wear and other hidden problems, while checking its service history, identification and ownership documents. A proper test drive can also reveal issues with the engine, transmission, steering, brakes or suspension that may not be obvious when the car is stationary.

Buyers should be wary of unusually low prices, which may conceal costly problems. It is also important to confirm that the vehicle’s registration details match the seller’s documents and that there are no outstanding ownership disputes.

Taking time to compare similar vehicles can also help a buyer judge whether the asking price is reasonable. Ultimately, the best car is one that meets your needs, suits your roads and remains affordable to maintain.