A brewing crisis: Millions of women still lack access to family planning

SHOBHA SHUKLA – CNS

The landscape of sexual and reproductive health and rights is shifting: millions of women want to avoid pregnancy but are not using a modern method of contraception.

Modern contraceptives are essential and life-saving, and yet an estimated 224 million women in developing countries who want to avoid pregnancy are not currently using safe and effective family planning methods.

For most women, the basic human right to choose whether to have children continues to be undermined. They are at risk of losing access to the most basic tools for bodily autonomy and health.

While contraceptives remain essential and lifesaving, yet supply chains, funding streams, and political will are collapsing, while demand is surging among women and girls worldwide. Millions are now at risk of losing access to the most basic tools for bodily autonomy and health.

Experts warn that this is not just a health issue – it is a human rights and economic crisis that threatens decades of progress in gender equality, education, and maternal health.

“Family planning is not only a matter of health, it is a matter of rights,” said UNFPA Executive Director Diene Keita.

“When women and adolescent girls have access to contraceptives, their pregnancies are more likely to be planned and safe, they are more likely to complete school, be employed and fulfil their potential, their children are healthier, and their societies are more prosperous. Contraceptives reduce abortion rates and lower the incidence of death and disability related to complications of pregnancy and childbirth”, she said.

Referring to the economic benefits that contraceptives bring, she said that every $1 spent ending unmet need for contraception yields nearly $27 in economic benefits.

A widening gap in access

In the Asia-Pacific region, more than 140 million women of reproductive age still lack access to modern methods of contraception. The consequences are staggering: an estimated 13 million unplanned pregnancies occur every year, alongside 3.9 million adolescent pregnancies, nearly half of which are unintended. Also fewer than one in four sexually active, unmarried adolescent girls in Asia and the Pacific are using a modern contraceptive method.

Across the region, 64 out of every 1,000 women will experience an unintended pregnancy during their lifetime. For many, this leads to unsafe abortions – a leading cause of maternal death and injury – or forces girls out of school and women out of the workforce.

“The supply, distribution, and availability of contraceptives are simply not keeping up with demand. Persistent supply gaps and funding shortfalls are putting millions of women at risk,” says a UNFPA regional report. This is especially true of women living in remote and rural areas.

A looming funding crisis

Despite the proven benefits, global funding for family planning is falling. The issue is being compounded by a decline in global funding for reproductive health supplies. Recent major funding disruptions and proposed cuts by key donors, including the USA, threaten to worsen this crisis significantly, in communities that rely on international family planning funding.

While shortages have been most visible in parts of Africa, UNFPA warns that similar ripple effects are now being felt in Asia and the Pacific. The UNFPA projects a US$ 1.5 billion shortfall in reproductive health commodity financing by 2030 in low- and middle-income countries.

The burden of the funding gap falls disproportionately on poor, marginalised, and vulnerable populations, – those who rely on public healthcare systems.

Beyond health: The social impact

The consequences of unmet family planning needs go far beyond healthcare statistics. Rising unintended pregnancies can lead to increased school dropouts, child marriages, and gender-based violence, especially among adolescent girls

“When contraceptive stocks run low, health systems brace for a spike in unintended pregnancies — and with that comes a rise in maternal deaths and unsafe abortions,” Keita warned. “The impacts ripple outward: into classrooms, workplaces, and entire communities.”

Barriers to access

Beyond funding and supply challenges, women and girls continue to face social and systemic barriers. These include limited access to healthcare facilities, misinformation about contraception, fear of side effects, and social opposition from partners or families. Young and unmarried women are often excluded from national surveys, making their needs less visible to policymakers.

A call to action

As the seventh International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP) 2025 opens in Bogota, with more than 3500 attendees from across the globe (including world leaders, researchers, and advocates) the world stands at a decisive crossroads for sexual and reproductive health and rights. ICFP 2025 comes at a decisive moment for sexual and reproductive health, rights and justice (SRHRJ) – as the world faces both reproductive rights rollbacks and a projected US $1.5 billion funding shortfall in reproductive-health commodity financing by 2030 in the poorest countries.

Without decisive action, millions of women will remain trapped in cycles of poverty and preventable health risks. Ensuring universal access to modern contraception is not just about preventing pregnancies – it is about saving lives, protecting rights, and enabling women and girls to shape their futures.

“Contraception saves lives. It is the front line of defense against maternal mortality. We cannot afford complacency – women and girls are counting on us,” Keita reminds the global community.

Keep the promise of Agenda 2030

By committing to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at United Nations General Assembly (UNGA 2015), all government leaders had promised health and wellbeing (SDG-3) and gender equality (SDG-5) by 2030 “where no one is left behind.” Two-third along the way in 2025, writing on the wall is clear: promises are not being kept.

“Together, these 2 SDG goals (SDG-3 and SDG-5) are at the heart of the 2030 SDGs agenda. Without them, there can be no human development, no sustainable peace, and no economic transformation, said Benedicta Oyedayo Oyewole, Community Engagement and Partnership Lead, International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) Africa. She was speaking in SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights) session ahead of ICFP 2025.

Rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushbacks along with conflicts, wars, invasions and genocides, have not only arrested the progress made on gender and health but also threatening to reverse (and reversing) some of the fragile gains made on health and gender.

We are not only majorly off track on health and gender but also governments have hardly prioritised them when it comes to political will, investment or integrated whole-of-government action.

Gender equality and human right to health are fundamental human rights. Governments must course correct and be on track to deliver on the promises of Agenda 2030.

Shobha Shukla – CNS (Citizen News Service)

(Shobha Shukla is a feminist, health and development justice advocate, and an award-winning founding Managing Editor and Executive Director of CNS (Citizen News Service). She was also the Lead Discussant for SDG-3 at United Nations inter-governmental High Level Political Forum (HLPF 2025). She is a former senior Physics faculty of prestigious Loreto Convent College; current President of Asia Pacific Regional Media Alliance for Health, Gender and Development Justice (APCAT Media); Chairperson of Global AMR Media Alliance (GAMA received AMR One Health Emerging Leaders and Outstanding Talents Award 2024); and Host of SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights). Follow her on Twitter/X @shobha1shukla or read her writings here www.bit.ly/ShobhaShukla)

–              Shared under Creative Commons (CC)

The post A brewing crisis: Millions of women still lack access to family planning appeared first on The Maravi Post.

South Africa Court bans Operation Dudula’s actions against foreigners accessing healthcare, education facilities

PRETORIA-(MaraviPost)-A South African High Court has ruled that Operation Dudula’s actions of preventing foreigners from accessing public healthcare and education facilities were unlawful and xenophobic.

In its ruling, the court has ordered the anti-immigration group to stop barring foreign nationals from accessing social services.

It has also prohibited the group from intimidating, assaulting, inciting hate speech and unlawfully evicting foreign nationals.

The ruling also restricts police from conducting warrantless searches, document demands, or arrests in private homes, allowing such actions in public only with reasonable suspicion.

Source: SABC

The post South Africa Court bans Operation Dudula’s actions against foreigners accessing healthcare, education facilities appeared first on The Maravi Post.

Kesha vs. Sabrina Carpenter Who’d You Rather?! (Blondes With Bangs Edition)

Not only are these two singers’ songs bangin’, their hairstyles are too! Kesha and Sabrina Carpenter took to Instagram to show off their cute blonde looks, but which sexy singer do you have eyes for?! The question here is: Who’d You Rather?! Vote…

The post Kesha vs. Sabrina Carpenter Who’d You Rather?! (Blondes With Bangs Edition) appeared first on The Maravi Post.

Luthando Holdings’ Hedrix Laner falls against DPP’s acquittal on Paramount Holdings directors’ case

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The High Court Judge Kenyatta Nyirenda has emphatically dismissed Luthando Holdings Limited, Hedrix Laner’s application against Director of Public Prosecution (DPP)’s March 2024 decision to discharge criminals’ changes on Paramount Holdings Limited and its directors.

Luthando Holdings owner Hedrix Laner sought high court review against DPP decision to discharge Paramount Holdings and Directors on case number 37 of 2025.

The Malawi Law Society (MLS) joined the case as Amicus Curia Corum while Luthando Limited and Laner and DPP are claimants and defendant respectively.

Despite a number of applications in the courts pursued privately, Judge Nyirenda is still amused with Luthando’s defiance on the matter.

Judge Nyirenda initial observation in the ruling, “Based on the wording of the Certificate of Discontinuance and the Order of Discontinuance, the challenged decision was effectively made on 3rd April 2024. There is nothing ongoing about the challenged decision. According to Order 19, rule 23(3), of the CPR, the Claimants had up to 4th July 2024 to commence judicial review proceedings challenging the Defendant’s decision to discontinue the case against the accused persons”.

In the 18 page ruling, Judge Nyirenda observes that, “I am completely baffled by the desperate attempt being made by the Claimants to muddy the waters by asserting that the court process in the Magistrate’s Court for discharge of the accused persons was on going.

“What the Claimants seek to be judicially reviewed is not the court process but the decision by the Defendant to discharge the Claimants: see paragraph 3 of this Ruling. By its very nature, a decision to discharge the Claimants cannot be ongoing. The material part of the Certificate of Discontnuance states as follows: “IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED in exercise of the powers conferred by section 77 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code that the State enters discontinuance of the aforementioned charges against the named accused persons”.

Reads the ruling in part. “It is not uninteresting to note that the Claimants have not addressed the point made by the Defendant that the law does not allow the Republic to recommence a matter outside the stipulated time limits. That the Claimants have not done so does not come to me with a sense of surprise. The arguments advanced by the Defendant are so formidable that they cannot be assailed. The Court has no option but to fully endorse the submissions set out in paragraphs 3.21 to 3.28 of the Defendant’s .

“It is commonplace that the application for judicial review was filed with this Court on 17th June 2025. This means that the Claimants delayed by more than eleven months. Needless to say, the Claimants made no application that they be allowed to bring these proceedings outside the period of three months prescribed by Order 19, rule 20(5), of the CPR. In the same vein, and perhaps more importantly, no reasons have been given for the inordinate delay in commencing the present proceedings. In view of the foregoing, I fully agree with the submissions by the Defendant that the application by the Claimants for judicial review of the challenged decision is time barred and this constitutes a valid ground for discharging the permission that was granted herein”.

Nyirenda adds, “Whether or not the remedies being sought by the Claimants are moot? It is the case of the Defendant that the remedies being sought by the Claimants are moot and thus the proceedings are an exercise in futility. Paragraphs 3.21 to 3.28 of the Defendant’s Skeleton Arguments are relevant and they will be reproduced. It is also to be noted that the submissions of both the Claimants and the Amicus Curiae proceed on the assumption that the Supreme Court of Appeal only has appellant jurisdiction and not original jurisdiction. With due respect, the assumption lacks merit.

“The Supreme Court of Appeal is a creature of section 104 of the Constitution which provides, in subsection (1), among other things, that the Supreme Court of Appeal shall have such jurisdiction and powers as may be conferred on it by the Constitution or by “any other law”. Order 1, rule 18, of the Supreme Court of Appeal Rules falls within the category of “any other law” envisaged by section 104 of the Constitution: see also Order II of the Supreme Court of Appeal Rules which makes provision for the procedure to be followed by the Supreme Court of Appeal when exercising its original jurisdiction”.

Judge Kenyatta rules with costs, “The long and short of it is that the accused persons were acquitted and cannot be tried again over the same case or facts. The law is the law: see the case of The State (On application of Lin Xiaoxiao & Others) v. The Director General –Immigration and Citizenship Services and the Attorney General, HC/LDR Judicial Review Cause No. 19 of 2020. In this regard, the remedies being sought by the Claimants are moot and the proceedings are clearly an exercise in futility.

“All in all, the application has failed the litmus test on two grounds, that is, the application is time-barred and the proceedings are an exercise in futility. Accordingly, the Application to Discharge Permission is granted. The general rule is that costs follow the event. An instructive authority is Order 31, rule 3(2), of the CPR. Having succeeded in his application, the Defendant must be awarded costs of this action. I so order Pronounced in Chambers this 17th day of October 2025 at Lilongwe in the Republic of Malawi”.

Meanwhile, embattled Luthando Holdings Limited Director Laner has appealed against the ruling in the Supreme Court against the ruling.

In a landmark ruling delivered on Friday, June 27, 2025, the court cleared Paramount Holdings directors—Prakash Virji Ghedia, Arvindkumar Atit Patel, and Suresh Khimji Jagatiya—alongside the company, of three criminal charges, including conspiracy to commit a felony and the alleged use of false documents to obtain a government tender.

Significantly, the court issued an order prohibiting the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) from pursuing any further charges related to the matter against the individuals or the company.

“The accused persons are hereby acquitted from criminal charges,” reads the court’s ruling in Criminal Case No. 868 of 2023. “The court hereby bars the state from bringing any charges against the accused persons on the same grounds.”

The charges, initially filed in July 2021, were based on a complaint by Hendrix Laher, director of Luthando Holdings Limited—a business competitor. Laher alleged that Paramount Holdings had submitted a forged Yamaha dealership certificate to win a motorcycle supply tender issued by JHPIEGO, an international health NGO.

Court documents reveal that both Paramount and Luthando Holdings had submitted bids to supply Yamaha motorcycles to several entities, including the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Local Government, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, and JHPIEGO.

The tender was awarded to Paramount Holdings on July 7, 2020. Laher subsequently lodged a complaint with the Fiscal and Fraud Section of the Malawi Police Service.

However, the case unraveled when the complainant failed to appear in court on at least three occasions.

This lack of cooperation, coupled with an absence of credible evidence, led the Office of the DPP—first under Dr. Steven Kayuni, then under Masauko Edwin Chamkakala—to discontinue the matter.

A formal certificate of discontinuance was issued on March 19, 2024, under Section 77 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code.

After the statutory six-month period passed, the court officially acquitted the accused and barred the state from reopening the case.

The ruling provides Paramount Holdings and its directors with full legal vindication, enabling them to continue participating in public and donor-funded tenders without restriction or blemish on their record.

In 2022, Yamaha Motor Corporation Japan formally appointed Paramount Holdings as the sole authorized distributor of Yamaha motorcycles and related products in Malawi.

The company has reportedly advertised Yamaha-branded products across Malawi—despite lacking any formal authorization from Yamaha Japan.

However, legal experts have criticized these actions as misleading and potentially fraudulent.

In a related civil case, Luthando Holdings and other companies are challenging Yamaha Japan’s exclusive dealership agreement with Paramount Holdings.

These firms are alleged to have bid for government tenders using documentation from Yamaha agents based in South Africa—raising questions about the legitimacy of such practices under Malawi’s procurement laws.

The post Luthando Holdings’ Hedrix Laner falls against DPP’s acquittal on Paramount Holdings directors’ case appeared first on The Maravi Post.

Four Big Races To Watch, Partial SNAP Funding, Famine In Sudan

Voters in New York, Virginia and New Jersey choose new leaders today, and a redistricting vote in California could reshape the balance of power in Congress. The Trump administration says it will restart SNAP benefits, but only partially, leaving millions of families uncertain about how they’ll eat this month. And aid groups warn of a deepening crisis in Sudan after a paramilitary force accused of genocide seized the last major city in Darfur, killing thousands of people and trapping many more without food or water.

Want more comprehensive analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.

<

p class=”readrate”>Today’s episode of Up First was edited by Ben Swasey, Catherine Laidlaw, Kate Bartlett, Mohamad ElBardicy and Alice Woelfle.

<

p class=”readrate”>

<

p class=”readrate”>It was produced by Ziad Buchh, Nia Dumas and Christopher Thomas

<

p class=”readrate”>

<

p class=”readrate”>We get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. And our technical director is Carleigh Strange.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

The post Four Big Races To Watch, Partial SNAP Funding, Famine In Sudan appeared first on The Maravi Post.

‘St. Denis Medical’ Stars Defend Hitting Pause on Matt and Serena’s Romance

Season 2 of St. Denis Medical threw fans for a loop by hitting pause on Matt and Serena‘s growing romance.

During the Monday, November 3, premiere, a brief time jump revealed that Matt (Mekki Leeper) and Serena (Kahyun Kim) were working in different parts of the hospital. Serena requested the change to help Matt get over his feelings for her — until she realized Matt asked for the same thing.

Matt then told Serena he was able to move on from her, which did not leave her thrilled. The twist hinted that now Serena was more aware of her feelings for Matt than the other way around — a shift from their season 1 dynamic.

“Like a real relationship, you got to get to know each other,” Leeper, 31, exclusively told Us Weekly. “There’s some stop and start there.”

NBC Fall Schedule for New, Returning Shows: ‘The Voice’ and More

Leeper teased Matt’s state of mind. “He doesn’t want to be too desperate and wants to kind of play it cool. Sometimes that means you have to step back for a season,” he explained. “I like that they’re not a classic sitcom-like romance.”

He continued: “They’re both really weird in their own right. If they weren’t dating, it would be just two interesting characters. I think it’s cool that we get to be weirdos together.”

Kim, 36, meanwhile, hinted that there would be more surprises as the season plays out.

St. Denis Medical
Justin Lubin/NBC

“A lot of things happen in season 2,” she added. “A lot of ups and downs so it definitely continues to grow and mold into something. It’s very exciting.”

While speaking to Us, Wendi McLendon-Covey recalled being shocked at the outcome. “Every table read we were like, ‘Well, what happens now?” she shared. “We all want it to go a certain way but it is sure to take some twists and turns that none of us ever expected.”

St. Denis Medical follows overworked doctors and nurses trying their best to care for patients at an underfunded Oregon hospital. In addition to Leeper, Kim and McLendon-Covey, the mockumentary stars David Alan Grier, Allison Tolman, Josh Lawson and Kaliko Kauahi.

USA Network Makes a Decision About The Rainmaker’s Future

When the series premiered on NBC in 2024, viewers couldn’t help but notice that Matt and Serena’s romance could make them the next fan-favorite sitcom couple. Creator Eric Ledgin didn’t rule out a potential romance between Matt and Serena.

“There’s definitely at least a one-sided will-they-or-won’t-they happening,” he previously teased to Us. “So I can tell you it’ll definitely be a slow burn of something that we will track over time.”

Ahead of season 2, Tolman, 43, defended the decision not to rush into the onscreen romance.

“We’ve been taught — especially by relationships in the media — that with shipping these are the handfuls of things that can go wrong. But in relationships, sometimes someone is gone for a month for work and when they come back the vibes are weird,” she told Us. “It’s just a little weird. Relationships are work all the time. Every single step along the way — even when they’re good. There’s lots of places where we could take a romance.”

St. Denis Medical airs on NBC Mondays at 8 p.m. ET before streaming the next day on Peacock.

The post ‘St. Denis Medical’ Stars Defend Hitting Pause on Matt and Serena’s Romance appeared first on The Maravi Post.

Why Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell Want Their Daughters to ‘Be Disrespectful’

Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell are proudly raising two daughters who “talk back” — even if that doesn’t sit well with everyone.

During the Monday, November 3, episode of his “Armchair Expert” podcast, Shepard, 50, recalled a conversation he had recently with a friend while out in Nashville where they “very kindly” brought up the fact that his and Bell’s daughters, Lincoln, 12, and Delta, 10, aren’t afraid to speak their minds.

“They’re kind of shook with how our daughters will talk back to us or to anybody because it’s very un-Southern, right?” Shepard explained, noting, “Down there, everyone’s like, ‘Hi, Ms. Kristen. Hi, Mr. Dax.’”

Shepard revealed that his friend proceeded to call him out for how vocal his kids are toward him in public, including while eating out.

Dax Shepard Jokes About 2 Daughters’ Future Sex Lives: Do It ‘In the Car’

“She’s like, ‘Yeah, your kids will let it rip,’” he explained. “‘They seem to have no kind of respect’ is what she was saying. And feeling a little entitled.”

While Shepard acknowledged that “there’s value” to having manners, like the ones that are evident throughout the south, he was proud that his girls will stick up for themselves against anyone.

“I said, ‘You’re dead right. They do talk back and they are not respectful,’” Shepard said of his response.

Dax Shepard Reveals Why He and Kristen Bell Want Their Daughters to Be Disrespectful Talk Back
Kristen Bell Courtesy of Kristen Bell/Instagram

The Parenthood alum said he told the friend, “I can understand where that seems completely unruly, but I want you to know what I’m prioritizing, which is when they’re 19 and their boss is a f***ing creep, I want them to talk back. I want them to be disrespectful. I want them to always advocate for themselves, whether I think they’re right or wrong.”

Shepard added that he is “willing to deal” with what others consider “embarrassing” behavior from his young children to promote empowerment for when they’re adults.

“I can handle that,” Shepard concluded. “Because I want this other thing for them as women.”

Kristen Bell Shares Hilarious DIY Mother’s Day Card From Daughters

Shepard and Bell, 45, have been honest about their parenting style — and the sometimes controversial approaches they have — throughout their marriage.

Earlier this year, Shepard told his podcast listeners that cursing is OK in their house, depending on the situation.

“I fully swear in front of my kids. They are allowed to swear, not with impunity, but when it’s called for, and they land it, and it’s in the house and not out at a restaurant, it’s OK,” Shepard said during the July 28 episode.

He revealed, “My defense of it is, I just told the girls, like, ‘Hey, these are noises that come out of your mouth, and you assign what they mean to you.’”

The post Why Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell Want Their Daughters to ‘Be Disrespectful’ appeared first on The Maravi Post.

Aspiring Lawyer Kim Kardashian Admits Using ChatGPT to Study for Law Exams

Kim Kardashian gets her results back from her bar exam this week, and if she doesn’t pass, we’ll know who to blame … ChatGPT. While taking Vanity Fair’s infamous lie detector test, dictated by her “All’s Fair” costar Teyana Taylor, Kim admitted…

The post Aspiring Lawyer Kim Kardashian Admits Using ChatGPT to Study for Law Exams appeared first on The Maravi Post.