The Khalashpir coal mine stands as a notable example of prolonged delay despite its signifi cant strategic potential for Bangladesh’s energy security.
Although a formal development application was submitted in 2006 by the Hoasaf Group in partnership with a Chinese consortium, the project has remained stalled for nearly two decades, primarily due to administrative indecision.
Authorities have repeatedly cited the absence of a fi nalized coal policy as the key obstacle.
However, this position has been criticized by experts, who argue that development activities should not be delayed while a specifi c policy is being formulated.
The Khalashpir Coal Basin, located in Pirganj Upazila of Rangpur District, is a signifi cant Permian Gondwana coal deposit and was fi rst identifi ed in 1959 by Stanvac, USA, during the drilling of an exploratory oil well.
The well was drilled up to a depth of 2875m and found to be a dry hole.
Later exploration carried out by the Geological Survey of Bangladesh (GSB) between 1989 and 1990 confi rmed the presence of high-quality bituminous coal at depths ranging from 284 to 480 meters.
This discovery established Khalashpir as one of the country’s most promising coal deposits.
Exploration History Exploration of the Khalashpir Coalfi eld was signifi cantly advanced by the Geological Survey of Bangladesh (GSB) during 1989-1990, when four boreholes (GDH-45, 46, 47, and 48) were drilled.
Three of these wells (GDH-45, 46, and 47) intersected coal seams of potentially mineable thickness at depths ranging from approximately 257 to 483 meters, while GDH-48 encountered only limited, non-commercial coal, indicating the western boundary of the deposit.
The basin is a northwest-southeast elongated, fault-bounded structure covering about 25 square kilometers.
Subsequent investigations identifi ed eight distinct coal zones at depths between 257 and 483 meters.
Coal is classifi ed as medium-volatile, lowsulfur bituminous, with certain seams showing strong metallurgical potential due to favorable maceral composition.
In 2004, Hosaf International Ltd, in partnership with a Chinese consortium, undertook further exploration, with additional drilling carried out by GeotechIndia, bringing the total number of boreholes to 19.
These studies confi rmed the presence of high-grade coal with good calorifi c value and low sulfur content, along with associated minerals such as limestone and glass sand.
A mining lease application submitted in 2006 by the consortium proposed underground mining with an annual production target of around 3 million tonnes.
In 2009, International Mining Consultants Limited (IMCL) of the UK conducted a comprehensive technical and economic review at the request of Petrobangla.
The report emphasized the need for further exploration in accordance with international standards.
Coal Zones and Distribution The coal-bearing sequence of the Khalashpir Coalfi eld is located within the upper part of the Gondwana Group, with an average cumulative thickness of about 44 meters across eight identifi ed coal zones.
Zone I, occurring at depths of approximately 257 to 332 meters, is the most prominent and averages about 16.95 meters in thickness.
Notably, it includes a three-meter section with high vitrinite content (around 80 percent), indicating strong metallurgical potential.
Zone II also comprises multiple seams and features an upper section of about seven meters dominated by inertinite, making it suitable for blending in coke production.
The remaining zones (III-VIII) show variations in thickness and lateral continuity.
Among them, Zone III is the thinnest, with an average thickness of around 1.22 meters, while other zones occur as thinner and less continuous seams.
Overall, the distribution and quality of these coal zones underscore the technical and economic signifi cance of the deposit.
The Khalashpir Coalfi eld is characterized by a fault-bounded trough (graben) developed within the crystalline basement, aligned along a northwest- southeast axis.
The basin exhibits signifi cant structural deformation, including a major fault on the northnortheast side near borehole GDH-46, with an estimated displacement (throw) of about 150 meters.
Structural Geology The structural geology of the Khalashpir basin reveals a composite faultbounded trough, or graben, formed within the crystalline basement.
The basin is aligned along a northwest- southeast elongated axis and marked by signifi cant faulting, including a prominent fault on the north-northeast side near drill hole GDH-46, with a calculated throw of approximately 150 meters.
Gravity anomaly maps further indicate that the basin comprises several smaller sub-basins, evidenced by three prominent gravity highs located at Pirganj, Bhendabari, and Bhadhuria.
Proximate Analysis Comprehensive laboratory analyses conducted by the GSB and the United States Geological Survey provide detailed insight into the quality of coal from the Khalashpir Coalfi eld.
Proximate analysis indicates an average moisture content of about 1.3%, ash content of 21.8%, volatile matter of 22.9%, and fi xed carbon of approximately 54.1%, with higher concentrations observed in Zones I and II.
The sulfur content is relatively low, averaging around 0.77%.
Coal demonstrates a strong calorifi c value, averaging about 11,264 BTU per pound and reaching up to 13,880 BTU per pound in Zone I, highlighting its suitability for high-energy applications.
Overall, these characteristics classify Khalashpir coal as medium- to highvolatile bituminous coal with favorable chemical properties for both power generation and industrial use.
Coal Reserve / Resource Estimation Resource estimation for the Khalashpir Coalfi eld is based on a geological certainty framework that distinguishes between proved reserves confi rmed by detailed drilling and probable reserves inferred from broader geophysical data.
According to the GSB, the estimates are derived from eight identifi ed coal zones.
Proven reserves are concentrated within a core area of approximately 2.52 square kilometers, centered around boreholes GDH-45, GDH-46, and GDH-47, and are estimated at 142.9 million tonnes.
Zone I holds the largest share (approximately 56.4 million tonnes), followed by Zone II (around 33.0 million tonnes).
Beyond this core area, total resources are estimated at approximately 685 million tonnes across a wider zone, indicating substantial additional potential.
The coal reserve estimation by the GSB is furnished below: In 2009, an assessment by International Mining Consulting Limited (IMCL) further estimated that the in-situ resource of the three principal seams (I, II, and IV) alone is about 337 million tonnes, underscoring the substantial scale of the deposit.
Economic Viability Analytical studies confi rm that coal mining from the Khalashpir Coalfi eld is suitable for thermal applications, particularly for electricity generation.
In addition, certain zones exhibit high vitrinite and inertinite content, indicating potential metallurgical value for use in steel production.
Reviews, including the 2009 study by IMCL, emphasize the need for detailed techno-economic feasibility assessments to determine its commercial viability.
Exploiting Khalashpir could support a 300-500 MW coal-fi red power plant, enhance national energy security, create thousands of jobs, and stimulate socio-economic development in Pirganj and neighboring areas, making it a strategic asset for both energy and regional growth.
The prolonged delay in developing the Khalashpir coalfi eld is particularly signifi cant in the context of Bangladesh’s steadily growing energy demand.
The Power System Master Plan (PSMP) 2010, prepared by JICA, set an ambitious target of 40,000 MW of power generation capacity by 2030, with around 20,000 MW expected to come from coal.
However, this strategy was subsequently revised in the Gas Sector Master Plan 2017 and later in the Integrated Energy and Power Sector Master Plan 2023, reflecting a shift toward greater reliance on imported LNG, coal, liquid fuels, LPG, and crossborder electricity.
At present, domestic coal production remains limited to the Barapukuria mine, which produces less than 1 million tonnes annually.
This creates a substantial supply gap that is largely being met through imports.
Environmental, Social, and Safety Hazards The development of the Khalashpir Coal Mine entails signifi cant environmental, social, and occupational risks that require careful management: Surface Subsidence: Underground longwall mining is expected to cause the land above to sink.
Extraction of a 5-meter-thick seam could create depressions up to 3.5 meters, leading to waterlogging and loss of rice-cultivated land.
Comprehensive socio-economic mitigation will be necessary, including land acquisition, farmer compensation, and potentially the construction of resettlement villages.
Underground Temperatures: Geothermal conditions at mining depths reach approximately 40°C.
Heat generated by machinery will require robust ventilation and cooling systems to ensure safe working conditions.
Gas and Fire Risks: The mine is classifi ed as ‘gassy’ due to methane emissions, necessitating strict explosion prevention measures and potential methane drainage systems.
Additionally, the coal is prone to spontaneous combustion, posing a fi re risk in mine waste areas and surface stockpiles.
Water Management: Large volumes of water will be produced, requiring treatment to remove suspended solids and prevent acid mine drainage before safe discharge into rivers or use for irrigation.
Proper planning, strict safety protocols, and environmental safeguards will be essential to mitigate these hazards while enabling sustainable coal extraction.
Feasibility and Financial Modeling The Hosaf Group feasibility study, carried out in 2006, is considered incomplete, lacking a detailed implementation schedule, phased production plans, roadway development, and realistic capital and operating cost assessments.
Financial assumptions, such as a low coal sale price ($50/tonne) and high discount rates, were unrealistic.
Environmental, Social, and Safety Hazards The development of the Khalashpir project carries signifi cant environmental and occupational risks that require careful mitigation: Surface Subsidence Surface subsidence will have a severe and direct negative impact on local agriculture, which is the primary source of income for the region and currently produces surplus yields of rice.
Because the local topography is extremely flat, varying in elevation by less than 1.0 meter, the existing rice cultivation is highly sensitive to changes in water levels and regional drainage.
Even a modest surface subsidence of just 300 to 500 millimeters will cause severe waterlogging.
As underground longwall mining progresses, surface depressions are expected to reach up to 3.5 meters deep.
This drastic alteration of the landscape will effectively preclude rice production and make it impossible to cultivate other crops during the monsoon season.
Consequently, the destruction of this arable land will result in a direct loss of livelihood for the majority of the local population who depend wholly on farming.
To mitigate these effects and extend the period the land can be farmed, experts suggest temporarily restoring local drainage through localized pumping or building up land levels using prestripped waste material.
In the long term, reviewers recommend that the mining consortium purchase the affected land upfront and invest in upgrading surrounding, lower-yield agricultural areas to offset the lost crop production and help retain farming jobs in the region.
Underground Temperatures: Due to the region’s geothermal gradient, the original rock temperature at the target mining depths is around 40°C.
High-powered machinery will add to this heat, requiring extensive ventilation and cooling systems to maintain a safe working environment.
Gas and Fire Risks: The mine is classifi ed as ‘gassy’ due to methane emissions from the coal beds, requiring strict explosion prevention measures and potentially methane drainage systems.
Furthermore, the coal has a high risk of spontaneous combustion, meaning it can catch fi re if exposed to low-velocity air currents in the mine’s waste areas or surface stockpiles.
Water Management: The mine will discharge enormous amounts of water (potentially tens of thousands of cubic meters daily), which must be routed through physical and chemical treatment plants to remove suspended solids and prevent acid mine drainage before being discharged into local rivers or used for irrigation.
Recommendations and Observations by IMCL In 2009, IMCL reviewed the consortium’s feasibility study and recommended several key actions to ensure that the Khalashpir coal mine development is both commercially viable and safe: To conduct further exploratory drilling using a reputable contractor with modern equipment following international JORC (Joint Ore Reserves Committee) standards, including downhole geophysical logging such as Natural Gamma Ray, Gamma-Gamma, Density, Calliper, and Temperature.
To perform 3D numerical groundwater flow modeling to manage water-related risks.
To complete a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) covering construction, operation, and closure phases.
To undertake a detailed market study to evaluate the commercial value of both cooking and thermal coal outputs.
These recommendations provide a framework for planning safe, economically viable, and environmentally responsible mining operations.
Sample Analysis All core samples must be logged and prepared per JORC principles, supervised by senior JORC-accredited geologists.
Analyses should be performed by at least two accredited international laboratories, following standard procedures.
Coal quality proximate analyses must be carried out on all exploratory cores to support computer-based resource modeling.
Geological Criteria for Mine Design Consider lessons from Barapukuria Coal Mine, Bangladesh’s fi rst underground coal mine.
Despite differences in sedimentology and structure, both sites share a nearsurface Dupi Tila aquifer, which poses signifi cant water inflow risks.
Care must be taken to prevent delays caused by uncontrolled water ingress.
Mine design should integrate deposit geology, faulting, coal seam characteristics, expected production, underground conditions, and surface layout/accessibility to ensure safe and effi cient operations.
Mine Design and Engineering For the Khalashpir Coalfi eld, underground mining is strongly preferred over opencast methods due to the depth and large volumes of the overlying Dupi Tila aquifer.
The recommended method is highly mechanized top coal caving longwall mining, with extraction sequences guided by progressive strata control modeling to limit subsidence beneath the aquifer to 10 mm per metre.
Vertical shaft construction should use the Artifi cial Ground Freezing (AGF) technique to stabilize the water-saturated Dupi Tila formation, transitioning to standard grouting in deeper, more stable rock units.
The underground layout should optimize pit placement for gravity-assisted drainage and level access, while computermodeled ventilation systems are essential to manage heat, methane emissions, and spontaneous combustion risks.
Underground Extraction Methods Coal extraction at the Khalashpir Coalfi eld is recommended using two primary underground methods, depending on seam geometry: Longwall Mining: For thicker seams, highly mechanized longwall mining is advised.
While the original feasibility study proposed hydraulic stowing to support the roof, this method has been criticized as costly and often ineffective.
Instead, top coal caving longwall faces are recommended for effi cient extraction of thick seams.
Pillar and Stall: For flatter seams, especially in the southern parts of the deposit, pillar and stall mining with remote-controlled continuous miners is preferred.
This method preserves roofsupporting coal pillars and provides operational flexibility, though it achieves a lower extraction ratio.
Government Decision On 2 April, 2026, the Government of Bangladesh informed Parliament that a fi nal decision on coal extraction from Khalashpir would be taken only after completion of a comprehensive feasibility study.
In response to a written question from Md.
Nurul Amin, the Power, Energy, and Mineral Resources Minister highlighted the coalfi eld’s historical exploration, signifi cant resource potential, and the need for careful, evidence-based evaluation before any development.
Coal Development Plan The present government has outlined a phased Coal Development Plan and Barapukuria Coal Mine Expansion Plan to strengthen national energy security.
Within the fi rst 180 days, a national seminar will be organized on coal production and utilization, aimed at framing policy directives and adopting integrated development plans for the fi ve discovered coalfi elds.
Building on these directives, during 2026-27, technoeconomic feasibility studies will be approved and initiated in line with the national plan.
During the same period, feasibility studies will be completed, mining development projects will be formulated, and project activities will commence.
Subsequently, during 202830, experimental coal extraction will begin, providing critical insights into operational viability and informing the scaling up of coal-based energy initiatives.
The phased approach is clear and aligns with best practices in coal project development.
However, for effective implementation, the plan should ensure early fi nalization of coal policy, include environmental and social safeguards, defi ne mining methods and infrastructure needs, and incorporate realistic timelines and fi nancing mechanisms.
Domestic Coal Production and Imports Domestic coal production in Bangladesh remains limited, with the Barapukuria Coal Mine producing less than 1 million tonnes annually, reflecting constrained capacity.
In contrast, coal imports by the private sector have grown steadily, exceeding 12.7 Mt in FY 2023-24.
This trend highlights the country’s increasing reliance on imported coal to meet rising energy demand, while domestic production contributes only a marginal share of total supply.
Commercial production at Barapukuria began in September 2005 with a designed annual capacity of 1 million tonnes.
At present, daily output ranges between 2,500 and 3,000 tonnes, with approximately 1.1 million tonnes in FY 2024-25, primarily supplying the 525 MW Barapukuria coal-fi red power plant.
With domestic natural gas production expected to decline, coal is emerging as a viable alternative to strengthen energy security.
Currently, coal accounts for about 35% of total electricity generation; however, domestic coal contributes less than 3%, underscoring the signifi cant gap between local production and national demand.
The coal import scenario from FY 2019-20 to FY 2024- 25 is as follows: Way Forward The Khalashpir Coalfi eld represents a signifi cant yet underutilized primary energy resource in Bangladesh.
While legitimate environmental and social concerns must be addressed with due diligence, the prolonged delay in decision-making highlights a broader challenge within the country’s energy sector.
Amid rising energy demand and increasing dependence on imported fuels, continued inaction on Khalashpir raises a critical question: how long can such a valuable resource remain untapped? An immediate review and update of the existing techno-economic feasibility study is therefore essential.
In line with recommendations by International Mining Consultants Limited, the government should take prompt and concrete steps to undertake a comprehensive and upto-date feasibility assessment without further delay.
Mortuza Ahmad Faruque: Energy Expert and Former Managing Director, BAPEX