Author: user user

Nigeria’s return to the global Frontier Market universe is shifting attention beyond improved investor access to whether renewed confidence can translate into productive investment, business expansion and jobs for Nigerians.

FTSE Russell has confirmed that Nigeria’s capital market will be reclassified from ‘Unclassified’ to ‘Frontier Market’ status from September 21, 2026.

Nigeria was removed from the category in 2023 amid concerns over foreign exchange liquidity, capital repatriation and market accessibility. Its return reflects improvements in these areas and is being presented by government and market authorities as an endorsement of the country’s reform programme.

But for Nigeria, the bigger test is whether the improved investment environment can attract capital that supports businesses and productive sectors rather than simply increasing portfolio inflows.

The reclassification comes at a consequential point for the economy, as the government seeks to move from macroeconomic stabilisation towards investment-led growth.

The administration is placing greater emphasis on private investment, productive sectors, infrastructure, industrialisation and job creation, while its ambition to build a US$1 trillion economy by 2030 is being carried into the new Medium-Term National Development Plan 2026-2030.

Benson Adenuga, West Africa director at British International Investment (BII), said the reclassification provides an opportunity to deepen Nigeria’s investment ecosystem by improving market accessibility for international and domestic investors.

The development could also strengthen the role of pension and institutional capital in financing businesses and infrastructure, while creating opportunities to mobilise more private capital into sectors capable of generating jobs and broadening economic opportunity.

For Nigeria, this raises a critical question: can the reforms that have helped rebuild investor confidence now translate into long-term capital for businesses, infrastructure and productive sectors?

The country has spent the past three years addressing concerns around foreign exchange liquidity, capital repatriation and market accessibility. The return to the FTSE Russell Frontier Market category could therefore provide a fresh platform for international investors to reconsider Nigerian assets.

However, the challenge will be to ensure that renewed investor interest supports sectors such as industrialisation, energy, agriculture, infrastructure, financial inclusion and entrepreneurship.

BII’s investments in Nigeria illustrate the type of productive capital that could help achieve this objective.

The development finance institution has invested in Odyssey Energy Solutions to support the expansion of mini-grids under Nigeria’s DARES programme, which aims to expand electricity access to 17.5 million people.

It also provided a US$30 million blended facility to InfraCredit to mobilise institutional capital into decentralised renewable energy and improve access to affordable power.

In manufacturing, BII has committed US$140 million over more than a decade to Indorama Eleme Fertilizer, one of Sub-Saharan Africa’s largest fertiliser producers, which now supplies around 80 percent of Nigeria’s domestic fertiliser demand.

In agriculture, BII invested US$40.5 million in Johnvents Group to support cocoa production, traceability and export capacity, while its investment in Valency International is supporting Nigerian cashew processing, with up to 2,800 jobs and 60,000 farmers expected to benefit.

BII has also backed Moniepoint, a fintech company supporting 2.5 million businesses, processing around 55 million transactions and handling approximately US$17 billion in monthly payments.

Its financial-sector investments include a US$100 million facility for First Bank Nigeria to support MSMEs, including US$30 million earmarked for women-owned and women-led businesses.

BII also provided a US$50 million facility to First City Monument Bank, with 70 percent directed to MSMEs in northern Nigeria and 30 percent to women-owned and women-led businesses nationwide.

These investments point to the broader economic opportunity that could emerge if Nigeria’s improved investment profile translates into more capital for businesses and productive sectors.

The changing UK-Nigeria economic relationship could further support this process. The two countries renewed their Enhanced Trade and Investment Partnership in March 2026, focusing on investment, regulatory cooperation, trade and sustainable, inclusive growth.

This aligns with BII’s new strategy to deploy up to £9 billion across Africa over the next five years, with Nigeria remaining a major focus market. Its investments are aimed at supporting private-sector growth, mobilising additional capital and advancing priorities including jobs, value addition, sustainable manufacturing, agriculture and energy.

The return to frontier market status therefore marks more than an index change for Nigeria. It provides an opportunity to test whether reforms that have restored confidence among investors can now deliver the capital needed to expand businesses, create jobs and strengthen the productive capacity of the economy.

With the 2027 elections approaching, the ability to convert improved investor sentiment into tangible economic opportunities for businesses and households is likely to become an increasingly important measure of the success of the reform programme.

A Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ), has trained journalists on contributing to the fight against Illicit Financial Flows (IFFS) in Nigeria during a two-day workshop under the broader SecFin Africa programme supported by the European Union.

The capacity-building workshop for journalists was part of efforts to enhance their understanding of illicit financial flows, strengthen investigative reporting and promote public accountability drive in addressing financial crimes in the country.

It also provided a platform for the participants to demonstrate improved understanding of Illicit Financial Flow issues and the existing legal and institutional frameworks to achieve follow-up actions.

David Ugolor, executive director, ANEEF in the opening address pointed out ‘illicit financial flows remain one of the most persistent obstacles to Nigeria’s development’ adding that ‘through corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, trade misinvoicing, procurement fraud, profit shifting and related illicit practices, vast resources that should support economic growth and improve citizens welfare are quietly diverted from productive use in plain sight and often only ever exposed through painstaking investigative work.’

According to him, the cost is not only measured in figures but in the schools that are never built, the hospitals that go unequipped and the roads that remain in bad condition. Every naira siphoned away in a naira unavailable for education, healthcare, infrastructure, social protection and job creation and the cumulative effect is weaker institutions, deepening poverty and a citizenry increasingly sceptical of governance itself.

He said Akwa Ibom state being part of Nigeria, the true cost of these losses is ultimately paid by the ordinary people.

Noting that ‘Nigeria has over time instituted legal , policy and institutional frameworks to combat financial crimes including anti-money laundering and anti-corruption mechanisms,’ he explained that ‘frameworks and agencies alone do not guarantee accountability, they require active engagement and informed public scrutiny to function as intended adding that explains where the media should step in and where your work carries weight far beyond the newsroom.’

‘Nigerian journalists and media organisations have over the years produced groundbreaking investigations that advanced anti-corruption efforts and sharpened understanding of governance issues. But the terrain keeps shifting. Illicit financial flows now move through increasingly sophisticated channels and reporting on them requires journalists to grasp concepts as beneficial ownership, money-laundering typologies, digital and cross-border financial transactions and the workings of international financial networks.

‘As a journalist, your responsibility goes beyond reporting events as they happen. It includes helping ordinary citizens make sense of issues that shape their lives, digging beneath the surface to uncover further details, illicit transactions, amplifying voices that would otherwise go unheard and in doing so, strengthen the foundations of democratic accountability,” he said.

In his remarks, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), urged the media to develop new strategies capable of identifying and blocking illicit financial flows at their source.

Theresa Nwosu, the commission’s head of public affairs zonal office in Uyo, Akwa Ibom state solicited for collaboration among civil society organisations and the media to combat the movement of illicit funds out of the country.

‘The time has come for CSOs and the media to join in the advocacy to stop illicit financial flows from Nigeria and the African continent to other parts of the world,” Nwosu said.

The workshop was attended by journalists from the print and electronic media as well as online bloggers and it had resource persons from various bodies including the Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit and SecFin Africa.

There is a ship I pass almost every working day in Ostend. The Mercator, a beautiful three-masted sailing vessel moored in this Belgian North Sea city, has become such a familiar feature of my daily landscape that I hardly need to look in its direction anymore. Its name, of course, honours Gerardus Mercator, the great 16th-century cartographer whose work would profoundly influence how generations came to visualise the world. There is a certain irony in this that I have only recently begun to appreciate.

Flanders, where Mercator was born and where I have made my home for more than three decades, is a relatively small corner of Europe. I was born on the African continent that his famous projection would, however unintentionally, help generations perceive as considerably smaller relative to northern landmasses than it actually is. And now, more than four centuries after Mercator’s death, African countries have successfully persuaded an overwhelming majority of the United Nations General Assembly to support a different way of looking at the world. For someone standing, quite literally, between these two geographies, the moment feels both surreal and fascinating.

Africa has not suddenly become bigger

The first thing worth clarifying is that Africa did not suddenly become bigger because of a United Nations vote. Africa has always been this big. What is changing is the international community’s willingness to reconsider the lens through which generations have been taught to see it. The Mercator projection was developed in 1569 for navigation. In that purpose, it was ingenious. By allowing sailors to plot a constant compass bearing as a straight line, Mercator helped solve one of the practical problems confronting maritime navigation. The problem came later.

A map designed principally for navigation gradually became one of the world’s dominant general-purpose representations of geography. And therein lies the distortion. Because the Earth is spherical, representing it accurately on a flat surface is mathematically impossible. Every projection sacrifices something: shape, area, distance or direction. Mercator preserves direction extremely well but increasingly exaggerates landmass as one moves towards the poles. The consequences are visually striking. Greenland can appear roughly comparable in size to Africa on a conventional Mercator map. In reality, Africa is about fourteen times larger. Europe and North America similarly acquire a visual prominence considerably greater than their actual geographical proportions would suggest.

Technically, therefore, it is not quite correct to say that Mercator simply ‘made Africa smaller’. Africa, straddling the equator, is comparatively less distorted. Rather, northern landmasses are dramatically enlarged relative to it. That distinction matters. Historical accuracy should not become collateral damage in the pursuit of cartographic accuracy.

When a navigation tool becomes a Worldview

I find little value in putting Gerardus Mercator himself on trial. He was a 16th-century Flemish mathematician and cartographer solving a navigational problem. To retroactively assign contemporary geopolitical motives to his mathematical innovation would be historically careless. The more interesting question is what happened afterwards. Why did a specialist navigational instrument become so deeply embedded in classrooms, atlases, newsrooms, public institutions and eventually our collective imagination of the world? That is where cartography becomes something more than mathematics. Maps do not merely describe the world. They help condition how we imagine it.

A child repeatedly encountering a world map in which Greenland appears roughly comparable with Africa is not simply receiving inaccurate information about square kilometres. That child is developing an unconscious mental hierarchy of scale. Who looks large? Who looks small? Who appears central? Who appears peripheral? This is what might be called the politics of cognitive geography.

The African-led initiative to encourage greater use of equal-area world maps should therefore not be trivialised as an exercise in cartographic vanity. Equal-area projections such as Equal Earth seek to represent the relative sizes of countries and continents much more faithfully while retaining a visually recognisable world map. They are not perfect. No flat map can be. Nor does this mean that Mercator should disappear. For navigation and particular technical purposes, it remains immensely useful. The more intelligent proposition is simpler: use the appropriate projection for the appropriate purpose. If the purpose is teaching children the relative geographical scale of the world’s continents, there is little justification for knowingly using a representation that significantly distorts those relationships when better alternatives exist.

And here Africa should lead by example. There would be something profoundly contradictory about African governments demanding that international institutions correct their maps while African children continue staring at Mercator projections in their own classrooms. If Africa wants the world to correct the map, Africa should be first to hang the corrected map in its schools.

Symbolism Is not development

There is nevertheless a legitimate criticism that deserves engagement. Africa faces wars, poverty, unsustainable debt burdens, infrastructure deficits, unemployment, climate vulnerability and enormous development financing requirements. Against that background, does changing a world map really matter? Yes. And no.

Correcting a map will not build a railway. It will not create a factory, resolve Sudan’s conflict, finance Africa’s energy transition or create employment for its rapidly expanding youth population. We should therefore resist transforming a symbolic victory into evidence of material transformation. But the choice between representation and development is a false one. Societies are capable of correcting cultural and educational conventions while simultaneously confronting economic and political problems. The more useful distinction is between symbolic achievement and structural achievement. Africa should welcome the first without mistaking it for the second.

Indeed, perhaps the most consequential part of this episode has received less attention than the map itself. African states identified an issue. They organised around it. They articulated a case. They built an international coalition. And they secured overwhelming support within the United Nations. That is African agency. And it is considerably more interesting than a narrative of African victimhood.

The lesson should therefore travel beyond cartography. Imagine similar levels of African coordination being deployed consistently around reform of the UN Security Council, sovereign debt architecture, climate finance, critical minerals, international taxation, trade negotiations and reform of global financial institutions. The map campaign demonstrates something that African diplomacy sometimes forgets: numbers matter when they are organised. Fifty-four countries acting individually are voices. Fifty-four countries acting strategically can become leverage.

From geographic scale to performed power

Yet the corrected map confronts Africa with an uncomfortable truth. The continent is geographically enormous. Its economic and geopolitical influence remains disproportionately small. Africa possesses around 30 million square kilometres of territory. It contains extraordinary mineral resources, immense agricultural potential and the world’s youngest population. It occupies strategic maritime corridors and will account for an increasingly significant share of humanity during this century. But endowment is not power. Population is not power. Resources are not power. Even geographical scale is not power. They become power only when converted through capable institutions, productive economies, technological competence, integrated markets and strategic diplomacy. This is the distinction I have increasingly described as the journey from asset endowment through conversion capacity to performed power. The new map may represent Africa’s asset endowment more accurately. It cannot manufacture its conversion capacity. That responsibility belongs to Africans.

Two maps to correct

Perhaps, then, Africa has two maps before it.

The first is the physical map. That correction is relatively straightforward. Replace an inappropriate projection with one that communicates relative geographical scale more accurately. Change classroom maps. Update institutional graphics. Encourage publishers, broadcasters and digital platforms to adopt more appropriate projections.

The second map is infinitely more difficult. It is the geopolitical map. On that map, Africa remains smaller than its population, resources, geography and strategic importance should permit. Correcting that map requires factories rather than resolutions. It requires regional value chains rather than declarations. It requires functioning institutions, infrastructure, technological capability, integrated markets and disciplined execution. It requires transforming the African Continental Free Trade Area from an agreement into commercial behaviour. It requires turning critical minerals into industrial ecosystems, agricultural potential into food security and exports, demographic scale into human capital, and diplomatic numbers into negotiating power. One map can be corrected by cartographers. The other must be corrected by Africans.

A Flemish reflection

Which brings me back to the Mercator ship in Ostend, my adopted hometown. Tomorrow, as I ride my bike to work through it again, I suspect I will look at it slightly differently. Not with resentment. Quite the opposite. There is something remarkable about the intellectual reach of Gerardus Mercator. A man born in tiny Flanders more than five centuries ago developed a mathematical solution so consequential that the world is still debating its legacy.

Perhaps that itself contains a lesson for Africa. Physical size does not determine intellectual influence. Flanders is tiny beside Africa. Yet one Flemish cartographer helped shape how humanity visualised the planet for centuries. Africa’s challenge, therefore, cannot simply be to insist that the world acknowledges how large it is. It must be to become as consequential as its size suggests it could be.

The corrected map can finally show the world something closer to Africa’s true geographical proportions. But the more consequential redrawing will occur when Africa closes the distance between its enormous endowment and its performed power. Africa did not become bigger when the world corrected the map. The real question is whether Africa will now become bigger in the affairs of the world.

Nweke is an International Trade Consultant and author of Economic Diplomacy of the Diaspora. A former Belgian politician of Nigerian origin, born in Igbuzo, Delta State Nigeria, he was a 2014 candidate Member European Parliament. A third-term Municipal Legislator at Ostend City Council, Belgium, since 2006 his portfolio included the Economy, Social Policy, Equality Affairs and International Development. Collins features regularly on TV Continental Lagos as Global Affairs Analyst, on Channels TV as Foreign Policy Commentator, on TRT World Istanbul as African Affairs Analyst among other Afrocentric media houses, including BusinessDay Nigeria

Business-customer relations is a deliberate investment in building trust, loyalty, and long-term engagement to drive sustainable growth, retention, and competitive advantage. Unlike customer service, which focuses on resolving immediate issues, customer relations takes a long-term view, aiming to nurture loyalty and satisfaction throughout the entire customer lifecycle. To achieve this, some businesses often use customer relationship management (CRM) software to automate data collection, track interactions, and create actionable strategies for improving customer relations.

Most brands and organisations that are not proactive with their business-customer relations find out a customer is unhappy only once they have already decided to leave. Supap Limited, a United Kingdom-based technology company, is betting that the warning signs show up much earlier in support tickets, product usage, tone of feedback, and the small shifts in sentiment that precede a cancellation, and that catching them early is worth building a company around.

Customer churn is a persistent cost for subscription and service businesses: research from Bain and Company, cited by Harvard Business Review, found that increasing customer retention rates by five per cent can increase profits by 25 per cent to 95 per cent. Most retention tools respond only after dissatisfaction is already visible: a support complaint, a downgrade, or a cancellation request.

Supaps product, Retentifi AI, is built on a different premise: that sentiment change is directional and detectable well before a customer acts on it, and that businesses that can see the shift early have a real chance to intervene.

Retentifi continuously analyses signals across the customer journey conversations, feedback, support interactions, and product usage to flag when a customer’s sentiment is moving towards disengagement, and to route that signal to the right team before it becomes a lost account. Where most sentiment tools stop at telling a business a customer is positive, neutral, or negative, Retentifi is built to go further: connecting a sentiment shift to why it is happening and what action might recover the relationship, effectively asking what happened, why the customer is disengaging, and what should happen next.

That approach has been formalised as intellectual property: the underlying method, described as a Customer Sentiment Recovery Detection System with Specialised Business Routing for Retention Optimisation, has been granted a Nigerian patent, registered under patent reference RP: NG/PT/NC/O/2025/20237, and is independently verifiable through the official IPO Nigeria patent registry.

It is a rare enough approach that it points to genuine technical originality rather than a repackaged sentiment-analysis tool. The patent covers not just detecting sentiment change, but the routing logic that decides what a business should do about it.

Retentifi has secured paying customers on customised plans, with the product being tailored and continuously refined around their specific retention and customer-sentiment requirements. The platform already has thousands of users and over 150,000 requests, providing a measurable indication of market interest and engagement with the product. The combination of commercial adoption and independently recorded platform activity provides early evidence of demand while continuing to inform Retentifi’s development around real-world customer requirements.

The idea for Retentifi grew out of Gabriel Udo’s work building Supapbot, an earlier AI platform focused on helping SaaS companies detect frustrated customers through sentiment analysis. As the team developed the platform and spoke with customers, Udo and his co-founders realised that businesses did not simply need a smarter chatbot or another tool that could identify whether a customer was positive, neutral or negative. They needed a system that could help them understand what was happening in the customer relationship and determine what to do next. That realisation became a turning point for the product and led to its evolution into Retentifi, with a focus on identifying changes in customer sentiment, understanding the reasons behind those changes, and connecting emerging risks to appropriate business actions.

As co-founder of Supap Limited and product lead on Retentifi, Udo pushed the product in a direction most sentiment tools do not go, insisting that flagging a problem was not enough unless the system could also point to a likely cause and a next action. That decision shaped Retentifi’s core architecture: the sentiment recovery detection layer and the business routing logic that connects a flagged risk to a specific team or intervention.

This thinking is also reflected in the product’s later focus on sentiment recovery rather than sentiment analysis: identifying not simply whether a customer is unhappy, but whether their relationship with a business is moving towards disengagement and what can be done while there is still an opportunity to recover it.

Customer retention should not begin the moment a customer decides to leave. Our vision with Retentifi is to help businesses recognise the signals much earlier, understand what’s actually driving them, and act while there’s still a relationship worth recovering, Udo said.

He added that what he likes about Retentifi is that it helps businesses understand what happened during a customer conversation, not just whether the customer was happy or unhappy.

We can see how their mood changed throughout the conversation, and if something went wrong, the team gets a summary in Slack with a suggested follow-up message. That’s been really useful when someone chats with us and then disappears almost straight away instead of just assuming they were not interested; we have some context and a good reason to reach back out, he said.

Retentifi is aimed at SaaS and customer-facing businesses trying to shift from reactive support to proactive retention, treating sentiment not as a fixed score but as something moving in a direction, where even a currently satisfied customer may be drifting, and a currently frustrated one may still be recoverable.

As more businesses compete on the strength of their customer relationships rather than just their product, tools that catch that drift early and can point to why it is happening may become a standard part of how retention teams operate, rather than a niche add-on.

By six o’clock on a typical Saturday morning in Lagos, the city is already bustling. Makeup artists head to clients’ homes and hotels, gele specialists set up, and caterers have been cooking for hours. Tailors are making last-minute deliveries, while photographers, decorators, musicians, drivers, and security personnel prepare for the day ahead. Although the wedding itself may start at 10 a.m., the economic activity surrounding it begins much earlier.

We call it Owambe. It is commonly seen as a celebration, but it also operates as a major economic system. This system relies on commercial properties, infrastructure, and an extensive business network.

Nigeria’s celebration economy extends beyond weddings to birthdays, funerals, naming ceremonies, traditional engagements, religious gatherings and corporate events. Its supply chain covers fashion, beauty, photography, catering, decoration, entertainment, transportation, accommodation, gifts and souvenirs.

Obtaining reliable industry data is difficult due to much of its activity being informal. Nonetheless, its presence is noticeable across Lagos every weekend. The key question isn’t whether commercial property is part of the Owambe economy; it clearly is. Instead, we should consider whether we truly understand this system enough to support it effectively.

The venue is just the starting point

A typical Lagos wedding shows how widely spending is distributed. Preparations may begin at home or in a hotel. The ceremony may move to a registry or place of worship before guests proceed to an event centre, restaurant, lounge or after-party.

At the reception, another network comes together: caterers, drinks suppliers, decorators, musicians, DJs, photographers, technicians, security personnel, cleaners and logistics teams. They may meet at the venue for only a few hours, but their property requirements exist throughout the year.

Many of these requirements are simple. A makeup artist needs just a clean station with a mirror, comfortable chair, good lighting, sockets, and cooling. A gele specialist can use a similar setup. A designer may require a fitting room; an event planner, a small consultation area; and a photographer, a bookable studio. Couples and bridal parties need private, comfortable rooms for changing before the reception or after-party, equipped with mirrors, seating, cooling, lighting, sockets, secure storage, washroom access, and enough space for stylists. Caterers and decorators need larger kitchens, workshops, or storage areas, which can often be shared.

This is why building more event centres captures only one part of the opportunity. Commercial property is already prevalent throughout the celebration economy. What may be missing is a deliberate attempt to connect these different uses and make them function as an efficient ecosystem.

Spend a few minutes on Instagram looking up makeup artists, gele specialists, fashion designers, photographers, cake creators, florists, and event planners in Lagos, and you’ll notice a vibrant marketplace. Many of these professionals have large followings and busy schedules, even without a physical shop. Instagram acts as their portfolio, WhatsApp is their booking tool, and they provide services at homes, hotels, and event venues.

A typical developer might assume these businesses don’t require formal commercial spaces. However, the reality could be quite different. They may need property, but the current market fails to offer suitable options. In Lagos, vacant shops and studios exist alongside thousands of online event businesses that need spaces for client meetings, clothing fittings, product preparation, photo shoots, or equipment storage.

The disconnect often stems from the lease. A successful gele specialist might be very busy on Fridays and Saturdays but have little need to rent a shop during the week. The same goes for some makeup artists, photographers, stylists, and accessory vendors. Their lack of presence in shopping centres shouldn’t be mistaken for low demand.

They do not require a lengthy lease or quarterly rent payments. Available vacant units could be converted into easily bookable micro-spaces, accessible by the hour, day, weekend, or on a weekly basis through simple occupancy licenses. The core setup doesn’t need to be complicated: a few makeup or gele stations, a fitting room, comfortable changing areas, a consultation room, and a small studio could share facilities like reception, cooling, power, security, and parking.

For the operator, property costs would be tied to income-producing periods. For the landlord, the space becomes a managed product that can earn from several users across the week instead of remaining vacant while one conventional tenant is sought. The question is not whether an Instagram entrepreneur can afford a conventional shop, but whether the property industry can create a product matching how that entrepreneur works.

Landlords have demonstrated that buildings can be transformed into short-term rental spaces. This approach can be extended here as well. Using lightweight partitions, reservable rooms, and shared amenities, a single property can accommodate multiple operators at different times without costly renovations.

The landlord doesn’t have to finance every element solely. Interior designers, decorators, furniture suppliers, and fit-out contractors often keep display pieces or stock for months before selling. They can furnish and organise the space using staged payments, leasing, or revenue-sharing agreements. This transforms the property into a functional showroom for them, while the landlord’s upfront costs are minimised.

The market already demonstrates this adaptability. School grounds, church compounds, community halls, and open spaces are regularly transformed for celebrations. Suitably located commercial buildings should not remain vacant simply because a conventional tenant has not appeared. Subject to planning, safety, access, parking, and neighborhood considerations, some can become flexible support properties rather than event halls.

Unlike short-term rentals, which can be largely seasonal like in (Detty) Dirty December, Owambe events occur throughout most of the year. Lagos hosts weddings, birthdays, funerals, corporate events, and religious celebrations almost weekly, both during the day and on weekends. While December often sees a surge in parties, it simply strengthens an already established market rather than creating one. This consistent demand is what makes the opportunity particularly appealing for landlords.

Social media also acts as a source of market intelligence, showing where event business clusters are expanding, where their customers are situated, their travel distances, demand peaks, and commonly bundled services. This data can guide landlords in determining the need for flexible space and how to design and price it accordingly.

The infrastructure behind the party

Around these properties sits an equally important infrastructure layer: dependable electricity, water, access roads, public transport, parking, loading areas, drainage, waste collection, security, digital connectivity and emergency services.

Go-slow congestion is probably the most obvious problem. During a large Owambe, hundreds of vehicles can quickly flood the area, overwhelming narrow access roads and limited parking. Vehicles parked on both sides decrease road capacity, while drivers searching for parking, dropping off guests, or waiting outside venues create additional traffic jams. This congestion affects residents, local businesses, emergency services, and all road users, not just party attendees.

Event planning should incorporate traffic management. Venues can establish drop-off zones, arrange off-site parking and shuttle services, stagger vendor access, and deploy road marshals. For larger events, coordination with public authorities might be necessary. Ensuring that the venue’s advertised capacity matches the capacity of nearby roads and parking facilities is crucial.

Infrastructure influences the property’s functionality. An appealing hall that is hard to access, costly to power, or impossible to service can become a problematic asset. Developers should consider beyond aesthetics to include kitchens, loading areas, backstage circulation, acoustics, power, water supply, parking, and vendor access.

The people who plan the parties

A practical approach to grasp these needs is to develop strategic partnerships with event planners, who choose venues, coordinate vendors, manage guest flow, and address issues on the spot. They can convert consistent client requirements into a functional brief for landlords, interior designers, and fit-out contractors, making sure spaces are designed for practical use instead of just aesthetics. Since planners run events regularly, their experience reflects a collective demand rather than the preferences of a single client.

Partnerships with established companies like Zapphaire Events, founded by Funke Bucknor-Obruthe, and Eventful etc could offer an easier entry into this market. Planners can help with feasibility studies, venue design, and operating procedures before large investments are made.

From separate buildings to a connected economy

The broader lesson for commercial real estate and infrastructure planning is that people perceive property as integral to places and journeys, rather than as isolated categories. The Owambe economy already links homes, hotels, registries, places of worship, event centres, restaurants, lounges, studios, kitchens, and workshops throughout the city.

Its activities extend beyond Saturday. Dress fittings, tastings, planning meetings, photography sessions, purchases, and hotel bookings create activity and expenses for weeks leading up to the event. Funerals, corporate events, and religious gatherings maintain demand throughout the week.

The opportunity doesn’t require accommodating the entire ecosystem in a single purpose-built complex. Instead, it may involve developing the right spaces at key locations, enhancing the infrastructure linking them, and establishing commercial relationships to enable the network to function effectively.

The Owambe economy doesn’t require the property sector to generate its demand; Nigerians have already established it. The key is to understand the entire commercial cycle, collaborate with those who coordinate it, and offer the spaces, infrastructure, and occupancy solutions that enhance its efficiency.

The party may last a day. The property, infrastructure and economy behind it rarely do.