Why shouting is not the best form of communication

There is a usual occurrence in organisations, and I have seen it happen too many times. A manager, red-faced and agitated, unleashes a torrent of words at a team member in front of everyone else. The recipient of this outburst stands there, shoulders hunched, eyes downcast, with dignity stripped away like the bark of a tree. At the end of the shouting, the irony is that nothing is achieved except resentment, fear, and a workplace culture that slowly rots from within. When leaders raise their voices at their team members, it is not a demonstration of strength or authority but an exposure of a fundamental weakness, which is the inability to manage oneself.

The import of leadership should never be to bruise the ego of those that are led. A leader’s role is to build people up and not tear them down. When leaders shout, they erect an invisible barrier between themselves and their team members. That barrier, once built, is difficult to dismantle. The truth is that many leaders’ shouts are a revelation of emotional bankruptcy. Shouting shows that one has run out of ideas. It shows a feeling of being powerless. Shouting is an indication that one lacks the emotional intelligence to articulate one’s concerns in a measured and constructive manner. Let’s be clear: shouting is not communication. Yelling is not leadership. It is rather the opposite. It is the abdication of leadership.

The story of Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, comes to mind. Early in his tenure, he inherited a company culture notorious for its internal competition and aggressive management style. This, in some parlance, is called a ‘dog-eat-dog’ environment. Nadella could have maintained that approach. He had every positional lever at his disposal. Instead, he did something radical. He listened and asked questions. He created psychological safety. He replaced the shout with the conversation. Under his leadership, Microsoft’s market value soared, but more importantly, employee engagement was transformed. Nadella understood what many leaders miss: when you have genuine authority rooted in respect rather than fear, you don’t need volume; you need clarity.

Shouting does not make your communication more effective. It only makes it intimidating. And there is a world of difference between the two. Effective communication achieves understanding. It creates alignment. It moves people from point A to point B with clarity and purpose. Intimidation, on the other hand, creates compliance but only temporarily. It breeds the kind of obedience that evaporates the moment you leave the room. Your team members might do what you say in that moment, but they will not give you their discretionary effort, their creativity, or their loyalty.

While Travis Kalanick was at Uber, his aggressive and confrontational management style, which included public outbursts and a culture of shouting, was normalised. This may have driven rapid growth, but it also drove the company into crisis. Sexual harassment scandals, legal battles, and a toxic workplace culture forced the board to push him out. This shows that you can shout your way to short-term results, but you will incinerate long-term sustainability.

On the other hand, Indra Nooyi, the former CEO of PepsiCo, was known for writing personal letters to the parents of her executives, thanking them for raising such talented individuals. She created a culture of respect and appreciation. She didn’t need to raise her voice to command attention. Her thoughtfulness, her strategic clarity, and her genuine care for people earned her the respect that no amount of shouting ever could.

Your colleagues, direct reports and your team members are not animals. They are human beings with families, aspirations, insecurities, and pride. When you shout at them, you dehumanise them. And in dehumanising them, you diminish yourself. The best leaders share a common trait: they treat people with dignity even in difficult moments. They understand that how you make people feel is as important as what you make them do. If these words have resonated with you and if you know you have been that leader who shouts, please note that it is not too late to change. Leadership is not about perfection; it is about progress.

Start by examining what triggers your outbursts. Is it stress? Is it insecurity? Is it the lack of tools or training in how to have difficult conversations? Whatever the root cause, it can be addressed. Get a coach. Read a book on emotional intelligence. Practice having hard conversations when you are calm, not reactive. When you feel the urge to shout rising in your chest, pause. Take a breath. Step away if you need to. Then return to the conversation when you can address the issue rather than attack the person. Please remember that your voice is a tool and not a weapon. Use it to clarify, to encourage, to correct when necessary, but never to crush.

Finally, authority is not volume. Leadership is not mastering the loudest voice in the room; it is mastering the language that brings people closer to the work and to each other. Stop shouting. Start speaking with purpose, clarity and respect, and you will get better results.

Irabor’s scars on Boko Haram conundrum and dead horse theory

There are few things more dignifying than when a towering public figure extends the courtesy of respect wrapped in humility. General Lucky Irabor, former Chief of Defence Staff, exemplifies that rare blend of strength and grace. When he invited me to the presentation of his new book, ‘SCARS: Nigeria’s Journey and the Boko Haram Conundrum,’ I was reminded that behind the imposing military uniform lies a man of reflection, intellect, and empathy – unless, of course, one dares to cross the line.

This quality stands in sharp contrast to the arrogance I have encountered at a strategic institute where a few officers’ inflated egos left little room for courtesy or intellectual exchange.

I could not attend the book launch due to a scheduling conflict with the International Public Relations Association’s (IPRA) Golden World Awards in Ghana, where the Nigeria Customs Service and Image Merchants Promotion Limited (IMPR) were honoured. On my return to Abuja, all copies of the book had sold out, and I was due to travel to Canada that same night. Learning of my predicament, General Irabor ensured a copy was sent to me – a gesture that spoke volumes about his character.

Taking the advice of his friend, Vice President Kashim Shettima, that ‘to truly enjoy a book, read it on a long journey,’ I opened it mid-flight and did not stop until I reached the last page. In less than twenty-four hours, I devoured the 300-page memoir – a deeply analytical, well-researched, and intellectually stimulating work that goes far beyond the typical autobiographical recount of a retired general.

Irabor’s SCARS stands out for its narrative style. It is not a self-indulgent memoir but a reflective chronicle that blends personal experience with historical analysis and policy critique. He writes with academic precision, referencing other scholars, field experiences, and verifiable data. Between the lines, the discerning reader can sense his measured but firm convictions on the Boko Haram insurgency, Niger Delta militancy, IPOB separatism, Yoruba nationalism, and the societal decay that has haunted Nigeria since independence.

The book is a panoramic chronicle – from the civil war and military coups to democratic transitions and insurgencies – offering a sober reflection on the choices and failures that have defined Nigeria’s evolution. Notably, Irabor avoids sensationalism or name-dropping; even his acknowledgments are strikingly modest despite the calibre of personalities, including former Presidents, who later attended the unveiling in Abuja.

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo, in his foreword, aptly describes the publication as ‘a soldier’s honest reflection on a nation’s unfinished journey.’ But the true revelations lie within the pages – in Irabor’s unflinching interrogation of Nigeria’s political and moral contradictions.

Among the book’s most intriguing points is his assertion that no full-fledged coup d’état in Nigeria has ever occurred without civilian collaboration. He argues that soldiers, bound by their oath of allegiance, often justify interventions ‘through the prism of national defence.’ This interpretation shifts part of the blame for Nigeria’s military incursions to opportunistic civilians who manipulate or enable such actions for personal gain.

Equally provocative is his historical framing of Northern Nigeria’s recurring religious conflicts. Irabor traces the roots to Usman Dan Fodio’s jihad of 1804, viewing it as the starting point of organized religious militancy in the region. While this perspective is historically grounded, it risks oversimplification. Thankfully, Irabor tempers his argument by contextualizing it within the broader ‘millenarian revolts of early colonialism,’ suggesting that both Islamic revivalism and Christian evangelism during the colonial era contributed to shaping Nigeria’s spiritual and social divides.

One area readers may find conspicuously absent is any mention of the tragic death of gallant General Ibrahim Attahiru, the late Chief of Army Staff who perished in a plane crash shortly after Boko Haram’s leader, Abubakar Shekau, was reportedly killed. Given Irabor’s position as the CDS, his silence on the matter is perhaps deliberate – an act of discretion from a professional soldier who values institutional continuity over personal disclosure.

The sections on Northern Nigeria’s political elite are unambiguously critical. Irabor faults the region’s leaders for presiding over deepening poverty, illiteracy, and insecurity despite their educational exposure and political dominance. He cites World Bank data showing that the ten poorest states in Nigeria are all in the North-East and North-West, with 87% of the nation’s poorest population concentrated there. He attributes this grim reality to elite hypocrisy, religious manipulation, and the failure to translate political power into social progress.

The former defence chief particularly denounces the politicisation of religion, using the Sharia Movement in Zamfara (1999) as a case study of how political opportunism derailed governance. Quoting Emir Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, Irabor laments the ‘commodification of piety’ – a process through which religion becomes a tool of control rather than a vehicle for moral upliftment.

He calls on Northern leaders to emulate progressive Muslim societies like Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which have harmonised faith with modernity rather than allowing religion to justify stagnation. His position on the Almajiri system is particularly powerful; he argues that no faith sanctions the institutionalisation of street begging or the abandonment of children in the name of learning.

The chapter on the ‘Dead Horse Theory’ is one of the most intellectually stimulating sections. Here, Irabor uses the metaphor to describe Nigeria’s tendency to keep ‘beating dead horses’ – sustaining failed policies and obsolete institutions instead of pursuing meaningful reform. He cites the duplication of examination bodies like WAEC and NECO, the Nomadic Education Programme, and the regional cut-off mark policy as examples of how Nigeria perpetuates inefficiency under the guise of inclusiveness.

The discussion on Boko Haram is both historical and diagnostic. Irabor situated the insurgency within a continuum of religious and socio-political crises, from the Maitatsine riots of the 1980s to the Sharia clashes of 1999-2000. He chronicles how Mohammed Yusuf, the sect’s founder, began as a member of Borno’s Sharia Implementation Committee, only to break away and radicalise disillusioned youth by preaching against Western education and government corruption.

The book exposes the irony of Boko Haram’s dependence on Western technology – weapons, communication tools, and propaganda platforms – even while denouncing Western civilisation. Irabor portrays Boko Haram not as a purely religious movement but as a symptom of governance failure, economic deprivation, and elite negligence. He identifies the drivers of extremism as ‘unaddressed political grievances, weaponisation of religion and tribe, a biased legal framework, and weakened institutions.’

The author also voices deep concern over what he described as an international conspiracy against Nigeria, singling out certain foreign entities and media organisations. He accuses them of not only supplying logistical support to terrorist groups but also of deliberately spreading false narratives aimed at discrediting the Nigerian military and destabilising national security.

In his closing reflections, the General offers a pragmatic pathway forward: diplomatic negotiation, socioeconomic and political realignment, and governance reforms that reward merit and restore trust. ‘The time for change is now,’ he writes, ‘and it must begin with truth, inclusion, and a commitment to genuine progress.’

SCARS is not just a memoir; it is a mirror reflecting Nigeria’s wounds – the scars of war, hypocrisy, and wasted potential. Irabor’s writing is measured but fearless, scholarly yet deeply human. His critique of the North is not an attack but a plea for introspection; his assessment of Nigeria’s leadership failures is not cynical but reformist.

This book is an essential read for anyone seeking to understand Nigeria’s enduring crises – from insurgency and leadership to the complex interplay between faith, politics, and national identity. It leaves readers not with despair, but with hope – the hope that confronting our scars honestly is the first step toward national healing.

CSOs reject water privatisation, seek investment to tackle climate crisis

Civil society organisations across Africa, under the platform of the Our Water Our Right Africa Coalition (OWORAC) have kicked against corporate takeover of public water systems and demanded governments invest in publicly owned, climate-resilient water infrastructure.

The CSOs made the demand at the kick-off of the 5th Africa Week of Action Against Water Privatisation.

The theme of this year’s observance is ‘Public Water for Climate Resilience’.

The event, which began at the headquarters of Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa, CAPPA, in Lagos, was organised in partnership with the Africa Make Big Polluters Pay Coalition..

The coalition, comprising civil society groups, trade unions, and community networks from more than 12 African countries, pointed out that the campaign aims to expose the dangers of privatisation and push for equitable, sustainable, and publicly managed water systems.

Addressing newsmen, Sefa Ikpa, Programme Officer, Water Campaign, CAPPA, said it was imperative that water must remain a public good and a human right, not a commodity for profit.

She lamented that governments policies had made water unaccessible for thousands of people within Nigeria and the larger African countries, stressing that many people living in remote and rural communities of the continent still drink water from unhealthy and imaginable sources.

She warned that the increasing push by African Governments to privatise water, often encouraged by international financial institutions, was deepening inequality and threatening access for low-income communities.

According to Ikpa, Climate resilience will not be achieved through privatisation schemes that entrench exclusion. It will be built through strong, transparent, and publicly accountable systems that guarantee access to water for all.

‘The climate crisis must not be turned into a pretext for water privatisation. Public water systems, when adequately financed and democratically managed, are the backbone of climate resilience.’

Akinbode Oluwafemi, Executive Director of Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA), said that the United Nations had adopted a historical resolution recognising the right to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation as a human right that is essential for the full enjoyment of life and all human rights, noting that this right is under threat in Africa by continued privatisation of water.

According to him, at a time when we need stronger, publicly accountable systems to guarantee universal access, we are seeing growing pressure to privatise our water systems and hand control of this essential resource to profit-driven corporations despite overwhelming public opposition.

Leadway Assurance bags double honours at 2025 BAFI Awards

Leadway Assurance, Nigeria’s leading insurance provider, has once again reinforced its industry leadership, clinching two prestigious honours at the 2025 BusinessDay Banks and Other Financial Institutions (BAFI) Awards Insurance, as the insurance company of the Year (for the second consecutive year) and Excellence in Claims Leadership and Digital Innovation.

These recognitions reaffirm Leadway Assurance’s position as Nigeria’s most trusted insurer, underpinned by 55 years of legacy of integrity, innovation, and customer focus. In 2024 alone, the company paid out N117 billion in claims-the highest in the industry-further strengthening its reputation as the nation’s most consistent and reliable insurer.

Commenting on the milestone, Gboyega Lesi, Managing Director of Leadway Assurance, said: Each payout reflects restored livelihoods and renewed confidence for families and businesses across the country. These double honours are a worthy recognition of the dedication of our team and our commitment to serving customers better every day. The recognition motivates us to continue building systems and teams that ensure no one faces uncertainty alone. Each innovation and every claim fulfilled reaffirms our promise to provide protection. For Leadway Assurance, these accolades celebrate our sense of purpose, reliability, and the lasting strength of an indigenous brand built to endure.

‘Winning the Insurance Company of the Year for the second consecutive year and adding Excellence in Claims Leadership and Digital Innovation awards reflects our consistent devotion to excellence, consistency, and innovation in delivering value.

”We thank the leadership of BusinessDay for celebrating our relentless pursuit of efficiency, transparency, and empathy in every customer interaction; from simplifying claims processes to leveraging technology for faster, smarter access to insurance policies, as we continue to redefine trust and innovation in the insurance industry.

‘Leadway Assurance’s transformation of claims management has set a new benchmark in the insurance industry. Leveraging cutting-edge technology, the company has digitised its claims processes, enabling customers to file, track, and finalise claims seamlessly. This digital shift has significantly reduced turnaround times and elevated customer experience nationwide’, Lesi added.

The BAFI Awards, regarded as the gold standard for financial excellence, celebrate institutions that embody innovation, strong governance, and customer-centricity.

Analysing Nigeria’s energy transition plan

As Nigeria positions itself for a low-carbon future, the Energy Transition Plan (ETP) offers both hope and a stern test of policy coherence, institutional capacity, and political will. If properly implemented, the Plan could reset Nigeria’s development trajectory; if mismanaged, it risks imposing new burdens on a fragile economy and vulnerable citizens.

When was the plan unveiled, and why it matters

The Government of Nigeria officially launched the Nigeria Energy Transition Plan at COP26 in November 2021, signalling its commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2060. This launch marked a turning point: Nigeria’s transition narrative shifted from rhetoric to a concrete roadmap backed by global visibility and national ambition.

Recognising that assumptions evolve and realities shift, the government convened a stakeholder consultation in October 2024, bringing together public and private sector participants to review and refine the original plan. The insights from this process directly informed the development of the updated Nigeria Energy Transition and Investment Plan (NETIP), which integrates more realistic timelines, financing mechanisms, and investment priorities. This iterative approach underscores the seriousness with which Nigeria views the transition: not as a one-off declaration, but as a living framework designed to adapt and deliver.

What is Nigeria’s Energy Transition Plan?

The Energy Transition Plan (ETP) is a comprehensive strategy aimed at balancing emissions reduction and energy access in five key sectors: power, cooking, transport, oil and gas, and industry. It aims to increase renewable energy use, modernise grid infrastructure, deploy energy storage, and use natural gas as a transition fuel. The Energy Transition Office coordinates implementation across ministries and agencies.

Merits: Why the plan matters

1. Tackling energy poverty and supporting development

Nigeria continues to struggle with electricity access and erratic power delivery. The ETP’s design to channel investments into decentralised, off-grid and mini-grid solutions offers a viable path to reach rural and underserved communities. Financing has already been secured for renewable mini-grids to power up to two million people. Reliable, affordable electricity will unlock growth in agriculture, small industry, health, and education.

2. Enhancing climate credibility and attracting capital

In an era when global capital markets favour ESG-compliant investment, Nigeria’s ETP can serve as a signalling device, showing that the country is serious about climate goals. This credibility can help unlock concessional climate finance, green bonds, and multilateral support. By reducing flaring and emissions, Nigeria can also reduce reputational and regulatory risks in its oil and gas sector.

3. Job creation and value-chain development

Transition sectors-solar assembly, grid installation, energy services, battery manufacturing, and energy efficiency retrofits-are potential sources of new employment. Analysts project that scaling renewables plus grid modernisation could yield hundreds of thousands of jobs by 2030. In doing so, the plan nudges financial markets and firms toward a more sustainable culture.

Demerits and risks: Where the plan may falter

1. Huge financing gap

The most formidable challenge is mobilising sufficient capital-both public and private. Historically, Sub-Saharan Africa receives a small share of global climate finance. Nigeria also faces underdeveloped green bond markets, limited incentives, and a banking sector still adapting to sustainable finance. Without bridging that gap, many pathways in the ETP remain aspirational.

2. Weak institutional coordination and policy coherence

Nigeria’s energy, finance, environment and planning agencies often have overlapping or conflicting mandates. The ETP demands strong coordination, but such unity is endangered by bureaucratic silos and shifting political winds. Policy reversals on subsidies, tariffs or land use can destabilise progress.

3. Transition costs to fossil-dependent sectors

Regions and communities dependent on oil and gas revenues are vulnerable. Even though the plan positions gas as a transition fuel, overreliance carries lock-in risks. Displacement of jobs and loss of revenue streams could be severe if alternative livelihoods are not planned and executed.

4. Grid, storage and technology constraints

The intermittency of renewables means grid upgrades and energy storage are nonnegotiable. Without them, reliability will suffer. Studies suggest that adding electricity storage could raise renewables’ share and significantly reduce emissions. Nigeria’s ageing, loss-prone transmission system must be overhauled-a task requiring massive investment, time and technical skill.

How the plan’s actualisation could impact the economy and citizens

If Nigeria can deliver the ETP effectively, the positive ripple effects could be transformative: clean, stable electricity would reduce production costs, attract industrial investment, bolster agricultural productivity, and spur growth in manufacturing and services. Electrification in rural and peri-urban areas would improve livelihoods, healthcare, education and microenterprise capacity, which would help to reduce inequality and boost shared prosperity.

On the fiscal front, success would help diversify Nigeria’s revenue base away from oil rents toward green sectors, carbon services, and energy value chains, aiding fiscal resilience in a low-carbon future. Early transition also cushions the shock of potential stranded assets or weakening global fossil demand.

Yet the transition also carries short-term costs. Tariff reform or subsidy removal may strain household budgets. Fossil-intensive regions will need social safety nets, retraining programmes, and inclusive industrial planning to manage adjustment. Politically, failure to deliver visible gains-reliable electricity, job creation, climate mitigation-would erode trust in government and fuel opposition.

But success could reposition Nigeria as a model continental leader in just energy transition-attracting ESG-sensitive capital, strengthening climate resilience, and aligning national development with global decarbonisation.

Conclusion: Execution is everything

The Energy Transition Plan, launched at COP26 in 2021 and updated after stakeholder consultations in 2024, represents Nigeria’s boldest attempt yet to reconcile development and decarbonisation. But beyond the launches and documents, the ultimate test is execution.

Its success hinges on bold coordination, sustained capital mobilisation, inclusive planning, and institutional discipline. If Nigeria can deliver on the ETP, the payoff is not just lower emissions but a more diversified, resilient, equitable economy and millions of citizens empowered by access to cleaner and reliable energy.

Let us hope this roadmap becomes more than aspirational rhetoric-it becomes the engine of Nigeria’s green future.

Community school emerges best in TotalEnergies book reading contest

A community secondary school has won the 2025 ‘Book Reading’ contest on Open Day Event packaged by TotalEnergies Nigeria in Port Harcourt.

The oil company that organized the event said it was a strategy to discover the next generation of greatness in the oil region.

ýThe ‘Book Reading’ brought together over 10 senior secondary schools in Port Harcourt, including Enitona High School, Immaculate High School, Model Secondary School GRA Port Harcourt, Redeemers College, and GCSS Borikiri, saw Community Secondary School (CSS) Okuru-Ama emerge winner.

ýSpeaking on behalf of the students of the winning college, Hellen Amakiri expressed gratitude to TotalEnergies for the initiative which she said has equipped her and other students to acquire vital knowledge needed to make the right choice for a successful future.

ýShe also commended TotalEnergies for its prominent role in the oil, gas, and renewable energy industry and their commitment to sustainable energy in Nigeria and the world.

ý Amakiri further expressed gratitude to the oil giant for the opportunity to participate in the Book Reading and Open Day Event, which paved the way for the emergence of her school as the winner of the 2025 edition.

Speaking, Olivier Casesolles, deputy managing director (DMD) Total Energies, Joint Venture Asset, said that the initiative of encouraging young ones to read was not simply about increasing literature but about nurturing minds capable of empathy, creativity, and critical thinking.

ýCasesolles stated that for over 60 years, TotalEnergies has been passionate about lighting up minds and empowering future generations through education.

ýHe said the scholarships provided by TotalEnergies has assisted thousands of students to access quality education, and that more than 700 petroleum engineers have graduated from the Institute of Petroleum Studies, University of Port Harcourt.

ýHe also stated that their lives today and in the future depend on the books they read and the knowledge they possessed. He traced his own life and success stories to an early exposure to reading.

ýThe DMD also identified other education support initiatives of TotalEnergies in Nigeria to include the provision of solar lamps to students to aid their studies, provision of classroom blocks, state-of the-art laboratories and equipment in schools and training of some university lecturers at the Massachusette Institute of Technology in the USA. The move, he said, is to strengthen teaching methodology in the country.

ýThe company emphasized that the ‘Book Reading and Open Day Event’ has enhanced character discipline and personal growth since it’s inception.

Adesua Adebola, General Manager, Country Services of TotalEnergies, said the purpose of the book reading contest was to empower students. She charged them to take reading seriously as it is the key that unlocks a successful and brighter future.

ýAlso, Azibaolalare Uzoma Wogu, Permanent Secretary, Rivers State Ministry of Education, who was represented by Charles Gbaranwi, a Deputy Director in the Ministry, commended TotalEnergies for their contributions to the growth, development, and success of education in the state, expressing the Ministry’s continuous readiness for partnership.

Speaking on the need for guidance in the choice of a career path, Adolphus Akwumakwuhie, a legal practitioner and ‘Role Model of the Day’, urged students to take advantage of the morning period which is the preparatory stage. He warned against bad association, drug abuse, and other social vices incidental to youths as they lead to a destructive future.

Olawepo-Hashim mourns labour activist Abiodun

A Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) stalwart, Dr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, has expressed sadness over the passing of labour activist, Abiodun Aremu.

Olwepo-Hashim said he and the late Aremu were good friends for 40 years.

In a tribute to the late labour activist, Olawepo-Hashim wrote: ‘Aremson (as we called him) and I met in 1986 as young activists. I was in the School of Basic Studies and Aremu in the school of Technology, both Campuses of the College of Technology, Ilorin, with the third college being the School of Management and Vocational.

‘Aremu and I belonged to the Youths Thinkers’ Club, a group of patriotic young thinkers committed to a better Nigeria and the Liberation of our Fatherland from underdevelopment. We were also joint members of the Patriotic Liberation Movement, a working-class and peasantry-focused left group with leading figures like M. Yaqub (later Rotimi Obadofin), Femi Ahmed, Didi Adodo, Rev. Father Ofei, Bona Chizea, Alex Ayatollah, Sunday Ewen, etc.

‘Ilorin, where Aremson cut his activist political teeth, like I, was an idealogical melting pot in the mid-’80s. At the Youth and Students’ fronts were actors like Shola Olorunuomi, now a University Professor; Denja Yaq, Lanre Fulani, Mathew Keyi, Hamzat Ibn Suleman, etc. In the media were Dapo Olorunyomi, Lanre Kawu (Modibo Kawu Ladi Abdul Azeez) who eventually became Dapo Olorunyomi’s wife, etc, etc.

‘A tribute to Aremson’s unwavering commitment to the working people of Nigeria and the cause of a better Nigeria cannot leave out the influence of the family of patriots that produced him and ideologically birthed some of us.

‘Aremu and I had a closer bond; we were very passionate about change. Some people say every opportunity to confront the status quo was like a birthday ceremony for Aremu and I. Some more uncharitable critics called us ‘Petty bourgeois exhibitionists’.

‘In May 1986, Aremu, as President of Students’ Union, led protesting students of the School of Technology, and I led thousands of students from the School of Basic Studies to protest the killing of students at the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, in what became the ‘Ango Must Go’ protest. We were heading to the rendezvous at the NTA Ilorin, where we had planned to make a broadcast, when we were confronted by a large detachment of mobile riot policemen at the Ministry of Agriculture in Ilorin. The government declared a curfew, but we managed to get together later at my grandmother’s place to a plate of mama’s amala and ewedu soup.

‘Aremson and I kept close contact and visited each other regularly over the past four decades.

‘He recently survived a stroke, but fell to the cruel assault of a hit-and-run driver.

‘Why was Aremu crossing the road all by himself? He had a car, which he seldom used because the road to his house was simply impassable, the last time I visited. Most residents of the community simply just park their cars.

‘Aremu built his house amongst the poor even though I won’t consider him poor: he chose by himself what he did, not because he lacked better options.

‘His choice was made easy for him by the understanding and cooperation of his loyal wife who must now bear the greatest weight of this loss.

‘Aremson was an internationalist, particularly a friend of Cuba and a promoter of the Legacy of Amicar Cabral.

‘We were ideologically bonded until his death. Though we chose different paths as we grew up, he, a professional revolutionary, I chose entrepreneurship and Mass Democratic Politics, but our cord of commitment to a better Nigeria remained unbroken.

‘A rare patriot has fallen, a combatant for the cause of the poor is gone, my friend has become the pool of water after the rain that passes by the street, never to return home again. Adieu, great one!’

University Admission: Credit in English, Maths no longer compulsory for certain courses

The federal government has announced a new policy that lowers the admission requirements for tertiary institutions in which a credit in English Language and Mathematics will no longer be mandatory for certain degree programmes.

The change is aimed at broadening access and creating more inclusive pathways for students whose strengths lie outside the traditional core subjects.

Folasade Boriowo, director of press at the Federal Ministry of Education in a statement emphasised that the new policy is geared towards increasing access to tertiary education for more admission seekers than the nation’s institutions currently accommodate.

According to the statement, Tunji Alausa, the minister of education is not satisfied with the existing policy, which he noted fails to recognise fairness and creates room for imbalance.

‘Alausa explains that the reform has become necessary after years of restricted access that left many qualified candidates unable to secure admission.

‘Every year, over two million candidates sit the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), yet only about 700,000 gain admission. This imbalance, he notes, is not due to a lack of ability but rather to outdated and overly stringent entry requirements that must give way to fairness and opportunity,’ the statement reads in part..

In addition, the statement reads, ‘The revised national guidelines for entry requirements into Nigerian tertiary institutions are designed to remove barriers while maintaining academic standards.

‘The new framework applies to universities, polytechnics, colleges of education, and Innovation Enterprise Academies (IEAs) across the country as follows..’

Universities: Minimum of five credit passes in relevant subjects, including English Language, obtained in not more than two sittings. Mathematics is mandatory for Science, Technology, and Social Science courses.

Polytechnics (ND Level): Minimum of four credit passes in relevant subjects, including English Language for non-science courses and Mathematics for science-related programs.

Polytechnics (HND Level): Minimum of five credit passes in relevant subjects, including English Language and Mathematics.

Colleges of Education (NCE Level): Minimum of four credit passes in relevant subjects, with English Language mandatory for Arts and Social Science courses, and Mathematics required for Science, Vocational, and Technical programmes.

Colleges of Education (B.Ed Level): Minimum of five credit passes, including English Language and Mathematics, as applicable to the course of study.

Innovation Enterprise Academies (IEAs): To adopt the same minimum requirements as Polytechnics for the National Diploma (ND) programme. The National Innovation Diploma (NID) is hereby abolished.

In addition, the National Industrial Diploma (NID) previously issued by Innovation Enterprise Academies will be phased out and replaced with the National Diploma (ND) to ensure uniformity, credibility, and progression opportunities for graduates. The National Board for Technical Education (NBTE) is currently re-accrediting all IEAs nationwide to align with the new ND standards. Institutions that fail to transition to full accreditation will be de-accredited.

Alausa explains that the reform has become necessary after years of restricted access that left many qualified candidates unable to secure admission. Every year, over two million candidates sit for the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), yet only about 700,000 gain admission.

This imbalance, he said, is not due to a lack of ability but rather to outdated and overly stringent entry requirements that must give way to fairness and opportunity.

‘The reform is a deliberate effort to expand access to tertiary education, creating opportunities for additional 250,000 to 300,000 additional students to be admitted to Nigerian tertiary institutions each year,’ he emphasised.

This according to the statement reflects a firm commitment to ensuring that every Nigerian youth has a fair chance to learn, grow, and succeed, putting the Renewed Hope Agenda into action.

Besides, the minister emphasised that harmonising admission guidelines will help reduce the number of out-of-school youths, strengthen vocational and technical training, and align Nigeria’s tertiary education structure with global and industry standards.

He reiterates that young people remain the heartbeat of the nation, and the government is committed to equipping them with the education and skills they need to reach their full potential and contribute meaningfully to national development.

The current policy makes makes obtaining credit in both English and Mathematics at O’level mandatory for admission seekers, and this, according to Alausa, is found to be constituting barriers for those seeking admission into tertiary institutions in the country.

Group pushes for integrity

A group, Nigeria Reputation Management Group (NRMG), has called for integrity among the citizens, saying the image of the country is shaped not by slogans or policies alone, but by the conduct, integrity, and values of the citizens.

According to a statement from the group endorsed by its Chairman, Yomi Badejo-Okusanya to commemorate the inaugural edition of Nigeria Reputation Day today, he said rebuilding Nigeria’s reputation, therefore, is not only about fixing systems, it is about restoring trust, strengthening character, and living with integrity.

Badejo-Okusanya said Nigerians have shown, time and again, that the citizens are creative, resilient, and unbreakable in spirit, adding that to fully harness these gifts, honesty and accountability are crucial.

‘Every act of fairness, every promise kept, and every truth spoken is a quiet brick with which we build a stronger, more respected Nigeria,’ he said.

According to him, the country’s challenges are real, but they are not insurmountable, adding that across the world, ‘and within our borders, we have seen communities revived and nations renewed when people chose to act differently, persistently, and together’.

‘Today marks a defining chapter in our nation’s story, the inaugural Nigeria Reputation Day. It is a day for reflection and renewal; a day to recognise one of our greatest national assets: our name.

‘The theme of this year’s commemoration, ‘Better Reputation, Better Nigeria,’ carries a truth that speaks to all of us, that the image of our country is shaped not by slogans or policies alone, but by the conduct, integrity, and values of each Nigerian.

‘Our reputation is not merely perception; it is power. It determines how the world receives us, how investors trust our markets, how our youth are treated abroad, and how proudly our children identify with their homeland.

‘Rebuilding Nigeria’s reputation, therefore, is not only about fixing systems, it is about restoring trust, strengthening character, and living with integrity.

‘Nigerians have shown, time and again, that we are creative, resilient, and unbreakable in spirit. ‘Yet to fully harness these gifts, we must anchor them in honesty and accountability. Every act of fairness, every promise kept, and every truth spoken is a quiet brick with which we build a stronger, more respected Nigeria.

‘Yes, our challenges are real, but they are not insurmountable. Around the world, and within our borders, we have seen communities revived and nations renewed when people chose to act differently, persistently, and together,’ he said.

Badejo-Okusanya said to guide the nation’s collective journey, the NRMG identified five pillars for building and sustaining Nigeria’s reputation. The pillars include Consistency – Acting with integrity not occasionally, but always; Transparency – Being open in our decisions and accountable for outcomes; and Responsibility – Owning our actions and correcting our missteps.

Others are Respect – Treating our people, institutions, laws, and environment with dignity; and Excellence – Rejecting mediocrity and striving for higher standards in all things.

‘On this first Nigeria Reputation Day, we call on every Nigerian, at home and abroad, to take up the #BetterReputationBetterNigeria# challenge: commit one act of integrity, live it daily, inspire others to do the same, and carry Nigeria’s name with honour,’ Badejo-Okusanya said.

He said the M-Factor is the country’s cultural power grid

According to him, the nation’s reputation is not built by policies alone, it is expressed daily through creativity, culture, and the people. ‘Across the world, Nigeria’s image is shaped by what we call ‘The M-Factor’, our five engines of soft power: music, movies, media, minds, and fashion.

These five dimensions, he said are the pulse of the Nigerian story, vibrant, expressive, and deeply human.

He said music – the rhythm of resilience, turning challenges into chants and hope into harmony;

movies – the nation’s mirror and megaphone, projecting truth, humour, and courage with global reach while media – the voice that frames perception, building or breaking trust depending on how it is used.

‘Minds – our thinkers, innovators, and reformers – the conscience behind our creativity; fashion – the fabric of our identity, where culture meets confidence and design meets dignity,’ he added.

According to him, when the M-Factor aligns with integrity, Nigeria becomes unstoppable.

‘Let our music carry messages of dignity as much as rhythm; Let our films uplift as much as they entertain; Let our media amplify truth, not toxicity; Let our fashion express pride anchored in purpose; And let our minds lead with clarity, conscience, and courage.

‘This is how a nation earns respect, when culture and character move in the same direction.

‘Our national image will not be defined by headlines alone, but by the quiet consistency of millions choosing what is right. Let this day be a turning point, a reminder that the reputation we desire begins with each of us.

‘From now on, Nigeria Reputation Day will be marked annually on October 15 as a national reminder that integrity and reputation are the foundations of progress. Each year, we will renew our shared commitment to honour, trust, and uphold the values that make Nigeria great.

‘Together, we can build a nation that commands respect, attracts opportunity, and reflects the greatness that lies within us all. The Nigeria Reputation Management Group (NRMG) stands ready to lead, support, and collaborate with every Nigerian in restoring and protecting our national character,’ he said.

Diri defects to APC, resigns from PDP

Governor Douye Diri of Bayelsa State has resigned his membership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in preparations for his defection to the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC).

The had announced his resignation from the main opposition, PDP, on Wednesday, taking with him, 23 members of the State House of Assembly.

Daniel Alabara, the Governor’s spokesperson, confirmed the resignation on Wednesday, October 15, 2025.

He disclosed that Governor Diri will be pitching his tent with the All Progressives Congress (APC).

This confirmation ends months of speculations over the sensitive issue of the governor’s defection to the ruling APC.

Prior to his movement from the party, Governor Diri recently headed the PDP National Elective Convention Organising Committee which approved the zoning of the party’s 2027 presidential ticket to the Southern part of the country.