The Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) of Federal Unity Schools has challenged Education Minister Tunji Alausa to produce evidence backing his allegations that PTA officials were engaged in admission racketeering.
The association said the ‘sweeping allegation” should not be made without identifying the particular school, the officials, dates of alleged transactions, bank accounts, admission documents and beneficiaries connected with the N20 million mentioned by Alausa.
It also faulted the minister’s claim that parents paid between N100 million and N150 million in legal fees over the controversial concession of King’s College in Lagos.
The parents’ body said it was saddening that the Education Ministry had failed to acknowledge its financial and operational support to the unity schools across the country.
Alausa had while shedding light on the concession of the 117-year-old college to its old boys association(KCOBA), claimed that the PTA sought the N20 million from admission seekers. He did not state when, the period, the names and number of unity colleges where the racket took place.
But the minister insisted that the King’s College concession arrangement was designed to enable KCOBA to finance, rehabilitate, operate and maintain the school while the Federal Government retains regulatory, oversight power and 100 percent ownership of the college.
Alausa also dismissed allegations by the PTA that the government was mulling the sale of unity schools across the country.
Referring to the allegation of admission racketeering, the PTA asked: ‘When did PTA chairmen become admission officers of the Federal Ministry of Education?’
The PTA said in a statement jointly signed by its representatives, including King’s College PTA Chairman, Peter Oluwaseye, if any of its officials engaged in admission racketeering , such a person should be identified, investigated and prosecuted rather than casting aspersion on the wider PTA structure.
The association insisted that its opposition to the concession policy was not against development but what it described as inadequate transparency and stakeholder consultation.
On the N100 million to N150 million in legal fees alleged to have been paid in relation to the King’s College concession, the PTA asked Alausa to disclose the court, suit number, parties to the case and evidence of the payment.
‘If such payment was made, let the evidence be produced. If no such payment was made, then the allegation should be withdrawn,’ it said.
The PTA also rejected any suggestion that its members and workers protesting the concession were ‘rented protesters,’ insisting that parents have legitimate concerns about the future of their children and public education.
ýThe association argued that disagreement with government policy should not automatically be interpreted as sabotage.
ýThe controversy has already affected the wider Federal Unity School system, with workers’ unions protesting the concession and the government subsequently agreeing to a two-week suspension of its implementation and setting up a seven-member committee to review the arrangement.
ýThe PTA chairmen said their central demand is for transparency over the concession agreement, insisting that King’s College remained a national public institution regardless of its management arrangement.
They called on the government to publish the complete concession agreement, including its duration, financial commitments, performance indicators, termination provisions and safeguards for students, teachers and parents.
ýThe chairmen also questioned what the reported 35-year arrangement would transfer to the concessionaire and what responsibilities would remain directly with the Federal Government.
ýThe PTA said it was not opposed to KCOBA contributing financially to the development of the college.
ýRather, it argued that alumni contributions should not be interpreted as ownership of a public institution.
ýThe government had maintained that admission into King’s College would continue under Unity College policies, including national representation and the prescribed entry process.
An alumnus of King’s College and former Nigerian Bar Association(NBA) President Olumide Akpata, yesterday backed the concession of the institution.
Akpata said on a television programme that KCOBA indicated interest in running the college, which described as the old boys’ ‘mother’ to save it.
ý He said: ”We have not bought the school. The school has not been offered to us, and we are not interested in buying our school.
”KCOBA could not watch it deteriorate after decades of contributing to its development.
‘The expression Alma Mater is a Latin expression which literally translates to ‘nourishing mother.’ You must understand that that school is our mother, and no son will sit idly by and watch his mother deteriorate in such a dastardly manner.’
Akpata recalled that the old boys had spent billions of naira over the years renovating buildings, upgrading sports facilities, installing generators, establishing an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) laboratory and providing a library equipped for visually impaired students.
‘We have renovated every building standing in that school at one point in time or another. We have redone the sports pitch, put tartan tracks, put drainage under the football pitch. What have we not done?’ the former NBA president said.
Akpata explained that the old boys initially played a complementary role in the school’s development but decided to seek a formalised partnership because of the competing demands on government.
‘ We went to government, we said, ‘We know you have a lot on your plate. We are ready to help. We have been helping, and we have demonstrated capacity. Going forward, can we formalise this engagement?’
‘We are going to raise money to make sure that we upgrade infrastructure. We are going to raise money to make sure that the learning experience of our boys will be top-notch, world-class.’
On concerns over consultation with stakeholders, Akpata said the Federal Ministry had engaged unions during the process, adding that KCOB remained willing to meet teachers, parents and other stakeholders.
‘I don’t think the door has been shut on conversations and engagement. As we have said from time to time, we are ready to continue the conversation,’ he said.
Addressing allegations of admission racketeering and excessive levies at the school, Akpata said he had not personally witnessed such practices but acknowledged that he had heard the allegations.
‘I cannot put hand to heart and tell you that I have witnessed anything of the sort, but we have heard these stories so many times,’ he said.