Author: user user

Fura da Nono is one of Northern Nigeria’s most cherished traditional foods and beverages. It is a nutritious, refreshing, culturally significant combination of millet dough balls (fura) and fermented cow’s milk (nono).

This nutritious drink is very popular among the Hausa and Fulani communities, and has remained an important part of Northern Nigerian food culture for generations.

The traditional drink represents the indigenous food knowledge, pastoral traditions, local agriculture, food processing and community identity of Northern Nigeria

From the millet fields and cattle-rearing traditions of Northern Nigeria, Fura da Nono is more than a traditional drink; it is a living expression of Nigeria’s rich culinary heritage and a worthy candidate for consideration under UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage framework.

In the bustling markets, neighbourhoods and roadside food stalls of Northern Nigeria, this traditional delicacy continues to hold its place in the country’s culinary landscape.

Served chilled or at ambient temperature, depending on local preference and preparation, Fura as it is popularly called, is a distinctive combination of soft, spiced millet dough balls and naturally fermented cow’s milk.

Its creamy consistency, slightly sour dairy flavour and characteristic aroma, make it one of the most recognisable traditional food products associated with the Hausa and Fulani communities.

Yet, beyond its refreshing taste and nutritional appeal lies a much deeper story of indigenous food science, agricultural adaptation, pastoral culture, women’s entrepreneurship and the intergenerational transmission of culinary knowledge.

At a time when countries are increasingly recognising food as an important expression of cultural identity, Fura da Nono deserves greater attention as part of Nigeria’s efforts to document, preserve, promote and internationally showcase its indigenous culinary traditions.

The name itself tells the story of its two principal components. Fura refers to the cooked, spiced millet dough formed into small balls, while Nono refers to the fermented milk traditionally obtained from cow’s milk.

Together, they produce a cereal-and-dairy delicacy that has remained an important part of food culture in Northern Nigeria.

The precise date or individual responsible for the invention of Fura da Nono is not established in available historical records. It is therefore more accurate to understand its origins through the long-standing agricultural and pastoral traditions of the Northern, particularly the relationship between Fulani cattle-rearing communities and the grain-farming populations of the region.

For generations, cattle have been central to Fulani pastoral livelihoods, providing milk and other resources that support household nutrition and local economies. In communities where fresh milk was readily available, fermentation became an important indigenous method of processing and preserving milk, extending its usability and creating products with distinctive flavours and textures.

At the same time, millet became an important cereal in the semi-arid environments of Northern Nigeria.

Its suitability to relatively dry growing conditions made it a significant component of traditional diets. The combination of millet and fermented milk represents a practical relationship between the region’s agricultural resources, food preferences and traditional methods of processing available ingredients.

Historical and food-science literature identifies Fura as a traditional staple among Hausa and Fulani communities, with millet, particularly the variety locally known as gero, serving as a principal ingredient.

Fura da Nono is not simply an accidental mixture of two ingredients, but a reflection of generations of accumulated knowledge about cereal processing, dairy fermentation, flavour development, food preservation and the use of locally available agricultural products.

Although closely associated with Fulani culinary culture, Fura da Nono has also become part of the wider food culture of Northern Nigeria, particularly among Hausa-speaking communities and other populations that have adopted and adapted the delicacy.

Its popularity demonstrates how food traditions can travel across communities while retaining important elements of their original cultural identity.

The preparation of Fura da Nono is a traditional culinary process involving several stages of food processing. It requires knowledge of grain selection, milling, spice combinations, dough consistency, cooking, pounding and dairy fermentation.

The process begins with millet grains, which are carefully selected, cleaned and washed to remove dirt and unwanted materials. Depending on the preferred preparation method, the grains may be dehulled before being dried and milled into flour.

The millet flour is then combined with water and traditional spices.

Ginger is particularly important, while cloves and dried pepper may also be included, depending on the recipe and the producer’s preference.

These ingredients contribute to the characteristic aroma, flavour and warmth of the finished product.

Water is gradually incorporated into the spiced flour to form a firm dough. The dough is shaped by hand into balls of varying sizes and cooked in boiling water until properly done.

The cooked millet dough is subsequently pounded in a mortar using a pestle, with small quantities of water added as necessary to achieve a smooth, cohesive and slightly elastic consistency. It is then shaped into balls and lightly dusted with millet flour to prevent sticking.

The second major component is nono, the traditional fermented cow’s milk. Fresh milk is fermented through the activity of naturally occurring or deliberately introduced microorganisms, depending on the production method. Fermentation produces lactic acid, which gives the milk its characteristic sour taste and changes its texture.

In traditional dairy processing, the cream may be separated from the fermented milk. The cream, locally known in Fulani dairy culture as man shanu, is processed into traditional butter, while the remaining fermented milk is consumed as nono.

To serve Fura da Nono, the millet balls are broken into smaller pieces or mashed and combined with the fermented milk. The mixture is stirred until the desired consistency is achieved. Some consumers prefer a relatively smooth drink, while others enjoy it with small pieces of millet dough remaining.

Sugar may be added to taste, although this is a matter of personal and regional preference.

The result is usually a distinctive cereal-and-dairy preparation that combines the earthy taste of millet, the aromatic character of spices and the tangy creaminess of fermented milk.

Essentially, the preparation is not entirely uniform. Recipes, spice proportions, textures, fermentation methods and serving preferences may vary between families, producers and communities.

Such variations are part of the living nature of culinary traditions.

One of the important characteristics of Fura da Nono is its combination of two food groups with complementary nutritional contributions.

Millet is a nutrient-containing cereal that provides carbohydrates, dietary fibre, plant protein and minerals. Its carbohydrate content makes it an important source of dietary energy, while its fibre contributes to normal digestive function and helps support a balanced diet.

Millet also contains minerals such as magnesium, phosphorus and iron, although the quantities available in a serving depend on the millet variety, processing method and portion size.

The grain contains B-group vitamins and various bioactive plant compounds. Its nutritional composition makes it a valuable indigenous cereal, particularly in communities where millet has traditionally served as a staple food.

The nono component contributes another important dimension to the nutritional profile. Fermented cow’s milk provides high-quality dairy protein, calcium, phosphorus and other nutrients associated with milk.

Protein is essential for the growth, maintenance and repair of body tissues, while calcium and phosphorus contribute to the development and maintenance of healthy bones and teeth.

Dairy products can also provide vitamin B12 and riboflavin, although the precise nutritional composition of nono varies with the milk used and the processing conditions.

Fermentation is another important aspect of its nutritional and technological value.

During fermentation, microorganisms convert some of the lactose in milk into lactic acid. This process produces the characteristic sour taste and influences the texture and microbial composition of the product.

Depending on the microorganisms involved and the handling conditions, fermented milk may contain beneficial live cultures.

However, not every traditionally fermented product has a standardised probiotic content. The presence of beneficial microorganisms must be established through appropriate scientific testing.

The combination of millet and fermented milk therefore provides carbohydrates, protein, fibre and minerals within one traditional food preparation. Its nutritional contribution, however, depends on the proportions of fura and nono, the quantity consumed and whether additional sugar is introduced.

Fura da Nono can form part of a varied and balanced diet, but it should not be presented as a cure for any disease or as a substitute for medical treatment.

Its nutritional value is particularly relevant to discussions about food security, local food systems and the promotion of indigenous crops.

Millet is an important climate-adapted cereal in many dryland agricultural systems, while traditional dairy processing provides opportunities to add value to locally produced milk.

By bringing these ingredients together, Fura da Nono illustrates how traditional food knowledge can contribute to dietary diversity and the utilisation of indigenous agricultural resources.

An essential part of the Fura da Nono story is the contribution of women who have sustained its production, processing and distribution across generations.

In many Fulani communities, women have traditionally played significant roles in milk processing and dairy trade.

Knowledge of milking, fermentation, cream separation, butter production and the preparation of nono is often transmitted within families, particularly from mothers and older female relatives to younger generations.

Women are also central to the preparation and sale of Fura da Nono in markets, neighbourhoods and other commercial spaces. Through small-scale businesses, they have helped maintain the availability of the delicacy while generating income for their households.

Their contribution extends beyond selling a traditional drink. They are custodians of specialised knowledge, including the selection of ingredients, control of fermentation, determination of product consistency, use of traditional utensils and understanding of consumer preferences.

This knowledge is not always written down or formally taught in institutions. It is frequently acquired through observation, participation and repeated practice.

Such informal systems of learning are precisely the kinds of cultural transmission that make traditional food practices valuable subjects for intangible cultural heritage documentation.

The women who prepare and sell Fura da Nono should therefore be recognised not merely as food vendors but as practitioners and knowledge bearers whose experiences, techniques and oral histories deserve documentation and preservation.

Fura da Nono occupies an important place within this diversity because it represents the intersection of cereal agriculture and pastoral dairy culture.

Its preparation preserves knowledge about millet cultivation, grain processing, traditional spices, milk fermentation and food presentation. Its consumption reflects established dietary preferences, while its commercial distribution supports small-scale food enterprises.

The tradition also offers an opportunity to tell a more comprehensive story about Northern Nigerian food culture beyond the familiar narratives of popular dishes.

For international audiences, Fura da Nono can provide insight into the communities that developed practical methods of combining locally available ingredients into nutritious and culturally meaningful foods.

It is also an opportunity to promote Nigerian food journalism, food tourism, travel journalism encourage investment in local millet and dairy value chains, and create wider markets for indigenous food product

However, its heritage value should not be measured only by its commercial potential.

Let’s visit the kitchen

Recipe for 6 servings:

– 6 Cups Millet grains or millet flour

– 8 Fresh gingers

– 10 Cloves

– 1 teaspoon dried pepper (optional)

– Water

– A little millet flour for dusting

For the Nono

– 6 Cups Fresh cow’s milk, preferably safely pasteurised milk for household preparation

– A suitable starter culture or previously prepared nono from a hygienically controlled source

Method

Step 1: Preparing the millet

The millet grains are carefully sorted to remove stones, dirt and other unwanted materials. They are washed and, where necessary, dehulled before being dried and milled into flour.

Step 2: Adding traditional spices

The millet flour is combined with ground ginger, cloves and, depending on individual preference, a little dried pepper.

These spices give fura its characteristic aroma and distinctive taste. The proportions vary according to family recipes and regional preferences.

Step 3: Making the dough

Water is gradually added to the spiced millet flour until a firm; workable dough is formed. The dough is divided into portions and shaped into balls.

Step 4: Cooking the millet balls

The shaped dough balls are placed in boiling water and cooked until thoroughly done. They are then removed and allowed to cool sufficiently for handling.

Step 5: Pounding and shaping

The cooked millet dough is transferred into a traditional mortar and pounded with a pestle. Small quantities of water may be introduced during pounding to produce a smooth, cohesive and slightly elastic consistency.

The resulting dough is divided into smaller balls and lightly dusted with millet flour to prevent sticking. These are the traditional fura balls.

Step 6: Preparing the fermented milk

The second component, nono, is produced through the fermentation of cow’s milk. Traditionally, fermentation relies on established indigenous practices and naturally occurring or previously introduced lactic acid bacteria.

The milk is allowed to ferment under controlled hygienic conditions until it develops its characteristic mildly sour taste and texture. Where traditional fermentation is practised, the preparation should be protected from contamination, with appropriate attention to temperature, cleanliness and safe handling.

In traditional Fulani dairy processing, the cream may be separated from the fermented milk. This cream, known as man shanu, is processed into traditional butter, while the remaining fermented milk is consumed as nono.

Step 7: Combining the Fura and Nono

To prepare the drink, the fura balls are broken into smaller pieces and placed in a clean bowl or serving container. The fermented milk is poured over them.

The mixture is stirred and gently mashed until the desired consistency is achieved. Some consumers prefer a smooth, creamy drink, while others prefer to retain small pieces of millet dough.

Sugar may be added according to individual taste, although it is not essential to the traditional preparation.

Step 8: Serving

Fura da Nono can be served chilled or at ambient temperature, depending on local preference. It is traditionally enjoyed as a refreshing meal accompaniment, a filling snack or a nourishing drink.

The preparation is not completely standardised. The proportions of millet, spices and fermented milk, as well as the texture and serving style, vary among households and producers. These differences are important expressions of the living nature of the tradition.

Conversations with Nigerian delegates attending the annual Nigeria-Belgium Luxembourg Business Forum revealed strong support for retaining more value at home. But they also reinforced a practical truth: Nigeria cannot legislate value addition without building the industrial system that makes it possible.

Over breakfast, the conversation began with cocoa. At lunch, it moved to minerals, machinery and industrial power. By dinner, we were discussing finance, European buyers and the uncomfortable possibility that a well-intentioned export restriction could harm the very Nigerian producers it was designed to support.

I am writing from Brussels, where I have been engaging with business leaders and institutional representatives attending the ongoing Nigeria Belgium Luxembourg Business Forum. Many have travelled from Nigeria to explore partnerships in agriculture, manufacturing, energy, maritime logistics, finance, technology and other sectors.

Amid the formal panels and scheduled business meetings, one subject has repeatedly found its way into our informal conversations: Nigeria’s proposed requirement that raw materials receive at least 30 per cent domestic value addition before export. I was amazed by how engaged the delegates were. They did not dispute the diagnosis behind the proposal. On the contrary, there was broad frustration with an economic structure in which Nigeria exports cocoa beans but imports branded chocolate; ships minerals abroad but purchases the machinery and industrial components produced from them; and supplies raw materials while employment, technology and processing margins accumulate elsewhere.

The desire to retain more value in Nigeria is real. It is not an abstract policy slogan. It is shared by entrepreneurs who want to manufacture, exporters who want to move up the value chain and professionals who understand the opportunities Nigeria loses when productive conversion happens elsewhere.

Yet the more we discussed the proposed legislation, the clearer the central question became:

Can Nigeria require value addition before it has built the factory, supplied the electricity, financed the machinery and secured the buyer?

The principle deserves support. The instrument requires careful design.

Breakfast and the cocoa question

Our breakfast conversation was particularly relevant in Belgium. Belgium occupies an important place in the international cocoa and chocolate economy. Nigerian cocoa enters European supply chains through ports, warehouses, traders and processors. Yet much of the highest commercial value is created after the commodity has left the producing country. Nobody around the table argued that this pattern should continue indefinitely.

But cocoa also illustrates why a universal percentage can create more questions than answers. What constitutes 30 per cent value addition? Is it measured by weight, production cost, market value or processing stage? Does fermenting, drying and grading cocoa qualify? Must beans be converted into liquor, butter or powder? Would finished chocolate be required? At which point has the statutory threshold been crossed?

The same difficulty appears across other commodities. Cutting and polishing a mineral is not equivalent to refining it into an industrial input. Processing sesame, cashew, timber or lithium requires different technologies, energy requirements, capital commitments and markets. A single percentage may offer political simplicity while producing commercial confusion.

My view, shared by several delegates, is that Nigeria needs commodity-specific value-chain assessments before imposing restrictions. For each product, the government should establish existing processing capacity, energy requirements, technology gaps, access to finance, viable markets and the time businesses will need to adjust. Thirty per cent may be achievable for one commodity, insufficiently ambitious for another and temporarily impractical for a third. Industrial policy must be bold enough to change behaviour but sophisticated enough to recognise different economic realities.

At lunch, electricity entered the conversation

By lunchtime, our conversation had moved from the legal requirement to the physical conditions of production. Factories do not run on legislation. Processing is energy-intensive. A Nigerian manufacturer operating with unreliable grid electricity and expensive self-generation may be legally required to add value but remain commercially unable to compete with a foreign processor enjoying dependable and cheaper power. This is not a theoretical concern.

Across Africa, governments are using export restrictions, tax incentives and access to mineral deposits to encourage local processing. Investors broadly understand the ambition. But they repeatedly identify affordable and dependable electricity as a decisive constraint. South Africa possesses enormous mineral reserves yet has lost much of its ferrochrome-processing capacity as electricity costs and reliability undermined competitiveness. Guinea has become a leading bauxite producer but will need several times its present electricity generation to realise its aluminium-processing ambitions.

The lesson for Nigeria is straightforward. For every commodity made subject to a processing obligation, the government should publish an accompanying industrial-capacity plan. It should address electricity, water, industrial land, transport, storage, waste management and access to the relevant technology. Otherwise, the policy would not create value addition. It would simply transfer Nigeria’s infrastructure deficit to producers and exporters. Power must precede prohibition.

The machinery still needs finance

Finance became the next subject. Domestic processing requires machinery, construction finance and working capital. Exporters must hold inventory through longer production cycles. Small farmers and artisanal producers need aggregation systems capable of delivering consistent volumes and quality. Yet the structure of Nigerian finance remains poorly suited to long-term industrial development.

A processor cannot sensibly finance machinery with short-term, high-cost credit. An international investor cannot price a twenty-year project if electricity tariffs, export rules or foreign-exchange arrangements may change after construction begins. The Federal Government has said that private capital should finance Nigeria’s next phase of growth rather than additional sovereign borrowing. That is a reasonable objective. But private investors will not finance industrial transformation merely because the government prefers private capital. They will require investable projects, appropriate finance, capable counterparties, predictable rules and credible routes to market.

Nigeria must therefore connect the value-addition proposal to credit guarantees, equipment leasing, development-finance facilities, export credit and blended-finance structures. The purpose should not be to subsidise factories indefinitely. It should be to bridge the difficult period between industrial ambition and commercially sustainable production. This is also where Belgian and Luxembourg institutions can contribute. Belgium brings industrial technology, logistics, commodity-market knowledge, and access to European buyers. Luxembourg brings expertise in investment funds, cross-border finance and structured capital. But those capabilities must be organised around real projects, not general expressions of interest.

Dinner and the danger facing primary producers

Our dinner discussion turned to the people most likely to be overlooked: farmers, miners and other primary producers. An export restriction introduced before domestic processors can absorb available production may reduce competition for raw materials. Farm-gate or mine-gate prices could fall. Large processors might gain access to captive supply while smaller producers lose the option of selling to foreign buyers. That would transform a policy presented as economic sovereignty into a transfer of income from primary producers to protected processors. Nigeria must not allow that to happen.

Before applying restrictions, the government should conduct transparent domestic-capacity tests. If local processors cannot purchase available production at commercially reasonable prices, producers should retain access to export markets. Independent monitoring should publish domestic processing capacity, utilisation rates, purchasing volumes, producer prices, and export demand. The purpose of value addition is to enlarge national income. It is not to redistribute existing income towards a small group of industrial beneficiaries.

My conversations with European counterparts

The responsibility does not rest with Nigeria alone. In my conversations with European counterparts during the forum, I have made the point that Europe cannot praise African industrialisation while preserving commercial arrangements that favour the importation of unprocessed African commodities. European buyers can support processing in Nigeria through long-term purchase agreements. Equipment manufacturers can provide training, maintenance and local assembly. Financial institutions can offer patient capital and risk-sharing. Importers and standards bodies can help Nigerian companies meet European safety, traceability and environmental requirements before new factories begin production.

Belgium is particularly relevant. Its ports, cocoa industry, commodity-trading networks, industrial engineering, and logistics capabilities connect directly to Nigerian value chains. However, a fair industrial partnership must go beyond selling European machinery into Nigeria. It should develop Nigerian suppliers, train engineers, transfer knowledge and guarantee meaningful market access for the processed products those factories eventually produce. Fair trade is not achieved merely when Africa processes more. It is achieved when African processed goods can enter valuable markets and compete on reasonable terms.

Not every factory must be national

Another point arising from our discussions concerned regional scale. Not every African country can efficiently process every commodity. Some industrial facilities require volumes, power and markets larger than one national economy can provide. AfCFTA should therefore form part of the value-addition architecture.

Nigeria could host facilities supplied partly by neighbouring producers. Another African country may develop specialist processing capacity serving Nigerian enterprises. Regional power pools, transport corridors, and harmonised standards can make investments viable where isolated national projects cannot. The objective should be African value addition. It should not be 54 countries attempting to reproduce every stage of every value chain. Economic sovereignty is strengthened through strategic interdependence, not industrial isolation.

The conversation after the forum

The engagement of our delegates has convinced me that Nigeria’s business community is ready for a serious value-addition conversation. These entrepreneurs are not asking to preserve an extractive economic model. Many want to manufacture, process and export higher-value goods. They understand that Nigeria cannot achieve prosperity by remaining principally a supplier of raw materials. But they also know from experience that ambition without infrastructure becomes another cost imposed on enterprise.

Nigeria’s proposed legislation begins with the correct diagnosis. Exporting unprocessed resources indefinitely will not create the jobs, technology, and productive capabilities the country needs. But diagnosis is not execution. A functioning value-addition strategy requires a complete conversion chain: Raw-material endowment, reliable power, processing technology, appropriate finance, skilled operators, competitive logistics, verified standards, committed buyers and measurable national value.

Break any link and the percentage mandate may become an obstacle rather than an industrial policy. Nigeria should therefore implement the proposed requirement gradually and commodity by commodity. It should publish capacity assessments, protect primary producers, provide realistic transition periods and connect export restrictions to measurable infrastructure and financing milestones.

As we break into two groups for company visits, one heading for Antwerp to take a tour around cocoa handling, warehousing, and logistics, and the other heading for Kortrijk to visit technology, innovation, and industrial hubs, I hope the Couch Conversation will be consistent. Success should not be measured by the volume of raw exports prevented. It should be measured by factories operating, workers trained, domestic suppliers developed, processed products exported, and national income increased. As our breakfast, lunch, and dinner conversations repeatedly reminded me, 30 per cent can be written into legislation. The factory, the electricity, the finance, and the market must still be built.

. Nweke is an International Trade Consultant and author of Economic Diplomacy of the Diaspora. A former Belgian politician of Nigerian origin, born in Igbuzo, Delta State, Nigeria, he was a 2014 candidate for Member of the European Parliament. A third-term Municipal Legislator at Ostend City Council, Belgium, since 2006, his portfolio included the Economy, Social Policy, Equality Affairs and International Development. Collins features regularly on TV Continental Lagos as Global Affairs Analyst, on Channels TV as Foreign Policy Commentator, on TRT World Istanbul as African Affairs Analyst, among other Afrocentric media houses, including BusinessDay Nigeria