RMD to deliver keynote at Nigeria digital content regulation conference

VETERAN actor and filmmaker Richard Mofe-Damijo will give the keynote speech at the sixth International Peace Anyiam-Osigwe Nigeria Digital Content Regulation Conference.

Industry leaders will gather to discuss the future of filmmaking and content distribution as the digital landscape evolves at the event.

Mofe-Damijo, also known as RMD, will speak at the conference on 18 and 19 November at the MUSON Centre in Lagos. He is the first male practitioner from the film industry to deliver the keynote, after Mo Abudu in 2024 and Bolanle Austen-Peters in 2025.

The event organised by the National Film and Video Censors Board (NFVCB), will focus on the theme ‘Film and Content Production in the Digital Era: Balancing Regulation and Innovation.’

The conference will bring together filmmakers, streaming platforms, distributors, exhibitors, policymakers, and academics to discuss how Nigeria’s creative industries can adapt to new technology while addressing regulation and audience protection.

RMD has worked for over three decades in acting, filmmaking, journalism, publishing, and public service. He has appeared in more than 60 film and TV productions, making him one of the most recognisable figures in Nigeria’s screen industry.

Before joining the entertainment industry, he worked as a journalist for newspapers like The Guardian and Concord. He later founded MISTER, which his biography calls Nigeria’s first all-gloss men’s lifestyle magazine, and then moved into public relations and film production with his companies White Water Limited and RMD Productions.

He has also worked in government, first as a special adviser and then as Delta State’s commissioner for culture and tourism. This gave him direct experience with the policy issues facing Nigeria’s cultural sector. Through the Richard Mofe-Damijo Foundation, he has supported projects to help new talent and create more opportunities in the creative industries.

Dr Shaibu Husseini, executive director and chief executive of the NFVCB, said RMD’s experience in entertainment, business, and public administration makes him especially well suited to speak at the conference.

‘RMD represents a distinctive blend of creative excellence, entrepreneurial experience and public service,’ Husseini said. ‘His journey across film, media, business and cultural administration offers valuable perspectives on the opportunities before Nigeria’s creative industries and the policy conversations required to sustain their growth.’

Dr Husseini said the conference will look at how regulation can adapt to new digital production and distribution methods without limiting creativity.

‘As the boundaries between film, television and digital content continue to evolve, our challenge as regulators is to create an environment where innovation can flourish while protecting audiences, promoting responsible content and supporting the sustainable development of the industry,’ he said.

This debate is happening as streaming services and digital platforms change how African films and TV shows are financed, distributed, and watched. For Nigeria, where film is a key part of cultural identity and international image, these changes bring both business opportunities and regulatory challenges.

The two-day conference will look at new trends in content production, digital distribution, streaming technology, and the policies needed to help the industry grow.

The annual event is held in honour of Peace Anyiam-Osigwe, the filmmaker and founder of the Africa Movie Academy Awards, a prominent advocate for African cinema and its international recognition.

Insecurity: Senator Karimi hails DSS director’s professionalism in Kogi

The Senator representing Kogi West Senatorial District, Sunday Steve Karimi, has commended the Director of the Department of State Services (DSS) in Kogi State, Bashar, for his professionalism and efforts to tackle banditry, kidnapping and other security challenges in the state.

Karimi, in a statement made available to journalists in Lokoja, praised the DSS director for his proactive approach to security operations, particularly his involvement with field personnel in efforts to rid the state’s forests of criminal elements.

The senator also commended Bashar for maintaining political neutrality and demonstrating professionalism in handling political matters, regardless of party affiliations.

He noted that the DSS director had consistently worked to maintain a peaceful political atmosphere in Kogi State by preventing thuggery, intimidation and violence during political campaigns and other public engagements.

Karimi cited an incident during one of his recently concluded town hall meetings in Kabba, where suspected hoodlums allegedly dressed in police uniforms attempted to disrupt the gathering in the early hours of the morning.

According to him, the DSS director swiftly deployed personnel to the area after receiving intelligence about the incident, preventing the suspected hoodlums from disrupting the programme or causing damage.

He said the prompt intervention of the security operatives forced the suspected hoodlums to flee before they could carry out their alleged mission.

The senator described the response as an example of effective intelligence gathering, timely intervention and responsible security leadership.

Karimi said the DSS director’s commitment to protecting lives and property, as well as his non-partisan approach to political security, deserved recognition and encouragement.

He urged security agencies to sustain their collaboration and remain professional in carrying out their responsibilities to ensure lasting peace, political stability, and security across Kogi State.

Beyond FGN securities: Understanding the long-term diversification of pension assets

Nigeria’s pension industry managed N5.9 trillion. By August 2026, it held N31.8 trillion, with N3.8 trillion added in the first eight months of this year alone. Behind that headline is a story of an industry that started cautiously and is now learning to invest like a mature retirement system. From the perspective of the Pension Fund Operators Association of Nigeria (PenOp), this evolution reflects the progress made in Nigeria’s pension industry and the continuing work required to deepen investment opportunities while safeguarding contributors’ retirement savings.

Born in a market with few options

When the Contributory Pension Scheme took off, Nigeria’s capital market offered little to choose from. The corporate bond market was small. Infrastructure investment vehicles barely existed. Long-dated instruments that could match retirement liabilities decades away were scarce, and private funds with the governance and track record institutional investors demand were scarcer still.

Federal Government securities filled the gap. They offered capital protection, predictable income, deep liquidity and long maturities. For years, high interest rates meant they also delivered strong returns. For a young industry whose first duty was to protect workers’ savings, leaning on FGN paper was a rational response to the market, not a failure of imagination.

That foundation still matters. FGN securities hold N17.80 trillion, more than half of all pension assets. But a share is only a snapshot. The better question is what has been growing around it.

The portfolio starts to grow up

Over the decade to August 2026, pension assets expanded roughly 5.4 times, and almost every other asset class grew faster. Domestic equities rose about twelve-fold and now stand at N6.32 trillion. Corporate debt grew 7.5-fold. Infrastructure funds and private equity, which began from almost nothing, now hold N344.62 billion and N267.01 billion respectively.

Regulation has moved with the market. In February 2026, PenCom issued a revised framework for investing pension assets. It raised equity limits across all RSA fund types and made room for infrastructure and private equity beyond the old five per cent ceiling. In September 2026, the Pension Industry Infrastructure Consortium committed N241 billion to infrastructure, a signal that the industry means to back long-term projects. And in March 2026, pension fund returns beat headline inflation for the first time in seven years. For PenOp, these developments reflect the importance of creating an investment environment in which pension funds can access a broader range of quality assets while maintaining the discipline required to protect contributors’ savings.

The progress has not been even

The story is not one of uniform success, and the gaps are instructive. Real estate fell from N212.37 billion to N132.81 billion. Foreign equities rose from N116 billion to N281 billion, yet their share of investment assets fell from 2.0 per cent to 0.9 per cent, because the overall pool grew so quickly. Offshore exposure is now the clearest gap in the portfolio.

These numbers show where the next chapter will be written. Geography is the largest unexploited source of diversification, since less than one per cent of the portfolio sits in foreign equities. Real estate’s decline is a reminder that illiquid, hard-to-value assets need patient and careful handling.

Every pension system walks this road

Nigeria is following a path older systems have already travelled, usually from the same starting point.

Chile, whose 1981 reform inspired pension systems around the world, began with portfolios dominated by government paper and bank deposits. Over the following decades, regulators widened investment limits, allowed more equities and foreign assets, and introduced multifunds so younger savers could take more growth risk than those nearing retirement. Mexico’s Afores followed a similar arc, moving from heavy reliance on government securities towards equities, foreign investments and structured vehicles for infrastructure and real estate.

The numbers show where the road can lead. Australia’s superannuation system, built on mandatory contributions from 1992, held A$4.77 trillion at June 2026, up 9.5 per cent in a year. Contributions for the year reached A$236.3 billion, and the compulsory contribution rate hit its final legislated level of 12 per cent in July 2025. Scale like that gives a pension system real influence over what gets financed.

Canada tells the story of a deliberate pivot. Before the late-1990s reforms, public pension money was largely lent to provincial governments. The creation of CPP Investments, with an independent professional mandate, changed that. Its net assets reached C$793.3 billion at 31 March 2026, up from C$714.4 billion a year earlier, with returns helped by public equities and by energy and infrastructure holdings. Its ten-year annualised net return stood at 8.4 per cent at the end of 2025. Since it began investing in 1999, it has added C$539.4 billion in cumulative net income to the fund. A system that once lent to governments became a global investor in equities, private markets and infrastructure.

Africa is moving the same way, as Kenya, Ghana and others widen their pension investment frameworks while their capital markets deepen.

The pattern repeats. Systems begin with safety, expand as markets and regulation mature, and eventually draw returns from many sources. Nigeria is early in that sequence and heading in the right direction.

Why diversification is a marathon

Diversification does not mean abandoning government bonds, and it does not mean collecting asset types for their own sake. It means spreading exposure across asset types, issuers, sectors, maturities and geographies so that no single source of risk dominates. Government bonds tend to do well when interest rates fall. Equities track corporate profit growth. Infrastructure often delivers inflation-linked income over decades. Together, they smooth the ride through economic cycles.

Several conditions set the pace.

Investable supply. Pension funds need assets with sound governance, fair valuation, adequate returns for the risk and strong legal protection, and enough of them to absorb institutional money without distorting the market. Supply is growing, but it must grow further.

Liquidity. A pension fund promises that contributions will reliably turn into retirement income. Illiquid assets such as infrastructure and private equity must therefore be sized carefully. This is core fiduciary duty, not bureaucratic caution.

Skills and governance. Buying sovereign bonds is simple. Equity research, credit analysis, project evaluation, private-market due diligence and manager selection are not. Without those capabilities, a complex portfolio does not reduce risk. It moves risk somewhere harder to see and measure.

Infrastructure that earns its place. Retirees’ benefits stretch over two or three decades, just as infrastructure cash flows do, which makes the match natural. But projects must be financially viable. Pension money should not be directed into weak projects in the name of national development.

The same logic covers alternatives. Private equity, real estate and specialised funds offer lower correlation with public markets and exposure to growth beyond the stock exchange, but they carry valuation, manager and governance risks. They should be an additional layer in the portfolio, not a destination for money leaving FGN securities.

What it means for contributors and for Nigeria

For RSA holders, the point is simple. Every allocation decision should serve one goal: a retirement balance large enough to live on decently. Diversification is a tool for building savings that can withstand inflation, interest-rate swings and economic shocks across a working lifetime. Returns finally beating inflation in March 2026, after seven lean years, show what a more balanced approach can deliver.

The effect reaches beyond individual savers. A pool above N31.8 trillion is among the most powerful forces in Nigeria’s capital market. Where it flows shapes the depth of the stock market, the growth of corporate bonds, the funding of long-term infrastructure and the development of private markets. Done well, this becomes a virtuous circle: pension money backs quality opportunities, those opportunities grow the economy, and a stronger economy produces better retirement outcomes.

The industry has come from a market with few choices to one with a widening menu. Its task now is to move deliberately, at a pace set by asset quality, liquidity and institutional capability. PenOp believes that if the industry holds that discipline, the next chapter of Nigeria’s pension story could prove as consequential as the first.

Reps member unveils development blueprint for Ogun constituency

The member representing Yewa North/Imeko-Afon Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, Gboyega Nasir Isiaka, has unveiled a 150-page development blueprint outlining a long-term vision for the economic and social transformation of the constituency.

The document, titled The Living Borders, was presented to stakeholders at Comprehensive High School, Ayetoro, Ogun State, as part of an engagement convened by the lawmaker to articulate a development pathway for the two local government areas over the weekend.

The development agenda, which followed extensive work on the constituency’s opportunities, challenges and development priorities, is intended to serve as a reference document for identifying its economic advantages, addressing existing gaps and providing direction for sustainable growth.

Speaking at the presentation, Isiaka described the initiative as an expression of what he called ‘development-focused representation’, arguing that meaningful development required a clear plan capable of connecting present interventions with the aspirations of future generations.

‘We know that we cannot do development without a plan. We need a strong development plan, development agenda or development guide, and we need a positive development guide,’ he said.

Explaining the thinking behind the document, the lawmaker said the objective was to identify and bring together the advantages and opportunities available to the constituency in a manner that could guide collective action and development planning.

He stressed that the pursuit of development must take account of both immediate needs and the long-term consequences of decisions taken today.

‘Developing is when you have the best of the day without compromising what the future will be like. That is exactly what we are trying to do and what we are aiming for,’ he said.

Among the major issues highlighted in the development agenda is the economic potential of the constituency’s international border with the Republic of Benin. Isiaka advocated the establishment of a free trade zone to enable Yewa North and Imeko-Afon to derive greater economic benefits from their geographical position.

He also identified the need for tertiary institutions in both local government areas, describing access to higher education as an important component of human capital development and the creation of opportunities for young people.

The proposals reflect the broader ambition to reposition the border communities as centres of economic activity, with improved infrastructure, education and investment opportunities.

The public presentation also provided an opportunity for stakeholders to engage with the development proposals and contribute their perspectives on the constituency’s future. Representatives of the Community Development Committee, traditional institutions, the League of Imams and Alfas, and the Christian Association of Nigeria participated in the interactive session.

The gathering included traditional rulers, Baales, former and serving lawmakers, All Progressives Congress chieftains, religious leaders, artisans, traders and youths.

The unveiling was also accompanied by an account of Isiaka’s four-year representation in the House of Representatives. He said his constituency interventions had covered all 21 wards, with projects and programmes spanning healthcare, education, infrastructure, empowerment, skills acquisition and employment.

He listed among the interventions the construction of a mini stadium and police station in Oja-Odan, provision of boreholes in six communities, installation of 1,200 solar streetlights, renovation of primary healthcare centres and the ongoing construction of a Computer-Based Test centre, which he said was 95 per cent complete.

The lawmaker said the development agenda was intended to provide a broader framework for the constituency’s progress, beyond individual projects and interventions.

He urged residents and stakeholders to take ownership of the development vision and work collectively towards its realisation.

Assess, Access, Their, There

Sample 1: ‘Akande, perceived as one of the closest allies to the President, is alleged to have lamented to party stalwarts on how difficult it has been for him to assess the villa, let alone have the opportunity to discuss issues of importance…’ (Tinubu: Discontent as new Aso Rock cabal emerges…News Opera,31 October, 2023)

The word of interest is assess which occurs in the following context: ‘…how difficult it has been for him (Bisi Akande) to assess the villa…’ The context does indicate that the word (assess) is intended to mean to enter, approach, come to without restriction or limitation, enjoy the presence of easily, have the benefit of moving into freely, etc. But that is not the meaning of assess.

The reporter has confused the word assess with access, a function of poor pronunciation and poor spelling. We have repeatedly advised readers to be attentive to slight differences in pronunciation and spelling that communicate lexical and semantic differences. In English, many times it does not require more than the presence or absence of a single letter in this or that position for a lexical item to transform into another word. Anyone who is not sensitive to these instances of lexical morphing is still a stranger to the English language.

Yes, there is a major difference between access and assess, significant enough to make them two words.

Capable of being used as a noun and a verb, the word access means having opportunity or right to use a thing, acquire a thing, enter a place, approach a person, etc.: (1) The business is not expanding because the owner does not have access to sufficient funds. (2) In spite of the media hype, the masses have no access to the low-cost houses. (3) The only access to the village is through a bumpy, dusty road. (4) Close to half a century of its existence, many people around the world still have no access to the email. (5) For more than two weeks now, I have not been able to access my mail. (6) Even Ministers do not have direct access to the president. (7) Three years after the divorce, the man has no access to his children. (8) Only by special permission can the room be accessed through that door. (9) For the country to make great strides in agriculture, farmers must have access to fertilizers and expansive land. (10) The man’s situation is worsened by the fact that he has no access to his lawyer.

Now the word assess is about evaluating, examining, trying to understand a situation, etc. It is a verb, whose noun form is assessment: (1) Experts are assessing the effects of the erosion on the environment. (2) The committee members will soon begin to assess the facts before them. (3) She says she is in the process of assessing how much love the man has for her. (4) Before the loans can be released, representatives of the bank will need to assess your production capability. (5) The purpose of our visit is to assess your facilities comparing them with the claims you make in the documents. (6) You cannot effectively tackle your political enemies without first assessing their strengths and weaknesses. (7) Before the Doctor can undertake to treat him, he must assess the extent of the damage done by the quack Doctor. (8) It is the duty of the Vehicle Inspection Officers to assess the road-worthiness of all vehicles. (9) An engineer from the Federal Ministry of Works is here to assess the quality and extent of work done so far. (10) Each applicant must be assessed objectively and impartially. 11) My assessment of him is that he is an intelligent but pompous man. 12) If journalists were not biased in their assessment, they would know that this man is unfit to rule a state. 13) I don’t believe the assessment of the new product was thorough enough.

At any rate, the verb access should replace access in the context under examination.

Sample 2: ‘I have to refund back there money…’ (News Opera, 31 October, 2023)

I have two complaints against that short piece of communication. The first is contained in the phrase: refund back. Please note the tautology in the phrase. The verb (or noun) refund does not require the particle back. You may pay back a sum of money or you simply refund it. Remember: Do not say, ‘Refund back…’ Say: ‘Refund…’ It is, however, acceptable to say: ‘Pay back…’

Next, we note the word there which occurs in the context: refund there money . It is a matter of elementary grammar that the form their should be the appropriate word in the context. This, I think, is one of the basic points of grammar we learnt at the elementary school. It is obvious that the writer has no grasp of the grammatical difference between the forms there and their. The error is irritatingly shameful.

In the light of this, it is important to illustrate the difference between the words there and their. Please read the following sentences: 1) There are many more people outside the hall than inside. 2) There is no wisdom in that suggestion. 3) There were rumours that the president had another woman in his life. 4) There is no reason to leave so early since the programme is scheduled to commence late in the afternoon. 5) There were many undercover security men snooping around. 6) There was no truth in the story. 7) Neither the chairman nor the secretary was there. 8) I was able to pick some useful information here and there. 9) How soon will you be there? 10) I was there waiting for you for almost three hours.

For the proper usage of the word their, please read the following sentences: 1) Their house is not far from ours. 2) The ancient Jews and their forefathers are part of the heroes of the Christian faith. 3) Their lawyers are holding a meeting with our own lawyers next week. 4) Sadly, their plan is to destroy their opponents’ business interests. 5) I find it difficult to understand why they could not mind their business. 6) Their directors are planning to reduce the workforce. 7) It is not their duty to tell us how to run our own affairs. 8) Their students are not even half as brilliant as our own. 9) Their house is directly opposite the bank. 10) How can our failure be a reason for their celebration?

The following sentences each contain the two words under consideration: 1) Were you not there when their thugs attacked our chairman? 2) It is their fault that their representatives were not there when the case started. 3) There were a few men at the meeting who claimed to be representing their bosses’ interest. 4) A lady went there, met the children, claimed be their mother’s friend and took some money from them. 5) I was there when our president visited that country and said something positive about their political system.

It should be obvious now that the word their should replace there in the context under review.

Solar investors push to address Nigeria’s power crisis

Solar energy investors and industry stakeholders are intensifying efforts to address Nigeria’s electricity crisis through increased investment in renewable energy, mini-grids and energy storage solutions.

The move comes amid persistent electricity challenges facing households and businesses, with about 86 million Nigerians reportedly lacking access to reliable grid electricity.

Speaking at a press conference in Lagos ahead of the Renewable Energy Forum Africa (REFA) 2026, Benjamin Clark, director of operations at the Africa Solar Industry Association (AFSIA), said Nigeria was emerging as a major player in Africa’s solar energy market.

He disclosed that Nigeria had approximately 620 megawatts of operational solar capacity, making it the leading country in West Africa, while its annual solar additions increased from 15MW in 2019 to 123MW in 2024.

Clark said the country’s solar market could record further growth in 2026, with new projects and partnerships expected to expand electricity access.

He also announced that more than 600MW in framework agreements had been signed with Nigerian partners to support commercial, industrial and residential rooftop solar installations.

However, industry stakeholders said financing, technical capacity and project development remained major challenges to expanding renewable energy access.

Ololade Raji, technical services manager for West Africa at Alpha ESS, said Africa’s challenge was not necessarily a lack of resources or capital, but the ability to develop bankable projects and connect them with investors.

He identified proper feasibility studies, reliable payment models, skilled local engineers and compliance with technical standards as essential to attracting investment.

Similarly, Olamide Niyi-Afuye, chief executive officer of the Africa Minigrid Developers Association (AMDA), said expanding electricity access should go beyond connecting communities to power and focus on the economic activities reliable electricity could support.

He highlighted agricultural processing, cold storage, local manufacturing and industrialisation as areas that could benefit from improved electricity supply.

Niyi-Afuye added that Africa’s mini-grid sector required between $28 billion and $46 billion in investment to connect approximately 150 million people.

Meanwhile, Esther Eyenobong, sales manager at Jinko Solar Nigeria, emphasised the importance of local partnerships and after-sales technical support in ensuring the long-term reliability of solar installations.

The Renewable Energy Forum Africa 2026 is scheduled for November 25 and 26 at the Radisson Blu Hotel, Victoria Island, Lagos, under the patronage of the Rural Electrification Agency.

The forum is expected to connect investors, project developers and technology providers to accelerate renewable energy investment across Africa.

FG spent N1trn on cancer control in one year – Bagudu

Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, has said that the Federal Government spent not less than ?1 trillion on cancer control in the last one year.

Bagudu made this known at the 5.4-kilometre walk in Abuja, with the theme, ‘One Walk, One Fight – Walk Away Cancer,’ which brought together survivors, health advocates and political leaders in a united call for early detection, prevention and stronger government support to combat one of Africa’s deadliest diseases.

The minister explained that ?350 billion had been invested in establishing cancer centres across the country, while over ?300 billion had also been committed to cancer detection equipment, in addition to other allocations to the health sector.

He stressed that additional revenue had been made available to state and local governments for cancer prevention, early detection and treatment, adding that there was a need to hold them accountable for the judicious utilisation of the funds.

‘I want to commend the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), under the leadership of its president, Dr Zainab Shinkafi Bagudu, for its relentless and longstanding cancer awareness and sensitisation campaign.

‘Cancer control remains one of the priority areas of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda in the health sector,’ he said.

On her part, the Minister of State for the Federal Capital Territory, Dr Maria Mahmoud, said early detection played a significant role in combating cancer before it advanced, urging Nigerians, particularly women and girls, to undergo regular screening, which she said was available at little or no cost in many centres.

‘We really appreciate and commend this sensitisation initiative for Nigerians. With this kind of massive turnout, the high prevalence of cervical cancer will go down,’ she said.

The Minister of State for Education, Professor Suwaiba Ahmed, also said nobody should fight cancer alone, stressing the importance of early screening and noting that the disease did not discriminate based on age or social influence.

‘To all cancer patients and survivors, we see your fight and honour your courage. We shall continue to stand with you in solidarity,’ she said.

In his remarks, the president of the Cancer Society of Nigeria, Professor Abidemi Omonisi, called on the Federal Government, civil society organisations and well-meaning Nigerians to support cancer patients and survivors as part of efforts towards national development.

‘I want to thank the president of the UICC, Dr Zainab Shinkafi Bagudu, for being a leading cancer control advocate in the country. She is not just an advocate but also contributes financially to supporting cancer patients and survivors because treatment is very expensive,’ he said.

In her address, the president of the Union for International Cancer Control, Dr Zainab Shinkafi Bagudu, said the organisation, in collaboration with other stakeholders, had been fighting cancer for over 12 years and would not relent in its efforts to tackle the deadly disease.

‘We want to see a lot more financial appropriation for the fight against cancer. A lot has been done this year, and we want to thank President Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Initiative for investing heavily in the health sector for national development,’ she said.

A cancer survivor, Mr Farooq Oreagba, said he had been diagnosed with an incurable form of cancer more than 12 years ago, attributing his survival to early screening and detection.

‘To everyone here, being diagnosed with cancer is not a death sentence. All I need from everyone is regular screening, as early detection saves lives. My cancer was detected even when I was not ill. I have a few more years to go, and I am still not ready to quit,’ Oreagba said.

2027 Senate Presidency: Uzodimma’s Imo battle, Akpabio’s ‘no vacancy’ move deepen succession politics

The contest for the presidency of the 11th Senate has taken a fresh turn following a Federal High Court judgment removing Hope Uzodimma, the Imo State governor, as the All Progressives Congress (APC) senatorial candidate for Imo West and recognising former governor Rochas Okorocha as the winner of the party’s primary election.

The ruling, delivered on Thursday, October 29, by Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognise Okorocha as the APC candidate for the January 16, 2027 National Assembly election.

The court also directed Uzodimma to stop presenting himself as the party’s candidate and ordered the APC to forward Okorocha’s name to INEC.

But in a swift response, the Imo State chapter of the APC rejected the position, insisting that Uzodimma remained its candidate for the senatorial district.

In a statement signed by Jones Onwuasoanya, its State Publicity Secretary, the party said Uzodimma emerged from the May 18 primary with the overwhelming support of party members, adding that its legal department would study the judgment and determine the next line of action.

‘The party wishes to state without any confusion that His Excellency Distinguished Senator Hope Uzodimma, CON, remains the candidate of our Party for Imo West Senatorial District, having won the primaries of our great Party with the overwhelming support of the majority of our Party members,’ the statement said.

The party’s position has introduced another layer of uncertainty into the political calculations surrounding the next Senate presidency, particularly as Uzodimma has been linked to the race to succeed incumbent Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

Although the court case concerns the APC’s Imo West nomination and not Uzodimma’s general eligibility to become Senate President, the judgment directly affects the first hurdle he must cross: securing a seat in the next Senate.

The 11th National Assembly is expected to be inaugurated in June 2027, following the January 16 National Assembly elections. Senators-elect will elect the Senate President and Deputy Senate President at the inauguration.

For Uzodimma, the immediate challenge is therefore no longer simply whether he can secure support for the Senate’s top position, but whether he can remain the APC’s candidate and win election into the chamber.

The ruling followed a suit filed by Okorocha, who challenged the recognition of Uzodimma as the party’s candidate. Okorocha argued that he won the May 18 primary and that INEC was bound by the report of its officials who monitored the exercise.

In its judgment, the court held that the evidence before it established that Okorocha, rather than Uzodimma, won the primary. It consequently ordered the APC to submit Okorocha’s name to INEC.

The governor and the APC had opposed the suit, arguing that it was filed outside the 14-day period prescribed by Section 285(9) of the Constitution for pre-election matters. The court nevertheless ruled in Okorocha’s favour.

The APC’s insistence that Uzodimma remains its candidate means the dispute could continue through further legal and party processes. Uzodimma also retains the right to appeal the judgment.

The development has revived attention on the political rivalry between the two former governors. Okorocha governed Imo State from 2011 to 2019 and represented Imo West in the Senate from 2019 to 2023, while Uzodimma represented the same district from 2011 to 2019 before becoming governor in January 2020.

Beyond the dispute over the party ticket, the outcome could affect the calculations of politicians positioning themselves for the Senate presidency.

The Imo dispute is unfolding against the backdrop of an increasingly public contest between Akpabio and politicians reportedly interested in succeeding him.

On October 14, during the inauguration of the APC Presidential Campaign Council at the State House in Abuja, Akpabio openly appealed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to support his return as Senate President in the 11th National Assembly.

He also used the occasion to caution governors against abandoning their constituents to pursue other political offices before completing their tenures.

‘I did eight years as a governor, and the constitution says you should do eight years. There’s no need for you to start eyeing another position that is not available,’ Akpabio said.

Although he did not mention Uzodimma by name, the remarks were widely interpreted as directed at the Imo governor, whose reported interest in the Senate presidency had become a subject of political discussion.

Akpabio also told Tinubu to encourage lawmakers to return to the National Assembly and support his second-term ambition.

‘Mr President, you already know that we (the National Assembly) are with you. Please, take the advice of Governor Soludo seriously. He (Soludo) said if the cloth is not torn, why try to amend it? If you try to amend it, you are going to tear the cloth,’ he said.

‘If the National Assembly is so much with you, why not encourage them to come back and support you in your second term?’

The Senate President’s comments were significant because they brought his ambition into the open while also drawing attention to the possibility of a rival candidate emerging from within the ruling party.

Uzodimma, who was also present at the campaign council inauguration, confirmed that he would contest the senatorial election.

‘Mr President, you will be on the ballot on 16 January 2027. But if we are honest with ourselves, so will we,’ he said.

‘I will be on the ballot as a senatorial candidate. So, all of us. The challenge of re-electing Mr President is the challenge of re-electing every member of APC.’

Uzodimma’s second term as governor is expected to end in January 2028, while the 11th Senate is scheduled to begin in June 2027.

If elected senator and determined to take up the seat before his governorship tenure expires, he would have to leave the governorship early, as he cannot simultaneously occupy both offices.

The timing has therefore become part of the political debate around his reported ambition.

A day after Akpabio’s appeal to Tinubu, the Senate witnessed another episode that further exposed the struggle over the next leadership of the chamber.

During plenary on October 15, Tahir Monguno, the Senate Chief Whip, moved to publicly endorse Akpabio’s return, declaring that the Senate presidency would not be open for contest in the 11th National Assembly.

Monguno also extended the endorsement to Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin and other principal officers, expressing confidence that most of the serving lawmakers would secure re-election.

‘By the grace of God, the majority of us are going to make it back to the Senate, and this seat is hereby declared: there is no vacancy. No vacancy at all, including the seat of DSP, and all other principal officers,’ Monguno said.

Cyril Fasuyi, senator representing Ekiti North, seconded the motion, insisting that the Senate presidency was already occupied by Akpabio.

‘The seat of the Senate President in the 11th Assembly is not open to any contest. It is already occupied by Senator Godswill Obot Akpabio,’ Fasuyi said.

Akpabio put the motion to a voice vote, which received support from lawmakers present.

The declaration was an unusually early public expression of support for the incumbent and his principal officers, coming months before the general election and before the composition of the next Senate is known.

Akpabio subsequently suggested that the controversy surrounding his remarks on the bill seeking to decriminalise attempted suicide was being exploited by politicians interested in the Senate presidency.

‘I know the position of president is gone. The position of vice president is gone. The only one that is left now is the position of Senate president that everybody wants to contest and have started mobilising,’ he said.

The declaration, however, does not amount to a formal election or guarantee that Akpabio will retain the office. Under the legislative process, the Senate President is elected by senators-elect at the inauguration of a new National Assembly.

The voters in the senatorial elections will first determine who enters the chamber, while the newly elected lawmakers will decide who leads it.

The episode nevertheless demonstrated that the battle for the 11th Senate presidency has begun well ahead of the inauguration.

The public endorsements followed an earlier controversy over amendments to the Senate Standing Orders in May 2026, which raised questions about whether the rules were being adjusted to shape the field of contenders for the next leadership.

On May 5, the Senate amended its rules to require lawmakers seeking the positions of Senate President and Deputy Senate President to have served for at least eight years in the chamber, across two consecutive terms immediately preceding their nomination.

The change represented a departure from the previous arrangement, under which ranking senators who had served at least one term could contest for presiding offices.

The amendment had implications for several politicians believed to be interested in leadership positions in the 11th Senate, including Uzodimma and Adams Oshiomhole, senator representing Edo North.

Uzodimma had served two consecutive terms in the Senate between 2011 and 2019, but had been outside the chamber since becoming governor. Oshiomhole, on the other hand, entered the Senate in 2023 and was serving his first term.

The proposed requirement for two consecutive terms immediately preceding nomination would therefore have excluded both men.

The amendment also generated questions about Akpabio’s own eligibility under the proposed framework, given that his previous Senate service was not continuous with his current tenure.

Oshiomhole publicly criticised the amendment, arguing that it raised questions about fairness and the circumstances in which lawmakers were changing the rules governing their own leadership.

Beyond Akpabio and Uzodimma, Oshiomhole is among the politicians whose names have featured in discussions about the next Senate presidency.

The former Edo governor, former APC national chairman and former president of the Nigeria Labour Congress has built a political profile around his confrontational style and public criticism of powerful interests.

His challenge to the May amendments placed him at the centre of the debate over the eligibility rules, although he must first secure re-election to the Senate before any leadership contest can take place.

Other political actors have also become part of the conversation.

Nyesom Wike, minister of the Federal Capital Territory, publicly opposed Uzodimma’s reported ambition during an appearance on TVC’s Journalists’ Hangout in September.

Wike accused governors of seeking to influence the emergence of the next National Assembly leadership by determining which candidates secure legislative seats.

He specifically criticised the possibility of Uzodimma seeking to become Senate President after leaving office as governor.

The dispute has therefore moved beyond the Senate chamber, drawing in governors, federal ministers and party leaders whose interests may shape the emergence of the next legislature.

The president’s position is also important. Although the Senate President is elected by senators and not appointed by the president, the ruling party’s internal arrangements and the president’s political preference can influence the contest.

Akpabio’s direct appeal to Tinubu for support reflects the importance he attaches to the relationship with the Presidency.

At the same time, Uzodimma’s position as chairman of the Progressive Governors’ Forum and his reported relationship with Tinubu have made his possible entry into the Senate a subject of wider political interest.

The question is whether the next Senate leadership will emerge primarily from the choices of senators-elect or from negotiations among powerful figures within the ruling party.

CCB sued for refusing to release CTC of Peter Obi’s asset declaration form

Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) has been dragged before a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja over its alleged refusal and failure to release the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the asset declaration form submitted by the Presidential candidate of the National Democratic Party (NDC), Mr. Peter Obi Gregory.

In a notification letter dated 30th October 2026 and made available to newsmen in Abuja over the weekend, counsel to the plaintiff, Fort Legal and Co., informed the Chairman of the CCB of a pending suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2504/2026, between Dr. Arabambi Abayomi v. The Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) and 3 Others before a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.

According to the letter signed by O. Peter Asimegbe, Esq., the suit concerns the CCB’s refusal to issue the CTC of Peter Obi’s asset declaration form, submitted to the Bureau in 2006 or at any other time, covering the period of 17th March 2006 to 17th March 2014, when he served as Governor of Anambra State under the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA).

The letter reads in part: ‘Pursuant to our client instruction, we hereby bring to your notice our client pending legal suit against you for your failure and refusal to release to our client the Certified True Copy of the asset declaration form of Mr. Peter Obi Gregory, he submitted to your office containing his assets declaration particulars and all attached documents to the asset declaration form he submitted to your office in 2006 prior and when he was sworn in as the Governor of Anambra State for the period of 17th March, 2006 to 17th March, 2014 when he served as the Governor of Anambra State under the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA).’

According to the document, the claimant, Comrade Abayomi Arabambi, is described as a Nigerian citizen and a registered voter in Ogun State. His counsel said the suit is predicated on his legal right under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, and the Freedom of Information Act 2011.

The letter addressed to the Chairman of the CCB further stated that: ‘In the said suit, the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) and the Chairman CCB are the 1st and 2nd Respondents. The suit is predicated on our client’s legal right under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended and the Freedom of Information Act 2011, and we urge your office to take the processes herein annexed as notification of the pending suit filed by our client at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

‘Find attached the Originating Motion duly filed on 15th day of October, 2026 and all its accompanied documents and processes as annexure A for ease of reference.’

The CCB and its Chairman are listed as the 1st and 2nd Respondents in the suit. The letter urged the Bureau to treat the annexed processes as notification of the pending suit filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

It added that the Originating Motion was duly filed on 15th October 2026, with all accompanying documents and processes attached as Annexure A for ease of reference.

Mixta Africa canvasses housing delivery system to tackle deficit at scale.

Mixta Africa has canvassed a housing delivery system to tackle Nigeria’s widening deficit at scale, arguing that housing interventions must shift to building the delivery system.

The company, which opened for business over 20 years ago, is a leading pan-African real estate developer with over 30,000 home units delivered across Nigeria, Senegal, Tunisia, Morocco and Côte d’Ivoire.

Tola Akinsulire, its Group Chief Commercial Officer, lamented recently that Nigeria has treated housing as isolated interventions focused on mortgages, without addressing the underlying delivery ecosystem.

‘What has worked elsewhere is a system that addresses both the supply and demand sides. In Morocco, we delivered 4,393 units on a single site because the government created that system,’ he said.

Tola spoke at the Africa PropTech Priority Summit (APPSUMMIT 2026) organised by Proptech Roundup with the theme, ‘Public-Private Partnerships for Large-Scale Housing Delivery: Unlocking Housing at Scale Through Collaboration.’

He recalled that in 2010, under Morocco’s housing programme, participating developers who committed to building at 250,000 Dirhams and meeting a target of 500 units in five years were offered tax credits across the value chain, including cement and company income tax.

‘On the demand side, buyers of qualifying homes were exempted from VAT and supported by a government-backed guarantee scheme that covered up to 70 percent of the lender’s credit risk that kicks in after default. That made banks willing to lend and buyers able to buy. That is how you create a market – engineered on both the supply and demand sides,’ Akinsulire explained.

On PPPs in Nigeria, Akinsulire said governments must be clear if a PPP is a monetisation or intervention strategy, noting: ‘if it is primarily a monetisation strategy, the private developer will ordinarily be expected to bear more of the commercial risk.

But if it is an intervention intended to deliver affordable housing for civil servants, for example, government must be prepared to absorb some of the cost – through infrastructure, land or other support – and agree on a realistic price point’

He stressed that for PPPs to deliver at scale, three things are critical: trust, buyer affordability, and developer capability. ‘The Federal Ministry of Housing’s Housing Delivery Framework in January and its subsequent policy framework later in the year address trust and affordability, but we are not addressing how to enhance developer delivery capacity. If people have money and there are no houses to buy, we still have the same problem,’ he said.

Akinsulire welcomed innovators into the real estate value chain, affirming that: ‘Technology must either reduce friction or reduce risk, from land titling, to approvals, construction monitoring, sales and off-plan finance.

Olajumoke Akinwunmi of Alitheia Capital highlighted lack of structured engagement, framework and trust as the biggest missing links in PPPs. ‘We need collaboration among ourselves and ready projects, not just land banks.

Often, after the handshake, you get to site and still deal with Omo Onile, compensation, and unbuildable portions. That is not a ready project. We also need transparent procurement and to build a local industrial base.

We are dealing with a housing challenge affecting roughly 30 million units – comprising a deficit of about 15 million homes and more than 15 million existing homes that are structurally inadequate or substandard,’ she said.

Odunayo Ojo, UPDC’s CEO, described housing as fundamentally an economics problem: rising government rates, low-income levels and the need for incentives. ‘Rates and charges have tripled this year, yet we say we want cheaper housing.

We need tax breaks and pioneer status incentives for housing like other industries. In the interim, we must encourage build-to-rent because many Nigerians cannot afford to buy, even on zero-interest mortgages, due to low incomes. And we must collaborate to cut overheads,’ he advised.