Religion is a common currency in Nigeria, and just as we love to flaunt money and wealth, so too are we always quick to show off our religiosity. It is difficult, and even unfair, that anyone’s act of religious worship or ritual is not strictly in the name of God or for reasons of advancing personal religious faith or piety. Yet, it is also difficult to avoid such a sense in many different circumstances of the public display of religion by individuals. So, we worship in the name of God, but there is little doubt that we also tend to make sure other people notice that we do.
Politics and social media have transformed this general tendency-to worship for God and for the notice of others-into something uniquely Nigerian. Of course, politicians and other political actors the world over invoke religion and religious ritual and symbolism to advance political objectives, rather than to deepen faith or conviction. The United States, often touted as the world’s bastion of democracy, is also at once the capital of exploiting religious ritual and symbolism for political purposes. The Church-and increasingly the mosque-in the U.S. is both a place of worship, but also a space for doing all kinds of politics.
Still, the way we do it here appears unique to me. At least one uniquely Nigerian-and for me disturbing-way of doing mixing politics with religious ritual and symbolism is the relative balance we accord to religion and governance in public life. This relates, in particular, to the idea of ‘praying for the nation’ frequently enjoined by our political and religious leaders, and even the ordinary Nigerians in diverse contexts. Afterall, nearly all informal conversations about governance among Nigerians end with a resort to praying more or leaving it all to God.
The idea and practice of ‘praying for the nation’ in Nigeria today is a religious, political and commercial activity. In fact, we can say quite safely that is a whole industry in its own right now. Billions of naira, and unquantifiable amount of energy and time are nowadays spent on praying for the nation across all religious and sectarian divides, particularly during elections.
I have always found this tendency among our political class curious, not to diminish the significance of prayers in human or national affairs, but because I always wonder whether the proportion is appropriate for success. Prayers are important for individual or national advancement, but for both, prayers work best with the most effort and preparation.
The federal government and the ruling APC made the most of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s jetting off for the lesser-hajj last week, to ‘pray for the nation’ as the newspapers reported it. I do not begrudge the President his prayers for the nation. But I could not help but wonder if the amount of time, effort, and money spent on this latest episode of praying for Nigeria would not have been better used in redesigning or adjusting his economic policies to make life easier for Nigerians. Even in the context of this 2027 election campaigns, the government and his party have not done enough to convince Nigerians on his policy direction.
The government has not done enough to listen to or respond positively to the mounting challenges its economic policies are inflicting on Nigerians, and however well intentioned, empty stomachs cannot survive on prayers alone.
From my mailbox
Re: Tinubu: Lion at home, lamb abroad?
My namesake, we haven’t seen each other and exchanged views for quite some time, but I do read your column religiously. Frankly, you made my day by your insightful, brutally frank and honest October 26, 2026, paper, ‘Tinubu: Lion at home, lamb abroad?’
Under Tinubu’s administration, Nigeria has become a one-man show. I first read George Orwell’s Animal Farm when growing up, and read it several times again up to the university and into the Foreign Service in 1975. I never imagined or visualised that Nigeria would later become the near basket case it has now become, where everything, poverty, hunger and insecurity would become the lot of Nigerians.
The President has become a sole administrator, surrounded by grovelling cronies who will not tell him the reality of the situation of Nigerians, honestly and truthfully. Nobody has the balls to tell him that Nigeria has become a living hell and that his reputation is far worse than that of Buhari. It is a tragedy.
Civil servants only care about the security of their jobs and the starvation salaries they receive. This National Assembly under Godswill Akpabio is the worst since the return of democratic rule, which, to me, is more appropriately a civilian rule camouflaging as democratic. During the PDP days, an attempt was made to impeach a PDP President, and it patriotically buried the third-term gambit. Nigerians then knew of the existence of an assertive and independent National Assembly. But under Akpabio, the National Assembly has become a poodle of the Presidency.
Civil servants, who are the engines of any government and need to be the middle class, are now emasculated and pauperised. They receive starvation salaries while the politicians live in obscene opulence and make no bones about flaunting it. The Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) appears to be barking and not biting. The good old days of Adams Oshiomhole appear to have gone forever.
Reforms are periodically undertaken by a government, and these reforms are meant to benefit the people. If the reforms instituted by the Tinubu government are not benefiting Nigerians and they are crying loudly, they should not be ignored.
The government commends the World Bank and IMF when they make favourable comments on some aspects of the reforms, but they get pilloried when they make adverse comments on some aspects. The views of economists and other knowledgeable Nigerians are dismissed as opposition politics.
I supported and campaigned in my own way for Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 2023 because I believed then that he was a democrat who would govern in accordance with the tenets of democracy for which he fought and even went into exile.
Sadly, on assuming office, he began to run a one-man show who must be slavishly obeyed. The Federal Executive became more pliant, and the National Assembly became an extension of the Villa.
As a retired hard-nosed career diplomat, I keep on asking myself about the direction of Nigeria’s foreign policy. It is scandalous to me that, after recalling ambassadors immediately on assumption of office, it took President Tinubu over two years to appoint replacements.
Regrettably, career diplomats who have devoted their service to Nigeria were more marginalised in favour of politicians who were more loyal to themselves than their country.
Under President Tinubu’s chairmanship of ECOWAS, the coup d’état in Niger Republic was badly bungled. If you cannot possess the wherewithal to carry out your threat, do not make it. Otherwise, it becomes an empty threat.
ECOWAS threatened Niger Republic with military action after suspending its membership. Nigeria followed up with the closure of the border between the two countries and went further to cut off electricity, which was a bilateral agreement and not a multilateral one.
Why should Nigeria cut off electricity supply to Niger Republic? This is not only a breach of bilateral agreement but a hostile act. The culmination of what ECOWAS led to Niger Republic, Mali and Burkina Faso breaking away and forming their own Association of Sahel States (AES).
Nigeria and Niger are like Siamese twins. We need each other, and we are closely related ethnically, culturally and religiously. Therefore, Nigeria should have been more tactful and diplomatic. ECOWAS resolution or not, in any case, Nigeria has the clout to moderate ECOWAS decisions.
As President of the Republic, Tinubu must decide whether he wants to be remembered for working to make life better for Nigerians, or for working against them. the choice is his own, and I hope he chooses wisely.