Insolvency stakeholders call for stronger frameworks in Nigeria

Business recovery and insolvency stakeholders have called for the strengthening of insolvency institutions to enhance practitioners’ effectiveness and align Nigeria’s frameworks with global best practices.

This was made known at the 2025 Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) conference in Lagos. The two-day event focused on deepening the use of insolvency tools to resolve chronic indebtedness and financial distress facing businesses.

Justice John Tsoho, Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, represented by Justice Akintayo Aluko, told participants that practitioners, regulators, and the judiciary all play critical roles in restructuring and insolvency processes, especially during periods of economic turbulence. He urged professionals to uphold integrity, independence, impartiality, and transparency while avoiding personal gain from sensitive corporate information.

‘The role of an insolvency practitioner in the life of a company under distress is significant. Insolvency does not necessarily signal the end of a business,’ Tsoho said. ‘Practitioners must carefully adopt tools such as receivership, administration, mergers and acquisitions, or bankruptcy in the best interest of both creditors and debtors.’ Chimezie Ihekweazu, BRIPAN President, said this year’s theme, ‘Deepening Insolvency Tools for Resolving Commercial and Financial Challenges of Businesses’, was timely given Nigeria’s exposure to economic headwinds, geopolitical shifts, and technological disruptions.

‘In Nigeria and across Africa, it has become imperative to sharpen and deepen the tools at our disposal for business rescue, debt restructuring, and sustainable recovery,’ he said. Justice Victoria Nwoye, also speaking at the conference, stressed that insolvency frameworks should serve as ‘economic stabilisers,’ not punitive measures. She warned that many regimes worldwide remain inaccessible to businesses that need them most, leaving both small enterprises and multinationals vulnerable during financial crises.

‘Be it small enterprises or multinational corporations, the ability to navigate distress is no longer a peripheral concern; it is central to survival and growth,’ she noted.

The conference concluded with a consensus that Nigeria must strengthen its insolvency institutions, enforce ethical codes for practitioners, and improve access to restructuring mechanisms to safeguard businesses and the wider economy.

Dangote Refinery still operating despite PENGASSAN strike

Dangote Petroleum Refinery has continued operating despite a nationwide strike by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), which has disrupted logistics and heightened tensions in the oil sector, company and trade sources confirmed on Tuesday.

Initial reports suggested that the entrance to the 650,000-barrel-per-day facility in Lagos was blocked by striking workers, but refinery operations have not been fully halted. The industrial action, which began on Sunday, is already attracting the attention of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), PENGASSAN’s parent body, raising fears of broader solidarity protests that could worsen pressure on the refinery’s operations.

A mediation meeting convened on Monday to resolve the standoff ended in deadlock after more than nine hours of deliberations.

The talks, chaired by labour minister Muhammad Dingyadi, brought together leaders of PENGASSAN, representatives of Dangote Refinery, the finance ministry, and top officials of both the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission and the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority. Festus Osifo, PENGASSAN’s president, said negotiations failed because Dangote management refused to reinstate 800 workers whose dismissal sparked the dispute.

He said the union would continue its action until those workers were reinstated.

‘Our position has been very clear; you have to reinstate these people. If you reinstate them tonight, we will call off our action tonight but unfortunately, that reinstatement did not happen. And we were not able to reach conclusions on the subject,’ Osifo told journalists after the meeting. The meeting continues today, according to reports. But for now, Dangote Refinery appears largely unshaken, with operations ongoing despite the union’s threats and the unresolved conflict.

Housing infrastructure as a driver of economic growth

In virtually every nation, the discourse on economic growth often revolves around factors such as industrial output, foreign investment, technology, and human capital development. Yet, one element that is sometimes underexplored but remains fundamental is housing infrastructure.

Housing is more than just shelter; it is an economic commodity, a social stabiliser, and a driver of development. From job creation to stimulating demand in allied industries, and from providing collateral for wealth creation to enabling urban renewal, housing infrastructure plays a central role in catalysing sustainable growth.

At the heart of modern economies, housing represents both a consumption good and an investment asset. For households, a house is the most valuable asset they may ever own; for governments, housing development signifies a visible expression of social contract fulfillment; and for the economy, housing is a critical sector that triggers multiplier effects across industries.

According to World Bank estimates, the real estate and construction sector contributes between 7 percent and 14 percent of global GDP, depending on the region. In advanced economies such as the United States, housing-related activities, construction, real estate, mortgage finance, home improvement, and property services, are significant drivers of employment and wealth accumulation.

Similarly, in emerging economies like Nigeria, housing is estimated to contribute about 3.1 percent of GDP, though with vast untapped potential. The importance of housing infrastructure stems from its ability to integrate multiple aspects of the economy, ranging from financial markets to labour absorption, raw material demand, and even energy consumption patterns.

One of the clearest pathways through which housing drives economic growth is job creation. Housing infrastructure development requires a wide array of skilled and unskilled labour-land surveyors, architects, town planners, engineers, builders, masons, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, and labourers. The construction phase alone is highly labour-intensive and generates immediate employment.

Beyond construction, housing stimulates jobs in allied industries such as:

Cement, steel, timber, and glass manufacturers benefit directly from rising demand.

Furniture, interior décor, and home appliance industries experience growth from household spending.

Financial institutions expand their mortgage, insurance, and investment portfolios.

The International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimates that every housing unit constructed directly and indirectly generates between 5 and 7 jobs, depending on the complexity of the project. In countries struggling with high unemployment rates, especially among youths, housing development represents a low-hanging fruit for labour absorption and poverty alleviation.

Furthermore, housing plays a unique role in wealth accumulation and capital formation. Unlike many consumer goods that depreciate, housing typically appreciates over time, thereby serving as a store of wealth. For many households, owning a home is the first step toward economic security and social mobility.

Moreover, housing assets are often used as collateral to access credit, which fuels entrepreneurial ventures, small businesses, and industrial expansion. In advanced economies, mortgage markets are among the most developed financial sectors, reflecting the centrality of housing to economic dynamism. In contrast, underdeveloped housing finance systems in many developing countries limit credit creation, thereby constraining economic opportunities.

Thus, by expanding housing infrastructure, countries stimulate financial deepening, broaden access to capital, and enhance wealth distribution among citizens.

Urbanisation is one of the defining features of the 21st century. The United Nations projects that by 2050, nearly 70 percent of the world’s population will live in urban areas. For countries like Nigeria, where urbanisation is rapid but poorly managed, housing infrastructure becomes a crucial determinant of whether urban growth leads to prosperity or squalor.

Well-planned housing infrastructure is not just about buildings; it encompasses roads, drainage, power supply, water systems, waste management, schools, and hospitals. When integrated with urban planning, housing infrastructure prevents the growth of slums, enhances liveability, and improves productivity.

A city with adequate housing infrastructure attracts investors, boosts tourism, and fosters innovation. On the contrary, inadequate housing leads to overcrowding, insecurity, health hazards, and economic inefficiency.

Therefore, housing infrastructure development must be seen as a strategic tool for urban renewal and sustainable cities, aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 11): ‘Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.’

Housing infrastructure has strong backward and forward linkages with the industrial sector. The construction of a single housing estate requires raw materials such as cement, iron rods, paints, ceramics, cables, and roofing sheets-all products of local industries.

This demand stimulates local production, encourages import substitution, and generates foreign exchange savings. In countries with strong housing policies, such as China, the real estate and housing sector has been deliberately leveraged to grow domestic industries.

The Chinese government, for example, integrated housing development with industrial production, thereby transforming its housing sector into a pillar of its economic miracle. For developing countries, expanding housing infrastructure could serve as a stimulus for industrial diversification away from resource dependency, creating a robust value chain of construction-related industries. Economic growth is not just about figures and GDP ratios; it is equally about social cohesion and stability. Adequate housing contributes to societal peace by reducing homelessness, overcrowding, and the tensions that arise from informal settlements.

A family that lives in decent housing experiences improved health, educational performance for children, and higher productivity for adults. Conversely, inadequate housing contributes to poor health outcomes, crime, and urban discontent-all of which erode economic progress. Housing is, therefore, not merely an economic commodity; it is a social stabiliser and a foundation for inclusive development. Countries that invest in housing infrastructure ultimately invest in the well-being and productivity of their citizens.

Despite its enormous potential, several challenges limit the ability of housing infrastructure to fully drive economic growth in many developing economies. These include:

High Construction Costs – Rising prices of cement, steel, and other inputs make housing unaffordable for low- and middle-income earners.

Weak Mortgage Systems – Limited access to long-term financing hampers home ownership and housing investment.

Land Tenure and Titling Issues – Bureaucratic bottlenecks in land administration discourage investment and inflate costs.

Infrastructure Deficits – Poor roads, electricity, and water supply in many areas limit large-scale housing projects.

Policy Inconsistency – Frequent changes in government policies undermine long-term housing sector planning.

These barriers explain why many countries face acute housing deficits. For instance, Nigeria is estimated to have a housing deficit of over 20 million units, requiring trillions of naira in investment to bridge. Without deliberate intervention, housing infrastructure cannot achieve its transformative economic role.

To fully harness housing infrastructure as a driver of economic growth, deliberate strategies must be pursued to:

Expand Affordable Housing Finance – Strengthen mortgage institutions, encourage low-interest housing loans, and promote innovative financing models such as cooperative housing schemes.

Promote Local Building Materials – Support research and development into affordable, locally sourced materials to reduce costs and dependence on imports.

Reform Land Administration – Simplify land titling processes, reduce bureaucratic delays, and digitise land registries to attract investment.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) – Governments should partner with private developers to deliver large-scale housing projects while providing enabling infrastructure.

Integrate Housing with Urban Planning – Housing development should be accompanied by roads, schools, hospitals, and utilities to create liveable communities.

Incentivise Green Housing – Encourage eco-friendly housing designs that reduce energy costs and promote sustainability.

By implementing these strategies, housing infrastructure can become a central pillar of economic transformation.

In conclusion, housing infrastructure is more than bricks and mortar-it is the foundation of economic progress and social stability. By stimulating employment, wealth creation, industrial development, and urban renewal, housing plays a catalytic role in shaping the trajectory of national growth.

Countries that have prioritised housing development, such as Singapore, China, and South Korea, have not only witnessed improved living standards but also experienced accelerated economic growth. For nations like Nigeria, where the housing deficit remains alarming, deliberate investment in housing infrastructure represents both a social necessity and an economic opportunity.

In the final analysis, the road to inclusive and sustainable growth is paved not only with factories, highways, and financial markets but also with the homes people live in. If governments and stakeholders recognise housing as a strategic growth driver, they will not only build houses but also build economies, build wealth, and build nations.

Edo approves revised supplementary budget of ?799bn for 2025

The Edo State Executive Council has approved a revised supplementary budget of N799.820 billion for the 2025 fiscal year, up from the initial N675.220 billion, representing an increase of approximately N125 billion, or 18 percent.

The approval which followed an emergency executive meeting presided over by the Chairman-in-Council and Governor of Edo State, Monday Okpebholo, on Monday,

Briefing journalists immediately after the meeting, the Commissioner for Finance, Emmanuel Okoebor, explained the rationale behind the adjustment and emphasised the government’s commitment to infrastructure development.

Okoebor explained: ‘Previously, we had a budget of N675 billion with recurrent expenditure having about 33 percent and capital 67 percent. The new revised budget now has about 70 percent for capital expenditure as against 30 percent for recurrent expenditure. It shows the commitment of Governor Monday Okpebholo in infrastructural development in Edo state.’

He further explained the size and nature of the increment. ‘The increment in the budget is about N125 billion, which signifies about 18 percent of the previous budget. Recurrent increased with about N12 billion, while capital is about N113 billion from the previous one. Given about 25 percent increment in Capital expenditure and just 5 percent increment in recurrent expenditure.

‘It clearly shows that the government is concerned about infrastructural development making Edo people happy. We have done about 254KM of road across the state, and many more construction works are ongoing.

‘Recurrent expenditure has about 5 percent increment as the increase in minimum wage necessitated that increment, including a lot of employment the present administration did in the hospital management board for over 1000, and it needs to be captured.

‘The budget has been increased by N125 billion, which is about 18 percent, and capital expenditure by about 25 percent, from N450 billion to N563 billion.’

According to the Honourable Commissioner for Information and Communication, Paul Ohombamu, the revised budget is expected to be forwarded to the Edo State House of Assembly for legislative consideration and passage.