Category: Business Day

In northern Nigeria, the hum of diesel generators that long defined everyday life at Katsina General Hospital has begun to fade. In its place, a quiet transformation is underway. A newly commissioned 250-kilowatt solar system with a 300-kilowatt-hour battery capacity now powers wards and operating rooms, reducing reliance on costly, polluting fuels while ensuring uninterrupted electricity for critical care.

The shift is emblematic of a broader trend sweeping across Africa: clean energy projects that are less flashy than billion-dollar mega dams or grand national grids, but far more immediate in their impact. At the centre of this movement stands Genesis Energy Group, a Lagos-based developer that is reimagining how power is delivered to the continent’s most underserved communities.

Founded in 2005, Genesis has spent two decades quietly building one of Africa’s most diverse portfolios of clean energy projects.

Its guiding mantra, ‘lighting up Africa one community at a time’, is proving more than just corporate rhetoric.

By working directly with state governments, hospitals, schools, and local industries, the company is making the case that access to affordable, reliable power is as much about health, education, and economic resilience as it is about kilowatt hours.

A growing crisis in energy access

Despite abundant natural resources, Africa’s power challenge remains stark. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), over 600 million people on the continent live without access to electricity, and nearly 1 billion still cook with traditional fuels like wood, charcoal, or coal. The consequences are profound: respiratory illnesses from indoor air pollution, millions of hours lost each year to fuel collection, and stagnant productivity in communities cut off from reliable power.

Nowhere are these challenges more acute than in Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy. The World Bank estimates that only 55% of Nigerians have access to electricity. Rural electrification rates are even bleaker, dropping to just 24%, compared to more than 80% in urban areas. Kerosene lamps, diesel generators, and firewood remain the default solutions, entrenching a cycle of high costs, pollution, and inequality.

The urgency is underscored by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7): ensuring universal access to affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy by 2030. Meeting that target requires bold action across the board-government reforms, international financing, and private-sector innovation. Increasingly, it is companies like Genesis Energy that are showing what that future can look like on the ground.

Genesis Energy’s state-level bet

In early 2025, Genesis signed a $500 million Memorandum of Understanding with the Katsina State Government to roll out decentralised clean energy infrastructure across the northern state. The initiative targets hospitals, schools, and government facilities as a first step in building what executives describe as ‘replicable models’ for state-led electrification.

The first phase includes a 1,000-kilowatt solar system with matching battery storage at the Katsina Government House and smaller installations at public health facilities, including Katsina General Hospital. Together, these projects form part of a broader 10-megawatt pipeline that Genesis aims to complete in the state.

‘This is not about building a single showcase project,’ said one Genesis executive familiar with the plans. ‘It’s about demonstrating that decentralised, clean power can be deployed quickly, affordably, and in ways that directly improve lives. Once proven, the model can be replicated across Nigeria’s 36 states.’

The strategy reflects a broader shift in Africa’s energy landscape: away from a singular focus on national grids, and toward distributed systems that can bypass the chronic bottlenecks of state utilities.

Financing the transition

Genesis is no stranger to the complexities of financing clean energy in emerging markets. In 2019, it issued West Africa’s largest clean energy bond at the time, worth $36.1 million, unconditionally guaranteed by InfraCredit and the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC). The raise gave the company both credibility and flexibility to scale projects across the region.

Since then, Genesis has invested over $150 million into clean energy ventures, from solar and battery storage to gas-to-power facilities. Among its more notable undertakings is an 84-megawatt private off-grid gas-to-power plant that supplies electricity to critical national infrastructure in Nigeria, reducing reliance on diesel and heavy fuel oil.

With a development pipeline of 4.5 gigawatts and nearly 458 megawatts already in operation or under construction, Genesis has positioned itself as a key intermediary between global financiers and Africa’s fragmented energy markets. Its access to equity risk capital and large-scale funding sets it apart from smaller players often constrained by capital scarcity.

A portfolio beyond solar

While solar remains central to Genesis’s identity, the company has deliberately built a multi-technology portfolio. Its projects leverage solar photovoltaics, battery energy storage systems (BESS), hydro, wind, and hybrid gas-to-power systems, depending on the specific needs of communities and industries.

One flagship example is the Banana Island Local Grid in Lagos, a distributed energy system serving more than 2,000 residents with up to 98% power availability. By replacing noisy diesel generators with a hybrid clean energy solution, Genesis has not only improved quality of life but also demonstrated the commercial viability of decentralised urban grids.

This flexibility is key in markets where one-size-fits-all solutions rarely succeed. ‘Africa’s energy future will not be defined by a single technology,’ Genesis executives argue. ‘It will be a mosaic of solutions tailored to local contexts.’

From clinics to classrooms

The social ripple effects of these projects are hard to overstate. With reliable power, clinics can refrigerate vaccines, students can study after dark, and farmers can store perishable produce in solar-powered cold rooms.

The World Health Organisation estimates that nearly 60 percent of health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa lack reliable electricity. Genesis’s installations at hospitals like Katsina General represent a step toward closing that gap, enabling better maternal care, emergency surgery, and disease response.

Similarly, electrification projects in schools and community centers extend opportunities for education and digital inclusion, while small businesses benefit from lower energy costs and improved productivity.

A voice in global forums

Genesis’s influence extends beyond project sites. At forums such as the Africa Energy Forum 2025 and the Youth Energy Forum 2025, the company has emerged as a leading voice on Africa’s clean energy transition.

At the Africa Energy Forum, Genesis executives participated in a panel on ‘Financing Gas: Is 2025 the Year Financing Is Unleashed?’-arguing that transitional fuels like natural gas remain critical for Africa’s near-term stability, even as renewables scale.

At the Youth Energy Forum, the company emphasised workforce development, offering guidance to students and young professionals seeking careers in clean energy. It also showcased how it tracks CO2 displacement across its solar and hybrid projects, underscoring a commitment to measurable impact.

This dual role-as both project developer and policy advocate-has helped Genesis influence the broader narrative around Africa’s decarbonization, balancing pragmatism with ambition.

Balancing legacy fuels with renewables

The tension between Africa’s fossil fuel wealth and the urgency of decarbonization looms large over every clean energy conversation. Nigeria, for example, is among the world’s top oil producers, and natural gas accounts for a significant share of its domestic energy use.

Genesis has sought to bridge that divide by positioning gas-to-power as a transitional tool. While critics argue that gas risks locking Africa into carbon-intensive pathways, Genesis insists that hybrid solutions are essential for maintaining reliability in regions where renewable intermittency remains a barrier.

‘We cannot leapfrog into a 100% renewable future overnight,’ a company spokesperson noted at a recent panel. ‘But we can chart a path that reduces emissions, displaces diesel, and builds the infrastructure for a sustainable energy mix.’

Measuring Impact

For Genesis, impact is measured not just in megawatts, but in lives improved. The company tracks outcomes such as reduced diesel consumption, CO2 displacement, and cost savings for clients. It also emphasises community engagement, working with local governments and residents to ensure projects are aligned with social and economic priorities.

This emphasis reflects a broader shift in how investors and policymakers assess energy projects. Beyond financial returns, stakeholders increasingly demand evidence of social dividends-health, education, and gender equity among them. Genesis’s model, by targeting schools, hospitals, and underserved communities, is designed to deliver on that mandate.

Next steps

With less than five years until the 2030 SDG 7 deadline, the scale of Africa’s energy challenge remains daunting. Achieving universal access will require not just billions in new investment but also regulatory reforms, cross-border cooperation, and a willingness to embrace decentralised solutions.

Genesis Energy is betting that its state-level partnerships, diversified portfolio, and proven financing record will allow it to scale faster than many peers. The Katsina initiative, if successful, could serve as a template for other Nigerian states-and potentially across Africa.

For now, the quiet hum of solar panels and battery systems in Katsina may seem like a small step. But for patients at the hospital who no longer face blackouts during surgery, or students who can now study after sunset, the change is nothing short of transformative.

And for Genesis Energy, it is proof that a clean power boom doesn’t always arrive with fanfare. Sometimes, it begins with the lights staying on.

BlockDAG has raised over $410 million in its presale, selling more than 26.4 billion coins. The current batch 30 price is $0.03, yet allocations remain available at $0.0013, highlighting why many buyers view it as one of the best crypto to buy now. Beyond presale momentum, BlockDAG (BDAG) is adopting a strategy that integrates sponsorship and cultural visibility, becoming the exclusive blockchain partner of the BWT Alpine F1 team.

This positions the protocol alongside global sports audiences while reinforcing its technical narrative of speed and scalability. Compared to privacy-focused Monero and institution-aligned Algorand, BlockDAG’s BWT Alpine F1® partnership highlights how brand integration could be a differentiator in the race for top crypto coins 2025.

BlockDAG: Sponsorship as a Growth Engine

BlockDAG’s multi-year sponsorship of the BWT Alpine F1® team is more than a marketing decision. It ensures that the brand is featured during race weekends, through fan simulators, on-track interactive experiences, and curated digital activations. This brings Web3 exposure into the same cultural conversations as motorsport, where performance and precision define the narrative.

For buyers wondering what crypto to invest in, this integration matters. It translates blockchain from abstract code to a tangible, high-visibility experience. The timing is also critical, with the Grand Prix ensuring maximum overlap between crypto audiences and mainstream sports fans.

Numbers back BlockDAG’s positioning. With more than $410 million raised and 26.4 billion coins sold, the project has already demonstrated market demand. The opportunity to buy at $0.0013 despite the batch 30 price of $0.03 highlights the current entry advantage.

While Monero and Algorand rely on price levels and institutional thresholds, BlockDAG is combining strong presale economics with cultural sponsorships. This dual foundation strengthens its argument as one of the top crypto coins 2025, particularly for those seeking both visibility and adoption potential.

Monero: Privacy as a Niche Advantage

Monero remains one of the most resilient privacy-focused assets in the crypto sector. Trading between $280 and $300 in September 2025, it has gained roughly 45% year-to-date. Analysts see potential upside toward $350 by the end of 2025, driven by demand for anonymity and upgrades like Seraphis. For buyers who prioritize what crypto to invest in for privacy, Monero offers long-term relevance.

Yet the asset’s appeal is concentrated among users seeking financial confidentiality, and its growth is limited by regulatory pressure and lack of mainstream brand exposure. In contrast, BlockDAG’s sponsorship strategy brings it into wider cultural visibility, something Monero does not prioritize.

Algorand: Stability with Institutional Leanings

Algorand trades near $0.25, a critical level for both technical and psychological reasons. Analysts note that if ALGO breaks above this threshold, bullish targets between $0.33 and $0.57 become realistic. Institutional interest has been encouraged by the launch of governance initiatives like the xGov Council, as well as by on-chain activity metrics such as NVT and whale flows. This underlines Algorand’s attempt to secure credibility with larger buyers.

However, regulatory concerns and competition from other Layer-1s remain obstacles. For those comparing what crypto to invest in, Algorand’s institutional path offers stability but lacks the cultural spark of BlockDAG’s BWT Alpine alignment.

Sponsorship vs Privacy vs Institutional Support

When considering top crypto coins 2025, the different strategies become clear. BlockDAG’s BWT Alpine sponsorship integrates blockchain into mainstream culture, using sports and media visibility to attract both institutional attention and grassroots adoption. Monero continues to specialize in privacy, offering strong resilience but limited reach.

Algorand focuses on institutional support and governance mechanisms, but remains vulnerable to regulatory challenges and slower ecosystem traction. BlockDAG’s model of combining technical reliability with cultural positioning offers a broader pathway, balancing presale traction with global exposure.

What makes BlockDAG unique is its ability to merge financial performance with physical presence. By leveraging Formula 1® partnerships, race-weekend fan experiences, and presale momentum, it provides buyers with both quantifiable ROI and qualitative adoption signals.

While Monero may reach $350 and Algorand may break higher thresholds, neither project offers the same blend of lifestyle integration and technical scalability. For buyers evaluating the best crypto to buy now, BlockDAG offers a multi-layered opportunity, positioned between retail visibility and institutional legitimacy.

The Bottom Line

The question of what crypto to invest in is not answered by price charts alone. BlockDAG’s over $410 million presale and partnership with the BWT Alpine F1 team create a unique blend of adoption strategy and brand visibility. Monero continues to excel in privacy with steady price growth toward $350, while Algorand builds institutional credibility around its $0.25 support level. Yet among these three, BlockDAG stands out by combining infrastructure strength with global cultural activation.

For buyers evaluating top crypto coins 2025 and identifying the best crypto to buy now, BlockDAG’s sponsorship strategy offers a broader, more compelling path to long-term adoption and value creation.

Presidency on Monday said it welcome former President Goodluck Jonathan to the 2027 Presidential race.

Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, stated this while reacting to a statement credited to Jerry Gana, former Minister of Information, who revealed that the former President would contest the 2027 Presidential election on the platform of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

Onanuga noted that there are premature desperation of the opposition ganging up against President Bola Tinubu despite his glaring giant economic strides.

‘We are once again regaled with a cacophony of voices, most of them full of sound and fury, signifying nothing, to paraphrase inimitable Williams Shakespeare in one of his classic works, Macbeth.’

Presidency stated that the’former Minister of Information and National Orientation, moving to draft former President Goodluck Jonathan into the 2007 Presidential race, affirmed that the former president would contest the coming election the platform of the discredited People’s Democratic Party (PDP), which bequeathed a legacy of economic ruins, after 16 years of bad governance.’

He stated that’Gana even deluded himself, asserting that the former President would defeat President Tinubu to reclaim power after 12 years.

‘Gana of the defunct MAMSER fame is free to delude himself and engage in his usual comedy; after all, Jonathan’s entering the race would provide another job for the Niger State-born former university don.’

Onanuga however cautioned former President Jonathan to be wary of the PDP sugar-coated cheerleaders.

The Presidential Spokesman said Politicians of Jerry Gana’s ilk merely want to lure Jonathan into the race to satisfy their personal, political, religious, and ethnic interests, but added that ‘They will abandon him midstream, as they did in 2015, and leave Gentleman Jonathan in the lurch.

‘Don’t get us wrong: President Jonathan reserves the right to run if he wishes.

‘It is his inalienable right to contest the presidency again. President Tinubu will wholeheartedly welcome him if he decides to enter the race.

‘But Jonathan will have his date in the court of the land. Indeed, the jury will determine whether Jonathan, who was sworn in twice as president, satisfies the constitutional requirements and is eligible to contest the presidency and be sworn in, if successful, for a third term in office.

‘Some of all those selfish considerations for which some PDP big guns find his candidacy appealing, President Jonathan will also have his encounter with the people as to whether he has anything new to offer after his disastrous six years, for which they voted him out in 2015. Onanuga, while speaking about Jonathan’s record in office, said Nigerians cannot forget in a hurry how ‘his regime, devoid of any clear economic agenda, engaged in frivolous spending, ran the economy aground and put the country in dire straits.

‘The nation’s economic downturn, which President Tinubu is working very hard to overcome, actually began under President Jonathan.

‘The Jonathan administration severely damaged the economy, and all key indicators declined under his watch. Under him, the so-called business moguls allocated foreign exchange to import fuel, simply pocketing the dollars without importing anything. Some of those big men still have court cases on the issue today.

‘Jonathan and his National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), freely distributed security funds to friends and cronies.

He also recalled that in ‘2010, President Jonathan inherited a total of $66 billion, of which $46 billion was in foreign reserves and $20 billion in the noble-but-abused Excess Crude Account.

‘By 2015, when the people democratically removed him from office, the foreign reserves had fallen below $30 billion, and the Excess Crude Account had been depleted to $2 billion, despite generating record revenue from crude oil sales that the country had never achieved in more than 25 years combined.

‘It is on record that between 2010 and 2013, crude oil sold for an average of $100 per barrel. By December 2014, however, the Jonathan-led Federal Government could no longer pay salaries to Federal Civil Servants. At least 28 states across the country owed workers huge salary arrears’

Presidency said in contrast, President Tinubu has taken bold decisions over the last 28 months to reset the economy, removing the ruinous fuel subsidy and abolishing multiple exchange rates, which paved the way for arbitrage to flourish.

‘The President has stabilised the economy in slightly over two years in office. In 2025 Q2, the Gross Domestic Product grew by 4.23%, the highest in four years, outpacing the 3.4% projected by the International Monetary Fund. Inflation decreased to 20.12% in August 2025, the lowest level in three years.

‘ The foreign reserves stand presently at $42. 03 billion. The Naira has virtually stabilised. Investor confidence in our economy has been restored, and investors are betting on Nigeria.

Onanuga said the nation has turned the corner, and our people have started reaping the gains of the bold reforms instituted by the Tinubu administration.

He cited road infrastructure being boosted, while old roads are being reconstructed while new ones, like the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway and the Sokoto-Badagry Highway, among others, are springing up. The government is addressing security issues in some parts of the country.

‘We can go on and on, reeling out the many macroeconomic gains of the Tinubu administration. However, the point is that the PDP and Jerry Gana’s co-travellers broke the economy; President Tinubu is fixing it.

‘President Jonathan and others are welcome to the 2027 race. They broke the economy before, but millions of Nigerians who will not easily forget the recent past will not allow them to return to run it down again.’

The Federal Government has moved to contain the fallout of a mine pit collapse in Jabaka Village, Maru Local Government Area of Zamfara State, which claimed the lives of at least 13 itinerant miners.

The Ministry of Solid Minerals Development confirmed that federal mine officers were deployed immediately to lead rescue operations following the collapse, which was triggered by heavy rainfall and worsened by the activities of illegal miners. Two more miners remain trapped, with efforts underway to recover them.

Dele Alake, minister of Solid Minerals Development, described the incident as ‘avoidable and unfortunate,’ stressing that the site would be sealed after the ongoing rescue operations.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the mine sits on loose, gold-bearing sand, exploited by illegal miners using rudimentary tools and unsafe methods.

Alake linked the tragedy to the broader challenge of illegal mining, which has plagued Zamfara and other parts of the country.

He noted that since the deployment of the Mining Marshals over a year ago, over 300 illegal miners have been arrested across 10 states and the FCT, while 98 illegal sites have been shut down. ‘Despite our vast land mass, we remain undaunted. With satellite surveillance and other enforcement measures underway, we aim to drastically reduce mine collapses across the country and tighten the noose around sponsors of illegal mining,’ Alake said.

The Minister disclosed that the government is investing in satellite surveillance systems to enable real-time monitoring of mining activities nationwide.

The move is expected to strengthen oversight, deter illegal operations, and enhance proactive responses to emergencies.

Zamfara remains a focal point in Nigeria’s mining sector due to its rich deposits of gold and history of insecurity.

Following military clearance operations coordinated by the National Security Adviser, the Federal Government lifted the ban on exploration in December 2024, paving the way for regulated mining activities.

The latest tragedy underscores the urgency of ongoing reforms as the Tinubu administration seeks to sanitize the solid minerals sector, reduce mining-related fatalities, and restore investor confidence in the industry.

Stanbic IBTC Insurance, a subsidiary of Stanbic IBTC Holdings has launched the Manifold Endowment Plan, an innovative blend of insurance and investment designed for Nigerians who want to protect what matters, grow their wealth, and enjoy peace of mind.

With life cover up to N1 billion, partial maturity pay-outs, and end-of-term bonuses, Manifold is for the modern Nigerian working hard today, planning boldly for tomorrow.

The Manifold Endowment Plan is uniquely designed for Nigerians aged 18 to 64, providing them with flexible policy durations ranging from six to fifteen years. At its core, it integrates death benefits, partial maturity bonuses, and accidental medical coverage, all while offering a structured avenue for individuals and families to plan, protect, and prosper.

The Nigerian insurance sector, though still underexplored, has seen remarkable growth, with industry revenues surging by 147 percent in the first nine months of 2024. Yet, with insurance penetration hovering around just 0.5 percent of GDP, the gap in uptake remains stark.

Stanbic IBTC is tackling this head-on by introducing an offering that speaks to the everyday concerns of middle- and high-income Nigerians who seek value, reliability, and transparency in financial services. Speaking on the launch, Akinjide Orimolade, chief executive, Stanbic IBTC Insurance, noted: ‘The Manifold Endowment Plan is a response to Nigeria’s pressing need for accessible and rewarding insurance solutions. We are not just offering protection; we are empowering Nigerians to build financial resilience while preparing for the future. With Manifold, every premium is an investment in both peace of mind and real financial return.’ Manifold bridges the perception gap often associated with insurance. It assures Nigerians that even if the ‘worst’ doesn’t happen, their money is never wasted. With premiums starting at just ?10,000 monthly, policyholders can earn two 25% bonuses on their premiums while still receiving 100% of their chosen sum assured at maturity.

At its core, the Manifold Endowment Plan aligns with Stanbic IBTC Insurance’s broader mission: to help Nigerians secure today and prosper tomorrow. Whether it’s a young professional saving towards future goals, a parent building generational wealth, or a retiree seeking peace of mind, Manifold offers a tailored and transparent financial solution.

With the Manifold Endowment Plan, Stanbic IBTC Insurance is not only offering Nigerians a way to secure their futures, but it is also redefining what insurance can and should mean in today’s world.

The 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly recently concluded successfully. This was a session of special significance, as it marked the 80th anniversary of the victory in the global anti-fascist war and the establishment of the United Nations. Over the past 80 years, the UN has become the most universal, representative and authoritative intergovernmental international organisation, with the UN-centred international system widely supported by the international community.

Eighty years ago, defeated Japan returned Taiwan to China, which was an indisputable outcome of the global anti-fascist war and a crucial part of the post-war international order. Currently, the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities stubbornly adopt a separatist policy seeking ‘Taiwan independence’, while a small number of countries claim that China’s sovereignty over Taiwan has not been established, openly challenging the authority of the UN and the post-war international order. To clarify the facts and set the record straight, I feel obligated to address several common fallacies on the Taiwan Question.

Fallacy 1: ‘The two sides of the Taiwan Strait are not subordinate to each other.’

Taiwan has belonged to China since ancient times, with clear historical and legal foundations. Numerous historical records and documents detail the early development of Taiwan by the Chinese people. As early as the 12th century, the Chinese government established administrative institutions and exercised jurisdiction in Taiwan. In 1895, Japan forced the Qing government to cede Taiwan and the Penghu Islands to Japan through war. In 1943, the Cairo Declaration issued by China, the United States and the United Kingdom stipulated that all the territories seized by Japan, including Taiwan, must be returned to China. In 1945, the Potsdam Proclamation issued by China, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union reaffirmed that the terms of the Cairo Declaration must be implemented.

In August of that year, Japan accepted the Potsdam Proclamation and signed the Instrument of Surrender in September, pledging to ‘faithfully fulfil the obligations laid down in the Potsdam Proclamation.’

Through a series of internationally legally binding documents, China recovered Taiwan both legally and in fact. Although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have not yet achieved complete reunification, the fact that both the mainland of China and Taiwan belong to one China and that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China has never changed and cannot be changed. This is the true status quo of the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan has never been a country, nor will it ever be in the future.

Fallacy 2: ‘China’s sovereignty over Taiwan has not been established.’

Shortly after the victory in the War of Resistance Against Japan in 1945, the Nationalist government led by Chiang Kai-shek launched a civil war. Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, the Chinese people won the civil war, ultimately overthrowing the ‘Republic of China’ government led by Chiang Kai-shek. Some members of the Nationalist regime retreated to Taiwan, and with interference from external forces, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait entered a prolonged state of political confrontation.

On October 1, 1949, the Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was established, and the PRC government became the sole legitimate government of China. This was a change of government within the same international legal entity of China, with no change to China’s sovereignty or inherent territory. The PRC government naturally enjoys and exercises China’s sovereignty in full, including sovereignty over Taiwan. Fallacy 3: ‘UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not establish the One-China principle.’

Resolution 2758 fully embodies the One-China principle. On August 20, 1971, before the resolution was put to a vote, the Chinese government issued a statement emphasising, ‘There are not two Chinas in the world; there is only one China, the People’s Republic of China. Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory and a province of China, which was returned to the motherland at the end of World War II. This is an indisputable fact.’ On October 25, 1971, the 26th session of the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 2758, which decided to ‘restore all the rights of the People’s Republic of China, recognise the representatives of its government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations, and expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organisations related to it.’

Resolution 2758 politically affirmed and consolidated the One-China principle: there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is a part of China, and the PRC government is the sole legitimate government representing all of China. Following the resolution’s adoption, UN official documents consistently refer to Taiwan as ‘Taiwan, Province of China’. These facts are indisputable and unchallengeable.

Fallacy 4: ‘UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not determine Taiwan’s status.’

Resolution 2758 and the One-China principle that the Resolution embodies impose a universal binding force on all subjects of the international community through the UN Charter, bilateral diplomatic treaties, and fundamental principles of international law.

In diplomatic practice, the resolution’s authority is reflected in the correct Taiwan-related positions, policies, and actions of the UN General Assembly, UN specialised agencies, and many UN member states. These collectively form an important international legal and moral foundation for handling Taiwan-related questions. The One-China principle, framework, consensus and related institutional arrangements supported by the resolution have become principles and common knowledge followed by all countries, as well as a solemn commitment by countries with diplomatic relations to respect China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The claim by a few countries that ‘Taiwan’s status is undetermined’ challenges the authority of the UN, defies the post-war international order, and is an absurd and dangerous attempt to reverse history.

Fallacy 5: ‘Now is the time for the UN to recognise Taiwan.’

According to Resolution 2758, China’s representation in the UN naturally includes Taiwan as part of the whole of China. This is entirely consistent with the international legal principle that ‘one sovereign state can only be represented by one central government.’ There is only one seat for China in the UN, and the PRC government is the sole legitimate representative of China in the UN. There is no issue of ‘two Chinas’ or ‘one China, one Taiwan’.

The Taiwan authorities have repeatedly pushed for farcical attempts to achieve ‘meaningful participation’ or ‘re-entry’ into the UN, trying to challenge the authority of Resolution 2758, but all ended in failure. Resolution 2758 clarifies that ‘China’ in the UN Charter refers to the People’s Republic of China, imposing an obligation on all UN member states to avoid raising the so-called issue of Taiwan’s representation in the UN system. Taiwan has no basis, reason or right to participate in the UN or other international organisations exclusive to sovereign states. On this matter of principle, there is no grey area or room for ambiguity.

The One-China principle has become an international consensus, with 183 countries, including Nigeria, establishing diplomatic relations with China based on this principle. In 1971, when China and Nigeria established diplomatic relations, Nigeria solemnly pledged in the Joint Communiqué: ‘The Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria recognises the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing the entire Chinese people.’ Since then, the One-China principle has been firmly supported by successive Nigerian governments, serving as the cornerstone for the healthy and stable development of China-Nigeria relations.

The Nigerian government requested the Taiwan authorities to relocate its trade office to Lagos from Abuja in 2017, strictly restricted official interactions between Nigerian government officials and Taiwan, and reiterated that the Taipei trade office in Nigeria is a non-diplomatic commercial entity that does not represent any government.

In September 2024, during President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s state visit to China, Nigeria reiterated in the Joint Statement: ‘Nigeria firmly adheres to the One-China principle, recognises that there is only one China in the world, that the Government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legitimate government representing the whole of China, and that Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory. Nigeria opposes any form of ‘Taiwan independence’, opposes interference in China’s internal affairs, and firmly supports the Chinese government’s efforts to achieve national reunification.’

China highly appreciates the Nigerian government’s firm stance on the Taiwan Question. Nigeria’s political resolve and firm stance align with the fundamental interests of the Nigerian nation and people, the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and the global landscape of one China. Currently, the China-Nigeria comprehensive strategic partnership continues to deepen, with friendly cooperation becoming a model for China-Africa cooperation and Global South collaboration. China is willing to strengthen strategic communication and practical cooperation with Nigeria, promote the early implementation of a zero-tariff policy for 100% of tariff lines on products, enhance collaboration under the framework of the Global Governance Initiative, and jointly build a China-Nigeria community with a shared future.

We hope that all peace-loving countries and peoples will stand on the side of historical justice, uphold the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, safeguard the authority of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, firmly oppose the deliberate distortions by the Taiwan authorities and a few countries, and take concrete actions to support the Chinese people’s just cause of defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity and achieving national reunification.