THE Impeachment Court trying Vice President Sara Duterte on Monday decided to refer to the Senate, as a legislative body, the issues against senator-judges that were raised in manifestations of certain senators, including questions of integrity.
Presiding Officer Francis Escudero noted that the Senate as a legislative body is due to convene soon (July 27) anyway, and the manifestations that certain senator-judges raised-and which are unrelated to the charges against Duterte-will be referred to it. The manifestations, however, will not be expunged from the records of the Impeachment Court.
Escudero made the ruling after Sen. Robinhood Padilla decried, at the start of the trial on Monday, what he called the rush to judge him on the matter of his having snubbed the Ombudsman in the obstruction of justice case pending against him related to the May 14, 2026 escape of Sen. Ronald dela Rosa from the Senate’s protective custody. He explained that he had used registered mail in replying to the Ombudsman, and he cannot be said to heve ‘snubbed’ the Ombudsman if the agency had not yet received it.
Sen. Erwin Tulfo protested Padilla’s manifestation and urged the presiding officer and his fellow senator-judges not to waste the time of the court with matters unrelated to the accusations against Duterte. He recalled how so many hours of the Impeachment Court were ‘wasted’ last week because certain senator-judges raised issues about the cases pending or lodged against them, but which do not relate in any way to the articles of impeachment against the Vice President.
Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano, who last week had raised non-impeachment-related issues on the floor, backed Padilla’s manifestation and argued against Tulfo. He said these issues raised pertain to the integrity of senator-judges and thus, on the court itself.
What is at stake is the integrity of senator-judges, thus, the integrity of the court, he said.
He cited as examples the detention of two senator-judges, Rodante Marcoleta and Jose Pimenel Ejercito alias Jinggoy Estrada, claiming that the flood-control controversy had been ‘weaponized’ against them. Both are facing plunder charges for separate cases. Cayetano and Padilla are being investigated for their roles in allowing dela Rosa, a fugitive from the International Criminal Court (ICC), escape government custody after being sheltered in the Senate.
However, Sen. Vicente Sotto III and later, Sen. Francis Pangilinan, insisted that matters unrelated to the impeachment charges should not be taken up in the court, but by the Senate sitting as a legislative body. They recalled an instance in the impeachment trial of then President Joseph Estrada when a manifestation by Sen. Rene Cayetano was not expunged from the records of the Impeachment Court but, being unrelated to the charges at hand, was referred to the Senate as a legislative body.
Taking a dig at Alan Peter’s reminder about the difficulty of ‘arguing with non-lawyers,’ Sotto said, ‘I don’t have four years of law school, but I have 29 years of lawmaking and I move that the manifestations of Senator Tulfo, be referred to the Senate [not the impeachment court].’