Deloitte Sri Lanka discusses Board governance in rapidly evolving risk landscape

Deloitte Sri Lanka, in collaboration with Deloitte India, recently hosted the Saarthi Program for Independent Directors at the Sheraton Colombo, bringing together independent directors and Board members to explore the future of effective corporate governance.

The program focused on some of today’s most pressing Boardroom priorities, including the future of governance, cyber and technology risks, fraud risk management and social media risk governance, providing practical insights into how Boards can strengthen organisational resilience while creating long-term value.

Speaking during the program, Deloitte Sri Lanka and Maldives Partner and Financial Services Assurance and Industry Leader Malinda Boyagoda emphasised that scope of governance today extends well beyond compliance and historical financial reporting.

‘Boards today are expected to be active stewards of resilience rather than passive reviewers of performance. As organisations embrace geo-political uncertainties, AI, digital transformation and increasingly complex business models, governance must evolve at the same pace. Fraud, cyber threats and emerging technology risks are no longer operational issues; they are Boardroom priorities that require sustainable solutions with informed oversight and constructive challenge. The organisations that will earn lasting stakeholder trust are those with Boards possessing right skills, who act with a proactive mindset and are prepared to ask difficult questions from management, before risks become crises.’

During his session on Fraud Risk Management, Boyagoda highlighted the evolving responsibilities of directors in guarding corporates against the rising risks of theft, corruption and financial reporting fraud. He underscored the need for Boards to move beyond reactive governance and foster ethical leadership, strengthen fraud risk management through prevention, detection and response mechanisms, and deploy continuous transaction monitoring tools and data analytics to identify emerging risks before they become significant business issues.

Building on these governance foundations, the program continued with a series of virtual sessions delivered by senior leaders from Deloitte India and distinguished members of the Saarthi Advisory Board.

The session on Boardroom Priorities: Navigating Cyber and Technology Risks, explored how artificial intelligence, cloud technologies and evolving cyber threats are reshaping Board oversight. The session highlighted that cybersecurity is now a strategic business issue requiring active Board engagement, with further discussions focusing on AI and data governance, third-party cyber risks, regulatory compliance and proactive incident response planning. Participants were encouraged to challenge management on cyber preparedness while recognising AI as both a driver of innovation and an emerging source of enterprise risk.

The session on Boardroom Priorities: Navigating Fraud Risks, reinforced that fraud is a governance priority requiring proactive Board oversight. Drawing on global fraud trends and recent corporate cases, the session examined the growing sophistication of cyber-enabled fraud, AI-powered scams and third-party risks, while highlighting the importance of reinforcing an ethical culture, web-based whistleblower mechanisms, fraud governance frameworks, and independent investigation protocol in protecting enterprise value and stakeholder confidence.

A key highlight of the program was the panel discussion on ‘Expectations from Boards in the Areas of Cyber, Technology and Fraud Risks,’ featuring members of the Saarthi Advisory Board and other veteran business leaders. Drawing on extensive Boardroom experience, the panel discussed the increasing expectations placed on directors to balance innovation with governance, strengthen oversight of emerging risks, challenge management constructively and foster cultures of accountability and resilience.

The program concluded with Social Media Governance: Balancing Risk, Reputation and Responsibility. The session highlighted the growing importance of social media governance as a Board-level priority, exploring governance frameworks for digital communications, regulatory compliance, influencer management, crisis response and brand protection. It also demonstrated how AI-enabled social media listening and continuous monitoring can help organisations identify reputational risks early while strengthening stakeholder trust in an increasingly digital environment.

Through Saarthi, Deloitte continues to create a platform for Board members and business leaders to exchange perspectives on emerging governance expectations, challenges and gain practical insights on strengthening oversight, managing risk and building resilient organisations equipped for long-term success.

Royal College Colombo first school to join GovPay

Royal College Colombo, became the first school in Sri Lanka to enable digital payments through GovPay, marking another significant milestone in the Government’s digital transformation agenda.

The official launch took place recently at a ceremony held at the Royal College, Colombo where the school was formally onboarded to the GovPay platform.

With this integration, parents can now conveniently make school Facilities and Service Fee payments as well as School Development Society (SDS) Fee payments securely through any digital banking platform or FinTech application connected to GovPay. The new facility replaces the cumbersome manual payment process, which was both time-consuming and inconvenient for parents while creating an administrative burden for the school. This initiative provides parents with a faster, more secure and convenient payment experience.

Royal College Colombo Principal Athula Wijewardena said: ‘As Sri Lanka’s first school to adopt GovPay, Royal College is proud to lead the way in embracing digital transformation within the education sector. This initiative will significantly improve the convenience offered to our parents while enabling the school to manage collections more efficiently, accurately and transparently. We believe this is a progressive step towards modernising public education administration.’

LankaPay CEO Channa de Silva said: ‘We are delighted to welcome Royal College, Colombo as the first school in Sri Lanka to join GovPay. Extending digital payments to schools represents another significant milestone in making Government services more accessible and citizen-centric. This further validates how digital payments can simplify everyday interactions between citizens and government while enhancing transparency, financial accountability and operational efficiency in Public Institutions.’

Royal College School Development Society Secretary Jaliya Perera, also welcomed the initiative, stating ‘The introduction of GovPay simplifies the payment process for our parent community while strengthening financial governance through secure digital transactions. It eliminates unnecessary paperwork and queues, allowing both parents and the School Development Society to benefit from a more efficient, transparent and accountable payment ecosystem.’

GovPay is a collaborative initiative of LankaPay and GovTech Sri Lanka, implemented under the direction of the Ministry of Digital Economy to enable secure and convenient digital payments for Government services. With the onboarding of Royal College Colombo, GovPay now connects 301 Government institutions, providing citizens with digital access to payments for 4,413 Government services. Since its launch in February 2025 the platform has processed 439,818 transactions with a total transaction value exceeding Rs. 4.8 billion demonstrating the rapid adoption of digital payments across Sri Lanka’s public sector.

GovPay is Sri Lanka’s national Government digital payment platform that enables citizens to make secure online payments to Government institutions through participating banks and licensed FinTech applications, offering a seamless, convenient and transparent payment experience.

2% or 5% inflation is not the question

The call for cutting the inflation target from 5% to 2% is gaining momentum. The case rests on an appealing proposition: less inflation means more monetary stability, lower interest rates and fewer distortions. But the argument risks confusing a lower numerical target with better monetary policy.

Sri Lanka’s problem has not been whether inflation was targeted at 2% or 5%. We have seen repeated failures to maintain monetary and fiscal stability in the past. But the dynamic has changed with new laws governing public finance and the Central Bank.

The claim that a higher inflation target increases the risk of overshooting does not necessarily follow. A Central Bank capable of holding inflation around 2% should also be capable of holding it around 5%. Conversely, weak policy, fiscal dominance or an external shock can overwhelm either target. Moving the number down does not remove those risks.

Nor does a 5% target amount to a policy of artificially cheap money. Interest rates can remain consistent with a 5% inflation target without being suppressed below market-clearing levels. The danger comes when monetary policy holds real rates too low for prevailing economic conditions, not from the inflation target itself.

The historical comparison with the past also warrants caution. Low inflation and interest rates then existed under an economic structure, exchange-rate regime, capital account and global monetary system far removed from those confronting Sri Lanka today. Singapore provides another useful lesson in monetary discipline, but its economic structure, external balance and monetary framework are hardly replicas available for Sri Lanka to adopt.

More importantly, inflation targeting involves trade-offs.

Sri Lanka remains exposed to oil, food and other imported price shocks. A 2% target could require a tighter adjustment path following persistent supply-driven inflation. Trying to force inflation rapidly back to 2% after an external shock could require interest rates and credit conditions that impose costs on investment, employment, public finances and an economy still rebuilding its capital stock.

That does not make inflation desirable. It means the cure carries costs too.

The proposition that exchange-rate depreciation merely magnifies imported shocks also understates the role of the exchange rate in adjustment. A country cannot simultaneously expect its exchange rate to remain stable, monetary policy to pursue an inflation target and capital to move freely without confronting the constraints imposed by the monetary policy trilemma. Something must adjust.

The strongest objection, however, is to the claim that a higher inflation target will lead to balance-of-payments crises. Sri Lanka’s external crises have involved fiscal deficits, monetary financing, reserve depletion, exchange-rate management, external borrowing and structural weaknesses. To assign such crises principally to whether the inflation target is 5% rather than 2% gives one policy parameter explanatory power it does not possess.

Credibility also does not require eliminating discretion. Central banks confront wars, pandemics, commodity shocks, financial crises and other events that no rule can fully anticipate. Credibility comes from explaining decisions, acting consistently with a mandate and returning inflation to target over a credible horizon, not from refusing to respond when circumstances change.

We certainly need monetary discipline. We need price stability, an independent Central Bank, continued fiscal discipline and structural reform. The institutional framework has also changed, with much tighter constraints on monetary financing of Government deficits.

But none of those propositions establishes that 2% is the right inflation target.

After the economic dislocation we have endured, the burden of proof lies with those proposing another change to the monetary framework. The question is not whether 2% inflation sounds better than 5%.

It is whether the economy is sufficiently resilient to adjust to those trade-offs, and whether forcing inflation towards 2% would deliver benefits greater than the economic costs required to get there and keep it there.

International experience offers successful examples across very different monetary regimes, from independent central banks to currency boards. The framework matters more than the number.

Pyramid Wilmar nurtures Sri Lanka’s next generation of culinary leaders through ‘ChefsHunt’ scholarship initiative

Celebrating its 20th anniversary, Pyramid Wilmar Ltd. has successfully concluded ChefsHunt, a landmark corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiative that reflects the company’s commitment to fostering culinary excellence and driving meaningful community impact.

ChefsHunt was conceived to discover and cultivate emerging culinary talent across Sri Lanka, bringing together 1,000 young participants between the ages of 18 and 25 from 10 locations nationwide.

The initiative provided a unique opportunity for aspiring chefs to develop their skills, gain industry exposure, and unlock their professional potential. Out of this talented pool, 23 exceptional individuals were selected to receive full scholarships for a comprehensive culinary course at the MW Institute of Culinary Arts.

The scholars commenced their intensive training on 19 January and successfully completed the six-month program on 10 July. Marking the next step in their professional journeys, these young talents are now entering the industry to gain hands-on, practical experience.

Upon completing this vital industrial training period, they will be officially awarded the prestigious NVQ Level 4 Certificate, setting a strong foundation for long-term careers in the culinary arts.

Commenting on this initiative, Pyramid Wilmar Ltd. Group Managing Director Sajjad Mawzoon said: ‘Through the ChefsHunt initiative, we are not only celebrating two decades of excellence but also actively investing in the future of Sri Lanka’s culinary landscape. Seeing these 23 talented young individuals complete their training and take their first steps into the industry is a testament to what is possible when raw talent is met with the right opportunities, education, and mentorship. This initiative is part of our obligation, as a company, to give back to our country and its citizens.’

As a driving force in the local food manufacturing sector, Pyramid Wilmar remains committed to uplifting Sri Lanka’s emerging culinary professionals while simultaneously expanding its footprint in the Hotels, Restaurants, and Cafes (Horeca) channel through innovative new product portfolios.

Through initiatives like ChefsHunt and industry-leading product offerings, Pyramid Wilmar continues to shape the future of Sri Lanka’s culinary landscape, fostering local talent and empowering the next generation of professional chefs.

Urgent need to fill diplomatic vacancies in key capitals

BRICS Chamber of Commerce General Secretary and a prominent private sector personality Kosala Wickramanayake has written an open letter to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Foreign Affairs Minister Vijitha Herath on the urgent need to fill diplomatic vacancies in key capitals.

I write to you with a deep sense of national interest and urgency regarding Sri Lanka’s current diplomatic representation in two of our most consequential partner nations: the People’s Republic of China and the United States of America.

1. The China vacancy – A strategic gap

It has now been over six months since Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to China departed, and we are yet to nominate a successor. In contrast, our largest neighbour, China, moved with remarkable speed to appoint a new Ambassador to Sri Lanka just one week after their previous envoy’s departure. This asymmetry sends an unintended signal of disengagement at a time when China remains our second-largest economy and a critical partner in infrastructure, investment, and debt restructuring. A prolonged vacancy undermines our ability to negotiate, attract investments, and advance bilateral projects that are vital to our economic recovery.

2. The United States – Our largest export market

Even more concerning is the current vacancy in Washington, D.C. The United States is our single largest export market, absorbing nearly 30% of Sri Lankan goods. With supply chain realignments, GSP+ discussions, and IMF engagement ongoing, having an Ambassador in place is not a formality-it is a commercial and economic necessity. Every week without a chief diplomat in Washington is a week we risk losing market share, investor confidence, and policy influence.

3. A call for decisive action

Prioritise nominations for both Washington and Beijing concurrently, rather than sequentially.

Set a clear timeline-no more than 30 days-to announce nominees, subject to parliamentary or constitutional approvals.

Select candidates with proven diplomatic acumen and commercial credibility, not merely political seniority. Our envoys must be dealmakers and advocates, not just ceremonial representatives.

Sri Lanka’s economic survival depends on our ability to project influence, secure markets, and sustain trust with our global partners. In the race for recovery, diplomatic speed is a strategic advantage. We cannot afford to be absent from the table when critical decisions about our future are being made.

I thank you for your leadership and trust that you will treat this with the urgency it deserves.

Trident Corporation launches BricsCAD

Trident Corporation, the official distributor for BricsCAD in Sri Lanka and the Maldives, has launched the globally recognised CAD platform through two high-profile industry events, marking a significant step in expanding access to advanced, affordable design technology across the region.

The customer launch, attracted over 100 architects, engineers, surveyors, designers, government representatives and corporate customers. The event featured live demonstrations showcasing BricsCAD’s capabilities in 2D drafting, 3D modelling, BIM, mechanical design and surveying.

The momentum continued the following day, with an exclusive Partner Meetup at Cinnamon Lakeside, where leading IT and engineering solution providers explored commercial opportunities, technical certification and strategies to expand BricsCAD adoption across both markets.

With more than 25 years of technology distribution experience, Trident Corporation will deliver comprehensive local sales, implementation, training and technical support, enabling organisations to migrate seamlessly to a cost-effective CAD platform without compromising productivity or native DWG compatibility.

Thakral Group Sri Lanka and Maldives Country Head Hilmey Niyas said: ‘We are delighted to be appointed as the official distributor of BricsCAD in Sri Lanka and the Maldives. This strategic partnership with Bricsys strengthens Trident Corporation’s position as a leading provider of innovative technology solutions across the region. By bringing BricsCAD’s powerful CAD and BIM platforms to our markets, we are committed to enabling engineers, architects, and businesses to accelerate innovation, enhance productivity, and drive digital transformation with greater efficiency and value.’

Commenting on the launch, Trident Corporation General Manager Hasalaka De Silva said, ‘BricsCAD provides an exceptional balance of innovation, affordability and productivity. Combined with Trident’s nationwide partner network and dedicated local expertise, customers can confidently embrace a future-ready CAD platform with world-class support.’

The launch reinforces Trident Corporation’s position as a leading technology enabler while providing Sri Lankan and Maldivian businesses with a competitive alternative for modern engineering and design workflows.

NCE Export Awards 2026: Another year of recognising Sri Lanka’s export sector

The National Chamber of Exporters of Sri Lanka (NCE) has opened applications for the NCE Export Awards 2026, the country’s premier national awards program dedicated to recognising and honouring the best-performing exporters.

In its 34th year, the awards have become a continuous and consistent feature of Sri Lanka’s export calendar, providing national recognition to businesses that have contributed to the country’s export performance and the overall economy.

Sri Lanka’s export sector has persistently played an important role in the country’s economic performance. Export earnings surpassed $ 10 billion during the first six months of 2026, highlighting the scale of activity generated by businesses serving international markets. The NCE Export Awards were established to recognise the achievements of Sri Lankan exporters and give due recognition to the contribution they make to the national economy. Over the years, the program has provided exporters with an opportunity to have their performance recognised at a national level, while also encouraging businesses across the export sector to maintain standards in international trade.

The awards program has been conducted consistently for more than three decades, through periods in which Sri Lanka’s exporters have faced changing economic conditions and challenges in international markets. Its continuation over the years highlights the importance placed on recognising the work of businesses operating in the export sector and the contribution they make to the country’s economic activity and foreign exchange earnings, as well as motivating exporters and encouraging them to pursue higher standards in international trade.

The 34th Annual NCE Export Awards Ceremony is scheduled to be held on 11 December 2026 at the Grand Ballroom of the Shangri-La Colombo. The event is expected to bring together exporters, public officials, policymakers, diplomats, business leaders and other stakeholders connected to Sri Lanka’s export sector.

The awards are presented following an evaluation process based on the criteria set out for the program. This provides a basis for assessing participating companies and recognising those that have recorded notable performance in their respective areas. Over the years, receiving an NCE Export Award has come to represent recognition within Sri Lanka’s business community and the export sector.

Applications for the NCE Export Awards 2026 are currently open, with the closing date set for 30 September 2026. The Chamber is also conducting briefing sessions for prospective applicants to provide guidance on the application process, evaluation criteria and other important aspects of the awards program. The briefing sessions are intended to assist interested companies in understanding the requirements before submitting their applications. Companies considering participation are encouraged to attend these sessions and make use of the guidance available as they prepare their submissions.

With the application period now underway, the NCE is calling on exporters from across the country and across sectors to take part in the NCE Export Awards 2026. The program is an opportunity for businesses to have their achievements recognised at a national level and to be part of an awards program that has recognised Sri Lankan export performance for more than three decades.

The deadline for applications is 30 September 2026, while the winners will be recognised at the 34th Annual NCE Export Awards Ceremony on 11 December 2026. Download the application from www.nce.lk.

Entrepreneurs who left lasting footprints on Sri Lanka

There is a fundamental difference between making money and building something that outlives you.

Some entrepreneurs become wealthy by taking a spectacular risk, capitalising on a moment of extraordinary opportunity or leveraging powerful networks and contacts. Others build their fortunes-and their reputations-more gradually, brick by brick, through persistence, conviction and an ability to see beyond the next quarter.

It is the latter group that offers the most valuable lessons.

Over the years, I have had the privilege of working closely with several of Sri Lanka’s most successful entrepreneurs, including at the board level. I have also had the opportunity to hear them speak candidly about their journeys through interviews, conversations and industry forums.

At the 2018 FT-ICCSL-CIMA Fireside Chat, for example, a number of these business leaders shared experiences that extended well beyond conventional management wisdom, revealing the motivations, setbacks and convictions behind their success. More recently, the SLID 2026 Fireside Chat provided another opportunity to hear directly from business leaders about their entrepreneurial journeys and perspectives.

Among those whose careers I have had the opportunity to observe closely are the late Harry Jayawardena, Aban Pestonjee, Binod Chaudhary, Sumal Perera, the late Merrill J. Fernando, Sohli Captain and Chandra Schaffter. There are, of course, many other Sri Lankan entrepreneurs including Late Rajamahendran, Dhammika Perera, Ranjit Page, Akbarally, Damitha Ramanayake, Ashok Pathirage, Late Upali Wijewardana and Ishara Nanayakkara. There are also home-grown brands, such as Spa Ceylon. Their businesses and personalities are distinctly different. Yet beneath those differences lie a number of common traits. They did not simply build companies. They built institutions, brands, people and, ultimately, legacies. And, importantly, many of them achieved their success without feeling the need to constantly flaunt it.

Vision is worthless without delivery

Successful entrepreneurs tend to see possibilities before they become obvious to everyone else. But vision alone is cheap. What separates the exceptional from the merely ambitious is the ability to translate an idea into an operating reality.

Aban Pestonjee and the late Merrill J. Fernando built businesses around ideas they believed in deeply. Their brands were not merely commercial propositions; they reflected values and convictions embedded in the very fabric of their operations.

Fernando, in particular, understood that Sri Lanka could compete globally not simply by exporting a commodity, but by building a brand around the provenance and quality of Ceylon Tea.

That requires more than imagination. It demands discipline, patience and relentless execution.

Change before you are forced to

The business environment rarely stands still. Markets evolve, technology advances, customer preferences shift and competitors emerge from unexpected quarters.

The strongest entrepreneurs do not wait for disruption to arrive at their doorstep. They anticipate it.

Sumal Perera’s journey with Access Engineering exemplifies this capacity for adaptation. His businesses have navigated difficult cycles in construction, infrastructure and property by continually seeking new opportunities rather than becoming prisoners of past success.

Harry Jayawardena adopted a similarly pragmatic approach. One observation that has stayed with me was his remark: ‘It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness.’

There is a powerful entrepreneurial philosophy embedded in that sentence: stop complaining about circumstances and take action.

Resilience is not merely surviving adversity. It is having the confidence to act while others are still debating what went wrong.

Take risks-but make them calculated

Entrepreneurship without risk is impossible. But successful entrepreneurs understand that courage is not the same as recklessness.

Harry Jayawardena built much of his career around calculated bets, often entering businesses where the outcome was far from certain. The ability to make such decisions requires judgement: knowing when to move, when to wait and when to change direction.

Binod Chaudhary’s investments in Sri Lanka demonstrate similar characteristics: a willingness to see opportunities beyond conventional boundaries and the confidence to commit capital where others may have hesitated.

Chandra Schaffter’s contribution to Sri Lanka’s insurance industry similarly reflected entrepreneurial conviction. Building and sustaining Janashakthi required the willingness to challenge an established market and create a new institution in a sector where the odds were not always obvious.

The lesson is critical. The best entrepreneurs are not necessarily those who take the biggest risks. They are those who understand the consequences of risk-and still have the courage to act.

Make quality and consistency part of the brand

A business can attract customers through price, promotion or novelty. It earns their loyalty through consistency.

Merrill J. Fernando understood this exceptionally well. His insistence on quality, provenance and authenticity helped transform Ceylon Tea from a commodity into a globally recognised brand.

That principle extends beyond products. It applies to service, culture, governance and reputation.

The strongest businesses develop a consistency that customers, employees and investors can trust. They do not reinvent their values every time the market changes.

Increasingly, enduring businesses recognise that financial performance and social impact are not mutually exclusive.

The MJF Foundation exemplifies how a business legacy can extend beyond shareholders. The work associated with MAS Holdings and Brandix similarly demonstrates how large enterprises can create employment, develop talent and influence the communities in which they operate.

Sohli Captain represented another dimension of this philosophy. His business contribution was accompanied by a strong commitment to philanthropy and community service. For him, success was measured not solely by what could be accumulated, but also by what could be given back.

Build people, not just businesses

Perhaps the most important lesson is that no entrepreneur builds a lasting institution alone.

Behind every enduring company is a team capable of carrying the vision forward.

The best entrepreneurs understand that talent is not simply a cost on the Balance Sheet. It is an asset that compounds.

They create cultures where people are trusted, challenged and given opportunities to grow. They build leaders who can eventually assume responsibility beyond the founder.

MAS and Brandix provide powerful examples of businesses where investment in people has been central to organisational development, while also contributing significantly to the communities in which they operate.

This is ultimately what determines whether a company remains a founder’s business-or becomes an institution.

The real measure of success

The defining characteristic of these entrepreneurs is not the amount of money they made.

It is what remained after they made it.

They created brands that became recognised beyond Sri Lanka. They transformed industries. They generated employment. They developed generations of managers and entrepreneurs. They supported communities. And, in different ways, they helped reshape how Sri Lankan business is perceived.

That is a very different definition of success from simply accumulating wealth.

Sri Lanka, like every economy, has no shortage of businessmen. What it needs are more institution-builders.

The distinction matters.

A businessman can build a profitable company. An entrepreneur can build a successful enterprise. But a true business leader builds something that continues to create value after he or she is no longer in the room.

That is what a lasting footprint looks like.

In an environment where mediocrity can often appear safer than ambition, these entrepreneurs chose the road less travelled. They entered markets others avoided, backed ideas others doubted and persisted when the easier option was to walk away.

They saw possibilities where others saw limitations.

And that, perhaps more than wealth itself, is the enduring lesson of their careers: the greatest entrepreneurs do not simply build businesses. They build legacies-and create new products, services and possibilities that change the markets around them.

Sri Lanka may not yet have produced entrepreneurs whose businesses operate on the global scale of Elon Musk, Bill Gates or Mukesh Ambani, whose success has been supported by much larger markets, deeper pools of venture capital and vastly greater access to global capital. But that should not diminish what Sri Lankan entrepreneurs have achieved.

There is much to learn from their journeys-and much to emulate.

The challenge for the next generation is not simply to become wealthier than those who came before them. It is to think bigger, take calculated risks, build globally competitive businesses, create new products and services, develop people and leave behind institutions that are stronger than when they found them.

That is the difference between creating wealth and creating a legacy.

(The views expressed in this article are the author’s personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of any organisation or company with which he is associated as Chairman or Director)

References

FT-ICCSL-CIMA Fireside Chat: YouTube reference provided by the author.

Daily FT: Harry Jayawardena at the Fireside Chat.

Daily FT: ‘Boards must move beyond compliance to strategic foresight to drive

Sri Lanka’s next growth chapter.’

Army SC continues domination with second successive win

Army SC continued to dominate the Major Club Women’s limited-over tournament when they beat Panadura SC by six wickets at Panagoda yesterday to record their second successive win.

Veteran off-spinner Sudarshika Bandara opening the bowling took 3/16 to dismiss Panadura SC for 116. Imalka Mendis hit an unbeaten 48 off 115 balls (4 fours) to see Army SC home with plenty to spare.

Another forces team Navy SC coming out for the first time defeated Colts by nine wickets at Welisara. Colts were shot out for 49 with right-arm seamer Sathya Sandeepani taking 3/4 off five overs. The strong Navy SC outfit with national cricketers Hasini Perera and Harshitha Samarawickrama knocked off the runs in 13 overs.

Badureliya CC and Ace Capital CC bounced back from defeats to win their respective matches by the same margin of six wickets.

An innings of 43 off 66 balls (6 fours) from number nine batter Tharuka Shehani helped Air Force SC to 132. Off-spinner Kaveesha Dilhari took 3/19. A 70-run unbroken stand off 115 balls between the Nisansala’s (no relation to each other) Sumudu (40* off 65 balls, 5 fours) and Sachini (28*) saw Badureliya CC home in the 38th over in the match played at Air Force grounds, Katunayake.

Ace Capital CC scored a resounding win over Chilaw Marians CC chasing down a stiff target of 180 at DHH ground, Madampella. The match was notable for the number of extras conceded by both teams that amounted to 70. In Chilaw Marians CC’s total of 179, Ace Capital CC conceded 32 extras (29 of which were wides). In Ace Capital CC’s run chase, Chilaw Marians CC bowlers were guilty of giving away 38 extras (36 of which were wides).

Opener Dinaya Gamagedara (45 off 118 balls, 4 fours) starred in three fruitful partnerships of 42 with Pavindi Nirmani (14), 68 with Glamandriya Athale (37) and 47 with Yeshali Jithara (37*) to see Ace Capital CC over the line in the 44th over. Jithara also excelled with the ball taking 4/31 bowling right-arm slow medium. – [ST]

Who is protecting the child?

I have spent years sitting across tables from children who have been abused.

I have watched children struggle to speak, children stare at the floor, children become angry, silent, withdrawn or strangely cheerful while describing something horrific. I have watched children tell one part of a story today and another part months later.

And then I have watched those same children enter our justice system.

This is where my frustration begins.

We speak constantly about the best interests of the child. We put it into laws, policies and speeches. We talk about child-friendly justice and trauma-informed practice.

But somewhere between the police station, the Magistrate’s Court, the High Court, the lawyers, the investigation, the prosecution and the endless postponements, we seem to forget one very basic thing.

A child is actually a human being

A child who has already survived something most adults would struggle to survive is then expected to survive the justice system as well.

We need to understand trauma.

When a child is frightened, the response is not always rational or predictable. We speak about the Fight, Flight, Freeze and Fawn responses. A child may fight. A child may run. A child may freeze completely. A child may become excessively compliant because pleasing the person hurting them feels like the safest way to survive.

A child may say nothing. A child may protect the person who abused them. A child may continue to return to that person. A child may laugh while describing something horrific. A child may disclose something today and remember another part of the experience much later.

None of this automatically means the child is lying.

Sometimes it means the child is surviving.

Yet we still expect children to behave like perfectly coherent adult witnesses. We ask why they did not scream, why they did not run, why they waited, why they went back, why they changed their story.

Because they were children. Because they were frightened. Because their brains were trying to survive.

And then comes the courtroom.

The accused has a lawyer. The State has lawyers. There are investigators, prosecutors, rules of evidence and constitutional protections. As a lawyer, I believe absolutely in the right to a fair trial and the right of a defence counsel to challenge the prosecution case.

But there is a difference between rigorous advocacy and cruelty.

There is a difference between testing evidence and humiliating a child.

There is a difference between exposing a genuine inconsistency and repeatedly attacking a traumatised child until the child feels that they are the person on trial.

A defence lawyer may forget the child when the hearing ends. The child does not.

The child remembers the questions, the tone, the humiliation and the feeling of being disbelieved.

Then there is the investigation.

Some cases do not fail because there was no evidence. They fail because evidence was not secured when it mattered.

A child discloses abuse. There may be neighbours, teachers, friends, medical evidence, CCTV, telephone records, digital communications or other witnesses. But the investigation drags on.

Weeks become months. Months become years. Witnesses move. Memories fade. People become frightened. People change their stories.

And eventually we look at the child and ask:

Where is the corroboration?

My question is different. Where was the State when the evidence was still there?

Where was the urgency when the witness was willing to speak? Where was the investigator when the CCTV could still be secured? Where was the system when the digital evidence could still be preserved?

The failure to investigate properly cannot become the child’s failure of credibility.

Then comes the media.

A child protection case breaks and suddenly everyone cares. Headlines everywhere. Television discussions. Social media outrage. People who have never met the child become experts on the child.

For two weeks, the child becomes the centre of national attention.

And then we move on. The news cycle moves on. The public moves on.

But the child does not.

The child still has to go to court. The child still has to live with what happened.

The Pallegama monk case is one example. The alleged abuse of a child by a prominent Buddhist monk generated enormous public and media attention. Eventually, as happens with so many cases, the headlines faded.

But what happened to the child when the cameras left?

That is the question we rarely ask.

We saw the same phenomenon in the horrific Mount Lavinia child exploitation case in 2021. A 15-year-old girl was exploited through an online network and the investigation expanded into a much larger group of alleged offenders. There were arrests, names and headlines. Police eventually reported 41 arrests in connection with the case.

The country was outraged. And then the country moved on.

But the child did not. Try to find out where she is right now.

We are also very good at announcing laws.

The Children’s Ordinance dates back to 1939. Yes, it has been amended, including important amendments that came into operation in 2024. But we are still working within a legislative architecture whose foundations were laid almost a century ago.

Now we hear announcements about a new Child Rights Act.

Where is it? What does it contain? Who drafted it? Who were the stakeholders?

Were children consulted? Survivors? Child protection lawyers? Psychologists? Prosecutors? Investigators? Teachers?

And then there is the question that frightens me most.

What happens when a child is in danger today?

Imagine there is a custody battle before the District Court. One parent has physical custody. Something happens and the child is suddenly at risk.

The Magistrate’s Court may be reluctant to interfere because the custody matter is before the District Court.

The Police cannot simply override a District Court order.

But… the District Court is on vacation.

So who protects the child?

This is not a theoretical question. These are the gaps we encounter in real cases.

Everyone can explain why they cannot act. But nobody can explain who will act.

A child does not understand jurisdiction. A child does not understand court vacations.

A child understands one thing:

“Am I safe?”

And if our justice system cannot answer that question when the child is actually in danger, what exactly are we protecting?

Children can also become victims of the justice system in custody battles. They become messengers, evidence, sometimes weapons. They are questioned about one parent by the other. They are taken to lawyers, psychologists, social workers, police stations and courts.

Sometimes we ask what the child wants when what the child really wants is simply for their parents to stop fighting.

We need a genuinely trauma-informed justice system. Not merely a colourful room called child-friendly. Not another policy document. Not another conference.

We need every person who encounters a child in the justice system to understand that silence can be trauma, inconsistency can be trauma, compliance can be survival, and that memory does not always behave like a CCTV recording.

And we need to stop treating every delay as a procedural inconvenience.

Every delay is part of a child’s life

The eight-year-old becomes ten. The ten-year-old becomes fifteen. The fifteen-year-old becomes twenty.

The case remains “before court”. But the child’s childhood has moved on.

I am tired of hearing “best interests of the child” spoken as though it is a magic phrase.

I want to know what it actually means when a child needs protection today.

Who investigates? Who secures the evidence? Who protects the witnesses? Who supports the child? Who prevents further trauma? Who acts when one court says it is another court’s problem?

And ultimately:

Who protects the child when the system itself cannot?

Because if the answer is come back when the court reopens, we have already failed. If the answer is the matter is before another court, we have failed again. If the answer is we are still investigating after years have passed, we have failed again.

We do not need another beautiful speech about child rights. We need a justice system that works when the child actually needs it.

Because a child should never have to survive the crime, and then survive us.