Reps to IGP: Produce ‘fake’ PFIPC DG within 48 hours

The House of Representatives has directed the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC), Adeyemi Adeniyi, before its investigative committee within 48 hours.

The order was issued on Monday during the resumed hearing of the House committee investigating the activities of the controversial council at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja.

Representing the IGP, Assistant Commissioner of Police Bashir Abdullahi appeared before the committee and was directed to ensure Adeyemi is brought before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday.

The committee is investigating how the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office space at Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budget allocation of ?1.32 billion in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation that it is investigating petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President, accusing Adeyemi of falsely presenting himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

Committee Chairman Yusuf Gagdi said Adeyemi’s appearance was necessary because of the seriousness of the allegations.

‘This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

‘It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,’ Gagdi said.

The committee then directed its clerk to formally notify the Inspector-General of Police.

‘The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,’ Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi told lawmakers that although investigations were still ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

‘The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,’ he said.

He added that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned but warned against making statements that could affect the ongoing investigation or court proceedings.

‘We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,’ Abdullahi said.

The police also confirmed that the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies on October 17, 2025, over allegations against Adeyemi, leading to investigations and criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators further confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the claimed office to secure accommodation at the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to obtain a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the council.

During the hearing, the committee compared signatures on documents said to have come from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with genuine official documents obtained by the police.

Asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness replied, ‘They are not the same.’

The committee said the difference raised further concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi said, ‘So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency.’

He disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had appeared before the committee and denied issuing the documents linked to their offices.

Gagdi said the committee had deliberately avoided asking the police to reveal information that could interfere with ongoing criminal investigations.

‘We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,’ he said.

Ban applies only to preaching in commercial vehicles, not streets – Senate

The Senate has clarified that its recent concurrent amendments to the Federal Road Safety Commission (Establishment) Act, No. 22, 2007 did not include a ban on street preaching by individuals or religious organisations as speculated in certain quarters.

It also noted that the proscription of hawking/preaching in commercial buses had been part of the law and not a new addition by the National Assembly.

Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, while making the clarification on Monday, explained that the new legislation merely altered the position of the provision of hawking/preaching in commercial buses from Item 36 in the Second Schedule of the Act to Item 49.

He added that the law remained what it had been -a ban on hawking/preaching in commercial buses- as against a ban on preaching in the streets by individuals or organisations as claimed.

‘The Senate has duly noticed public concerns on the purported proscription of preaching and hawking in a commercial vehicle under the ongoing amendment to the Federal Road Safety Commission (Establishment) Act, No. 22, 2007.

‘Pursuant to Section 10(4) of the Federal Road Safety Commission (Establishment) Act, 2007 and Regulation 220 of the National Road Traffic Regulations (NRTR) 2012, preaching and hawking in a commercial vehicle are offences.

‘The offences have been part of the Act before the current amendment.

‘Entrenched as Item 36 in the Second Schedule of the Act, preaching and hawking in a commercial vehicle are not new provisions in our legal system. The provisions have been part of the Act as far back as 2007. However, it is now listed as Item 49, Second Schedule of the Act’, his Directorate of Media and Public Affairs said on Monday.

The leader stressed that the bill did not outlaw street preaching, adding that the whole essence of the proscription of hawking or preaching in commercial buses was for the safety of travellers.

‘The bill, therefore, does not outlaw preaching on the streets as some interests have claimed in different fora. It is about the safety of commuters and other road users and not intended to undermine any religious activity in the public space.

‘The bill is not an initiative of the Leader of the Senate, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele. Rather, it is a concurrence bill first amended by the House of Representatives. As required by the 1999 Constitution, the bill requires the concurrence of the Senate before it can become effective’, his office stated.

However, Bamidele said the amendment process was ongoing and could still accommodate more views ‘in the spirit of democracy’, urging stakeholders to channel their concerns to the appropriate institutions before the completion of the process.

In the amended bill, which was passed on July 14, motorists are to pay fines up to N100,000 for traffic offences.

Stiffer penalties await disobedience to traffic lights, road signs and general markings, all of which now attract a fine of N100,000.

Similarly, driving under the influence of alcohol or other substances attracts a fine of N100,000 on conviction.

Motorists who refuse to cooperate with FRSC officials during roadside breath tests carried out on reasonable suspicion of intoxication can be liable to a ?50,000 fine, a six-month prison sentence, or both.

The proposed law also prohibits hawking inside commercial vehicles or making noise to disturb the peace of fellow passengers under the guise of trading or passing messages.

Offenders caught hawking or trading inside commercial buses will pay a fine of N50,000, according to the provisions of the bill.

The bill also targets speeding and dangerous driving. Under the extant law, speed limit violations attract modest fines, but the new bill jacks such offences up to a fine of ?100,000.

In the same vein, reckless driving will attract a ?100,000 fine, imprisonment for up to two years, or both, depending on the circumstances of the offence.

The bill was passed as part of measures to strengthen the operations of the FRSC and reduce accidents on the nation’s highways.

DEON regulations: ’40 million Nigerians may lose airtime borrowing access’ – Court document

No fewer than 40 million Nigerians who place their reliance on airtime borrowing services may be confronted by another round of disruptions if the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) begins complete enforcement of its Digital, Electronic, Online or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending (DEON) Regulations 2025 before the determination of a pending appeal.

The above warning is contained in an affidavit sworn to by the Chairman of WASPAN, Ayo Stuffman, in support of the association’s application for an injunction pending appeal following the July 20 judgment of the Federal High Court sitting at Ikoyi, Lagos, which upheld the FCCPC’s authority to issue and enforce the DEON regulations.

The suit, designated FHC/L/CS/760/2026, seeks to determine whether the FCCPC has the statutory authority to regulate telecommunications-based airtime lending services or whether such regulatory powers belong exclusively to the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) under the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.

Consequent to the judgment handed down by the Federal High Court, WASPAN initiated a Notice of Appeal on July 21, praying to the court to restrain the FCCPC from implementing the regulations until the Appellate Court determines the substantive issues.

The association, according to Stuffman, became alarmed after the FCCPC announced immediately after the judgment that enforcement of the DEON Regulations had resumed, declaring that the legal impediment responsible for the earlier suspension of implementation had been removed and that the regulations were now fully operational and enforceable.

Stuffman posited that enforcing the regulations before the appeal is heard could expose operators to regulatory sanctions, create uncertainty within the telecommunications industry and disrupt airtime borrowing services relied upon by millions of Nigerians.

Stuffman, in the affidavit, declared that ‘I know for a fact that unless restrained by the orders of this Honourable Court, the Defendant will proceed to enforce the said regulations against members of the Plaintiff.’

He equally contended that FCCPC’s actions would continue to subject WASPAN members to regulatory uncertainty, expose them to sanctions and interfere with their lawful business operations while the appeal remains pending.

WASPAN insisted that its members are already being constrained in exercising their operational responsibilities under the NCC, which it described as their primary regulator, through additional regulatory obligations imposed by the FCCPC, including partnership approvals and service agreement requirements.

Stuffman equally argued that allowing the regulations to be enforced before the appeal is determined would render the appellate proceedings ineffective by creating a fait accompli before the Court of Appeal has an opportunity to rule on the legality of the regulations.

In the affidavit, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Chukwudi Enebeli, who represented WASPAN, opined that the appeal raises substantial and arguable legal questions regarding the scope of the FCCPC’s regulatory authority over telecommunications services.

The legal opinion attached to the application further stated that there is a real likelihood that enforcement of the regulations could disrupt the operations of WASPAN members while the appeal is awaiting determination.

The association maintained that refusing its request for an injunction would undermine the purpose of the appeal and expose operators to irreversible consequences before the appellate court delivers its judgment.

It would be recalled that in the proceedings earlier, the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON) had argued that airtime credit is not a traditional financial product but an essential telecommunications service that enables millions of Nigerians to remain connected, especially during emergencies.

In fact, the regulatory disagreement had previously resulted in the temporary suspension of airtime borrowing services by major mobile network operators before the Federal High Court granted interim relief allowing the services to resume pending the determination of the substantive suit.

The FCCPC, through its Director of Corporate Affairs, Ondaje Ijagwu, revealed that the FCCPC remains committed to the rule of law and would continue to discharge its statutory responsibilities in line with the court’s judgment.

According to him, the Commission had always maintained that the rule of law is fundamental to effective regulation and good governance, adding that following the court’s affirmation of the DEON Regulations, the FCCPC would continue to implement its statutory mandate professionally and in accordance with the law.

Why some nations prosper while others only change governments

Every election changes a government, but very few of them change an economy. This is one of the most important lessons in political economy, but it is often forgotten in public debate. Elections attract headlines, governments make appointments afterwards, and political parties celebrate victory or explain defeat. But once the excitement is over, the real question remains unanswered: Has anything changed that will make the economy more productive?

This question explains why some nations become prosperous while others remain trapped in the cycle of political competition without achieving lasting economic progress.

For many years, people believed that natural resources determined the wealth of nations, but experience has shown otherwise. Countries with few natural resources have become some of the richest in the world, while many resource-rich nations continue to struggle with unemployment, poverty and slow economic growth. The difference is rarely the resources beneath the ground. More often, it is the ideas that guide those who govern above the ground. And, this is where political economy becomes important.

Political economy begins with a simple truth that, every economic outcome is shaped by political choices. A government’s decision to protect property rights affects investment. Its tax policies influence business expansion. Its education policies affect the quality of future workers. Its infrastructure decisions determine how easily goods move from farms and factories to markets. Even the confidence investors have in an economy is influenced by the quality of public institutions.

In other words, politics creates incentives, and incentives define economic behaviour.

Businesses invest when they believe tomorrow will be more predictable than today. Farmers produce more when roads, storage facilities and markets reduce waste. Young people invest in education when they believe hard work will be rewarded. Investors commit capital where rules are stable and contracts are respected. Productivity does not grow by accident. It grows because political decisions encourage people to produce, invest, innovate and create value.

This is why I believe Nigeria’s political conversation needs a new standard of measurement.

For too long, we have measured politics by elections won, appointments secured and offices occupied. These are political outcomes, but they are not necessarily development outcomes. I propose a different measure, and I call it ‘The Prosperity Test.’

Every major political decision should answer these simple question:

Will this decision increase Nigeria’s productive capacity over the next five, ten or twenty years?

Will it encourage investment? Will it create jobs? Will it improve learning? Will it strengthen institutions? Will it help businesses grow? Will it increase agricultural and industrial production?

If the answer to these questions is largely no, then we should honestly ask whether the decision serves the country’s long-term interest. Because the purpose of politics is not simply to manage power, rather it is to organise society in a way that allows more people to become productive.

This is what I describe as the ‘Politics of Production.’ And a nation focused on it does not judge success by the number of political offices it creates. It judges success by the number of economic opportunities it creates. Its governments compete to attract investment, its states compete to improve education, its institutions compete to deliver better public services, and its policies reward enterprise instead of uncertainty.

History offers many examples. Countries such as Singapore, Vietnam and Botswana followed different political paths, but they shared one important characteristic. Their governments consistently made choices that encouraged production, investment and institutional stability over long periods. They understood that sustainable prosperity is built gradually through predictable policies and capable institutions, not through short-term political victories alone.

Nigeria possesses many of the ingredients required for similar progress. We have a youthful population, vast agricultural land, entrepreneurial talent and abundant natural resources. These advantages should be engines of national prosperity, but advantages alone do not produce development.

Resources create possibilities, institutions turn possibilities into productivity, and productivity creates prosperity. That is why institutions matter so much. Strong institutions reduce uncertainty. When uncertainty falls, investment becomes easier. As investment increases, businesses expand. Expanding businesses employ more people, produce more goods and pay more taxes. Those taxes allow governments to invest further in infrastructure, education and healthcare, creating another cycle of growth.

Prosperity is therefore the result of many good political decisions reinforcing one another over time. And this understanding should also change the way we judge leadership.

A successful leader should not be remembered simply for winning elections. Did more businesses open under them? Did more young people find meaningful work? Did farmers become more productive? Did exports increase? Did institutions become stronger? And, did citizens gain greater confidence in the future? These are the questions political economy encourages us to ask because they measure whether politics is creating lasting economic value.

Nigeria has an abundance of politics. What we need is more productive politics; politics that expands opportunity, rewards enterprise and strengthens institutions. Our national conversation should therefore move beyond personalities and focus more on productivity. Governments should compete not only for political support but also for economic results. And citizens should judge leaders not only by promises made but by opportunities created.

If politics becomes more productive, the economy will become more productive. If the economy becomes more productive, living standards will improve. And if living standards improve, politics itself will become healthier because hope grows where opportunity exists.

The future of Nigeria will not be determined only by who occupies public offices, but whether those in public office understand that political power is valuable only when it expands economic opportunity.

That is the central lesson of political economy.

And perhaps it is the conversation Nigeria needs most today.

Two emerge winners of maiden Pius Oleghe Poetry Prize, pocket N2m

Two young Nigerian writers, Uzoigwe Miracle and Aremu Goodness Adejare, have emerged winners of the maiden edition of the Pius Oleghe Poetry and Literary Awards (POPALS), winning a combined N2 million in prize money for their outstanding poetic works.

Miracle won the Young Voices category, reserved for participants aged 12 to 17 years, while Adejare emerged winner of the Emerging Poets category for contestants between the ages of 18 and 35.

Each winner received a cash prize of N1 million, alongside publication opportunities, certificates of recognition, mentorship and other literary development benefits aimed at nurturing emerging talents.

One of the winners, Goodness Adejare Aremu is a Nigerian poet, essayist, and law student at the University of Ibadan, where he maintains a first class academic record.

The winners were selected after an extensive adjudication process by an independent panel of literary scholars, who assessed more than 145 entries submitted from across Nigeria and beyond.

The panel of judges comprised Professors Maria Ajima, Emmanuel Sule Egya, Chimalum Nwankwo, and Chike Okoye, as well as Dr Deji Ige.

The competition was coordinated by renowned poet and former President of the Association of Nigerian Authors (ANA), Professor Remi Raji, alongside award-winning playwright Nnamdi Okose, who served as literary directors.

In a statement jointly signed by the literary directors, the organisers said the inaugural edition, themed ‘Nigeria of Our Dreams,’ attracted impressive entries that reflected the creativity and intellectual depth of young Nigerian poets.

According to the statement, the quality of submissions reaffirmed poetry’s enduring relevance as a powerful medium for imagination, national reflection and hope for a better Nigeria.

The judges described Miracle’s winning entry in the Young Voices category as exceptional, citing its originality, creativity and impressive poetic craftsmanship.

Similarly, Adejare’s winning poem in the Emerging Poets category was praised for its artistic excellence and thoughtful interpretation of the competition’s theme.

The organisers also announced that shortlisted entries from both categories would be published in the inaugural Pius Oleghe Poetry Prize Anthology, showcasing some of the finest works submitted during the maiden edition of the competition.

They expressed appreciation to all participants, noting that the overwhelming response underscored the abundance of literary talent in Nigeria and the importance of creating more platforms to discover and support young writers.

The organising committee reaffirmed its commitment to identifying, nurturing and celebrating literary excellence while providing emerging poets with opportunities to reach wider audiences across Nigeria, Africa and the rest of the world.

It also commended the panel of judges for their professionalism, diligence and integrity throughout the selection process, describing their contributions as instrumental to the successful debut of the awards.

Kano leads as INEC records 2.97million new voters in final phase

THE Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)’s latest statistics, covering Phase III, Week Nine of the exercise as of July 17, 2026, indicate that 2,970,257 eligible Nigerians had successfully registered.

Of the total figure, 970,865 registrants (33.79 per cent) completed their registration online, while 2,000,092 (66.21 per cent) registered physically at designated centres.

A demographic breakdown of the registrants shows that women accounted for 1,561,765 (52.57 per cent), while men constituted 1,409,192 (47.43 per cent).

Young Nigerians between the ages of 18 and 34 years made up the largest category of registrants with 2,003,183 (67.43 per cent).

They were followed by those aged 35 to 49 years with 645,651 (21.73 per cent), 50 to 69 years with 294,443 (9.91 per cent), while 27,680 (0.93 per cent) were aged 70 years and above.

By occupation, students recorded the highest number of registrations with 695,026, followed by business owners (626,523), farmers and fishermen (505,402), and housewives (480,682). Other registrants included artisans (152,184), traders (133,834), civil servants (74,507) and public servants (47,778).

INEC further disclosed that 32,361 persons living with disabilities were successfully registered during the exercise.

State-by-state statistics showed that Kano State recorded the highest number of new registrations with 234,305, followed by Lagos (140,546) and Edo (139,313).

Other states with high registration figures included Delta (132,330), Taraba (113,409), Ebonyi (111,344), Sokoto (109,076), Ogun (96,571), Bauchi (96,061), Jigawa (95,592), Kaduna (92,505), Benue (88,840), Oyo (88,716), Imo (88,155), Anambra (87,195), Nasarawa (86,914), Cross River (86,559), Bayelsa (80,425), Niger (76,841), Kwara (76,084), Katsina (74,896),Gombe (74,152), Yobe (71,382), Kebbi (70,859), Kogi (69,713), Adamawa (65,505), Borno (44,866), the Federal Capital Territory (41,700), and Plateau (31,352).

At the lower end of the scale, Ekiti recorded 841 completed registrations, while Ondo had 17,679.

Registration in Osun State remained suspended because of the forthcoming August 15th governorship election, in line with Section 9(6) of the Electoral Act 2026, leaving the state with no registrations during the reporting period.

INEC noted that the 2.97 million registrations remain preliminary, explaining that the figures are subject to clean-up through the Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS) to remove multiple registrations and address objections from citizens.

National commissioner Haruna has said that in continuation of the process, the commission will display the Register of Voters for claims and objections from Thursday, 23rd July to Wednesday, 29th July 2026.

However, INEC has ruled out the possibility of further extension of nationwide Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise after the end of its third and final phase on Sunday, 26th July 2026 ahead of the 2027 General Elections.

INEC National Commissioner and Chairman of the Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC), Mohammed Kudu Haruna, as well as INEC’s Director of Voter Education and Publicity (VEP), Victoria Eta-Messi, confirmed this to Nigerian Tribune.

Also, in a post on its official X handle, INEC stressed that CVR closed on Sunday, July 26.

When asked if the commission would extend the deadline again, Haruna said, ‘No. There will be no extension of the two-week extension’, while Mrs Eta-Messi simply asked ‘Is there any need to extend the CVR exercise?’

The duo also confirmed the receipt of access codes for the upload of names and particulars of Governorship and State Houses of Assembly candidates by all the 21 registered political parties.

When asked about the number of political parties that had obtained access codes to enable their designated national officers to upload names, personal particulars, and other required information relating nominated candidates, the chairman of IVEC said, ‘All 22 political parties have collected their token for the submission of their candidates’, while the Director of VEP said, ‘All parties I believe have obtained their access codes.’

On the number of captured during the CVR and the total number of registered voters in the country, the national commissioner said, ‘We will not know the total number until after 12 midnight tomorrow (Sunday) when the portal shuts down.’

However, Nigerian Tribune can conveniently report that about 9,291,715 eligible Nigerians may have been added to the register of voters ahead of the 2027 general election during the three phases of the CVR exercise.

APC must strengthen grassroots, close ranks ahead 2027 elections – Akinfolarin

A former member of the House of Representatives and senatorial aspirant, Rt Honourable Mayowa Akinfolarin, at the weekend, mobilised his political structures across Ondo South Senatorial District with the directive to ensure overwhelming victory for President Bola Tinubu as well as every candidate within the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Akinfolarin, who had served as both state and federal lawmaker, emphasised that the interest of the APC and the success of Tinubu’s emergence at the polls in 2027 outweigh every personal ambition.

The APC chieftain, who contested the ticket of the party for the senatorial district during the recent primaries of the party, stressed this while meeting with party leaders, women, youths, and grassroots coordinators across the six local councils of the senatorial district.

According to Akinfolarin, the gathering was aimed at strengthening the APC’s electoral machinery ahead of 2027 and ensuring that the party presents a united front.

While directing all members of his political family to close ranks and work for the victory of every APC candidate in the state, maintained that the APC has always remained a party built on discipline, sacrifice, and respect for constituted authority.

Akinfolarin added that every loyal party member must stand by the decisions of the leadership of the party in order to preserve the unity and strength of the progressive family.

The former lawmaker, who commended the minister of interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, for his support before, during, and after the party primaries, described him as ‘a political lion’ whose courage, influence, and capacity to defend and protect his followers have continued to inspire confidence across the political landscape of the state.

On his part, the Director-General of Akinfolarin’s political structure, Nimbe Tawose, hailed party leaders, stakeholders, and loyal supporters for their support and prayers for Akinfolarin during the struggle for the party’s ticket.

WHO raises alarm as HIV funding cuts threaten Nigeria, Africa

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has warned that cuts in international funding could reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV across Africa, with Nigeria among countries most at risk due to its heavy reliance on donor support for prevention, testing and treatment programmes.

The warning is contained in WHO’s latest assessment of the Global Health Sector Strategies on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), released on Monday during the 26th International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2026).

The report said that although global HIV infections have dropped by 42 per cent and AIDS-related deaths by 57 per cent since 2010, about nine million people worldwide are still without life-saving treatment, while funding disruptions recorded in 2025 have already affected prevention services in several countries.

WHO noted that access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a key medicine used to prevent HIV infection, declined in some countries following reductions in donor funding, despite efforts by governments to sustain services.

For Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation and one of the countries with the highest HIV burden globally, the development raises concerns over the sustainability of programmes that have depended largely on international partners.

WHO Director-General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said years of progress could be wiped out if governments and development partners fail to sustain investments in healthcare.

‘This report tells two stories. It demonstrates what is possible when countries invest in health, communities and science. But it also shows how quickly progress can be undone with funding disruptions, humanitarian emergencies and persistent inequalities,’ he said.

The report also identified viral hepatitis as an increasing public health threat, despite improvements in prevention and treatment.

According to WHO, hepatitis B infections have fallen by 32 per cent since 2015, while deaths linked to hepatitis C have declined by 12 per cent. However, viral hepatitis still claimed an estimated 1.3 million lives globally in 2024, with hepatitis B-related deaths rising by 17 per cent over the same period.

Nigeria is among countries with a high burden of hepatitis B, but experts say low testing rates and limited access to treatment continue to fuel preventable deaths from liver disease.

The global health agency further warned that sexually transmitted infections remain a growing concern, citing rising infection rates and increasing resistance to antibiotics used to treat gonorrhoea.

To prevent setbacks, WHO urged countries to strengthen domestic financing for HIV, hepatitis and STI programmes, integrate disease services into primary healthcare, improve surveillance systems and expand access to innovative prevention tools, including the newly recommended twice-yearly injectable lenacapavir for HIV prevention.

WHO’s Director of HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis and STIs, Dr Tereza Kasaeva, described the report as a roadmap for countries to accelerate action towards ending the three epidemics by 2030.

The report comes as governments, including Nigeria, face increasing pressure to bridge funding gaps created by declining international health assistance while sustaining progress towards the global target of ending HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections as public health threats.

As daddy’s girl, I always got away with things my siblings couldn’t -Tayo Animashaun

HOW was growing up in Ibadan?

Yes, I grew up in Ibadan. I went to school in Ibadan. We are five children and growing up was really fun. I was the last girl. Being the last girl, I was daddy’s girl. He was very clever. My dad was a civil servant. We were not rich, but just an average family.

As ‘Daddy’s girl’, what were those privileges enjoyed?

I wouldn’t say I got special privileges, but rather, I got away with some things that my siblings couldn’t. They used to push me to daddy anytime they wanted something. They would say, ‘Tayo! You are the one we will send to Daddy.’

What informed your career ambition while growing up?

I wanted to study Economics at the University of Ibadan. But for some reasons, I think my JAMB result was the issue. At that time, you had to know someone to enter the university. It was that bad. Even if you passed, you still had to know someone. So, my mum took me to her friend, who said there was no space, but that I could put in for Sociology. So, I finished my Sociology degree, but I still had that love for figures. When I finished Sociology, I started ICAN. When I told my mother I wanted to be an Accountant, she told me about my uncle who was in an accounting firm and suggested I go and see him. So, he showed me what to do and that was how I started my journey.

At the University of Ibadan where you read Sociology, what was the experience like?

I started very early in life at age 15. The main thing then was just partying. We would gather ourselves and travel to Ife sometimes just to party. I remember one particular day I went to Abeokuta, not knowing that my parents were already heading to Ibadan on a Friday. They were living in Abeokuta at the time, but wanted to pay me a surprise visit.

I also remember a riot at my school, and, as usual, we had an off-campus party which I attended, completely unaware that my dad was coming to check on me in school. When my dad arrived, he met my friend who didn’t know what to say. So, when I got back to school, she told me my dad had come looking for me. When I eventually saw my dad after going home, he asked where I was coming from. He told me he came to my school, saw various people, and added, ‘Where you are coming from takes nine months’ (laughs). I can never forget that!

What were those traits you took from Mum and Dad?

My dad was very kind and generous, and I think I took that from him. While my mum was very strict, you could occasionally get away with some things with dad. She was a teacher.

What did life present to you when you started your Accounting journey?

I was 25 years old when I started my ICAN journey. It was really tough because at that time you had five papers and had to pass all of them at once. But, as God would have it, I qualified. I also got married along the line.

How did you meet your partner?

His cousin and I were sent to audit at NNPC as accountants, and when we were done, she said her cousin would come and pick us up. When the cousin arrived, we got into his car and he said, ‘Oh, when would I see you again?’ I was like, ‘Why do you want to see me?’ So, that was how we met.

What made you give him a ‘Yes’ eventually?

I found out that he was very smart. My husband still teaches our grandchildren mathematics. We became good friends, and beyond that, he would always discuss life issues intelligently.

Looking back, is there anything you would have loved to do differently?

No regrets at all.

What makes you give thanks to God?

My family, my children, and my grandchildren.

What made you leave Nigeria for the UK?

At that time, education in Nigeria was not doing well-I don’t know about now-and students were sitting at home for up to a year. So, I felt I didn’t have the resources to send them abroad. I thought, why don’t we travel together and look for work? I knew if we didn’t go when we were supposed to, it would become much harder later. So, that was why I left Nigeria for the UK.

When would you say things started changing differently?

I would say I am one of the few lucky ones. If you were not doing very well in the country you were coming from, they would not give you a visa. I don’t think they do it that way anymore; perhaps it is restructured under a different scheme now. Back then, it was a point-based system where they evaluated what you were earning and your years of experience before applying. You had to earn a certain number of points before they finally gave you a visa. When I arrived, there was no job right away and I didn’t know what to do. Eventually, I got a job with Barclaycard, where my work involved chasing people for payment. Before I got that job, I was looking for work everywhere, but they were requesting UK experience which I did not have. Luckily, I met an accountant who told me I could come in a few times a week. So, that was what I was doing until a family friend introduced the currency exchange business to me.

God has been so merciful to you. Hence, how have you been giving back?

I am very active in church. I serve as the Financial Secretary in church, and in the ICAN UK District Society, I am the Chairman. So, that is my little way of giving back.

As the new chairman of ICAN UK, what do you intend to do differently?

Thank you for that question. I want to see our members do better. I see a lot of Chartered Accountants coming into the country who don’t know what steps to take next. So, one key initiative I want to drive as Chairman is a Mentorship Programme. Some established members have run their practices here for a long time and will be able to guide these young people coming in. So, we have the mentors ready.

So, how do you want to catch these mentees?

At the last meeting we had, we announced it. All they need to do is send an email to the General Secretary and we will take it up from there.

Next year is your annual conference in the UK. What are you planning to do?

A lot of things! Planning has already started; we have a venue secured and a date set. While I cannot officially state who the speakers will be yet, I am using this opportunity to call on the Nigerian Government to attend and support us. They can support us by sending delegates, and we would be happy to receive them. If anyone is interested, they should start preparing now.

Why the need to support the Institute?

The ICAN UK District is the flagship district. We have been in existence for many years. At that conference, people from all over the world usually come together to discuss and chart a better way forward for Nigeria across various sectors. It is always an excellent platform for networking. We have opportunities for sponsors and advertisers, and we are open to whoever wants to partner with us.

How do you relax?

To be honest, I have my 9-to-5 job. When I am not working, I am involved in church or ICAN activities. Otherwise, I am relaxing with my family.

What would you love to be remembered for?

As someone who made a real impact in people’s lives. When people hear the name Tayo, I want them to smile and speak of the amazing things the Almighty God has done through me.

How technology could be used to protect children, create opportunities for youths -Bobmanuel

MANY young Nigerians have brilliant ideas but often complain that government policies, poor infrastructure and limited access to funding discourage innovation. Do you think the government is doing enough to support young entrepreneurs?

I believe there has been progress, but there is still a long way to go. Young Nigerians are among the most creative and resilient people anywhere in the world. Every day, I meet young people with ideas that have the potential to solve real problems, not just in Nigeria but globally. The challenge is that many of them spend more time fighting the environment than building the solution.

Reliable electricity, affordable internet, access to funding, business-friendly regulations and efficient public institutions all play an important role in helping innovation thrive. When these things are difficult to access, entrepreneurs are forced to solve problems that have nothing to do with the businesses they are trying to build.

Some of the world’s greatest companies were built during difficult times because their founders chose to solve meaningful problems instead of waiting for ideal circumstances.

Government support is important, but I also believe innovation is driven by people who refuse to stop building. Africa should not only consume technology. We should build technology that the world depends on.

If you have the opportunity to advise the Federal Government on three things it should do to help young innovators and technology startups thrive, what would they be?

The first thing would be to make it easier to build legitimate businesses. Registering companies, protecting intellectual property, accessing government services and complying with regulations should be straightforward, affordable and efficient. Young founders should spend more time building products rather than navigating bureaucracy.

Also, I believe we need to invest much more intentionally in technology education. The future belongs to countries that build technology, not just consume it. That means encouraging software engineering, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, product design and entrepreneurship from an early stage. We should be preparing young Nigerians to create solutions for global markets.

Do you think Nigeria is creating an environment where young people can build global technology companies or are we still losing too many talents to other countries?

I honestly believe both things are true. Nigeria has the talent to build globally competitive technology companies. We have brilliant engineers, designers, founders and problem solvers who have repeatedly demonstrated that they can compete anywhere in the world.

At the same time, we continue to lose many of these talented people because they are searching for environments where they can grow faster, access better opportunities, and focus on building instead of constantly overcoming basic operational challenges.

Rather than seeing this purely as a loss, I think it should challenge us to create an environment where talented people choose to build here because they believe they can succeed here.

That is one of the reasons I founded RouteEd. I wanted to prove to myself that a company solving a Nigerian problem could also solve a global problem.

Student transportation safety, visibility, and accountability are not uniquely Nigerian challenges. Families all over the world want to know that their children are safe during the journey between home and school.

Youth unemployment remains a major challenge in Nigeria. Beyond seeking white-collar jobs, what mindset shift do you think young Nigerians need to embrace?

I believe the biggest mindset shift is moving from asking, ‘Where can I find a job?’ to asking, ‘What problem can I solve?’ The world rewards people who solve meaningful problems. Entrepreneurship is not simply about owning a business or becoming your own boss. It is about creating value in a way that improves people’s lives.

I also think we need to redefine what success looks like. Too often, social media makes entrepreneurship appear glamorous, but behind every successful company are years of learning, setbacks, uncertainty, and persistence. Building something meaningful requires patience, discipline, resilience, and the willingness to keep showing up even when progress is slow.

Artificial Intelligence and digital technology are transforming economies around the world. Do you think Nigeria is moving fast enough to prepare its young people for the future of work?

Artificial Intelligence is changing the world, but I believe the conversation should go beyond AI itself. The real question is whether we are preparing young people to think critically, solve problems creatively, and adapt continuously. Technology will continue to evolve, but those human qualities will always remain valuable.

Nigeria has made encouraging progress in embracing digital technology, but there is still a significant opportunity to strengthen digital education, invest in practical skills, and expose more young people to emerging technologies from an early age.

What gap did you notice in student transportation and safety that convinced you there was a need for the solution that RouteEd brings?

Every morning, millions of parents across Nigeria do something remarkable. They entrust the most precious part of their lives, their children, to someone else for the journey to school. That trust is one of the greatest responsibilities any school accepts.

At the same time, we live in a country where stories of insecurity have become far too common. We have seen heartbreaking reports of school attacks, kidnappings, transportation incidents, and families left searching for answers during moments of uncertainty. Those realities changed the way I thought about student transportation.

I realised that schools had invested significantly in securing classrooms and campuses, yet one of the most important parts of a child’s day, the journey between home and school, often remained far less visible.

For me, RouteEd was never simply about tracking vehicles. It is about reducing uncertainty. It is about helping schools know more, helping parents worry less, and creating a trusted system where schools, parents, guardians, and drivers all share the same information throughout every school journey.

Technology cannot eliminate insecurity, but it can strengthen communication, improve accountability, and provide an additional layer of awareness when every minute matters.

What makes RouteEd different and what problem is it truly solving for schools and families,particularly as many assume it is just another GPS tracking platform?

If RouteEd were simply another GPS tracking application, I honestly would not have built it. Parents are not looking for a moving dot on a map. They are looking for reassurance. Schools are not simply looking for vehicle locations. They are looking for confidence, accountability, and better operational oversight.

RouteEd was designed as a student transportation visibility infrastructure that connects schools, parents, guardians, drivers, and students through one trusted ecosystem.

When a child boards a school bus, when a trip begins, when trusted guardians receive updates, and when schools maintain operational visibility, everyone shares the same trusted information at the same time.

One of our most important innovations is our family-centred approach. Parents can monitor multiple children attending different RouteEd enabled schools through one account, assign different guardians to each child based on where they live, and continue using the same family account even if a child changes schools. Whether a parent is in Abuja, London, New York, or anywhere else in the world, RouteEd is designed to keep families connected to their children’s daily journeys.

As you prepare to launch your pilot programme in Nigeria and expand internationally, what has been your biggest lesson as a young entrepreneur building a technology company?

The biggest lesson has been that great products are built by listening before they are built by coding. Some of RouteEd’s strongest ideas did not come from sitting behind a computer. They came from conversations with parents, school proprietors, drivers, transport coordinators, educators, and families. Every conversation revealed something we had not considered before and helped us build a better solution.

I have also learned that execution is what separates ideas from impact. Many people have brilliant ideas, but ideas only begin to change lives when they are consistently executed with excellence.

Perhaps the most important lesson is that trust cannot be rushed. Whether you are building technology or building relationships, trust is earned one journey at a time. That philosophy guides everything we are building at RouteEd.

What advice would you give to young Nigerians who have innovative ideas but are afraid to start because of financial constraints or fear of failure?

I would tell them not to allow fear to become a permanent decision. Every successful company started as an uncertain idea. The difference is that someone chose to begin.

You do not need to have everything figured out before taking the first step. What you need is a genuine problem worth solving, the humility to keep learning, and the resilience to continue even when progress feels slow.

Do not become so focused on building a company that you forget to build yourself. Read constantly. Learn continuously. Listen carefully. Surround yourself with people who challenge you to think better. Most importantly, remember that failure is not the opposite of success. For many entrepreneurs, it is part of the journey toward success. The future is built by people who choose courage over comfort.

Looking ahead, what legacy do you hope RouteEd will leave, not just in Nigeria, but across Africa and the rest of the world?

When people hear the word legacy, they often think about companies. I think about children. I hope RouteEd contributes to a future where parents no longer spend the school day wondering whether their child arrived safely. I hope we help schools strengthen the trust families place in them every single morning. I hope we encourage a culture where student transportation is treated with the same seriousness as every other part of education.

If RouteEd helps reduce uncertainty, improve communication, strengthen accountability, and give families greater confidence during one of the most vulnerable parts of a child’s day, then I believe we will have made a meaningful contribution.

I also hope RouteEd demonstrates that world-class technology can be built in Africa to solve African challenges while serving families across the globe. Because I believe our greatest export should not only be talent. It should also be innovation.

My dream is that one day, parents everywhere naturally ask one simple question before enrolling their children in a school: ‘Is your school RouteEd enabled?’ Not because it is fashionable. But because visibility, accountability, and peace of mind have become the expected standard.

At its heart, RouteEd is not simply building transportation technology. We are building trust into one of the most important journeys a family makes every day. And that is the legacy I hope we leave behind.