N14trn subsidy blackout: SERAP demands full account from govs, FCT Minister

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has fired a salvo at Nigeria’s 36 state governors and the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, issuing a seven-day ultimatum to publicly account for the spending of an estimated N14 trillion collected as fuel subsidy savings.

The organisation also threatened to institute legal proceedings should the state governors and the FCT Minister fail to comply with the demand for transparency.

The N14 trillion represents a portion of the increased Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) funds shared among the three tiers of government since the removal of the petrol subsidy in mid-2023.

According to SERAP, the FAAC distribution for 2024 alone surged to N28.78 trillion, a 79 per cent jump from the previous year, with state governments’ allocations rising by 45.5 per cent to N5.22 trillion.

In a Freedom of Information (FoI) request dated October 4, 2025, and signed by SERAP Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare, the group insisted that the savings must be spent solely for the benefit of poor and vulnerable Nigerians.

Failure to do so, SERAP warned, ‘would result in a morally repugnant result of double jeopardy on these Nigerians.’

SERAP urged public officials to invite anti-graft agencies – the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) – to track and monitor spending, ensuring that the money is not diverted into private pockets.

The human rights group also expressed concern over the alleged mismanagement of the funds, stating that the spending details have been mostly shrouded in secrecy.

‘We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within 7 days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter.

‘If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall consider appropriate legal actions to compel your state and the FCT to comply with our request in the public interest,’ the group added.

We’ll protect teachers’ interests, aid access to education – Speaker Abbas

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Abbas Tajudeen, on Sunday, congratulated Nigerian teachers as they joined their counterparts across the globe to celebrate World Teachers’ Day.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) in 1994 designated October 5 as World Teachers’ Day to recognise and celebrate teachers.

Speaker Tajudeen, in a congratulatory message issued through his Chief Press Secretary, Leke Olatunji Baiyewu, commended Nigerian teachers for their unquantifiable role in shaping the lives and careers of young people in society.

He stated that teachers and academics deserve public and private support to efficiently carry out their educational role in the lives of young Nigerians.

The Speaker, who was also a teacher before joining politics, described teachers as ‘co-parents and experts in nurturing and moulding young people into educated, civilised, productive, and patriotic citizens’ of any country.

While noting that teachers are critical stakeholders in the polity, the Speaker called for training, retraining, and better welfare, especially for the academic staff of educational institutions.

Speaker Tajudeen reiterated the commitment of the 10th House to using legislative instruments to enhance access to quality and affordable education for all Nigerians.

The Speaker wished Nigerians happy celebrations.

Lagos: OBIdient Movement slams Yunusa Tanko over leadership crisis

Some grassroots leaders in the OBIdient Movement’s Lagos chapter have turned their criticism towards Dr Yunusa Tanko, the national coordinator, accusing him of backing a disputed list for the state’s leadership council.

The pushback came in a statement released at the weekend by Obiasogu David and Hon. Bamidele Akpata, representing support groups, the Central Organising Committee, and other stakeholders.

They rejected a circulating list for the State Coordinating Council, saying it was allegedly put together without their input by a group of politicians close to Tanko.

‘The purported list of the Obidient Movement State Coordinating Council for Lagos state, now making the rounds, hit us with rude marvel. This isn’t because we lacked knowledge of and were not actively involved in the process of revamping and structuring the Obidient movement in Lagos state, which has been running for months.

‘But the eventual decision and choice of the leadership for the movement in the state were totally abrupt and surreptitious, and the source of the list and some of the names enlisted are unknown to any active Obidient in the state.

‘To give it a befitting context, a set of position-seeking political actors, for intents that raise doubts, met and drew up a list, wherein they shared positions with loyalists, branded it ‘State Coordinating Council’ and imposed on the ObidientMovement in the state.

‘Such a move slaps us, as well as every concerned and active member of the Obidient movement in the state, with sharp, irksome shock, especially considering its covert and manipulative manner.

‘Our unequivocal stand is that of utter disregard and rejection of the purported list. We resolve to ensure that the Obidient Movement, for which we laboured to pioneer and build in the state since March 2022, must not derail from its core principles of integrity, truth, democracy, transparency, and populism, the virtues our leader, Peter Obi, espouses.

‘We must, also, reiterate that the movement in the state is not a political structure for any politician to hire or hijack for self-aggrandisement or to further their political agenda.

‘We are a people-driven movement, built on sacrifice, resilience, and the conviction to rescue Nigeria and Lagos from decades of failed leadership. Therefore, it is imperative that the decisions and activities of the movement, especially a vital one as forming the leadership of the movement at any level, must be subject to and co-opt the core principles of the movement.

‘In view of this, we insist that the leadership of the movement must be constituted through wide consultation and popular consent of the active stakeholders of the movement, a process that is devoid of political gimmicks and the interference of self-willed politicians.

‘Such leaders of the movement must embody the values and qualities of leadership, be active members of the movement from the founding times, and above all, must be chosen by active stakeholders of the movement, especially the Obidient support groups.

‘We call on those who shared the purported list to withdraw it immediately. The national leadership of the Obidient movement must, as a matter of urgency, call for a meeting with stakeholders of the movement in the state to discuss progress’.

5 interesting facts about World Teachers’ Day you should know

Every October 5, classrooms, communities and countries around the globe pause to honour the people who shape the minds and morals of every generation: teachers.

World Teachers’ Day is more than just a date on the calendar; it is a reminder that without teachers, no society can grow, no nation can thrive, and no dream can truly take flight.

As the world celebrates World Teachers’ Day 2025, themed ‘Recasting Teaching as a Collaborative Profession,’ here are five interesting things to know about this important global celebration and why it matters more than ever.

1. Commemorates a Historic 1966 Agreement

World Teachers’ Day marks the anniversary of the 1966 ILO/UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers, a groundbreaking document that established international standards for teachers’ rights, responsibilities, recruitment and training.

That recommendation was the first to recognise teaching as a profession essential to social progress and human development. It set the stage for the modern understanding that teachers deserve not just respect, but strong institutional support to do their work effectively.

2. Officially Established by UNESCO in 1994

Although the 1966 agreement was the inspiration, the first official World Teachers’ Day was celebrated in 1994, following a declaration by UNESCO and its partners.

The goal was simple yet profound: to draw the world’s attention to teachers’ vital roles in shaping minds, building nations and driving development. Since then, every year’s celebration has grown into a global campaign for better teacher welfare and recognition.

3. Unique Yearly Theme

Every World Teachers’ Day is guided by a theme that reflects a pressing issue or aspiration in global education.

In 2025, the theme ‘Recasting Teaching as a Collaborative Profession’ emphasises teamwork, mutual learning and the power of educators working together.

Past themes have focused on topics like teacher leadership, digital innovation and rebuilding education systems after crises, underscoring that teaching is both an art and a shared responsibility.

4. Global Celebration, but No Uniform Date

While October 5 is internationally recognized as World Teachers’ Day, several countries have chosen their own dates to honour educators, often tied to historical or cultural milestones.

For example: India celebrates on September 5, the birthday of Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, a philosopher and former President. Also, in Australia, as the day usually falls during school holidays, Australian states and territories celebrate on the last Friday of October each year instead.This variety highlights the universal respect for teachers, regardless of borders or calendars.

5. Attention to Teachers’ Challenges and Calls for Action

World Teachers’ Day is not only about celebration; it is also a wake-up call. Each year, UNESCO and education advocates use the day to highlight persistent challenges facing teachers worldwide like shortages of qualified educators, poor working conditions, limited access to professional training and low pay and job insecurity

UNESCO’s 2025 materials stress that ‘teachers are essential for achieving global education goals’ but warn that many still lack the resources and recognition they deserve. The day serves as both a thank-you and a reminder: teachers need more than applause; they need action.

Edo PDP faction elects state working committee

The crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP ) in Edo State continued on Sunday as the faction (Legacy Group) loyal to Minister of Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Barr. Nyesom Woke, elected its state working committee, headed by Barr. Nosa Ogieva.

Ogieva and 13 other members of the Edo PDP Executive who were sworn in during the party’s 2025 State Congress in Benin, promised to reunite members of the party, adding that PDP would soon begin to win elections again in the state.

While 11 of the members were returned unopposed, Tony Aziegbemi, Henry Tenebe and Victor Enoghama, were announced to have contested for Chairmanship, Secretary and Deputy State Chairmanship, respectively.

A total of 576 delegates from the 192 wards participated in the election.

Responding on behalf of the newly executive members, the state party Chairman, Barr. Nosa Ogieva, said their emergence marked a new chapter in Edo PDP.

He promised not to betray the party nor take it for granted, adding that his leadership would be repositioning and rebranding the party in Edo.

Ogieva sued for unity amongst the party members, maintaining that the loyalty of members is the bedrock of PDP.

Earlier in his opening remarks, Dan Orbih, said that the former Governor of the State, Godwin Obaseki, was responsible for the crisis in the party.

He alleged Obaseki quarreled with everybody he met in PDP, asserting that the poor performance of the party in the recently conducted by-elections showed how unpopular the PDP had become in Edo

Orbih urged the delegates to elect people with capacity that would reawaken the party in the state.

He carpeted an earlier statement issued by the other faction of the party, calling members to disregard the announcement for the State Congress.

He said ‘Just yesterday (Saturday), I saw a statement issued by some funny characters saying they are advising party members not to attend this event. Are you not here?

‘Those who don’t have any moral authority to speak on behalf of the party should keep their mouth shut.

‘As we prepare to elect our executive, I will appeal to you to vote for those with capacity to lead this party, not those who will sell out, not those who will deny members their legitimate right

‘As members of our great party. There is no doubt that PDP is going through a leadership crisis, both at the national level and several other states.

‘Let us not deceive ourselves for the first time in the history of our great party, we have elected governors of PDP and founding leaders, founding members of this party, leaving this party every day for one simple reason, failure of leadership.

‘Elected governors are living. Elected senators are living. Elected members of the House are living in Edo state, we know the root of our problem.

‘We had a united party where everybody related with one another as brothers and sisters, until Godwin Obasiki joined our party.

‘Obasiki destroyed our party. He sowed the seeds of discord, deep rooted seeds of discord in our party.

‘He sinned against the party. He sinned against the people. He sinned against the state.

Continuing, Orbih said ‘He came into the party and destroyed everything that was good in the party. Today, our party’s umbrella is shattered, torn, and we are here today to rebuild the party.

‘What used to put us together as a family was totally destroyed by obaseki. He fought every person except himself, and at the end, we are at a very disadvantaged position in the politics of Edo state.

Orbih described the other faction of the PDP as undertakers who he said were only praying for the party to collapse and then join the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

ASUU’s 14-Day Ultimatum: Can Nigeria afford another nationwide strike?

TUNBOSUN OGUNDARE in this report X-rays the implications of the repeated strike actions by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) against the backdrop of the current threat to embark on a fresh indefinite strike if the Federal Government fails by next week to attend to its cry of many years.

IT is no more news that the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) embarks on industrial actions whenever it has unresolved issues with the Federal Government. It does so repeatedly just like many other trade unions within and outside the academic system in the country.

In the last 26 years – from 1999 to date -, for example, hardly would a year pass without ASUU going on strike that lasted several weeks.

In 2020 alone, the union went on strike for nine months – which happened to be the longest in the recent history of ASUU strike. Just two years later, the union also went again for another round of eight months. These were during the administration of the late President Muhammadu Buhari, which also witnessed three months strike in 2018.

Every time, ASUU’s claim has always been that it declared strike after exhausting all other legal means of getting government to address its concerns.

Ironically, ASUU’s concerns over the years are almost the same. It has been about pushing government to inject more money to develop infrastructure in the public universities, to increase staff salaries and allowances, improve their working conditions and so forth.

The union always accuses government of underfunding universities and underpaying workers, claiming the condition has led to gross depreciation in the standard of public universities and their products.

At a time in 2009, an agreement was reached between the Federal Government and ASUU on the best way to fix the gap. This effort resulted in drafting of the popular 2009 Agreement and the subsequent memorandum of actions.

Now, 26 years down the line, most of the critical issues in the original agreement are still unattended to by the government, except for those that required little or no fund to implement, such as the recent imposition of ban on the establishment of new universities and a few others.

On this, the union is consistently pushing pressure on government to attend to them else it would order members to stay off work indefinitely.

For the current administration of President Bola Tinubu, the union has equally on several occasions issued warning strikes, staged several protests on campuses and also engaged the media all with a view to reminding the government about pending issues between them. But till date, there has been no convincing response.

A fresh threat was issued on Monday September 29, giving government a 14-day ultimatum to address those issues, failure of which will compel the union to declare an indefinite strike.

On the current threat, ASUU’s National President, Prof Christopher Piwuna, expressed strong determination and readiness of the union to proceed this time on indefinite strike if government remains adamant on the matter.

He said the union has been patient enough with the current government and now has been pushed to the wall and needs to react.

But to the stakeholders, while ASUU is right in its demands and also has the right to use strike actions to pursue its course, students, parents, the country’s education cause the general economy are always the ones who suffer major consequences of such actions.

According to them, the repeated disruptions caused by strke affect academic progression, delay graduation, push up parents spending, and also create long-term effects on career prospects and students’ personal growth.

Faruk Olateju, for example, has just finished his undergraduate Law degree programme at the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Akoka. He got admitted to the university in 2018 for the five years course. By calculation, he is supposed to have done with his studies in 2023.

Though, the COVID-19 pandemic, which brought the whole world to its knees for some months, prolonged Faruk’s stay on campus, the major cause of his additional two years was ASUU strike.

In 2020 alone, ASUU went on strike for nine months- the longest in the recent history of ASUU strike- and two years later, it went again for another eight months, totaling one year and five months.

Faruk, who had earlier in 2018 wasted another three months because of strike by the same ASUU, told Sunday Tribune in an interview that he would never wish that ASUU should go on strike again in the country.

According to him, whenever ASUU downs tools, the students bear the greatest impacts, because academic calendars are disrupted, graduation timelines are extended and many students lose opportunities, especially internships, scholarships or postgraduate studies abroad that are tied to strict timelines.

‘These are some of the opportunities that students tend to lose in the event of strike,’ Faruk stressed.

He also observed that ‘For the university system generally, the repeated industrial actions create uncertainty and weaken the global competitiveness of Nigerian graduates.

‘We also know that parents lose confidence in public education and this indirectly pushes people towards seeking alternative in expensive private universities or foreign institutions that many can’t afford, widening socio-economic inequality.’

Faruk emphasised that even though he may not be directly affected if ASUU should embark on a fresh strike as being threatened, he would wish such a strike is averted by all means.

According to him, it is difficult to be completely at ease when the future of thousands of students is at stake.

According to him, ‘The current strike notice reminds me of the uncertainty that always comes with every strike notice- the anxiety, the disrupted plans and the emotional torture that accompany such notices.

‘The 2020 and 2022 ASUU strikes really had a real impact on my academic journey as they extended my expected graduation timeline and disrupted my rhythm of learning, always having to pause on my reading or my learning every now and then.

‘So, the reading, the learning is not flowing as IT should and that alone HAS negative consequences.

‘Beyond the academics, strikes also affected the social impacts aspect of my students’ life, plans for law internships, professional programmes and even personal goals had to be rescheduled. However, that period taught me resilience, but it also reinforces how much instability can damage students’ morale.

‘Honestly, the repeated threat creates a climate of uncertainty. As a student, your mind won’t be at rest. You will be thinking that you will now be forced to go home again.

‘So, such instances become mentally draining because you cannot plan your life with confidence. Even when the strike doesn’t happen, the constant threats hang over students like a cloud. It reflects a deeper problem in the system.

‘While I recognize that ASUU has legitimate grievances about their concerns, I still believe that strike should not always be the weapon of choice.

‘We need more creative solutions, perhaps legal frameworks that enforce agreements, independent mediators with government and the union and more importantly demonstration of accountability on both sides. Students should not be the collateral damage in this struggle.

‘So, I hope both the government and ASUU can prioritize uninterrupted education for Nigerian citizens,’ he concluded.

Sharing the same view, the National Assistant Secretary of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Adetunji Olatunji Emmanuel, said no matter what, this proposed strike must not become a reality.

According to him, it is obvious that strike actions only inflict pains and suffering on the children of the ordinary Nigerians- the masses- who struggle day and night to send their children to school.

He argued that the politicians and government officials whose failures created the protracted imbroglio are actually not affected as their children are comfortably schooling abroad or in expensive private universities locally.

‘If their children were in our public institutions, he said, this protracted issue would have been resolved long ago.

‘That is why all Nigerian students demand that the Federal Government should, without further delay meet its obligations to ASUU and resolve all the outstanding issues.

‘We say enough of endless promises, excuses, and insincerity as we are tired of being victims of leadership irresponsibility.

‘On the part of ASUU, we also call its leadership to reconsider the weaponization of strike as the only tool of engagement moving forward.

Just like Faruk had observed, Adetunji said, ‘Every strike destroys our academic calendar, elongates our years in school, and diminishes the quality of our education.

‘The lecturers must understand that their struggle, no matter how just, should not become a weapon against the same students they claim to fight for.’

He declared that should the proposed strike become a reality, NANS as an umbrella body of all Nigerian students would have no option BUT to mobilize themselves for massive protests that would shut down the major highways, airports, government offices, and critical infrastructure across the country.

He said Nigerian students and their poor parents cannot BE faced with economic hardship, high inflation, all form of taxes in the face of low incomes and still have to suffer again just because of attenging public schools.

According to him, enough of government and ASUU wasting their future

For the National President of Parent-Teacher Association of Nigeria (NPTAN) Alhaji Haruna Dajuma, his thought and perspective on the ASUUFG face off is becoming too embarrassing for the country.

He noted that parents have always been saying say no to ASUU strike as no parent is comfortable having their children at home when they supposed to be in school learning.

He, just like others, equally observed that the negative effects of strike actions outweigh the positive, with students bear the major brunt.

‘So, we cannot afford any strike again in Nigeria’s public universities,’ he emphasized, urging both government and ASUU to resolve their differences without disrupting academic calendar.

Can you forfeit your final-year exams for Big Brother Naija show?

Timmy Daniel

I would not forfeit my final-year exams for Big Brother Naija. Education is a long-term investment that guarantees opportunities, while BBN is a temporary platform. I would prefer to finish my studies first, then explore opportunities like Big Brother Naija afterwards. Completing my degree gives me a solid foundation, credibility, and more confidence. Big Brother can wait. Missing my final exams could have lasting consequences on my future and career path.

Afolabi Olakunmi

I cannot forfeit my final-year examinations for Big Brother Naija, because leaving my life-time asset for a show that does not guarantee winning or even long-term fame is a very bad decision for me and my career. Having my degree can open many doors in my career and business. I can still pursue Big Brother Baija later, if I choose to. I am not against the show – it is a great platform and many people have enjoyed it. However, forfeiting my final exams for it would be something I cannot even imagine.

Salahudeen Bolanle

Participating in the show does not guarantee me emerging as the winner. It is more of another journey that cannot add much value to me. On the other hand, my final exams stand as a conclusion of an important phase of my life and a stepping stone to great achievements for myself and my family.

Oluwatobiloba Akinade

Big Brother would not pay me for all the effort I have put into my studies, not to mention toiling with my final-year exams. However, I might consider choosing a certain amount of money over my final-year exams if the money is life-changing enough to secure my future, start a stable career or business, and possibly return to complete my education later.

Still, education is a solid backup plan no money should easily replace. Besides, fame and money from platforms like Big Brother can be temporary, but education remains a permanent asset. Even if I gain fame, having a degree gives me something to fall back on when the trends fade. So, unless the offer is overwhelmingly worth it and guaranteed, I would rather stay and complete my final-year exams.

Ayobami Obayemi

This is a very tricky question in the sense that they want to know your priorities. So, talking about the Big Brother show and my priorities, I put things that make a positive impact on my life first before any other thing. Big Brother Naija is just for entertainment, for relaxation. My final-year exams are my priority. I would need the exams to graduate, and when I have the certificate, I can get a good job and have a better life. In fact, I would take N20,000 to forfeit the Big Brother Naija show. I am not a fan of it. I would only make it my priority if I were getting something more reasonable, like an endorsement worth millions of naira.

Akorede Onifade

I cannot forfeit my final-year examinations for Big Brother Naija because my education remains a top priority. I have invested years of hard work and sleepless nights to reach this stage in my academic journey. To abandon all of that for a temporary show would be to throw away the foundation of my future.

Big Brother Naija, though entertaining and full of opportunities, is uncertain. There is no guarantee of winning, lasting fame, or even how long one might remain in the house. However, my final-year examinations are certain. It is the key to completing my degree, securing my career, and honouring the time, money, and effort already spent in school.

Therefore, with wisdom and conviction, I choose my final-year examinations over Big Brother Naija. Education first, because opportunities will always come, and the certificate I earned will remain mine forever.

Esther Ayoola

I cannot forfeit my final-year examinations for Big Brother Naija because my education is my foremost priority. Forfeiting it means delaying or risking my graduation. It means I would lose that academic year and repeat those exams later. Fame comes and goes. The examinations represent the culmination of years of hard work, sacrifice, and financial investment. Missing them would mean delaying my graduation, losing the degree I have worked tirelessly for, and jeopardising the opportunities tied to my academic success.

Big Brother Naija can come again in another season. I cannot forfeit my studies I am supposed to do at the right time, for a show I could be evicted from, and that is the end.

Oladipupo Boluwatife

I cannot do that. My dreams and goals do not align with being popular or famous. So, I would not forfeit my final exams because of an entertainment-based show like Big Brother Naija. Education is a priority for me. It is the path I have committed to, and it aligns with the future I envision. While the show may bring fame and quick money, it does not guarantee long-term fulfilment or stability, which is what I am truly aiming for.

Iyanuoluwa Oguntola

I would go for the show and earn good money. I could always come back to complete my studies. Money makes things easier. But it is still a gamble. The show does not guarantee winning or fame, so I need to be sure the opportunity is real and worth the risk. If the money is guaranteed and enough to sort out my future, I would accept it. If not, school first.

Alexandra Oladipupo

I would not because Big Brother Naija is an entertainment show where the future seems blurry and uncertain. It is not something I see aligning with my long-term goals. I would not want to risk my final exams for temporary fame or unclear opportunities. However, if it were a better opportunity with a clear and promising future, something that adds real value to my life and goals, I would gladly consider it. But for BBNaija? I would rather finish school first.

Olayiwola Joshua

I would not forfeit my final-year exams for BBNaija. I have worked hard for years to reach my final year, and I would not throw that away for a reality show. Big Brother Naija may bring fame and money, but it is temporary. Education is a long-term investment, and completing my degree gives me a solid foundation for the future. I would rather graduate first, then explore opportunities like BBNaija, if they still interest me.

Bamigboye Daniel

It depends on the offer. If Big Brother Naija guarantees enough money and exposure to change my life completely, I might consider it. But it would have to be worth more than the years I have spent studying. If there is no guaranteed reward, I would not risk missing my final-year exams. Education is still the safest bet for me.

Why Tinubu is afraid of Jonathan’s 2027 comeback bid

Although former President Goodluck Jonathan hasn’t formally declared his intention to run for president, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu appears to be already worked into a frenzy by the mere prospect of it, at least judging from the sensation of fright that drips from the statements of his spokespeople and close supporters.

Bayo Onanuga, Tinubu’s official spokesperson, described the proposal to draft Jonathan into the 2027 race as ‘delusional!’ As if he somehow embodies the Nigerian electorate, Onanuga warned that the Jonathan administration’s record on the economy and governance would constitute an insurmountable obstacle on his path to the presidency. He also raised questions about Jonathan’s eligibility for a third term and cautioned that those promoting his run may abandon him midstream.

The Lagos State branch of the APC, perhaps the most strategic APC branch in Nigeria at the moment given that Lagos is Tinubu’s home base, has also mocked the idea of Jonathan’s comeback, arguing that he would need ‘an overdose of good luck’ to be competitive. It framed the push for his return as rooted more in nostalgia than in competence and questioned internal democratic practices within the opposition.

I told a reporter who interviewed me a few days ago that the apparent panic in the Tinubu power circles over Jonathan’s rumored entry into the presidential race is puzzling to me for at least two reasons.

One, at the moment, Jonathan has no political base. The PDP, on whose platform he is likely to run (should he decide to run), is vastly enervated and riven by what seems like irresolvable dissension. The Southeast, which used to be a solid, reliable support base for him, is now seduced by the charm and promise of its own son, Peter Obi.

Without a strong grassroots structure, a solid party platform, or the support of governors, a Jonathan comeback bid would be a damp squib. If anything, the presidency’s statement inflates his relevance more than his actual political strength warrants.

Second, if I were in Tinubu’s inner circles, I would actually encourage, even slyly sponsor, Jonathan’s participation in the 2027 election since he appeals to the same demographic slice as former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi. His participation in the 2027 election, along with Atiku and Obi, would ensure that the opposition self-cannibalizes, just as it did in 2023.

If Jonathan isn’t a real threat – if Jonathan would, in fact, be a boon to Tinubu – why does Tinubu seem terrified at the prospect of a Jonathan comeback bid? Here’s what I think.

When Onanuga pointed to Jonathan’s abysmal record on the economy and governance as a reason the electorate would not want him back in the saddle, he unintentionally gave vent to deep-seated but unacknowledged anxieties about Tinubu’s own record. Despite different contexts, Jonathan and Tinubu converge on their style of governance and economic policies.

Tinubu is pursuing the exact same economic policies that Jonathan attempted, which he was compelled to roll back after Tinubu and several people who later constituted the APC joined forces with ordinary Nigerians to fight back.

As most people can recall, Jonathan’s New Year ‘gift’ to Nigerians in 2012 was an attempted full petrol-subsidy removal. After mass protests, he was forced to implement a partial price rollback, but he paired the watered-down version of the subsidy-removal policy with SURE-P to cushion its effect on ‘vulnerable’ households and to fund social and infrastructure projects.

On Inauguration Day, May 29, 2023, Tinubu also announced the end of petrol subsidy. But thanks to the success Muhammadu Buhari had achieved in taming any consequential, sustained opposition to unpopular government policies (and, of course, the integration of several careerist protesters into the government), Tinubu’s announcement didn’t attract any mass protests. Nigerians have learned to accept their piecemeal incineration with equanimity.

But like Jonathan’s SURE-P claimed it did, Tinubu restarted cash transfers to millions of ‘vulnerable’ households as ‘palliatives,’ although most Nigerians I have read and spoken with haven’t had the luck to benefit from these palliatives.

The very economic policies Onanuga invokes as a major reason why Nigerians will resist Jonathan’s return to the presidency are the policies the Tinubu regime not only defends but celebrates as an unprecedented, all-time-high achievement which, though biting and bitter, they insist will birth an El Dorado at an indefinite future.

And this is where Lagos APC’s reference to nostalgia for Jonathan is important. At the core of their consciousness, Tinubu’s honchos know that Tinubu and Jonathan are basically indistinguishable in their policies and philosophy of governance, with Tinubu only being luckier than Jonathan in the quality and virility of the opposition that confronts him.

This kind of rhetorical inversion draws on a well-documented psychological mechanism known as projection. In projection, individuals or groups unconsciously attribute their own flaws, motives, or behaviors to others as a way of deflecting scrutiny and avoiding accountability. When accused of what they are themselves guilty of, they attempt to confuse the moral ledger by shifting attention outward, creating a smokescreen that redirects blame.

Politically, this tactic is especially potent: it muddies the waters, preempts criticism, and rallies supporters around a narrative that appears to expose an opponent’s failings, when in reality it is a mirror image of their own.

In this case, APC operatives attack Jonathan’s economic record not only to tarnish him but also to mask the uncomfortable resemblance between his policies and those Tinubu now implements.

And nostalgia can be a powerful winning tool in elections. Donald Trump benefited from it. The American electorate remembered that prices of eggs were lower when he was president, not minding that the lower prices had nothing to do with him. In fact, the prices have tripled since his return.

In Malawi, 85-year-old former President Peter Mutharika defeated incumbent Lazarus Chakwera in the 2025 presidential election partly because of nostalgic feelings about his time in office and hopes that he can recreate that time in place of the hell Malawians are going through now, although as Boniface Dulani, an associate professor of political science at the University of Malawi, told The Guardian, ‘If there was an election that one would want to lose, then maybe this was one election to lose for Chakwera, because I don’t really think they are going to be able to turn things around.’

In my August 16, 2025 column titled ‘Jonathan’s Entry Would Radically Shake the 2027 Election,’ I conceded that ‘there are some genuinely praiseworthy things Jonathan did when he was in power, which many of his critics, including me, acknowledge only with the benefit of hindsight. For instance, his willingness to back down from unpopular policies after sustained outcries and protests, which we took for granted but which none of his successors has replicated, has stood him out.’

That is precisely why Tinubu’s people may be deeply unsettled by the prospect of Jonathan’s return. In the midst of the economic torment Nigerians are enduring, the memory of Jonathan’s era, however imperfect, can take on a golden hue.

The danger for Tinubu is not that Jonathan has a magic formula to solve Nigeria’s crises, but that Nigerians, weary of hardship, may cling to the relative stability, tolerance for dissent, and responsive governance they now retrospectively associate with Jonathan’s presidency.

Even if Jonathan cannot turn things around, nostalgia doesn’t need to be rational to be politically potent; it only needs to resonate emotionally with a suffering electorate.

This latent power of memory is, perhaps, what keeps Tinubu’s camp on edge – particularly in the unlikely event that Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi decide to forgo their ambitions and unite behind him.

Tinubu’s fear of Jonathan says less about Jonathan’s actual political strength and more about the fragile legitimacy of Tinubu’s own policies. When a government mirrors the past it once condemned, it risks empowering nostalgia as a political force. And in a country battered by hardship, memory can be as decisive at the ballot box as manifestos.

Tinubu commissions road projects in Abia, commends Otti

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Friday, at the commissioning of road projects done by Governor Alex Otti, commended the governor for restoring the lost glory of Aba.

President Tinubu handed down this commendation on Friday, at the Enyimba International Stadium, Aba while addressing Abians after commissioning the 6.7 kilometres, 6-lane dual carriage, Port Harcourt road and other roads including, Ohanku Road, Ndoki Road by East, Ajiwe Street, Pepple’s Road, Gabriel Nwosu, Nkoro and Umuatako.

The President, represented by the Minister of Works, Dave Umahi noted that, through Governor Otti, Abia people have taken back their state as he has restored the lost glory of Abia State.

He appreciated Abians for trooping out enmasse to welcome him, stating, ‘It shows the love you have for our government, for your Governor, and for the infrastructural development taking place in Abia State.

‘Since I came, 10am, we have been commissioning projects. First was Michael Okpara Auditorium, a legacy project, a beauty to behold. I commend your Governor very highly. He is a sound economist, and a very experienced personality. I have no doubt that through him, Abia has recovered her lost glory.

‘Governor, I thank you very much, and I commend you for the great work you are doing, and I thank the leaders of Abia State, irrespective of political leanings.’

The President, who said that Abia State is very important in the economic development plans of Nigeria, assured that his government is committed to helping the sub-nationals to develop and deliver good governance, stating, ‘I commit to helping your governor, working with him to ensure that Abia State fully takes back their state.

‘Let me assure the people of the state that we are committed to helping the sub-nationals. The removal of subsidy is getting a lot of momentum projects. We are witnessing the gain of the removal of subsidy here in Abia State. It is happening in other states of Nigeria’, and higlighted many projects his administration is carrying out in the South East and solicited more support from Nigerians.

In his speech, Otti said that the road projects commissioned are of great economic and social importance to Aba business community.

‘Our joy is boundless, and for millions of people who live in this city, this day shall remain a background in our memory. Port Harcourt Road, which at a point mirrored Abari’s regrettable decline, has now returned triumphantly to its place in destiny.

‘it is projected that the economic impact of these roads could see the value of Aba’s gross domestic product rise significantly in the medium to long term. I have no doubt that over the next 12 months, the volume of trade between Aba and other business capitals in the country will double,’ he said.

He requested Tinubu to help in the developmaent of functional rail network in the Southeast and South-South region, as well as exploring how the seaports closest to businesses in the region could be optimised to drive the export of goods.

While responding to a request by Senator Enyinaya Abaribe if Abia Central on the release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, Otti informed that he is in talks with the President, assuring that he would be released.

‘I can assure you that I am engaging with Mr. President and he is favourably disposed to it (release of Nnamdi Kanu). And I am sure that in no distant future, Nnamdi Kanu will regain his freedom,Gov. Otti stated.

Abaribe while acknowledging the good projects of Alex Otti, made a case for the release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu by the President, saying that it would calm the nerves and bring lasting peace in the South East.

Also speaking, the Deputy Speaker of the Federal House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Benjamin Kalu commended Governor Otti for the various projects he carried out in the State and urged him to do more.

While stressing the need for more partnerships between the State and Federal government, which he said, assists in delivering good governance to the people, Kalu said that he has no reason not to identify with the good governance of Governor Otti in Abia State, stating, ‘I have seen projects carried out by the governor, I commend him’.

In their goodwill messages, the Speaker Abia State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Emmanuel Emeruwa, member representing Isialangwa and Chairman of Caucus of Labour Party Ginger Onwusibe and the acting National Secretary of Labour Party, Senator Darlington Nwokocha congratulated Governor Otti and said he has earned himself a second term in office.

The event which featured conferrement of a chieftaincy title of ‘?d? Kp? Enyi 1 of Abia State’ on President Tinubu by the Abia State Council of Traditional Rulers led by its Chairman, Eze Linus Nto Mbah witnessd organic crowd both at l the venues of commissioning and the stadium, and attracted many dignitaries across the country.

Stay healthy with Soya beans soup

Soya beans offer an excellent source of plant-based protein and contain an array of vitamins, minerals and plant compounds including isoflavones. Regular consumption of soya beans may help manage cholesterol levels, and for some women, help with the symptoms of the peri-menopause. It is also good for the bone. Ingredients

1. Soya beans

2. Cray fish

3. Ponmo

4. Dried fish and smoked fish

5. Meat

6 Fresh pepper

7 Vegetable/butter leaf/uziza leaf

8. Palm oil

Preparation

?You can grind or blend your soya beans into powder form with any of the followingdry mill, dry blender, hand grinding machine or you pound it.

?Blend pepper and onion together and pour through a sieve to remove any excess water.

.This is done when you want to fry the soyabean.

?Mix with spoon, onion, ground crayfish, ground pepper, and ground/blended soya bean with little warm water, to form paste (thick consistency) and set aside.

?Cut and wash vegetable.

?Clean dried fish, and smoked fish with lukewarm water

.Wash ponmo, season and cook for five minutes

.Clean meat, season and cook till tender.

Method

.Put pot on fire, pour in palm oil and heat

.Pour in chopped onion and ogiri/locust beans and fry until onion becomes translucent.

.Add soya bean paste mixture bit by bit like balls into the cooking pot and let it fry for about 5 – 8 minutes on low heat.

Note: The soya bean will suck all the palm oil.

.Add meat/fish stock bit by bit and stir, so that the soya bean does not burn

.Cover and leave to boil for 10 minutes on medium heat.

.You can add hot water if soup is thick.

.Add meat, smoked fish and other protein ingredients.

.If your choice of vegetable is bitter leaf, add at this point and cover for 5 minutes.

.Do not stir.

.Pour in ground crayfish and pepper, and stir

.Taste for salt and other spices.

Note: Soya bean soup is done when the red oil settles on the surface of the soup.

.You can add vegetable (optional)

.Cover pot and allow to simmer for 1 to 2 minutes.

.Turn off the heat and your delicious soyabean soup is ready to be served with any swallow of your choice.