ACT Teachers party-list Rep. Antonio Tinio has called for an investigation into the flood control projects in Davao City’s first district, citing alleged ‘red flags’ discovered by his team in 80 out of 121 projects.
These allegedly anomalous public works cost P4 billion.
At a press briefing on Wednesday, Tinio reported the findings of his team’s analysis of projects within Davao’s first district – under Rep. Paolo Duterte – after checking documents requested from the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), the agency’s website, and the National Expenditures Program and General Appropriations Act from 2019 to 2022.
The analysis spanned flood control projects along the Davao River and the Matina River.
According to Tinio, his team found a pattern of irregularities – like overpricing, duplication of projects, and even ghost projects – that merit an investigation.
‘Our analysis reveals a pattern of irregularities that demands explanation and accountability. There are indicators that point to ghost projects, double funding, location changes, gross overpricing, and contracts awarded without clear specifications,’ Tinio said.
Tinio gave five categories for classifying the red-flagged projects:
Total Overlap: Two contracts worth P135.14 million funded construction on identical river sections, with one 2019 project covering a section of the Davao River, while a 2020 project covered the same section plus additional areas.
Double Funding: Two contracts worth P115.09 million were awarded to different contractors for the exact same project location (‘revetment [facing of barriers like stones or concrete slope to protect a wall] Davao River at the Davao River Bridge upstream section’)
Changed Location and Shortchanging: Nine contracts worth P484 million were implemented at different locations than specified in the General Appropriations Act (GAA), often with significantly reduced coverage.
For example, one GAA item allocated P30 million for 375 meters of revetment , but the actual contract covered only 120 meters-a shortfall of 255 meters while charging P161,250 per meter, instead of the budgeted P80,000.
Awarded Contracts Without Details: A staggering 62 contracts worth P3.4 billion were awarded without proper specifications (such as exact location and length) in official records, making verification and accountability difficult.
Awarded Contracts Not in GAA: Ten contracts worth P622.5 million were implemented despite having no corresponding line items in the approved national budget.
Tinio said the team flagged 54 of the 68 implemented projects along the Davao River, which was worth P2.6 billion, while 26 out of the 28 implemented projects near the Matina River worth P1.7 billion allegedly showed irregularities as well.
‘So basically, we saw through a scan of flood control projects in Davao – and this is just partial – that there are disturbing indications of irregularity. And there is a huge possibility of ghost projects [.] Clearly there is overpricing, and other indications of anomalies,’ Tinio said.
‘That’s why we need a deeper probe on these projects, especially since the people are calling for accountability for everyone, and this includes the Dutertes and their use of public funds, in this case, flood control and other infrastructure projects,’ he added.
Inquirer has reached out to the office of Rep. Duterte for his response regarding Tinio’s allegations, but it has not issued a statement as of posting time.
Dutertes vs Tinio
Aside from claims of irregularities, Tinio noted that some of the projects were constructed by companies linked to the controversial Discaya couple, while contracts were supposedly awarded to allies and relatives of Senator Bong Go and Vice President Sara Duterte.
Rep. Duterte and Vice President Duterte are the children of former President Rodrigo Duterte, who was a long-time Davao City mayor before his rise to national prominence.
Go, meanwhile, has been an aide of the older Duterte up to the first half of the latter’s presidency.
Tinio said he will file a resolution calling for a congressional investigation into these anomalies.
‘The Filipino people deserve answers about how P4.66 billion in public funds was spent-or misspent,’ he said.
‘This is about ensuring that every peso of public funds meant to protect our communities from flooding actually serves that purpose. Transparency and accountability must apply equally, whether in Bulacan, Davao, or anywhere else in our country,’ he added.
Tinio and Rep. Duterte have been engaged in a verbal feud since the ACT Teachers solon backed the House committee on public accounts’ looming investigation into the Manila Bay Dolomite Beach project.
Duterte on Monday night claimed that Tinio has been ironically silent on corruption within the current administration despite his calls for a probe on the controversial Manila Bay Dolomite Beach project – which was implemented during the term of former President Duterte.
According to Rep. Duterte, such silence shows that Tinio’s political bloc Makabayan is subservient to the current administration.
But Tinio on Tuesday said it appears Rep. Duterte is ignorant of what Makabayan has stood for, telling him that the use of Google as a search engine is free of charge – so that Rep. Duterte can check his group’s previous statements and initiatives against corruption.
A quick search on social media and search engines would show that Makabayan has called out the government, including both the House of Representatives and the Senate, over issues involving the 2025 budget – and even voted against the budget bills.
After claims of possible issues in the then-proposed 2025 General Appropriations Bill (GAB), the former roster of Makabayan – former ACT Teachers party-list Rep. France Castro, former Gabriela party-list Rep. Arlene Brosas, and former Kabataan party-list Rep. Raoul Manuel – said that the bicameral conference committee should convene again to address alleged allocation issues.
In December 2024, Makabayan – particularly Castro and Tinio – said that the 2025 budget failed to give priority to the education sector, contradicting provisions in the 1987 Constitution.
Castro and Tinio said Marcos’ veto of P194 billion line items in the budget was just a ‘deceptive maneuver to create an illusion of constitutional compliance.’