In the absence of new answers from Vice President Sara Duterte to dispute the Articles of Impeachment against her, Akbayan party-list Rep. Chel Diokno believes the next course of action would be to start the trial process for everyone to see the evidence.
In a press briefing on Monday before the House of Representatives prosecution team submitted its manifestation to the Senate Impeachment Court, Diokno said that the reason they did not file a formal answer was because there is nothing new in Duterte’s answer to the articles.
Since there is nothing new that will be worth responding to, Diokno believes that the trial proper should start, adding that the prosecution team is ‘very ready’ to present the evidence.
‘The reason why we did not file a reply is because there are no new factual allegations that we have to answer. What we need now is to try this case immediately and we, on the part of the prosecution team, are very ready to present our evidence,’ Diokno, member of the 11-person prosecution team, said.
Diokno said that it seems that Duterte wanted the case to be dismissed even before a trial, which cannot be the case.
‘What we were expecting as an answer to the Articles of Impeachment, are counter arguments to the allegation of facts stated. But if you look at the vice president’s answer, it seems that she wants the case to be dismissed immediately,’ he said.
‘But that can’t be the case because we need to have a trial of the case first before the Senate sitting as an impeachment court makes its judgement,’ he added.
Duterte’s camp filed her reply to the Articles of Impeachment last Monday, June 1, after being given 10 calendar days by the Senate Impeachment Court.
The House prosecution panel was given five days to answer. However, lead public prosecutor and Batangas Rep. Gerville Luistro revealed last Thursday that they would not be filing a reply, and will just submit a manifestation since the issues raised by Duterte were similar to her consolidated answer ad cautelam submitted to the House committee on justice during the hearing proper.
Luistro, who was also present during the briefing, also said that the team is ready to go into the next step, which is the pre-trial brief – where evidence, witnesses, and other documents will be marked and examined.
The lawmaker said the prosecution is prepared, even with the leadership dispute in the Senate.
‘I wish to share with the Filipino people that the 11 prosecutors are resolved, we will continue to proceed with the impeachment trial, the 11 prosecutors are ready. As a matter of fact, even our pre-trial brief is ready,’ Luistro said. ‘Despite the commotion, irregularities that happened in the Senate, the 11 prosecutors are not shaken, and are ready to face the looming impeachment trial.’
‘We are considering the same timeline released by the former leadership. So we anticipate that by June 18, the 11 prosecutors will appear before the impeachment court for the first day of pre-trial conference. And on July 6 for the first scheduled trial of the impeachment court.’
The Senate has been engulfed in drama for the past few weeks.
Last May 11, Duterte was impeached for a second time by the House after 257 lawmakers voted in favor of adopting House Resolution No. 989, which contains the articles of impeachment. However, news of Duterte’s impeachment was engulfed by storylines from the Senate, as more eyes were focused on Sen. Ronald dela Rosa’s sudden return, after six months of absence.
Dela Rosa was seen running along the Senate’s staircase to dela Rosa evading arrest from National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) personnel out to serve an arrest order from the International Criminal Court (ICC).
The senator’s attendance proved to be significant as it allowed Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano to muster 13 votes – the minimum number of votes to have him installed as Senate President, replacing Sen. Vicente ‘Tito’ Sotto III.
Then on March 13, violence erupted in the Senate after gunshots were heard inside the facility. This was the same day that the Articles of Impeachment was transmitted by the House to the Senate.
On May 26, the minority bloc walked out of the session after the majority – led by Cayetano and Sen. Rodante Marcoleta pushed for the discussion of a proposed amendment on the Senate rules.
The amendment, made by Marcoleta through a motion, sought to allow online voting during plenary deliberations, for senators who are not physically present. The minority, before walking out, questioned the rush to amend the rules, and as to why the amendment was contained in a motion instead of a formal resolution.
While the proposed rule change was for plenary matters, several lawmakers feared that this might set a precedent towards allowing online participation for the impeachment trial.
As retaliation, the majority bloc did not attend session last Monday and Tuesday. On Wednesday, lawmakers said that the Senate was on the verge of violating the 1987 Constitution, as there is a provision stating that the Senate cannot adjourn its session for more than three days without informing the House.