Two Philippine Army officers took center stage at Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial on Tuesday as they testified about military certifications that the Department of Education (DepEd) used to support its liquidation of P112.5 million in confidential funds in 2023.
Col. Manaros Boransing II told the Senate impeachment court during Day of the impeachment trial that the Army did not receive any funds from Duterte’s offices-whether regular or confidential-to finance the 2023 Youth Leadership Summit (YLS) or the Information Education Communication (IEC) campaign.
Boransing, however, said DepEd could have used its own regular budget for the programs, although he had no knowledge of whether confidential funds were used.
Col. Magtanggol Panopio, meanwhile, testified that a certification he issued for the youth summit was not a valid supporting document for liquidation before the Commission on Audit (COA).
Panopio said he was shocked to learn that DepEd had used the certification to justify its expenses and told Sen. Joel Villanueva that he personally believed the use of the document was improper.
The two officers were presented by the House prosecution to shed light on how military certifications were obtained and used by DepEd under Duterte’s leadership.
Their testimonies are expected to form part of the prosecution’s case on the alleged misuse of confidential funds under Article I of the Articles of Impeachment.
Meanwhile, Presiding Officer Sen. Francis Escudero issued a blanket prohibition on Tuesday barring witnesses at the impeachment trial from possessing or accessing earpieces, mobile phones, smartwatches, and similar communication devices while testifying.
Escudero made the announcement to correct misinformation about previous witness, OVP Assistant Chief of Staff Lemuel Ortonio, after the court determined that a viral image allegedly showing Ortonio wearing an earpiece during his testimony was AI-generated and false.
Sen. Vicente Sotto III also weighed in on the ongoing debate over suspicious names on OVP confidential fund acknowledgment receipts, stating that a name may be considered an alias only if there is an actual person behind it.
Sotto said that if no real person exists behind a name, it must be treated as fictitious or fake, not merely an alias.
Signatories on the receipts included names resembling food brands, fruits, and local politicians, such as Mary Grace Piattos, Miggy Mango, and Kristine Applegate Estrada.
After the session, public prosecutor and Manila Rep. Joel Chua said the prosecution may have three or four witnesses remaining under Article I, covering the confidential fund allegations, with defense lawyer Michael Poa set to take the stand next.
Poa, who stepped aside temporarily from his role as defense spokesperson out of deference to the court, is expected to face questions about military certifications he helped obtain for DepEd.
Chua said the prosecution would decide on its next set of witnesses after Poa’s testimony, estimating about one week before they rest their case on Article I.