Category: The Nation – Nigeria

Activist lawyer , Femi Falana (SAN), yesterday urged the judiciary to urgently determine the constitutional validity of the emergency rule recently lifted in Rivers State.

Falana warned that leaving the matter unresolved would set a dangerous precedent for Nigeria’s democracy.

Falana, in a statement issued yesterday, warned that without a judicial pronouncement, Section 305 of the Constitution-which empowers the President to declare a state of emergency-could be abused to settle political scores.

President Bola Tinubu had on September 17, 2025, announced the cessation of emergency rule in Rivers State and reinstated Governor Siminalayi Fubara and other elected officials. President Tinubu in his broadcast acknowledged the controversy generated by his proclamation.

The President, however, noted that over 40 cases were instituted in Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Yenagoa to challenge the declaration.

‘That is the way it should be in a democratic setting,’ Tinubu said, adding that some of the suits remain pending in court.

Falana, however, insisted that the judiciary cannot sidestep its responsibility as it did in earlier cases involving emergency rule.

He cited that in Attorney-General of Plateau State v Attorney-General of the Federation (2006), the Supreme Court struck out a suit challenging the suspension of state officials on the grounds that the emergency rule had expired, rendering the case academic. Similarly, he said that in Attorney-General of Ekiti State v Attorney-General of the Federation, the apex court declined jurisdiction.

Falana, however, contended that the Rivers’ cases are different because they raise ‘live constitutional issues’ that go beyond the restoration of Governor Fubara and other officials.

He said: ‘the pending suits question the President’s powers to suspend elected state officials, appoint a sole administrator, dissolve state executive bodies, and even conduct local government elections without due process.

‘These matters involve the interpretation of sections 1(2), 5(2), 11, 176, 180, 188, and 305 of the Constitution, and they cannot be dismissed as speculative.’

Falana also cited the Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), who had earlier described the Rivers declaration as a ‘clear signal’ to other crisis-ridden states, and urged critics to allow the courts to make a final determination.

‘The Bola Tinubu administration has thrown a challenge to the judiciary,’ Falana said.

‘The courts must take it up without further delay. Otherwise, the sword of Damocles will continue to hang over the heads of elected governors’, he warned.

A Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an order restraining Prof. Pat Utomi and his associates from proceeding with their plan to establish a shadow government/cabinet in the country.

Justice James Omotosho issued the order yesterday in a judgment on a suit filed by the Department of State Services (DSS) with Utomi as the sole defendant.

Justice Omotosho declared the idea of a shadow government/cabinet is unconstitutional and a concept alien to the nation’s presidential system of government.

The judge held that Utomi and his associates cannot hide under the rights to freedom of association and expression to engage in unlawful activities.

He hailed the plaintiff for filing the suit and held, among others, that it was within the powers of the DSS, being a premier national security agency, to take steps to prevent acts capable of threatening the nation’s internal security.

Justice Omotosho upheld the argument by the lawyer to the DSS, Akinlolu Kehinde (SAN), that the move by Utomi and his associates to form a shadow government/cabinet was intended to create chaos and destabilise the country.

The judge also agreed with the plaintiff that not only was the planned shadow government an aberration but that it also constituted a grave attack on the Constitution and a threat to the democratically elected government currently in place.

He held that such a structure, styled as a shadow government/cabinet, if left unchecked, may incite political unrest, cause intergroup tensions, and embolden other unlawful actors or separatist entities to replicate similar parallel arrangements, all of which pose a grave threat to national security.

Justice Omotosho held that although the defendant is entitled to enjoy the rights to freedom of expression and to associate, such rights are not absolute.

He further held that the two rights being claimed by the defendant can legally be violated in some instances, particularly where there is a need to protect society from anarchy and the breakdown of law and order.

The judge held that, in the interest of the security of the country, such rights (freedom of expression and association) do not exist for the defendant, warning that the court would not sit idly by and allow the defendant to cause confusion in the country.

According to him, the planned shadow government/cabinet by Utomi and others portends a danger to the stability and safety of the country.

He said that although Utmi claimed to be running a civil society organisation, his decision to form a shadow government was a nullity.

The judge averred that there are existing avenues through which people could criticise the government, which the defendant could explore, but not to take unconstitutional steps, like forming a shadow government/cabinet.

Justice Omotosho also faulted the forum adopted by Utomi and his associates, noting that Big Tent Limited, a limited liability company under which the defendant claimed to be operating, cannot be used as a vehicle for political purposes, as was done in this case.

The judge said should Utomi and his associates wish to set up a platform to criticise and monitor the government, they should either form a political party or join an existing one, not use a limited liability company for political purposes.

He issued an order declaring the purported shadow government/cabinet being planned by Utomi and his associates as unconstitutional and amounting to an attempt to create a parallel authority not recognized by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

Justice Omotosho also declared that under Sections 1(1), 1(2) and 14(2)(a) of the Constitution, the establishment or operation of any governmental authority or structure outside the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). is unconstitutional, null, and void.

The judge issued an order of perpetual injunction, restraining Utomi, his agents and associates ‘from further taking any steps towards the establishment or operation of a shadow government, shadow cabinet or any similar entity not recognized by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

It is not for nothing that Nigerians have generally welcomed the reduction of the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) from 27.5 per cent to 27 percent at the committee’s 302nd meeting last week. Although it was something that Nigerians had long hoped for in the last few years, the exigencies of the economy had made it practically unrealistic.

According to Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor, Yemi Cardoso, the MPC decision was underpinned by ‘sustained disinflation recorded in the past five months, projections of declining inflation for the rest of 2025, and the need to support economic recovery efforts.’

In other words, the time was finally right.

Among other reasons, he noted that headline inflation had slowed to 20.12 per cent in August from 21.88 per cent in July. Food inflation, he also reported, fell to 21.87 per cent from 22.74 per cent, while core inflation eased to 20.33 per cent from 21.33 per cent.

On a month-to-month basis, inflation dropped sharply to 0.74 per cent in August compared with 1.99 per cent in July.

There were other notable decisions. The MPC also adjusted the Standing Facilities corridor around the MPR to +250/-250 basis points to improve the efficiency of the interbank market and strengthen monetary policy transmission. The committee further introduced a 75 per cent Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) on non-TSA public sector deposits for enhanced liquidity management.

For commercial banks, this was adjusted to 45 per cent while retaining that of merchant banks at 16 per cent. The Liquidity Ratio was left unchanged at 30.00 per cent.

Said he of the cut in MPR: ‘This reduction is the first under my leadership and the first in five years’; noting that ‘the last time the MPC cut its policy rate was in September 2020 when it dropped from 12.5 per cent to 11.5 per cent.

As would be expected, members of the organised private sector see the reduction as not only ‘marginal but insufficient to ease the credit squeeze on their businesses’. For Nigerians as a whole, it seems unlikely that they would be particularly enthusiastic about any cut short of returning the reference rate to a single digit.

Here, Nigerians would recall occasions in the past where suggestions were actually made in some quarters that the rate be legislated by fiat!

While varied positions on the subject would seem understandable, they merely highlight the misconceptions about the CBN’s role, particularly its dilemma in its statutory role of keeping inflation under control while ensuring unimpeded growth on one hand, and the daily frustrations of economic actors who have businesses to run, and must do it competitively under a constantly looming shadow of foreclosure, on the other.

In all of these, we cannot but commend Cardoso and his team for keeping admirably calm, while keeping their eyes on the ball.

For us, however, good as the trend is, the work has only begun. In fact, there is still much to be done to get the economy back to full recovery. Liquidity management remains a huge challenge even more so now that state treasuries are literally awash with Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) cash.

We expect the apex bank to continue to keep a keen eye on the monster of inflation to prevent a relapse to the immediate past. As for interest rates, we expect things to moderate a bit to reflect the trend.

On the whole, we urge the state governments in particular to focus on those expenditures that could engender real growth in the economy; surely the time for bogus expenditures should belong in the past.

If anything, the expectation is for both the fiscal and monetary authorities to continue to work together to deliver on growth that Nigerians can truly be proud.

Edo State Government said its deployment of technology and innovation would help it to meet targeted N100billion in Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) by December ending.

It said it had made gains in the area of increasing the state IGR and being able to manage some of the challenging issues with tax evasion and tax avoidance.

Executive Chairman of Edo Internal Revenue Services (EIRS), Otunba Bamidele Bankole-Balogun, in an interview, said the state was making steady progress through audit processes, assessments and good use of the courts.

He said the state’s IGR at the end of August was N74billion and had hit N79billion at press time.

Bankole-Balogun said the Governor Monday Okpebholo administration inherited a virtually non-existent digitalised system.

The EIRS boss said his team was working assiduously to digitalise revenue collections in Edo State such that in future, cash collections and manual collections would be reduced to the barest minimum.

He said: ‘At the moment, Edo State Internal Revenue Service is making tremendous gains in the area of increasing the state’s IGR. There are many components to our taxation and each and every part of this mix is seeing significant improvement as compared to last year in review.

‘There are other companies that are lined up and individuals lined up somewhere. It has been traditionally difficult, as you say, to come to grips with high net worth individuals. They have all the resources to evade and avoid tax, but we’re on top of it.’

He expressed the state’s preparedness for the new tax regime from January 1, 2026.

‘As you know, the new tax regime that will come in on the 1st of January 2026 places very little emphasis on the low income and places a lot of emphasis on the high income. Our objective is to tap into the high net worth individuals who are able to pay much more than the lower income, so as to harness that group and maximise the potential from the group.

‘Digitalisation is on top of it. Tax bodies are on top of it. The FIRS, which will now be the Federal Revenue Service, is also on top of it. Edo State Internal Revenue Service is also on top of it. Technology will help and as you know TINs, BDNs and NINs are going to be critical to doing any financial transaction in Nigeria from the 1st of January. So all of these mechanisms put together, hopefully, will help us to get more from these people who can pay more actually to give everybody a better life.’

The National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) has inaugurated the committee for the screening of 2026 Hajj Tour Operators at the Hajj House in Abuja.

The committee comprises management workers of the commission alongside other key members, including representatives from the secretariat.

The commission’s Director of Administration, Alhaji Alidu Shutti, who represented the Chairman at the event, described the inauguration as an important milestone in preparations for the Hajj operation.

He expressed the commission’s confidence in the competence and capacity of the committee members to deliver on the crucial assignment.

Shutti urged the committee to thoroughly scrutinise all documents submitted by intending Hajj Tour Operators seeking licences for the 2026 exercise, ensuring validity, accuracy, and compliance with international best practices.

He directed the committee to recommend slot allocations only to qualified and competent operators.

‘You are expected to submit your recommendations to the leadership of the commission for approval or otherwise, and produce a comprehensive report of your findings at the end of the exercise,’ Shutti said.

The director reminded the committee of the urgency of their task, stressing that the assignment must be completed within one week in line with the deadline set by the Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah for the 2026 operations.

Before pouring jeremiads on Nigeria at 65, behold the parallels between Emperor Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon (reigned: 605-562 BC) and US President Donald Trump, as America approaches its 250th year in 2026!

Much more than a warrior-king, Nebuchadnezzar was a renowned builder. His neo-Babylonian Empire, of course, provided a surfeit of forced labour.

Trump is a real estate magnate. But with Trump accused as a shark that often shirks payment for work done, duped labour is answer to Nebuchadnezzar’s forced labour.

Nebuchadnezzar drove Jews into exile, among hated Gentiles, in his prized Babylon city, with his 586 BC razing of Jerusalem; and his capture and torture of rebellious Judah King Zedekiah.

In a settler country with neither Jew nor Gentile, Trump is creating fake Gentiles of US illegal immigrants, and dumping them in fake Babylon: in Africa, South America and Asia, where as the ancient Jews in Babylon, they might not even know anyone!

But it’s in preening hubris that the Trump-Nebuchadnezzar parallel is eeriest.

At the zenith of his self-worship – even with a prophetic caution, by Daniel the Jew to humble himself – Nebuchadnezzar crowed: ‘Is not this the great Babylon I have built, as the royal residence, by my mighty power and for the glory of my majesty?’

Compare and contrast that with Trump’s United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) September 25 conceit, and you’ll spot the tragic similarity between the two.

Using his native New York and UN base as Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylon city, Trump bluffed and blustered, abused and traduced, cursed and smeared everyone in sight.

The United Nations was useless for alleged escalator and TelePrompTer sabotage; and for not aiding him to stop ‘seven wars’ – a brazen lie by the way – even though America picks up the biggest chunk of the UN tab, which is true.

Global science is wrong on climate change, only because a loud Trump – even with combative ignorance – declared it’s ‘the greatest con ever perpetrated on the world.’

Europe earned Trump’s ire, for not herding own ‘illegal immigrants’ into human pens like hens; and, like the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), cart them off to wherever the wannabe emperor damn well pleases!

For shunning that icy savagery, Trump foreswore Europe would go to hell! Besides, having numbed uppity America with his cocktail of bare-faced lies, and pushing his deep vices as high virtues, he pitches such vile claptrap to the globe. What hubris!

Prof. Wole Soyinka just christened Trump ‘Idi Amin of America’: after that odious 20th century military brute, that made Uganda – and Africa – a global laughing stock. By his UNGA huff-and-puff, Trump further branded himself some neo-Nebuchadnezzar.

But it’s all thanks to American democracy, just shy of its 250th year: returning the Idi Amin favour, and delivering America’s own 21st century global laughing stock!

Dolly Parton, that great American country music megastar, with a sweet but haunting voice, once sang ‘It’s my time to cry .’ in one of her fetching numbers.

Africa and the third world, often savagely caricatured by a condescending America and the rest of the West are, in Trump, grabbing their chance to laugh – or even gloat! Indeed, Trump’s bubbly bumbling would have been so sweet, were it not so tragic!

Nigeria is 65. America, 249 years. But its doubtful if a Trump, with his clear flaws, can gain the Nigerian presidency, even with Nigeria’s many challenges!

Which is why, the world leaders at UNGA, condemned to enduring Trump’s tirade – at least the historic-minded among them – would not but wonder if this was not after all a 21st century Nebuchadnezzar eating grass, after burst hubris!

To be sure, core historians claim that was a Jewish biblical fable – for in truth, no hard core historical account recorded Nebuchadnezzar as eating grass. But it’s a powerful metaphor: pride goes before a fall. That might just be America’s fate under Trump. He radically disrupts the world. Yet, his thinking – and whining – are baby-like!

Still, an ambivalence gifts Trump apologists – quite a number! – some cold comfort.

Nebuchadnezzar was the divine rod from Jehovah himself – thus goes the biblical account – to punish the decadence of Judah.

Trump too, might just be the divine rod to conk the Democratic Party, often blamed for the moral decay of America. The grand irony, though: no single person epitomizes that decay more than Trump!

Still, never mind: Trump as divine rod is why America’s White Evangelicals support him – aside the snouting elephant of White racism in the room! Some priggish Nigerians also buy into that ‘divine’ apologia.

Just as well Trump merrily emits raw American wrongs, buried under more than two centuries of – hypocritical (?) – breeding. But it would appear crunch time!

Still, America is famous for self-correcting, after major crises. Might there then be redemption, after profane Divine Rod Trump is long gone? Maybe!

But a chilly video making the rounds, tracking a 250-year empire rise-and-bust cycle, suggests otherwise.

On 4 July 2026, America will be 250 years. Rome: 244 years from republic to empire. Ottoman: 250 years from its rise to its peak. Britain: 251 years from empire to a bust.

What’s more? America suffers socio-economic dissonance that bodes ill. Its rich 0.1%, claims the video, corral more wealth than the rest 90%. Trust in institutions has fallen 54% from 1970. By 2026, it would plunge below 20% – the Soviet Union sank at 19%. America’s political polarization is almost at par with its civil war period. By its 250th year – 2016 – that fissure would reach nadir not plumbed by any modern democracy.

Incidentally, Trump, the unfazed face of this rot, is here bang at the crunch: levying war against Congress and getting away with it, convicted on 34-point felony yet elected president, and whines regularly to divide, not unite, his country.

Now, if he goes to UNGA to play Nebuchadnezzar, after wreaking the system at home, it’s signal to the rest of the world that America’s global awe is dated.

That has started in earnest: Brazil’s President Lula da Silva, at those same UNGA portals, already told Trump to buzz off pushing political outlawry in Brazil, with his daft support for the jailed Jair Bolsonaro who, after defeat, staged a Trump-like siege on Parliament to stay in power. Unlike Trump, however, he just got tossed into the can.

Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, right there in New York, told American soldiers to, on Palestine, disobey outlawry orders from their commander-in-chief!

Even the French, philosopher-Kings of America’s ‘liberty and fraternity’ credo: their president had to abandon his car, and trek to own embassy, because insecure Trump must project raw power, and seal up the entire New York!

For these diplomatic incivilities, Trump has the mandate of his people. They voted him. So, if they drown, they drown in concert.

The saving grace is America might not remain a global bully much longer, though it can continue ruling or misruling itself in its vast insular territory.

So, how does Nigeria at 65 take advantage of this winking global opportunity? Use natural and human resources to build Nigeria for formidable global trade – and peace.

That – and not stale jeremiads at 65 – should drive Nigerian thinking.

A former Edo Speaker Hon Frank Okiye has been appointed pioneer Chairman of the Edo State Lottery Regulatory Commission.

The appointment of Okiye was contained in a statement by Secretary to the Edo State Government, Musa Okhilor, following establishment of the Commission.

Ikhilor said the Commission was conceived as the central regulatory body for all lottery, gaming, and related activities within the State.

He said the Commission was to provide legal and institutional framework for regulating lottery and gaming operations as well as ensure transparency, accountability, and integrity in the conduct of lottery activities.

The SSG explained that the Commission would safeguard interests of participants as well as generate revenue for the state through well-structured licensing and regulation of gaming operators.

Other members of the Commission are Dandy Imoukhuede Oserei, Elvis Uadiale, Ndidi Aghimien and Hon. Habibat Yakubu as Secretary.

Okhilor said the names of the nominees would be forwarded to the Edo State House of Assembly for consideration and confirmation.

The Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) has officially launched ISO 37003:2025, a Fraud Control Management System designed to strengthen transparency, accountability, and governance across the country.

Speaking at the unveiling ceremony in Abuja, SON Director-General, Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwunonso Okeke, described the standard as a globally recognised framework that helps organisations prevent fraud before it occurs, detect it efficiently, and respond decisively to minimise damage.

He added that ISO 37003:2025 also fosters a culture of integrity by embedding fraud prevention into the core of organisational operations.

Dr. Okeke explained that adoption of the standard will benefit both the public and private sectors – reducing leakages and rebuilding trust in government while positioning Nigerian companies as credible and trustworthy partners to investors.

He further stressed that widespread implementation would improve Nigeria’s global rankings and attract foreign direct investment.

SON, he noted, will embark on awareness campaigns, training, and certification programmes to ensure effective adoption, calling for active participation from government leaders, industry captains, professional bodies, and civil society.

Also speaking, Prof. Oserheimen Osunbor, Convener of ISO/TC309/WG8, highlighted that ISO 37003:2025 serves as a guardian for organisations managing fraud risks, noting that the process of developing the standard began during the ISO TC 309 plenary in Sydney, Australia, in November 2018.

‘There was awareness of fraud risks in organisations and existing fraud controls within the organisations, including internal fraud, whistleblowing, code of conduct, anti-fraud policies, fraud training, and management reviews to mitigate the impact of fraud.

‘With the existence of these internal mechanisms and statutory regulations, there was a clear need for an ISO standard dealing with fraud control. Research findings from the literature published by reputable sources show that fraud costs the global economy about $4 trillion per year. The chief executive of the Strategic Institute of Forensic Examiners put it at $4.7 trillion a year, so it is increasing.

He added that this Amounts to a total loss of 7% in the annual turnover of the organisations. Based on the findings, the leadership of TC309 in 2022 approved the proposal and established Working Group 8 to develop a fraud control management system standard. After going through all the different stages of development, from working draft to committee draft, draft international standard to final draft international standard, the document was published as an international standard on 29th May 2025.

Land remains one of the most valuable assets in the world today, contributing to economic growth at an unprecedented rate across global landscapes.

Cities around the world like Monaco, where land costs an average of $100,000 – $120,000 for a square metre, Hong Kong, London, New York, Tokyo, and Paris, to mention a few, have witnessed a dramatic growth as a result of land investments.

The Lagos State’s experience of land’s capability to improve local economy is not different from the experiences of the wealthy cities (by land value) mentioned above.

As Nigeria’s commercial nerve centre, Lagos State is grappling with unchecked population growth, rapid urbanisation, which among other things birthed the need for increasing security of land ownership.

The state has witnessed, in time past, violent land grabbing cases, fraudulent misrepresentation in title perfection, cloning of titles, and documents theft, which has cast doubts in the minds of the general public about the state’s capability in running a smooth, efficient, and reliable land administration.

Title perfection, which is the process of converting an imperfect landholding into a legally recognised, registrable, and defensible title, is crucial for individuals, families, developers, and corporate organisations.

It fosters land-based investments, and ensures, among other things, security of tenure, reduces disputes, and enhances the value of real estate assets by making them acceptable for mortgage, investment, and development.

In Lagos State, however, the path to title perfection has become a long, costly, and sometimes frustrating journey. Although very rare, title perfection trip, which should last a maximum of one calendar year could take forever.

At the heart of title perfection process in Lagos State and across Nigeria lies a controversial group: the middlemen. These middlemen include lawyers, estate agents (both educated and semi-literate), and estate surveyors and valuers.

Their involvement has become both indispensable and problematic, shaping how land title perfection is perceived and practised.

While some middlemen provide legitimate guidance, others thrive on exploiting loopholes, inefficiencies, and applicants’ ignorance.

This paper interrogates the problems posed by middlemen in Lagos’ title perfection process, the impact on applicants and the government, and the possible reforms that can sanitise the system for the benefit of all stakeholders.

At first glance, the role of middlemen appears justifiable. Land title perfection involves multitude of stages, and cumbersome process, and would be requiring different application documents, payments of statutory fees (such as consent assessment, stamp duties, and registration fee), surveys, charting, and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Governor’s Consent. These procedures are highly technical, bureaucratic, and time-consuming.

Given the complexity, many applicants, whether individuals, families, or corporate bodies-turn to middlemen for assistance. Lawyers are often engaged for drafting, legal interpretations, and processing. Estate surveyors and valuers guide on property-related documentation and valuation requirements. Agents and informal facilitators offer ‘connections’ within the Lands Bureau. In practice, the middleman has become the bridge between the landowner and the Lands Bureau.

Yet, instead of easing the process, this arrangement has bred distortions, bottlenecks, and corruption.

What nature of problems do the middlemen cause in title perfection process in Lagos State? A few ones are:

One of the major criticisms of middlemen is the sharp escalation in the cost of title perfection. Statutory fees in Lagos are already high compared to other states in Nigeria. When applicants engage middlemen, additional charges are imposed-sometimes arbitrary, sometimes exploitative. What should ordinarily cost millions of naira in statutory charges ends up being inflated to double or triple the official amount. For ordinary landowners, this makes perfection nearly impossible.

Middlemen thrive on applicants’ ignorance of procedures. Many title seekers are not informed about the official steps, documentation, and fees involved. This knowledge gap is exploited by middlemen who withhold information, manipulate timelines, and justify arbitrary costs. There are cases when middlemen will put their personal details at places on application forms where applicant’s details are needed. This sharp practice and more, leave applicants at the mercy of middlemen, without direct knowledge of what transpires within the Lands Bureau.

The activities of middlemen have entrenched corruption in the system. Instead of following due process, some middlemen resort to informal payments, bribery, and ‘man-know-man’ tactics to fast-track applications. This undermines institutional integrity, frustrates honest applicants, and encourages a vicious cycle where only those who can afford ‘extra’ payments get results.

Ironically, middlemen do not always speed up the process. In many cases, files are delayed or even lost because middlemen operate through informal channels rather than official routes. Applicants who refuse to pay additional charges often suffer endless delays. The inefficiency feeds a perception that title perfection in Lagos is designed to frustrate ordinary citizens.

While lawyers and estate surveyors are trained professionals, the system is also flooded with unqualified agents and touts who pose as facilitators. Many of these semi-literate middlemen mislead applicants, file incomplete documentation, and collect fees without delivering results. Their activities deepen the crisis of trust in the land administration system.

The middlemen crisis has dual consequences. For the government, it translates into loss of revenue, since informal payments often bypass official channels. It also undermines Lagos State’s vision of becoming a global smart city with efficient land administration.

For applicants, the consequences are financial and emotional. Exorbitant costs discourage many landowners from perfecting their titles, leading to a large number of unregistered properties in Lagos.

This perpetuates land disputes, weakens collateral value for mortgage financing, and reduces confidence in real estate investments. The emotional toll of repeated delays, endless demands for money, and uncertain outcomes cannot be ignored.

The challenges posed by middlemen are not insurmountable. With deliberate reforms, Lagos State can reduce reliance on middlemen, improve efficiency, and restore confidence in the land title perfection process.

The government must deepen the ongoing digital reforms in the Lands Bureau. A fully automated, transparent, and user-friendly platform where applicants can submit documents, track progress, and make payments directly will drastically reduce human interference. Online dashboards showing real-time application status can eliminate reliance on middlemen.

Applicants need to be educated about the steps, costs, and timelines involved in title perfection. Regular sensitisation through newspapers, radio, and community forums can close the knowledge gap that middlemen exploit. A citizen who understands the process is less vulnerable to exploitation.

Lagos can establish one-stop centres where all land perfection processes-survey charting, valuation, consent, stamping, and registration-are coordinated. This reduces the run-around across multiple offices and curtails opportunities for middlemen to hijack the process.

While lawyers and Estate Surveyors are legitimate players, their activities in title perfection need to be better regulated by their professional bodies to ensure transparency and fairness. Unqualified agents and touts should be weeded out through enforcement and public warnings.

The high cost of perfection in Lagos fuels the demand for shortcuts. A review of statutory fees to make them more affordable will encourage compliance. When official fees are fair and predictable, the incentive to patronise middlemen diminishes.

The Lands Bureau must strengthen internal monitoring systems. Staff found colluding with middlemen should face disciplinary actions. Anonymous whistleblowing channels and audits can also help check corruption.

In conclusion, land title perfection is not merely a bureaucratic exercise-it is the foundation of property rights, investment confidence, and urban development in Lagos State. Yet, the overwhelming role of middlemen has turned the process into a burden for many applicants. While middlemen emerged to fill gaps created by bureaucracy, they have become part of the problem, inflating costs, encouraging corruption, and undermining trust.

For Lagos State to achieve its ambition of transparent land administration, bold reforms must be undertaken. Digitalisation, public education, regulatory enforcement, and fee rationalisation will go a long way in reducing reliance on middlemen. By making the process efficient, affordable, and transparent, Lagos can ensure that landowners perfect their titles with confidence and without exploitation.

The crisis of middlemen should no longer define title perfection in Lagos. It is time for the government, professionals, and the public to embrace a new order where land title perfection is transparent, affordable, and truly accessible to all.

The Attorney General of the Federation(AGF) and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi has hinted of plans to probe the September 11 United Kingdom judgment involving Senior Advocate Mike Ozekhome and the late Gen. Jerry Useni over a disputed London property.

The Tribunal judgment was given by Judge Ewan Paton.

The late Gen Useni was the true owner of the disputed property located at 79, Randall Avenue, LondonNW2, purchased in 1993, according to the Tribunal. He got the property under false identity-Tali Shani.

Ozekhome’a application to register the property was ordered to be cancelled by the Tribunal. It ruled that Tali Shani couldn’t pass ownership because the name was used as a conduit for the late General’s fraudulent acquisition.

Fagbemi spoke yesterday at a special court session to mark the beginning of the Supreme Court’s 2025/2026 Legal Year and the inauguration of 57 senior advocates of Nigeria(SANs).

Fagbemi expressed concern about the rising number of complaints of professional misconduct against senior lawyers.

He noted that his office receives such complaints frequently.

Fagbemi said: ‘My office has, in recent times, taken note of the increasing number of complaints against senior members of the bar.

‘Thankfully, these are few and far between, but they still constitute such numbers as to be troubling.

‘The complaints border on professional misconduct and, if not addressed urgently, are capable of bringing this prestigious rank into disrepute locally and, as we have seen recently, internationally.

‘We need to reverse the perception that the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria confers immunity from disciplinary measures for professional misconduct.

‘We simply cannot have a Bar where one law applies to juniors and another to seniors.

My Lords, of note is the topical and trending matter that recently struck at the standing of our profession in Nigeria in the eyes of the world and in a way that stands out in recent memory.

‘It bears sadly on the high esteem and integrity that our noble profession commands as a sine qua non for our collective commitment and investment in the legal brand.

‘I am referring to the recent decision (11th September 2025) of an English property tribunal, by Judge Ewan Paton.

‘It will be remiss of me not to bring such an egregious development to the attention of my lords, in the hope that it is addressed frontally against the backdrop of the hallowed rules that guard and define the finest traditions by which our nobility should be measured.

‘It is for this reason that my office has now taken the unusual step of verifying the authenticity of this and often complaints with a view to referring them to the appropriate disciplinary bodies.

‘I look forward to receiving the cooperation of the Nigerian Bar Association and the Body of Senior Advocates in this regard,’ Fagbemi said.

The AGF, who challenged the Judiciary to be transparent in its operations, said ‘it is quite concerning to see the adverse ratings and negative perception indexes of our Judiciary.’

He went on: ‘Public confidence in the judiciary has been shaken by perceptions of undue influence, inconsistent rulings, and delays that frustrate justice.

‘Allegations of corruption, though often unproven, cast long shadows.

‘While I agree that the judiciary should be accountable less to public opinion and more to public interest, may I respectfully insist that in this climate, the judiciary should discharge that accountability by being principled, independent and impartial.

‘It must not only deliver justice, it must do so transparently, consistently, and with intellectual rigour.

‘It is therefore the responsibility of everyone present here and beyond to ensure that, like Caesar’s wife, the judiciary is above reproach and suspicion,’ Fagbemi said.

Also yesterday, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun expressed concern over the inadequate funding of states’ Judiciaries by the governors.

Justice Kekere-Ekun said the unfortunate development hampers the capacity of courts in states to effectively function.

She said: ‘The judiciary, especially at the sub-national level, is often underfunded, which impacts its ability to function effectively.

‘Inadequate funding leads to poor infrastructure, insufficient resources, and inadequate training for judicial staff members and support staff.

‘This, in turn, affects the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial process. I need to state unequivocally that the challenges facing the Judiciary are not the responsibilities of the judiciary alone.

‘They require a collaborative effort involving all the three arms of government – the Executive, the Legislature, and the Judiciary – as well as the active participation of the citizens.

‘I therefore, call upon the executive arm of government, especially in the states to provide adequate funding for the judiciary, improve judicial

infrastructure, and support the implementation of technological advancements.

‘I urge the legislature to enact laws that support the independence of the Judiciary, strengthen anti-corruption mechanisms, and streamline court processes,’ she said