Ranil’s resolve to end rule of law

Ranil Wickremesinghe (RW), one of the fallen heroes at the 2024 Presidential Election, has been reported to be planning to organise 1,000 rallies across the country and calling all Opposition leaders, their aficionados and apparatchiks to rally behind him in his war against what he described as a ‘constitutional dictatorship’. If one understood the logic behind that concoction, one would have gathered that if there is a dictatorship prevailing currently in the country then that dictatorship has been permitted by the constitution.

But what is strange is the fact that that constitution was introduced by none other than RW’s own uncle and Sri Lanka’s first Executive President, J.R. Jayewardene, who boasted that he could do anything under his constitution except to change the gender of a person, and RW was a minister under JR. It was the same constitution but with additional powers that elevated President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to become a virtual dictator. When the Aragalaya youth forced him to run away from the country and resign, RW stepped into the presidential shoes with the consent of the Parliament, and the first thing he accomplished was to order the security forces to end the Aragalaya by arresting its leaders, demolishing their temporary shelters and chasing out the rest to their homes. Now he is calling AKD Presidency and NPP Government a constitutional dictatorship. Is it?

What made RW come out of the woods?

To start with, what was the immediate provocation which made RW to come out of the woods at the age of 76 to announce unofficially his readiness to enter the race for presidency again? It was undoubtedly the shame that he had to endure when he was produced before the court by the Police to face allegations of misusing public funds when he was the stop-gap president. After an incredible drama at the court, which raised questions about the honesty and integrity of the medical professionals who vouched for RW’s failing health condition, he had been granted bail until investigations are completed. He has not been acquitted yet.

When an allegation is made against any person or persons under an existing law then the country’s judiciary is constitutionally bound to deal with it independently. This is what is meant by Rule of Law (ROL) in a democracy. ROL is not just a concept but the cornerstone of a society that values equality and fairness for all individuals. Therefore, RW’s resolve to end ‘constitutional dictatorship’ is in other words his agenda to end ROL. But what happened to ROL before RW fell victim to it?

ROL was professed by all political leaders and was inscribed in all constitutions in operation since independence; but politicians and especially those belonged to the ruling party or parties were virtually elevated to become a special species of individuals whom the arms of law were unable to touch. It was this untouchability which almost became an unwritten ‘convention’ if one may call it that allowed corruption to flourish, illicit businesses with underworld connections to prosper and organised crimes to increase during the reign of several governments. (Is it a coincidence that Tangalle in Hambantota District, the political fortress of Rajapaksas has become virtually an epicentre of narcotics)?

When an allegation is made against any person or persons under an existing law then the country’s judiciary is constitutionally bound to deal with it independently. This is what is meant by Rule of Law (ROL) in a democracy. ROL is not just a concept but the cornerstone of a society that values equality and fairness for all individuals. Therefore, RW’s resolve to end ‘constitutional dictatorship’ is in other words his agenda to end ROL. But what happened to ROL before RW fell victim to it?

New political culture in which ROL remains supreme

It was against such corrupt political culture and system operating with legal immunity that a new generation of awakened youth staged the Aragalaya in 2022, a landmark event in Sri Lanka’s post-independence history. The fundamental message of that revolt was a lot broader than just a narrow regime change. It implied a radical change of an entire system built on identity politics and corrupt governance which ultimately led to economic bankruptcy. The rebels demanded a new political culture in which ROL remains supreme without any political interference and with an independent judiciary as enshrined in the constitution. And that was the pivotal promise made by AKD and NPP in their election campaigns respectively, and which they are delivering now. Is that constitutional dictatorship or constitutional governance?

RW is therefore inviting all reactionary elements to rally behind him to stage a showdown against the current Government, which has just completed the first of its mandated five years. Perhaps to support RW, critics have begun to unleash a vicious propaganda with a catalogue of AKD’s and NPP’s promises before and failure to deliver them after the election. Within one year?

Constructive criticism is a necessary element in a healthy democracy which should be encouraged. But criticism driven by a spirit of seeking vengeance is to create chaos and that is what is driving the current propaganda. Without being overtly apologetic towards the new leadership it is fair to say that the country is not at least worse off than what it was when the new leaders took charge. But given the relative inexperience of several of the cabinet ministers and the enormity of challenges facing the nation, pragmatism and not blind commitment to ideology is the need of the time. That appears to be the strength of the current President.

For example, on the economic front the fact that AKD accepted IMF strategy towards economic stabilisation and growth instead of renegotiating for alternative terms and conditions has stopped the economy from heading backwards. Hasn’t the speed of stabilisation and recovery amazed even the IMF and World Bank? Hasn’t the country’s dollar surpluses higher now than when the Government came to power? Hasn’t AKD’s delivery of corruption-free governance been the main reason why IMF is not insisting on privatisation of the SOEs? Yet, there is a long way to go to achieve economic independence as promised. The incoming Budget should give a better picture about the actual state of play. Given these facts, isn’t it reasonable to wait at least till the end of the first half of the Government’s tenure to make an educative judgement about its performance? As they say, Rome was not built in one day.

Cancellation of perks and privileges

But what really seem to have added to an already angered group of fallen heroes and encouraging them to support RW’s battle cry is the recent cancellation of perks and privileges enjoyed by this self-promoted elite and which had become an unbearable burden to a struggling economy. That cancellation had angered not only RW but more so the Rajapaksas and other previous presidents. Before law catches them, several other politicians and public officials for misusing their powers and privileges, they would prefer a regime change as early as possible. In short, RW’s agenda is a move to restore the ancient regime with its weaknesses.

But these fallen heroes are obviously underestimating the strength and reach of the Aragalaya phenomenon. When RW thought that he had ended the revolt by force, the protestors did not go home to give up their mission but went straight to the voters instead to convince them of the rebels’ radical message. The rest is history. Would RW’s countermove provoke another Aragalaya of different dimensions?

Justice delayed and institutional credibility: Lessons from Easter Sunday case

Justice delayed has not only compounded victims’ suffering but has also damaged institutional credibility

Purpose

To analyse the justice delays and inconsistencies following the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, and to propose policy measures to strengthen the rule of law, enhance prosecutorial and judicial independence, and restore public trust in Sri Lanka’s criminal justice system.

Background

The Easter Sunday terrorist attacks in April 2019 killed over 260 people and injured hundreds.

Despite extensive investigations, justice for victims remains delayed.

Inconsistencies in prosecutorial decisions by the Attorney General’s Department, coupled with judicial delays, have raised questions about political interference, institutional weakness, and erosion of public trust.

This case has become a litmus test for the credibility of Sri Lanka’s criminal justice system.

1. Rule of law under strain

Justice must be equal, timely, and free from political influence.

Prolonged delays have weakened the principle of equality before the law.

2. Law enforcement challenges

Investigations identified key suspects, but allegations of selective targeting and poor evidence management persist.

Coordination gaps between police and prosecution undermine case strength.

3. Attorney General’s Department

The AG’s independence is questioned due to inconsistent decisions on suspects.

Lack of transparency in prosecutorial choices fuels public suspicion.

4. Judiciary and delayed justice

Courts have been slow to adjudicate, compounding victims’ frustration.

Perception of judicial reluctance in politically sensitive cases undermines independence.

5. Erosion of public trust

Survivors and families perceive justice as politicised and stagnant.

Declining trust risks weakening social cohesion and democratic legitimacy.

Policy recommendations

1. Fast-track mechanisms for high-impact cases

Establish special terrorism and complex crimes courts with statutory timelines.

Ensure judges and prosecutors receive specialised training.

2. Strengthening law enforcement capacity

Develop specialised terrorism case units within police.

Enhance forensic and digital investigation capabilities.

Introduce independent oversight mechanisms for sensitive investigations.

3. Reforming the Attorney General’s Department

Introduce an independent appointments and oversight process for senior AG officials.

Mandate annual public reporting of prosecutorial decisions for transparency.

Strengthen constitutional guarantees of prosecutorial independence.

4. Judicial efficiency and independence

Establish dedicated benches for terrorism and organised crime.

Implement case management systems to reduce delays.

Ensure judicial performance monitoring with accountability for excessive delay.

5. Restoring public confidence

Create a Truth and Accountability Commission to complement criminal trials.

Provide regular public updates on case progress.

Strengthen victim-centred justice measures: legal aid, psychological support, and participation rights in proceedings.

Reform is urgent

A fast, fair, and transparent justice process is essential to uphold the rule of law.

Independent institutions are the cornerstone of democratic stability.

Restoring public trust requires visible accountability and victim-centred justice.

Conclusion

The Easter Sunday case demonstrates a critical breakdown in the alignment of law enforcement, prosecution, and judiciary. Justice delayed has not only compounded victims’ suffering but has also damaged institutional credibility. Reform is urgent: a fast, fair, and transparent justice process is essential to uphold the rule of law, restore public trust, and ensure democratic stability. Failure to act decisively will leave the Easter Sunday tragedy remembered not only as an act of terror but as a failure of justice in Sri Lanka

(The writer is a Senior Law Enforcement and Intelligence Specialist, former Head of Counter-Terrorism – State Intelligence Service, First Secretary (Defence), Embassy of Sri Lanka in Thailand, and present member of the Sri Lanka Waqfs Board.)

CSLEIS 2025 explores export diversification

The Sri Lanka Economic and Investment Summit 2025, themed ‘Gateway to Growth: Asia’s Emerging Opportunity’, will be held on 2 and 3 December at the Shangri-La, Colombo. A key sector deep dive on day one will examine how Sri Lanka can broaden its export base and deliver sustained growth through diversification.

The session, ‘The New Age of Diversified Exports – Delivering on Diversified Export Products and Markets’, will highlight the urgency of moving beyond traditional export sectors as global demand patterns shift and resilience becomes a strategic imperative. The discussion will explore untapped opportunities in high-value industries such as cinnamon, seafood, electronics, minerals, and advanced manufacturing. It will also examine how Sri Lanka can strengthen its position in non-traditional markets through branding, standards, logistics, and strategic trade partnerships.

The keynote address will be delivered by Centre for Social and Economic Progress Visiting Senior Fellow Prof. Sanjay Kathuria. Prof. Kathuria holds a Doctorate in Economics from the University of Oxford, and has over 27 years of experience at the World Bank, and a decade at ICRIER in New Delhi. He is also the Co-Founder of the Trade Sentinel, and a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies in Singapore.

In addition to Prof. Kathuria, the panel will feature Hirdaramani Group Managing Director Ranil Pathirana, Joint Agri Products Ceylon Director/COO Chathura Abeyratne, OREL IT CEO Dr. Upendra Peiris, and Sunshine Healthcare CEO Dr. T. Sayandhan, with Verité Research Director Subhashini Abeysinghe moderating the discussion.

Fox Jaffna wins Silver for ‘Leading Heritage Hotel/Resort’ at South Asian Travel Awards for fourth consecutive year

Fox Jaffna by Fox Resorts has been honoured with the Silver Award for ‘Leading Heritage Hotel/Resort’ at the prestigious South Asian Travel Awards (SATA) 2025. This marks the fourth consecutive year that the boutique property has received regional recognition, cementing its position as a premier heritage hospitality destination in Sri Lanka.

Located in the culturally rich city of Jaffna, Fox Jaffna offers guests a unique blend of heritage and contemporary comfort. The hotel is housed in a carefully restored historic compound, where the original architectural features have been preserved to maintain the site’s deep cultural significance. One of the standout features of Fox Jaffna is its innovative reuse of the underground bunkers, which have been thoughtfully transformed into a captivating art gallery and history museum. This initiative reflects Fox Jaffna’s commitment to giving back to the community by preserving and promoting the rich cultural heritage of the region. These spaces offer guests a tangible connection to Jaffna’s complex history, showcasing local artistry and telling the stories that define the cultural tapestry of the Northern Province. Through this thoughtful curation, Fox Jaffna not only educates visitors but also celebrates and supports the vibrant community that shapes the identity and future of Jaffna.

Fox Jaffna’s commitment to heritage preservation goes hand-in-hand with its dedication to sustainable tourism. The property incorporates eco-friendly initiatives such as energy-efficient systems, water conservation practices, and waste reduction measures. Furthermore, local materials and traditional craftsmanship have been prioritised throughout the hotel’s design and operations, supporting the regional economy and preserving artisanal heritage. This holistic approach ensures that Fox Jaffna not only honours the past but also safeguards the future of Jaffna’s community and environment.

Fox Resorts CEO Chris Quyn said, ‘Receiving the South Asian Travel Award for the fourth year running is a tremendous honour. This recognition reflects the hard work and passion of our team, who strive to create authentic and meaningful guest experiences rooted in the rich history of Jaffna. Our goal is to offer more than just accommodation – we aim to share the unique story of this region with travellers from around the world.’

The South Asian Travel Awards is the region’s most respected hospitality and tourism event, celebrating excellence, innovation, and leadership across South Asia. Fox Jaffna’s continued success highlights its role as a leader in heritage hospitality, combining cultural preservation, sustainable practices, and genuine hospitality to inspire travellers worldwide.

Perera, Daluwatte crowned champions at Sri Lanka Amateur Golf 2025

One of Sri Lanka’s top amateur golfers, Chanaka Perera won the Gents segment at the 134th Sri Lanka Amateur Golf Championship 2025 when he got the better of Saad Habib Malik of Pakistan after 36 holes at the Roya Colombo Golf Club last weekend.

In the 119th Ladies event 17 years old, Kaya Daluwatte was in supreme class beating Asara Sawhney of 8ndia in the final.

The F.B. de Mel Cup saw Viv Fowler Watt beat Elsie. This event was sponsored by CEAT Europe.

Trinity beat Royal in hockey

Trinity College beat Royal College 1/0 at the Under 20 Annual Hockey Big Match played at the Astro Turf Colombo 7 recently. This encounter was played for J C Corea Challenge Shield.

Winning goal was scored by Arkam Rifas of Trinity College. Tevin Liyanage of Trinity College won the Best Player award. The Under 16 match was won by Royal 4/1. This encounter was played for Paul Jeyarajah trophy.

FCEJ stands in support of the birds, the land and the people of Mannar

of Mannar. One of the darkest days of this Government has come to pass on the night of 26 September 2025, with the brutal attack by hundreds of police officers of peaceful protestors in Mannar.1 Many protestors have ended up in hospital including women and children.

For years the people of Mannar have been fighting an inspiring battle against sand mining and the wind power project that threatens to destroy their fragile ecosystem. The wind turbines have affected the globally renowned migratory paths of thousands of birds and sandmining is destroying the coastal ecosystem.2The people of Mannar are feeling the social, economic and ecological deterioration caused to the region.3

The Government appears to be carrying through the plans of the previous regime with cosmetic changes. Having stopped the Indian investor, Adani Company from setting up a wind power plant in Mannar, the contract has been handed over to a Sri Lankan company, Hayleys Fenton.4 There are no assurances that the local company will do anything different from the Indian investor in terms of preserving the environment, and not harming the people of Mannar.

November deadline

Similarly, the Mannar wind power project coincides with the Government coming under review by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) of their ‘electricity tariff methodology’ in November 2025. This is a pre-requisite for the Extended Fund Facility. The review is to ensure ‘cost recovery and cost reflectiveness’ and the urgency to deliver a broader and privatised energy sector. The bulldozing through of the Sri Lanka Electricity Act in the past few months,5moving electricity closer to complete privatisation by unbundling the services and forming new entities of Ceylon Electricity Board,6 and the now violent removal of people raising concerns about the Mannar wind power project seem to align with the November deadline.

On the other hand, the Government reminds people that the electricity tariffs have been reduced. Taken in light of the monumental increases between 2022 and 2024, the reduction is not a significant relief. The reality is that paying electricity bills has become another burden pushing ordinary Sri Lankans into an incessant debt cycle. The systems of forcing payment of bills are causing households to struggle without electricity for many months.

The people protesting in Mannar surely had hopes for change. Instead, the continued dancing to the tune of the IMF, the blindness to the irreversible environmental and social impact of a wind power plant and sand mining, and the complete failure to engage people’s views, in this instance, cries, means there is no system change. The people of Mannar speak from their lived experiences of existing wind turbines and the loss they have already suffered.7The situation in Mannar is particularly horrifying as the destruction to the fragile ecosystem and erasing of the culture and livelihood of people who are tied to this ecology are irreversible.8

Act of suppression

The attack on the protest is also an act of suppression of Tamil speaking people of the North of the island. The attack took place in the context of a history of marginalisation of Tamil and Muslim communities, and the continued experience of Sinhala majoritarianism. A Sinhala majoritarianism that continues to dictate the actions of this Government within its party and beyond. Populations severely disenfranchised for generations because of the war, violence and top-down imposed ‘development projects’ by the Sri Lankan state will, justifiably, see this as yet another oppressive act by a Sinhala state. The majoritarian mindset has fuelled conflict and justified violence. It is a violence that is valuable to corporations also interested in capturing markets such as the energy sector.

Bringing ‘green energy’ without real consideration for the environment or human rights is an exercise in green washing which many governments and companies across the world are engaging in. Dismantling the subsidised public energy sector to make way for profit extraction by private parties in the guise of expanding renewable energy projects is another trend we are witnessing world over. To see the National People’s Power Government joining these ranks is troubling. The move is particularly tragic, as Sri Lanka has been known as a country that had achieved 99% electrification through its public energy sector.

Right to energy as a fundamental right

We require a thorough review of the energy infrastructure, costs and inflow through a consultative process that takes as its foundation the right to energy as a fundamental right. Through this lens, it will be possible to restructure tariffs and undertake other measures to balance cost and income from the energy sector without bringing ecological and social destruction. This is imperative as the existing mode of addressing the issue, especially through privatisation, is unsustainable in the long run and will only increase costs to the Government and to the people.

People must have a right to energy, a basic necessity for life today. This right must co-exist with the right to a safe environment. To pit one against another is a vulgar mode of functioning which has become all too common in the world. To watch a supposedly ‘progressive government’ that rose to power through the energy of people’s protest join the bandwagon of this vulgarity is heartbreaking.

Elephant in the room

The recent sentencing of Niraj Roshan, widely known as Ali Roshan, to 15 years in prison and a fine exceeding Rs. 20 million marks the first time a high-profile wildlife smuggler has been held accountable in our courts. Roshan was convicted of unlawfully keeping five elephants without valid permits.

This verdict deserves to be welcomed. For decades, Sri Lanka has watched helplessly as its majestic elephants were ripped from the wild, trafficked under fraudulent documentation, and paraded as trophies of wealth and influence.

Yet, in celebrating this victory, we must not ignore the metaphorical elephant in the room. Ali Roshan, despite his notoriety, could not have operated such a vast smuggling empire alone. His activities thrived because of the politicians, Government officials, business magnates, members of the clergy, and even elements within the judiciary who aided, abetted, and benefitted from his crimes. Unless these powerful enablers are also brought before the law, the justice delivered recently will remain incomplete. Partial justice that risks becoming little more than symbolic.

Among the politicians allegedly entangled in this sordid affair was none other than Gotabaya Rajapaksa. During his tenure as president, the case against Roshan was shamelessly dragged on. Even worse, elephants that had been seized and placed in judicial custody were handed back to their so-called ‘owners,’ an act that amounted to a betrayal of both justice and the voiceless animals whose lives were at stake. At that time, the judiciary seemed paralysed, unwilling to stand up to the Rajapaksa regime. The courage and activism we see from today’s courts were absent then, leaving traffickers free to thrive under the cover of political patronage.

The belated conviction of Roshan is therefore both a triumph and a reminder of how much was lost during those years of cowardice and complicity. How many elephants were torn from their herds? How many were forced into servitude, chained in backyards or temples, while their natural bonds and habitats were destroyed? How many officials lined their pockets? These are questions that demand answers, not merely from Roshan, but from the entire network that sustained him.

If Sri Lanka is serious about turning a corner in the protection of its wildlife, this judgment must be the beginning, not the end. The Attorney General, the Wildlife Department, and the judiciary must act with equal vigour in pursuing those who provided Roshan with cover and legitimacy. Every politician who interfered, every official who falsified permits, every business leader who profited, and every monk who blessed this cruelty and even kept these illegal elephants in their temples must face the same uncompromising standard of justice. Anything less would reduce Roshan’s punishment to a token gesture, harsh enough to shock, but hollow in its effect.

Elephants are more than animals to Sri Lankans. They are living testaments of our rich biodiversity and cultural heritage, symbols of wisdom and strength, and integral to our ecosystems. The subspecies of Asian elephant is endemic to the island and if they were to go extinct that genetic resource will be lost forever. To traffic such an animal is to desecrate not only our biodiversity but also our identity as a nation.

Ali Roshan’s conviction must therefore serve as a warning to all who believe they can hide behind political power, social influence, or religious standing to exploit the voiceless. Sri Lanka has begun to show that justice can reach even those who once seemed untouchable. But until the entire network of abettors is exposed and punished, justice remains unfinished.

Through deepfakes and data breaches, CEOs must lead cybersecurity battle

The 11th Annual Cyber Security Summit, organised by Daily FT in collaboration with CICRA Holdings, commenced last week at Cinnamon Grand Colombo with its flagship CEO Forum, bringing together leading voices from global and local industries. The forum set the stage for a two-day conversation on the rapidly evolving cyber landscape, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is simultaneously reshaping opportunities and amplifying risks.

Setting the context

During his opening remarks, CICRA Holdings Group Director/CEO Boshan Dayaratne highlighted how the convergence of AI, cloud adoption, and digitalisation has expanded the attack surface for businesses. He emphasised the need for Sri Lankan corporate leaders to elevate cybersecurity from a back-end IT function to a boardroom-level strategic priority. ‘The conversation today is no longer about compliance, but about resilience, trust, and long-term competitiveness,’ Dayaratne said.

This framing mirrors global concerns. The World Economic Forum’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2025 warns that 72% of organisations reported a rise in cyber risks last year, with ransomware and AI-enhanced phishing topping the list. The report stresses that in an age of complexity, resilience must be treated as an enterprise-wide responsibility, not merely an IT issue.

A central theme of the forum was the role of AI in cyber defence and cybercrime. Meta Director – Public Policy for South Asia and Central Asia Sarim Aziz noted that while AI-powered tools are enabling faster detection of threats, adversaries are also weaponising AI to carry out sophisticated attacks. He stressed the importance of public-private collaboration in developing governance frameworks that balance innovation with safety.

Globally, two-thirds of executives expect AI to have the most significant impact on cybersecurity this year, yet fewer than four in ten organisations have processes in place to assess the security of AI tools before deployment. The paradox is clear; businesses are rushing to adopt AI without securing it, leaving themselves exposed. Participants also warned that banning AI outright is ineffective; employees will simply turn to personal devices or shadow tools. Instead, companies must set clear usage policies, backed by training and awareness, to prevent sensitive data from leaking into uncontrolled systems.

Global threat landscape

From a financial services perspective, Visa Consulting and Analytics, Asia Pacific Risk Practice Lead Sen Dibyajyoti described the escalating scale of fraud in digital payments. He pointed to phishing, social engineering, and AI-driven scams as the most immediate threats for banks and fintechs. ‘Resilience depends on embedding security by design across payment ecosystems,’ Dibyajyoti said.

Fraud and social engineering were recurring concerns. Deepfake-enabled scams, such as impersonated CEO and CFO phone calls, have already cost global firms millions. Panellists highlighted the importance of layered security using multiple controls such as call-backs, shared secret questions, and verification protocols to counter increasingly sophisticated attacks. Education was stressed as a frontline defence, not only for employees but also for consumers, who are often the most vulnerable target group.

Rajah and Tann Cyber Security CEO Wong Onn Chee reinforced this by warning of ransomware-as-a-service and state-sponsored cyber espionage as top regional threats. He noted that fragmented regulations make coordinated responses difficult. Around seven in ten executives worldwide share this concern, citing cyber regulations as overly complex, fragmented, or burdensome. With cloud migration accelerating across industries, SECGRA Director Paul Hidalgo focused on the structural vulnerabilities of multi-cloud environments. He stressed that traditional perimeter-based security models are obsolete in today’s distributed systems. Instead, he advocated for zero-trust architectures that continuously validate users and devices, combined with strong incident response frameworks.

Supply chain vulnerabilities remain a critical concern, with more than half of large organisations citing third-party risk management as their biggest barrier to resilience. Software vulnerabilities introduced by external partners, coupled with concentrated dependence on a small number of providers, are creating systemic points of failure that ripple across entire economies. The global IT outage in 2024 caused by a single faulty software update served as a stark reminder of this risk.

The forum also highlighted that most AI and cloud vendors limit their liability to refunding subscription fees in the event of a breach. CEOs were urged to negotiate contracts that include liquidated damages clauses, ensuring vendors face real financial consequences if failures expose businesses or customers to harm.

Local imperatives for Sri Lanka

While global experts painted a broad picture, the discussion also returned to Sri Lanka’s specific context. Speakers agreed that the country’s growing digital economy, from e-commerce to fintech to e-governance, faces acute vulnerabilities due to resource constraints and limited cyber maturity. For corporate leaders, integrating cybersecurity directly into business continuity planning is no longer optional; it must be treated as a core element of long-term operational resilience.

At the same time, participants stressed that technology investments alone will not be sufficient. Companies must balance systems spending with the development of skilled people who can anticipate and respond to threats effectively. The skills challenge is especially relevant: two out of three organisations worldwide now report moderate-to-critical cyber skills gaps, with only 14% confident they have the talent they need. For Sri Lanka, where digital adoption is accelerating, workforce development and capacity-building will be decisive in determining whether digital growth can be sustained securely.

The CEO Forum crystallised several strategic insights for corporate leaders. A clear consensus emerged that AI will fundamentally transform the cybersecurity battlefield, with deepfakes and AI-enhanced fraud creating threats that outpace traditional controls. This reality demands that cybersecurity be recognised as a leadership issue, where responsibility cannot rest solely with IT teams. Boards and CEOs must set the tone, embed resilience into strategy, and ensure that security is treated as a driver of trust and competitiveness rather than a compliance checkbox. Importantly, CEOs cannot simply delegate accountability to CISOs or IT managers; regulators and stakeholders are demanding board-level responsibility for cyber resilience.

Equally important was the recognition that the foundation of digital operations is shifting. Zero-trust principles are becoming the new baseline for organisations operating across cloud and hybrid work models, where continuous identity verification and endpoint security are non-negotiable. Leaders were urged to move beyond regulatory compliance by stress-testing systems, building a culture of security, and prioritising collaboration. Since no single company or Government can confront these challenges alone, partnerships across regulators, technology providers, and enterprises will be critical in shaping a safer digital future.

In conclusion

In his closing remarks, Dayaratne reiterated that cybersecurity is not just a technical challenge but an economic and national security priority. He urged Sri Lankan businesses to invest early, adapt continuously, and collaborate openly. ‘The threats are global, but so are the solutions. Our ability to act decisively today will determine whether Sri Lanka thrives in the digital future or lags behind.’

The CEO Forum set a decisive tone for the full-day Cyber Security Summit, where technical experts, policymakers, and industry practitioners delved deeper into emerging technologies and sector-specific risks.

Strategic partners of the 11th annual cyber-security summit were Visa and Sysco LABS, Platinum partner was the South Asia Technologies, Community Impact Partner was Meta, Payment network partner was LankaPay. Other partners included platform partner #HashX, podcast partner Techtalk, hospitality partner Cinnamon Grand, Colombo, Creative partner Mullenlow Sri Lanka and electronic media partner Yes101, TV1 and News1st.

Manneken Pis dressed in traditional costume for Cyprus Independence Day

To mark Cyprus Independence Day, the famous Manneken Pis statue in Brussels will be dressed in a specially tailored Cypriot traditional men’s costume, the vraka, during an event organized by the Cyprus Ministry of Foreign Affairs in collaboration with the City of Brussels.

The ceremony will take place on Wednesday, October 1, at 1:00 PM, in the presence of Cyprus’s Ambassador to the EU Political and Security Committee (PSC), Petros Mavrikios, representing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The event serves as a symbolic bridge between Belgian and Cypriot culture, highlighting the importance of independence and national identity.

Manneken Pis is an iconic symbol of Brussels. The 55.5-centimeter-tall bronze fountain sculpture, located in the city center, is regularly dressed in various costumes on a nearly daily basis, with a collection exceeding a thousand different outfits. Since 2017, the costumes-including the Cypriot vraka-have been displayed at the GardeRobe MannekenPis, a museum dedicated exclusively to the statue, located on the same street in Brussels’ historic center.

The vraka was donated to the City of Brussels by the Cypriot Embassy in 2010 ahead of Cyprus Independence Day, and is exhibited in the museum’s “Manneken Pis, a very European Bruxellois” section, alongside other national costumes of EU member states.