Farmers say mill still owes them B42m for last year’s crop

About 150 farmers filed a complaint with police in Bangkok on Wednesday, seeking help in getting 42 million baht they say is still owed them for rice they delivered to a local mill early last year..

Pol Maj Gen Jruykiat Pankaeo, deputy commissioner of the at the Central Investigation Bureau (CIB), met with the farmers, who are from Suphan Buri province and nearby,

The farmers said they had delivered paddy rice to the mill in early 2025, but had yet to receive any payment for their crops. They were owed at least 42 million baht in total.(continues below)

One of the famers, who gave her name as Kannika, said the mill had offered to pay 7,000 to 8,000 baht per tonne above the market rate, attracting growers from several districts, including Si Prachan, Muang, Sam Chuk, Song Phi Nong, Don Chedi and Bang Pla Ma, as well as adjoining provinces.

Since delivering their grain in March 2025, the farmers had not received any payment, but still had to pay their mounting debts, which included payment for fertiliser and farm chemicals, daily living expenses and their children’s education, Ms Kannika said.

‘While we are facing severe financial hardship, the mill owner continues to live a luxury lifestyle, travelling comfortably. The contrast could not be more stark,’ she said. (continues below)

Another representative said the famers had previously filed a complaint at Muang Suphan Buri police station and the case had been forwarded to prosecutors. Since then, there had been no tangible progress. They therefore decided to take their case to the CIB.

Pol Maj Gen Jruykiat acknowledged the complaint and said it would be reported to CIB commissioner Nattasak Chawanasai. Officers from the consumer protection division would conduct a thorough investigation.

If evidence of public fraud or a related offence were found strict legal action would follow, to provide relief for the affected farmers.

Karabakh rebuild enters final phase as resettlement accelerates

Reconstruction and rehabilitation work in Karabakh is continuing at full speed, with the final year of the State Program for the liberated territories now underway, AzerNEWS reports.

This was stated by Emin Huseynov, the Presidential Special Representative for the Aghdam, Fuzuli, and Khojavend districts, in comments to journalists.

Huseynov said that over the past period, more than 30,000 internally displaced persons have been resettled in the liberated areas. In total, more than 70,000 people are now living, working, and studying in these territories.

‘Today, 92 families have been relocated to the city of Aghdam, and the process is continuing with increasing momentum every day. This year, the resettlement process to the liberated territories will reach its peak. It is projected that up to 20,000 people will be relocated to Aghdam alone. Around 15,000 people are expected to be resettled in the Fuzuli and Khojavend districts. Reconstruction and rehabilitation work is also ongoing across 25 settlements in Khojavend,’ he added.

Background

On September 27, 2020, long-standing tensions escalated into full-scale military operations. Azerbaijan launched a counter-offensive, utilizing modern warfare tactics-most notably the extensive use of precision drones and advanced satellite intelligence.

The turning point occurred on November 8, 2020, when Azerbaijani forces liberated the fortress city of Shusha, strategically positioned above the regional capital.

The Ceasefire: On November 10, a trilateral statement signed by Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Russia ended the hostilities. Under the agreement, Armenia returned the occupied districts of Agdam, Kalbajar, and Lachin to Azerbaijan.

Final restoration of sovereignty

While the 2020 war liberated the surrounding districts, parts of the region remained under the control of a separatist administration. On September 19, 2023, Azerbaijan launched localized “anti-terror measures” lasting less than 24 hours. This led to the total dissolution of the separatist regime and the full restoration of Azerbaijan’s constitutional order across its entire internationally recognized territory.

Today, the region is undergoing massive reconstruction and demining efforts through the “Great Return” program, aimed at resettling displaced populations into newly built “smart villages” and cities.

Azerbaijan sends new diesel shipment to Armenia as fuel exports continue

A new batch of fuel products is set to be delivered from Azerbaijan to Armenia as part of ongoing supply operations. AzerNEWS reports that 16 railway tank cars loaded with diesel fuel are scheduled to be dispatched today.

The shipment will depart Azerbaijan by rail, continuing a series of recent fuel exports to Armenia. Earlier, on April 14, Azerbaijan sent 22 ons of diesel fuel, while on April 11, another 15 tank cars carrying 887 tons of diesel were delivered.

In total, Azerbaijan has exported 6,312 tons of diesel fuel (including the latest shipment), along with 979 tons of AI-92 gasoline and 2,955 tons of AI-95 gasoline to Armenia.

It is worth recalling that on October 21, 2025, President Ilham Aliyev announced the removal of all restrictions on cargo transit to Armenia that had been in place since the period of occupation. Speaking alongside Kazakhstan’s President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, Aliyev noted that the first such transit involved the delivery of Kazakh grain to Armenia.

Subsequent shipments have included fuel, grain, and fertilizers. On December 18, SOCAR delivered 1,220 tons of AI-95 gasoline to Armenia. On January 9, 2026, a total of 2,698 tons of cargo (48 wagons), including 1,742 tons of AI-95 gasoline and 956 tons of diesel, were sent.

Further deliveries followed, including 979 tons of AI-92 gasoline on January 11, 4,500 tons of diesel on February 25, and multiple shipments of diesel, fertilizers, and grain throughout March. These included 1,984 tons of diesel on March 5, Russian fertilizers and grain shipments on March 9 and 11, as well as wheat, buckwheat, and fertilizer deliveries between March 24 and 25.

The ongoing shipments reflect a broader shift in regional logistics and economic cooperation, with Azerbaijan playing a growing role as a transit and supply hub in the South Caucasus.

Vince Dizon, Vico Sotto inspect damaged F. Manalo Bridge in Pasig City

The Department of Public Works and Highways is aiming to finish the permanent rehabilitation of the damaged F. Manalo Bridge in Pasig City within one and a half years, citing right of way acquisition as one of the main concerns, its secretary Vince Dizon said on Tuesday.

The bridge was temporarily closed after being hit by barges during the onslaught of Typhoon Carina in 2024. Dizon said that its temporary reconstruction was shouldered by the Japanese contractor, which lasted for a year.

Dizon also said that Pasig City Mayor Vico Sotto asked the agency to fasttrack the permanent construction of the bridge. With this, Dizon said that it will be widened from two lanes to four lanes.

‘That is our commitment to Pasig City and Quezon City and to the people of Pasig and QC. Hopefully, we finish this in one year, one and a half years,’ Dizon told reporters in an interview as he and Sotto inspected the bridge.

Dizon shared that the agency is facing problems with right of way acquisition of 100 meters on the part of Quezon City. He added that while the agency has already started addressing the problem, the owner of the land is contesting the acquisition.

‘We’ll have to either negotiate but if they don’t really want to, we’ll have no choice but to expropriate,’ Dizon added.

He also shared that the government will try to source for additional funding of P700 million for the completion of the bridge from the 2026 or 2027 budget.

Start of rainy season

Dizon also said that the construction of a temporary bridge will not bring much adverse effects to motorists and residents at the start of the rainy season. However, he said that the current state of the bridge limits the moving capacity from Pasig City to Quezon City.

‘We will not allow this bridge to be closed. Like I said, this should only be closed when there are fewer people in Metro Manila, [like during] Holy Week, Christmas. This should not be closed on ordinary days,’ he expressed.

The Pasig City Public Information Office earlier announced the temporary closure of the bridge from April 17-20 for maintenance works, speed humps replacement, repair of vertical clearance barrier, and installation of rubber plates.

Pakistan Navy tests indigenously developed Taimoor cruise missile in live-fire drill [VIDEO]

Pakistan Navy has conducted successful live weapon firing of Taimoor Air-Launched Cruise Missile – an indigenously developed Anti-Ship Weapon System – in a powerful demonstration of precision strike capability and operational readiness, AzerNEWS reports via DND News Agency.

The Air-Launched Cruise Missile executed its mission with exceptional precision, validating Pakistan Navy’s combat capability to detect, target and decisively neutralize enemy sea-based threats at extended ranges.

This demonstration by Pakistan Navy marks a pivotal elevation of national defence capability, further strengthening Pakistan Armed Forces’ multi-dimensional coordinated strike posture and capabilities in the conventional domain.

Pakistan Navy stands resolute in its commitment to safeguard the nation’s maritime interests and sovereign waters.

The President, Prime Minister of Pakistan, Chief of Defence Forces and Services Chiefs have congratulated the scientists and engineers on achieving this significant milestone.

Why Brussels speaks with two voices on Azerbaijan [OPINION]

Wednesday, April 16th, was a busy day in Brussels. One room saw discussions between a high-level delegation from Azerbaijan and representatives of the European External Action Service in connection with negotiating a new partnership agreement with Azerbaijan. Another room saw a vote on resolutions by Belgian and Dutch parliaments to insist on the immediate release of the Armenian prisoners held by Azerbaijan and withdrawal from Armenia. Four days after this incident, Azerbaijan called in the ambassadors of Belgium and the Netherlands to its capital, Baku. This was not surprising. It was, to say the least, an interesting time for this kind of activity.

The events of April 16 are by no means an exception. This is what the typical functioning of the European foreign policy vis-a-vis Azerbaijan looks like. The strategy of engagement and criticism at the same time, both seemingly unaware of, or at least indifferent to, each other’s existence. While Europe’s executive is courting Baku as a supplier of natural gas to fill the gap left by the Russian Federation, an intermediary for transit through the Middle Corridor, and a geopolitical partner in the South Caucasus which is not aligned with Russia or Iran, the European parliament occasionally, and this time in out-dated manner, reminds both itself and Baku that the September 2023 anti-terror measures was done ‘injustfyingly’.

The Belgian resolution, tabled by MP Michel de Maegd and MP Els Van Hoof, who serve as chairman and vice-chairman of the foreign affairs committee, demands the freedom of Armenian POWs, the repatriation of the Armenian population of Karabakh under international security guarantees, and the retreat of Azerbaijani troops to their positions prior to May 2021. The Dutch resolution, tabled by MP Don Seder, is largely in the same vein and also briefly addresses the recognition of the Armenian genocide, an evergreen topic which Azerbaijan does not hesitate to conflate with the issue of Karabakh in its entirety. Neither resolution carries any binding force, but both were approved, albeit not without precedent.

In the statement issued by the Azerbaijani parliament, the documents were dismissed as emanating from “the unhealthy imagination and racism of traditionally anti-Azerbaijani, Islamophobic forces.” However, irrespective of what the statement is aimed at, it is unlikely that it would enhance Baku’s position. The tone of the statement issued by the foreign ministry was somewhat restrained; nonetheless, it reiterated that the documents constituted a gross violation of international law, driven by “a deep-rooted prejudice against Azerbaijan.” It should be noted that the ICJ had already refused to entertain the demands made by Armenia to free the arrested individuals. Besides, the UN Working Group had also concluded in March 2025 that their arrest was legal.

The timing of this resolution and its audacity are really contradictory; it passed on the very day of the bilateral meeting between the Speakers of the Armenian and Azerbaijani parliaments, an unremarked yet effective piece of diplomacy that the drafters of the resolution may have been unaware of or chosen to disregard. For his part, Pashinyan has, in recent weeks, already informed domestic audiences that dwelling on previous wrongs is inconsistent with a peace process the two governments have already agreed upon. The 2025 Washington Declaration on the normalization of relations is there. The TRIPP Corridor initiative is there. Normalization with Trkiye is there. Demands for the withdrawal of Azerbaijani troops back to pre-2021 lines, which bear no resemblance to political realities, do not seem likely to contribute to any of the above.

Of course, all this is not surprising, and it is not the first time. The European Union often overlooks certain realities in pursuit of a so-called ‘neutral’ position. To some extent, it’s plausible to see them advocating for human rights while neglecting a fundamental principle they’ve historically supported: the importance of internationally recognized boundaries. The claims being made are outdated and do not reflect today’s realities.

And yet. There is one significant exception regarding the peace treaty signed in Washington, and it is not the commitment of Azerbaijan to release the prisoners. In none of the declarations made at the August summit is there any mention of this issue. Should the problem of their release not be settled as part of the official peace treaty, then perhaps among the very few tools that could help solve it would be those resolutions made by European parliaments – albeit with their questionable timing, influence by diasporas, and lack of binding force. Perhaps, at the end of the day, this is a matter for the two countries to decide.

It is an argument for the difficult truth that Europe’s “right hand and left hand” problem is sometimes, in the specific and narrow case of human rights accountability, deliberate rather than merely disorganised.

Iran reportedly planning coordinated strike that could wipe out 32% of global oil supply

A report by Tasnim News Agency claims that Iran is considering a coordinated strike targeting critical global energy infrastructure, a scenario that, if realized, could disrupt up to 32% of global oil supply, AzerNEWS reports.

According to the report, potential targets include the Yanbu pipeline in Saudi Arabia, the Fujairah oil facility in the United Arab Emirates, and a possible full closure of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait by Houthi forces.

These locations are considered vital nodes in the global energy system. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait alone handles roughly 6 million barrels of oil per day, while Fujairah is one of the world’s largest bunkering hubs.

The Yanbu pipeline serves as a major artery connecting Saudi oil fields to the Red Sea, allowing exports to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.

However, the claims remain unverified, and no official confirmation has been issued by Iranian authorities or independent sources.

Armenian PM accuses his opponent Karapetyan and others of being ‘foreign agents’

Nikol Pashinyan has appeared to accuse his opponent, detained Russian-Armenian businessman Samvel Karapetyan, of links to foreign influence, stating that authorities have compiled a ‘thick file’ on individuals allegedly acting in line with external agendas, AzerNEWS reports.

Pashinyan cited ‘assessment and data obtained’ by state agencies, claiming that a number of individuals were operating as ‘foreign agents’ in Armenia.

He further noted that he maintains a list of such individuals and clarified that his remarks primarily concern political figures.

‘If those people are still at large, it means they have not yet crossed the line into espionage, but they are acting within that logic. Some individuals are very close to that line, walking along its edge. Once they cross it, there will be a response,’ Pashinyan said.

Trump claims Iran sending ‘hundreds of ships’ to US for oil amid tensions

Donald Trump has claimed that Iran is being forced to send ‘hundreds of ships’ to the United States to obtain oil, amid ongoing geopolitical tensions, AzerNEWS reports.

In a post shared on his Truth Social platform, Trump alleged that Iranian authorities have placed the country in a difficult position, stating: ‘Iranian leaders have sent hundreds of ships to the US, mainly to Texas, Louisiana, and Alaska, to obtain oil.’

The claim comes against the backdrop of heightened confrontation and economic pressure involving Iran, though no official confirmation or supporting data has been provided by independent sources or US authorities regarding such large-scale shipments.

Diplomatic efforts to resolve the US-Israel conflict with Iran remain uncertain, as Tehran insists it will not engage in negotiations while facing threats. US President Donald Trump has stated that the blockade on Iranian ports will continue until Tehran agrees to a deal.

In addition, Lebanon and Israel are set to return to Washington, DC, for another round of talks on Thursday to address hostilities. Despite a 10-day ceasefire, Israel continues to carry out airstrikes in southern Lebanon, resulting in injuries to six people in an attack on the town of Qaaqaaiyet El Jisr and the destruction of homes in the town of Khiam.

Azerbaijan becomes bridge between civilisations with its multicultural strategy

Throughout the centuries, as human society has evolved, so too has the nature of relationships among its various components. The diversity of religious, ethnic, and racial characteristics has shaped distinct cultures, each with its own values, traditions, and social norms. In the process of intercultural interaction, the recognition and understanding of these differences have played a crucial role in improving communication and fostering cooperation. Such engagement has often led not only to the exchange of ideas and practices but also to the blending of cultural traits, as well as the expansion of trade, economic ties, and diplomatic relations.

As these interactions intensified, processes of integration and unification gradually gave rise to what is now understood as globalization. This phenomenon has significantly increased interconnectedness among nations, linking societies across geographical, political, and cultural boundaries. Globalization has enabled the rapid flow of information, goods, and people, creating new opportunities for collaboration and development. At the same time, however, it has also raised complex questions about the nature and limits of intercultural engagement.

Ultimately, the success of intercultural interaction in the modern world depends on the ability of societies to embrace diversity while promoting mutual respect and understanding. Rather than viewing cultural differences as sources of division, they can be seen as opportunities for enrichment and innovation. In this context, effective intercultural policies and inclusive governance become essential tools for preventing conflict and ensuring sustainable global cooperation in an increasingly interconnected world.

Azerbaijan’s foreign policy achievements cannot be fully understood without examining the decisive role of its domestic political framework – particularly the emphasis on multiculturalism. As a core component of internal governance, multiculturalism in Azerbaijan has contributed to the preservation of ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity. This internal stability and inclusiveness naturally extend into the country’s external relations. By promoting tolerance and coexistence at home, Azerbaijan creates a foundation for building constructive and cooperative relationships abroad, regardless of ethnic or religious differences. In this way, domestic multiculturalism becomes a strategic asset, fostering dialogue and strengthening intercultural and inter-civilizational connections on a global scale.

The process of building an independent Azerbaijani state, safeguarding its sovereignty, ensuring territorial integrity, and protecting economic interests has required a carefully balanced and multidimensional foreign policy. Since gaining independence, Azerbaijan has sought to gradually move beyond traditional spheres of influence while maintaining pragmatic ties with major global actors. Its foreign policy is characterized by flexibility and strategic balance: relations with Russia are counterbalanced by cooperation with the United States; engagement with the Islamic world is complemented by strong partnerships with European countries. This multi-vector approach allows Azerbaijan to position itself as a reliable partner across different geopolitical and cultural spaces.

Azerbaijan’s balanced diplomacy is also evident in its active participation in leading international organizations, including the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the Council of Europe, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, NATO, the Commonwealth of Independent States, and the Organization of Turkic States. Through these platforms, the country contributes to international security, economic cooperation, and cultural dialogue, further reinforcing its role as a bridge between regions.

An important aspect of Azerbaijani diplomacy is its self-identification as a bridge between the Muslim and Christian worlds. This idea has been repeatedly emphasized by Ilham Aliyev, who highlights Azerbaijan’s unique position as a member of both the Council of Europe and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Such dual engagement reflects the country’s commitment to fostering mutual understanding between different civilizations and underscores its reputation as a tolerant and inclusive state.

In pursuit of protecting the rights of national minorities and religious communities Azerbaijan has acceded to more than 50 international legal instruments within the frameworks of organizations such as the United Nations, the Council of Europe, and the OSCE. The country has made notable progress in fulfilling its international obligations, further strengthening its image as a responsible member of the global community. Altogether, Azerbaijan’s experience demonstrates how a strong and inclusive domestic policy can serve as the foundation for a successful, balanced, and forward-looking foreign policy.

A key question in contemporary political and cultural discourse is: where and why have multicultural values failed? In a number of cases, difficulties have emerged in societies where the process of cultural and spiritual formation had already reached a certain level of consolidation, and only afterward new waves of migration introduced unfamiliar norms, values, and social practices. In such contexts, multiculturalism was often perceived not as an organic development, but as an externally introduced or artificially promoted model. As a result, established social and political systems sometimes struggled to absorb these new elements, leading to tensions, fragmentation, and debates over identity and cohesion.

This distinction brings forward an important methodological approach – the differentiation between “original diversity” and “late diversity.” Late diversity is typically associated with migration-driven changes, where new cultural layers are added to an already formed societal structure. In contrast, original diversity refers to a historical coexistence of different ethnic, religious, and cultural groups that have evolved together over centuries within the same geographical and social space. In such cases, diversity is not perceived as foreign or imposed, but as an inherent and natural characteristic of society itself.

Azerbaijan represents a notable example of what can be described as original diversity. The multicultural environment of the country has deep historical roots and has developed organically rather than through external imposition. Various communities have coexisted for centuries, forming a shared social fabric grounded in mutual respect and interaction.

This historical continuity helps explain why Azerbaijan has been more resilient in the face of challenges that multicultural policies have encountered in parts of Europe. While some European societies have faced difficulties integrating newly arrived cultural groups, Azerbaijan’s model is rooted in a longstanding tradition of coexistence rather than adaptation to sudden change. This has allowed the country to maintain social cohesion while preserving cultural plurality.

Today, Azerbaijan can be seen as a unique environment where representatives of different cultures, religions, and value systems live together in relative harmony. Its experience suggests that the success of multiculturalism depends not only on political frameworks, but also on historical context and development of diversity within society.