Millions of Nigerians abroad collectively send more money home than the country earns from foreign direct investment – yet they have no say in who governs the nation, even as their remittances help keep the country afloat, while several African countries allow their citizens abroad to vote. Oluwatobi Odeyinka writes.
52-year-old Uchenna Pricilla ordered her teenage daughter to turn off the TV or change the channel as the news flash of another schoolchildren abduction in Nigeria appeared on their screen.
Pricillia, her husband and their two children moved to Canada 10 years ago for economic reasons.
In 2015, the family sold their only house in Lagos and moved to Ontario, where they both got employment and are now residents, but the stories coming out of Nigeria have been troubling for her.
‘We like to follow Nigerian news, but the daily bad news from the country is making me depressed, especially because we are hoping to go back home, but to what? Insecurity?’ she told this reporter.
Pricilla follows Nigeria’s political activities and yearns for an opportunity to make an input through voting. She said she has been disappointed by recent electoral outcomes and believes that her vote and those of other Nigerians abroad could have made the difference. But weak legislation have persistently dashed her hopes for decades.
From the United States’ city of Missouri, Omotayo Jemiluyi, a graduate fellow at the University of Missouri, Columbia, worries about his siblings and relatives scattered across Nigeria, as banditry and terrorism spread from the ravaged North to the hitherto peaceful South.
‘I have five siblings and almost twenty nephews and nieces, all of whom I am very close to, so the consequences of Nigeria’s failures are anything but distant to me.’
He argues that not being allowed to vote for the leaders who manage his taxes on remittance is ‘disenfranchising’ and may be deliberate by the Nigerian political class to prevent Nigerians like him, who cannot be swayed by ‘stomach infrastructure’ and ethnic or religious bigotry, from participating in elections.
Beyond the material effects of bad leadership on citizens at home, Jemiluyi said he is affected even abroad, as he carries the burden of Nigeria’s ‘negative global perception’.
‘When a country consistently fails to develop itself, the societies its citizens migrate to or even visit often extend that failure onto the people who come from there. This is one of the most unfortunate consequences for those of us in the diaspora, especially as one now sees growing waves of anti-Nigerian animus in different places,’ he emphasised.
Despite being the most populous nation in Africa, Nigeria has yet to integrate diaspora voting in its electoral processes for its over 17 million diasporans living abroad, while no fewer than 19 countries on the continent allow diaspora citizens to vote.
Diaspora remittance dwarfs FDI, rivals total tax revenue
Nigeria is also the country with the largest diaspora remittance in Africa and ranks among the top 10 in the world. There are about 17 million Nigerians in diaspora, and they remitted $21.8 billion in 2025, contributing nearly 12% of the country’s GDP, according to data from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
Diaspora remittance inflows rival total capital importation, which stands at $23.2 billion in 2025, and dwarfs foreign direct investment (FDI), a measly $923 million.
Diaspora remittance inflows also edge Nigeria’s total tax revenue, which is N28.29 trillion ($19.8bn) in 2025.
Jemiluyi argues that it is unfair to Nigerians who contribute millions of dollars in remittances to be denied their civic responsibility of voting without having to travel down home every election period.
Senegal, Benin, Ivory Coast, other African countries take lead on diaspora voting
While Nigerians abroad struggle to see their quest for diaspora voting through legislation, several other African countries have since adopted the practice into their electoral laws, albeit with varying levels of implementation.
Senegal has a record of enabling diaspora civic and political participation, granting all diaspora members the right to vote and to be elected to Parliament. For the March 24, 2024, presidential election, Senegal’s voter registry included 7,372,110 voters in total – 7,033,852 on the national territory and 338,258 registered abroad. To accommodate them, 809 polling stations were set up across 51 countries.
In the neighbouring Benin Republic, diaspora voting is permissible in its electoral laws and is consistently practised. In its April 2026 presidential election, the electoral authority declared that a total of 7,897,287 people were eligible to vote, including 62,679 diaspora voters spread across 112 polling stations in diplomatic and consular representations abroad.
Also, Cameroonian citizens settled or residing abroad exercise their right to vote in presidential elections and referendums. Since 2011, they have participated in three presidential elections: 2011, 2018, and 2025.
Other countries that have adopted diaspora voting include Kenya, Botswana, Rwanda, Ivory Coast, and Egypt, among others. Ghana and Togo have also legalised diaspora voting, but implementation is yet to commence.
Abike Dabiri’s unfulfilled dream, and Abass’s unfinished business
For decades, several legislative efforts to give the diaspora a political voice have repeatedly failed.
Abike Dabiri-Erewa, the pioneer Chairman and CEO of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM), once served as a member of the House of Representatives, where she represented Ikorodu Federal Constituency from 2003 to 2015.
As the Chairman of the House Committee on Diaspora, she sponsored a bill seeking to amend Nigeria’s 2010 Electoral Act in order to grant Nigerians in the diaspora the right to vote during general elections in Nigeria. Specifically, the bill sought to grant voting rights in the form of absentee voting.
But her bill was rejected by the majority of members of the House on the grounds that it was too expensive and that Nigeria was not ripe for it. She made several unsuccessful attempts before she left the green chamber.
In 2022, the bill for diaspora voting returned to the National Assembly through another bill sponsored by the National Assembly Joint Ad-Hoc Committee on Constitution Review, and presented by Ovie Omo-Agege (Deputy Senate President), and Ahmed Idris Wase (Deputy Speaker of the House of Reps).
The bill sought to amend Sections 77(2) and 117(2) of the 1999 Constitution to allow every Nigerian citizen aged 18 and above, whether residing within or outside the country, to register and vote in elections.
However, the proposal failed to scale beyond the second reading. Of the 360 lawmakers in the green chamber, only 87 voted in favour, while 269 opposed, and the rest abstained. In the Senate, only 29 of the 92 senators present voted in its favour.
A similar bill was introduced separately in the Senate in 2023 by Ned Nwoko, representing Delta North, seeking to amend sections of the constitution to legalise diaspora voting.
Tajudeen Abass the speaker of the House of Reps, revived the struggle in 2024, when he co-sponsored a bill alongside Sadiq Ango Abdullahi, representing Sabon Gari federal constituency of Kaduna State, for the inclusion of diaspora voting in the Electoral Act. After its second reading, the bill was subsequently referred to the Constitution Amendment Committee for further legislative consideration. But nothing has been heard of it since.
We are ready for Diaspora voting, but waiting for NASS – NIDCOM
Abdul-Rahman Balogun, the head of Media at NIDCOM, said the commission is ready for diaspora voting but is waiting for the report of the constitutional review committee to know the position of the national assembly on the matter.
‘But I think it is too late for the next election, because the election process (for 2027) is already concluded. So, I don’t think it is on the table. But then, it is with the National Assembly,’ he told BusinessDay Investigations.
While in office, the former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Yakubu Mahmood, said that the commission was ready to integrate diaspora voting in Nigeria’s elections, once it is passed into law by the National Assembly.
‘INEC believes that Nigerians living outside the country should have the right to vote for a variety of reasons: they are citizens of Nigeria interested in the affairs of their own country; they make considerable contribution to the economy through huge financial inflow to the country; there is a sizable amount of Nigerian citizens living outside the country; and diaspora voting is consistent with global best practices,’ Mahmoud said.
Meanwhile, the Speaker of the House of Representatives did not respond to calls and text messages when contacted for an update on the bill.
Professor Mondy Selle-Gold, Co-Chairman of the African Policy and Research Consortium, argued that the lack of political will is the only reason Nigeria is not practising diaspora voting. He stressed that many countries are already practising it, and have been for years.
‘It is a practice that was put into place in 1975 in the United States. It is a practice that was already in place during the Roman Emperor Augustus, 12 BC to AD 14. So we are not trying to reinvent the wheel,’ the Diplomat argued.
Speaking on remittances of diasporans, he stressed that the figures cannot be fully quantified, as they spend more that they spend more than the government figure of $21 billion.
‘You have to also take into consideration how much Nigerians are spending, travelling to Nigeria on a yearly basis. What about the things we are shipping to Nigeria? So it is totally unfair to tie our financial contributions to the nation on the basis of what is reported by the government figures amounting to $20 billion.’