Rethinking container inspection at the port gate

Container inspection is a routine part of port operations. But routine processes deserve scrutiny when they are repeated at scale.

At a busy container terminal, a truck arrives at the gate, stops for inspection, and the container is checked for visible damage, seals, and labels before the vehicle proceeds. Each transaction may take only a few minutes. Across hundreds or thousands of trucks, however, those minutes can affect truck turnaround and gate capacity.

This raises a practical question: can routine container inspection be automated without compromising control?

The Port of Helsingborg in Sweden provides an instructive example.

In July 2025, the port introduced automated damage inspection at its Central Gate. Cameras capture containers as trucks pass through, while artificial intelligence analyses the images for visible external damage and checks for the presence of seals and labels. Routine manual inspection is reduced, while exceptions can still be referred for further inspection.

The significance lies not simply in the use of cameras at a port gate. Automated imaging and gate systems are not new. The important development is the use of AI to support a different inspection model: rather than manually inspecting every container in the same way, technology can screen the containers as they gate in and direct human attention only to specific containers that require closer examination.

The value of better information

Container condition matters because damage can become a source of disputes between terminals, shipping lines, hauliers, cargo owners and other stakeholders.

A digital record of a container’s condition at the gate can provide evidence of what was observed and when. It does not eliminate disputes, but it can improve the information available when they occur.

This is where AI inspection becomes more than an automation project.

If inspection results can be connected to the terminal operating system, electronic records, and gate processes, inspection becomes part of the wider cargo transaction. The container is identified, its condition is assessed, the result is recorded, and the system determines whether it can proceed or requires further attention.

The objective is not necessarily to remove human inspectors. It is to use them where human judgement is most valuable.

What does this mean for Nigeria?

Nigeria and other African markets are already investing in port digitalisation. But digital infrastructure alone does not necessarily produce operational efficiency. The value depends on how effectively different systems and processes work together.

For a Nigerian terminal considering AI-powered container inspection, the starting point should therefore not be the technology. It should be an operational problem.

How much time does inspection add to a gate transaction? How many containers are processed each day? Where are the biggest sources of delay? How frequently do container damage disputes occur? What is the cost of those delays and disputes?

Only then should a port assess the technology and its potential return.

There are also practical considerations. The system must work reliably across different weather and lighting conditions. It must integrate with existing gate and terminal systems. A clear process for handling exceptions, along with appropriate human oversight, is required.

A pilot deployment at a high-volume gate or terminal could provide the evidence needed to determine whether such an investment makes operational sense.

Integration is the bigger opportunity.

The wider lesson is that ports should avoid treating automation as a collection of standalone projects.

An AI inspection system has greater value when it connects with other parts of the port ecosystem. Gate activity, truck appointments, terminal operations, cargo information, and inspection records can become part of a more connected operating process.

Nigeria already has local technology companies developing capabilities around this kind of integration. WATT, for example, is developing intelligent mobility infrastructure focused on connecting technology, data, and physical operations across the logistics chain. That kind of capability will become increasingly relevant as ports move from isolated automation projects towards integrated operating models.

The opportunity, therefore, is not simply to introduce AI at the gate. It is to create an environment in which the information generated by AI can trigger the right action, promptly, elsewhere in the port.

For African ports, the objective should not be to copy Helsingborg. It should be to identify where manual processes create avoidable delays, inconsistent information, or unnecessary intervention, and determine whether technology can address those specific problems. AI-powered container inspection may be one such opportunity.

The more important question is whether ports are prepared to examine their existing processes closely enough to know where automation will create measurable value.

That is where the next wave of port efficiency gains is likely to emerge: not from technology for its own sake, but from technology applied to clearly defined operational challenges.

IFAD commits additional Sh7bn to expand Kenya livestock programme

The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) is set to give Kenya Sh7.1billion ($55mn) fresh financing to help farmers raise productivity and gain access to better markets.

IFAD Country Director and representative for Kenya, Matteo Marchisio, said the executive board of the UN’s specialised agency approved the additional financing for the Kenya Livestock Commercialisation Programme (KeLCoP).

‘The IFAD Executive Board approved today additional financing of approximately Sh7.1 billion (US$55 million) for the Kenya Livestock Commercialisation Programme,’ Mr Marchisio said in a statement.

The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) is set to give Kenya Sh7.1billion ($55mn) fresh financing to help farmers raise productivity and gain access to better markets.

IFAD Country Director and representative for Kenya, Matteo Marchisio, said the executive board of the UN’s specialised agency approved the additional financing for the Kenya Livestock Commercialisation Programme (KeLCoP).

‘The IFAD Executive Board approved today additional financing of approximately Sh7.1 billion (US$55 million) for the Kenya Livestock Commercialisation Programme,’ Mr Marchisio said in a statement.

Investors lose Sh93bn in Kenya startup failures

Kenyan startup Twiga Foods has entered administration amid financial turmoil, joining a group of 13 once-promising ventures that have collapsed over the past five years after raising capital in excess of Sh93 billion.

The business failures, including that of Koko Networks, Lipa Later and Copia, highlight the heavy losses that financiers and investors, mostly venture and private equity firms based in Western countries, have suffered.

The collapse of the young businesses has also rendered thousands of Kenyans jobless, with the firms typically engaging in a hiring blitz with a plan to gain scale and reach profitability.

Twiga Foods operated a business-to-business (B2B) marketplace that sourced farm produce directly from farmers and delivered it to urban retailers.

Mohamed Mohamed of Maawiy Financial Advisory Limited was appointed administrator of GT Flow Limited, formerly known as Twiga Foods One Limited, on August 17.

Twiga Foods attracted $185.4 million (Sh24 billion) from investors, according to the global business database Crunchbase. Its backers include the French investment firm Creadev.

It is the latest in a series of heavily funded Kenyan startups that have collapsed, been placed under administration, or wound up after struggling to raise more money, achieve profitability, or cope with difficult market conditions.

A Business Daily analysis shows Twiga Foods is among 13 ventures to collapse in the past five years after collectively raising $717.5 million (Sh93 billion) from investors.

E-commerce startup Copia, which raised $123 million (Sh15.9 billion), failed to secure additional funding as 2024 began, putting it under financial strain.

Copia provided a platform for rural consumers to order products delivered through agents.

In May 2024, the company cut more than 1,000 jobs and warned of a looming shutdown before being placed under administration.

Copia was backed by the Kenyan venture capital firm Enza Capital and UK’s Lightrock.

Clean cooking startup Koko Networks, which had raised more than $100 million (Sh13 billion), was placed under administration in February 2026 on the brink of bankruptcy.

Koko Networks sold heavily subsidised bioethanol stoves and fuel to low-income households.

The company recouped losses through carbon credit sales in global compliance carbon markets.

Koko Networks filed for administration after Kenyan authorities refused to issue it a letter of approval to sell carbon credits, leaving over 700 direct staff and thousands of refilling agents jobless.

Its investors include Microsoft’s Climate Innovation Fund and French asset manager Mirova.

Another casualty has been Lipa Later, a technology credit venture that raised $16.6 million (Sh2.1 billion) and was placed under administration in March 2025 amid undisclosed financial woes.

Lipa Later was backed by Cauris Finance and Lateral Frontiers and had over 200 staff and a network of about 1,000 agents.

Gro Intelligence, an agriculture and climate data company, raised $117.7 million (Sh15.2 billion) before shutting down operations in June 2024.

The company provided AI-powered data analytics, satellite imaging, and predictive models focused on agriculture and climate risk.

In March 2024, the company laid off 60 percent of its workforce before shutting down operations after failing to secure sufficient capital.

Carmaker Mobius Motors shut down operations in August 2024 and sent over 40 workers home amid mounting debts and a multi-million-shilling tax dispute, which pushed it into voluntary liquidation.

By August 2020, it had a debt of Sh649.2 million and a shareholders’ deficit of Sh389.1 million. The company had raised $56 million (Sh7.3 billion) from investors such as Kepple Africa Ventures.

Mobius was later acquired in bankruptcy in 2025 by Silver Box, a Middle Eastern firm.

Agritech startup iProcure, which raised $17.1 million (Sh2.2 billion), was placed under administration after filing for bankruptcy in April 2024.

The business-to-business (B2B) platform connected agricultural input suppliers directly with local agro-dealers.

Logistics startup Sendy, which raised $24.7 million (Sh3.2 billion), closed in 2023 after running out of money and failing to find a buyer, sending home over 200 staff.

Sendy operated an app linking delivery drivers with customers. Its investors include the Toyota Tsusho Corporation.

Another B2B e-commerce startup, MarketForce, raised $84.1 million (Sh10.9 billion) before winding up in April 2024.

The company enabled informal retailers to order fast-moving consumer goods from distributors and manufacturers. It was backed by V8 Capital Partners, among others.

Kune Foods shut down in June 2022, barely a year after starting operations. It offered ready-to-eat affordable meals and had raised $1 million (Sh129 million).

Wefarm, which raised $32 million (Sh4.1 billion), shut down in 2022 due to difficult market conditions and scaling challenges. Wefarm operated a farmer-to-farmer digital network that enabled users to share information via SMS.

E-commerce firm Zumi shut down in March 2023 after raising $1 million (Sh129 million).

Notify Logistics also shut down in August 2022 after raising $374,000 (Sh48.4 million).

The failures have come despite large investments in Kenyan startups over the past decade.

In 2025, Kenya was Africa’s leading venture capital destination, when startups raised $984 million (Sh127.5 billion), according to the startup funding tracker Africa: The Big Deal.

For venture capitalists, however, startup collapses are factored into the funding strategy, where a small number of successful companies pay for a high rate of failures.

Cost pressures weigh on Legend Internet profit despite N4.14bn asset base

Legend Internet Plc continued to strengthen its balance sheet in the twelve months ended July 31, 2026, with total assets rising 29 percent to N4.14 billion from N3.21 billion a year earlier.

The internet service provider disclosed the performance in its unaudited management financial statements for the period, filed with the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX).

The expansion reflects continued investment in infrastructure and increased access to financing, although higher costs are weighing on earnings.

The company Legend reported a profit of N13.2 million for the period, down from N142.5 million in the previous year due to infrastructure acquisition costs, administrative expenses and financing-related pressures.

Analysts said Legend Internet’s ability to translate its expanded asset and financing base into stronger revenue growth, while bringing administrative and financing costs under control, has strong potential to restore profitability and improve shareholder returns.

Total assets increased by N929.4 million during the year, driven largely by a significant increase in current assets, which rose to N1.65 billion from N597.8 million. The stronger liquidity position provides the company with additional capacity to support operations and fund near-term growth initiatives.

Despite a decline in revenue, Legend Internet maintained a relatively strong gross profit position. Revenue fell to N1.10 billion from N1.19 billion, while gross profit moderated to N714 million from N761.4 million. This translated to a gross margin of approximately 65 percent, underscoring the resilience of the company’s core operating economics despite softer top-line performance.

The company’s infrastructure base also remained substantial, with property, plant and equipment valued at N2.47 billion at the end of the reporting period. Legend Internet invested an additional N49.6 million in property, plant and equipment during the year, highlighting its continued commitment to expanding and maintaining its network capacity.

Legend recorded a net cash inflow of N1.07 billion from financing activities, following proceeds from loans, term loans and commercial paper, partly offset by loan repayments. The increased financing provides additional resources for expansion, but also raises the importance of effective debt and financing-cost management as the company scales.

For investors, the key question will be whether the company can convert its enlarged asset and financing base into stronger revenue growth and improved earnings. Sustained investment in infrastructure could provide a platform for future expansion, but tighter control of administrative and financing costs will be critical to translating balance-sheet growth into shareholder returns.

How three Kenyans turned hustles into Dubai businesses

Yuvinalis Japhet is in his Dubai office, phone in hand, confirming a desert safari booking for the next morning. On the wall behind him hangs framed photos of his fleet: A Toyota Land Cruiser Prado, a Land Cruiser LC300, a Hyundai Tucson, and a 37-seater bus he bought last year.

“This is my whole fleet right now,” says the 34-year-old.

It is a long way from where he started.

Japhet landed in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in the winter of 2016, one face in a busload of Kenyans, Ugandans and Tanzanians driven straight from the airport to a labour camp in Sonapur (‘City of Gold’), a district nearly 15 kilometres east of Dubai.

“I think there were 32 of us, all hired by Transguard, a company that supplied workers to hotels and food companies,” he says.

Four men shared a room, sleeping on bunk beds like boarding school students in a dormitory far from home. He started as a kitchen steward, then spent six months as an outdoor waiter at the five-star Atlantis Hotel.

“My pay was around Sh28,000 a month,” he says. The job came with free transport, accommodation and meals, so he saved much of the pay.

In November 2017, he enrolled for driving lessons and got his licence the following May. By 2019 he was driving taxis for a local company, hoping for better terms. Instead, he found work with no basic salary, built entirely on commission. “If you don’t work, you don’t get paid,” he says.

Fines cut deep into his earnings. Some were as high as Sh15,000 for something as small as forgetting to buckle up. In his best month, he took home close to Sh28,000. But the job taught him the country inside out.

“I was so familiar with the country that even if I was to start something, I already knew what I should do and where I should start,” he says.

An idea and an expensive lesson

The idea for his company began forming while he ferried fellow Kenyans across the seven emirates. He started a WhatsApp group for monthly road trips, a way to fight loneliness, that slowly turned commercial. Before it could grow, trouble found him. Frequent fines got his licence suspended for six months.

He leaned on savings and sold Kenyan hoodies, bracelets and foodstuffs like unga and omena to homesick countrymen. During that stretch, he bought his first car, a used Mitsubishi Lancer, for about Sh250,000, and used it for side hustles and airport pickups.

When he eventually went to sort his paperwork, he discovered his old taxi company had marked him as absconded, a serious immigration offence. A local Emirati contact helped settle the matter, but it cost him nearly Sh1 million to clear the fines and lift the flag from his file.

“It was one of the most expensive lessons,” he says.

With his name cleared, Japhet registered Al Badoor Project Management Services, sponsoring freelance visas for people wanting to live or work in the UAE.

“Clients paid for their visa, I covered the government fees, and the difference became my income,” he says.

In May 2022, he registered it as a tourism company, Yuvinalis Tourism LLC, and turned his road trips into a proper business. “The tourism licence alone cost about Sh800,000, and it has to be renewed every 12 months,” he says.

His office contract cost about Sh1.1 million a year, paid partly through post-dated cheques. Insurance added roughly Sh80,000, and furnishing the office another Sh600,000. “In total, I spent more than Sh2.2 million just to get the company started,” he says, all from saved commissions, without a single bank loan.

His fleet grew one vehicle at a time, bought whenever the business earned enough.

Today, Yuvinalis Travel and Tours runs desert safaris, city tours, Burj Khalifa visits and dhow cruises.

Packages start from about Sh190,000 for four nights of accommodation and select activities. Seventy percent of his clients are Kenyan, he says, loyalty built on word of mouth rather than advertising.

Running his own company has tested his patience in ways employment never did.

“Sometimes I feel like giving up, because it can be overwhelming,” he admits, before adding that the reward outweighs the frustration once things are managed properly.

His advice for aspiring entrepreneurs is simple. ‘Know your market before making anything official, keep enough cash saved to survive the slow months, and treat every early mistake, even the expensive ones, as a lesson rather than a failure.’

Seven years into the tourism business, Japhet is now eyeing a Mombasa branch and an expansion into Qatar.

Hobby that became good business

Across the same city, Juma Abubakar Osore built his business out of a hobby. At 57, he runs a free zone company, handling import and export, training, and travel consultancy, all from one desk.

His path there was never planned. Juma spent 16 years at Emirates airline before the Covid pandemic cost him his job.

“When I was off duty, I could buy things, take them to the Somalis, they’d ship them, and I’d learn how the business works,” he says.

It started with suits for lawyers and politicians back home. “I started posting suits on my social media status, and before I knew it, two or three people would want to buy a suit from me,” he says.

That small demand pulled him toward cars and machinery, work he found more interesting than clothes.

When Emirates let him go, Juma made a decision to pursue his hobby full time. “I would rather do my own thing that I’m proud of, something I can use to help myself, and maybe the generations to come.”

He registered the company in 2020, a year after leaving Emirates. The startup capital was modest.

“I started with about Sh493,000 for the licence and one visa,” he says. Adding five work visas pushed the total closer to Sh880,000. Each new employee adds another Sh70,000 to Sh88,000, depending on the quarter.

His business now runs on three pillars. The first is e-commerce, mostly spare parts moving between Kenya and the UAE. The second is training, arranged in house or outsourced. The third is travel consultancy, helping Kenyans plan trips with hotel bookings and itineraries across Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah.

Juma sources containers imported in bulk from Japan, sold through auctions once they land.

“If I get an enquiry for, say, a Toyota part, and I know of a container coming in with that part, I’ll go source it, or find people who’ve been in the auction and buy from them,” he says.

Volumes shift constantly, sometimes a tonne or two, sometimes far less, and he often consolidates shipments with other buyers to fill a container.

Delivery delays are his most common complaint, though he now offers faster couriers like Aramex or DHL for urgent, smaller items.

Competition comes from rivals sourcing directly from Japan and undercutting his prices, but Juma insists his edge is quality. “We test the engines and get the best quality from Japan, as opposed to those who buy in bulk without testing,” he says.

Moving large sums of money creates its own headaches, since banking limits force him to split big payments into several transactions.

His secret for success is quite open.

“You need to be truthful, and commit to what you say. Trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild in a market built almost entirely on referrals.’

Looking ahead, he wants to set up a storage yard in Kenya so clients no longer wait for items sourced one by one from Dubai, a plan he expects to pursue once the next election cycle back home settles.

From DJ to concert promoter

George Otieno, known to friends as Geo Ogango, built his venture the loud way, one stage light and one packed dance floor at a time.

Geo was a young man in Nairobi when he first felt the pull of music and crowds, spinning vinyl in small clubs in the 90s. He remembers a 1990 dance competition at the Kenyatta International Convention Centre where the prize was a Fiat Uno.

He didn’t win it, but the memory stuck. “I think that was the background of my entertainment journey,” he says.

Weekends pulled him to Kisumu, where he fell for Ohangla music, dancing to Tony Nyadundo at the Sunset Hotel, who later became his friend. That friendship turned into a business idea when Geo convinced Tony to perform in Nairobi. He opened a small shop and began promoting shows, funding them from his day job. “I was just spending, and in the process, I saw this was a good business,” he says.

Geo arrived in the UAE in 2012, planning to stay a year. “Once you’re out here, you start getting busy, you have to keep the pace by trying to grow more,” he says, explaining how one year became 15.

His first Dubai job was in close protection, giving him structure while he studied the entertainment scene. He noticed Indian, Pakistani and Filipino communities flying in their own artistes, but nobody doing the same for East Africans.

“I said, okay, I’ll do Luo music, because I have a good network of Luo musicians,” he says.

His first event, on May 1, 2014, featured musician Johnny Junior and cost him more than Sh704,000. “The response was very good,” he says.

Registering a full company was expensive, so he worked under hotel and club licences instead, a common arrangement among promoters. Even that required a residence visa costing Sh528,000, with medical tests and financial checks that took three months to clear.

Once settled, his business expanded across East Africa and eventually to Jamaica, bringing in acts like Turbulence, Fantan Mojah and Etana, alongside Kenyan stars such as Prince Indah, Guardian Angel and Nadia Mukami.

His most expensive show, featuring Prince Indah, cost around Sh1.5 million.

Every performer on stage, even an emcee, needs a licence costing nearly Sh28,000, meaning a seven person band alone costs about Sh197,000 in licensing, plus a Sh52,000 application fee.

Still, the returns come fast. “If you put in like Sh352,000, you get your Sh702,000, or maybe extra, in return,” he says.

The road hasn’t always been smooth. Covid pandemic forced him to cancel shows already booked, including Jamaican acts under contract, and visa delays sometimes took over two months to clear. Eventually the Jamaican leg became unsustainable, and Geo shifted his focus back to Kenyan and East African talent.

Beyond concerts, he built a second income organising corporate events that link Gulf investors with Kenyan businesses, and more recently sourcing Kenyan meat and vegetables for UAE buyers. That diversification carried him through his longest gap yet, an entire year without a live show in 2025, after buying property and shifting toward trading.

His office now sits in the Dubai Airport Free Zone, run by a lean team of three.

“The law is straight,” he says, comparing Dubai’s business environment to Kenya’s. “You only earn what you deserve to earn.”

His plans now stretch into Qatar and Saudi Arabia, with an eventual return to Kenya. “I don’t need to go to their countries,” he says. “It’s their turn now to come to our country.”

Asked what success means after everything he has built, Geo doesn’t point to numbers.

“Success is when you’re actually proud of what you’ve done, which, of course, I’m very proud of what I’ve done so far,” he says.

World championships promise an economic boon for Nairobi

Kenya could look forward to significant economic benefits after Nairobi was picked to host the World Athletics Championships in 2029.

Hosting the global championship promises to attract the country hundreds of billions of shillings through stimulation of local businesses, construction, tourism, and service industries before and during the event.

Nairobi was selected to host the 2029 World Athletics Championships, beating other rivals including Rome and London to become the first African city to stage the event. The selection marked a major win for Nairobi, which had previously failed in its bid to host the event in 2025, which went ?to Tokyo. Munich was picked to host the 2031 World Athletics Championships.

‘We were fortunate to have four outstanding bids for 2029 and 2031, and this was not an easy decision for the Council,’ World Athletics President Sebastian Coe said.

‘Nairobi and Munich ultimately presented two compelling propositions. They offer very different but equally exciting opportunities for our sport, and I am delighted that we can now begin working with both cities to stage two world-class championships.’

The 2029 World Athletics Championships events will take place at Kasarani Stadium, which is currently under renovation to host matches at the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations.

A review of the previous World Athletics Championships revealed massive economic benefits for the host cities.

The economic opportunity extends beyond ticket sales, with thousands of athletes, officials, media representatives and spectators expected to generate demand for services in hotels, transport, retail, among other sectors.

The latest edition, which was hosted in Tokyo last year, provides an indication of the scale involved, with about 620,000 spectators attending the 2025 championships and 1,992 athletes representing 193 countries and the Refugee Team.

The Tokyo event also recorded about 860 accredited media representatives from 79 countries, while its television and digital platforms extended the competition’s reach beyond spectators attending the stadium.

The World Athletics Organisation said three of its 2025 events, including the Tokyo championships, generated a combined economic impact of $522million (Sh67.67 billion), with some 619,288 stadium fans gracing the events where 1,992 athletes competed.

The organisation says that in last year’s Tokyo experience, its 2025 ticket-marketing strategy generated more than $3 million (Sh388.9 million), creating a model it intends to develop for future hosts and events.

Nairobi’s selection to host the 2029 World Athletics Championships gives Kenya a major international sporting platform but puts pressure on the country to fast-track upgrades to stadiums, transport networks, and hospitality facilities to meet international standards.

The event also provides a platform for Kenyan businesses to sell services to international visitors and companies, particularly in hospitality, logistics, security, and destination management.

Kasarani is expected to serve as the main competition venue and is already undergoing refurbishment, while Kenya has been upgrading sports infrastructure ahead of the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations.

The government has also been constructing the 60,000-seat Talanta Sports City in Nairobi, although the facility is primarily designed for football.

The Treasury’s 2026 Budget Policy Statement (BPS) said Talanta Sports City, also known as Raila Odinga Stadium, was about 68 percent complete and was being developed as a 60,000-seat multipurpose facility, with more than 3,300 workers involved in construction.

The government has recently set a target to borrow Sh38.74 billion against the Sports Fund to complete the construction of 33 new and existing stadiums across the country.

The new facility will mark the second securitisation under the Sports, Arts and Social Development Fund, after the Sh44.8 billion Talanta bond whose proceeds are in use in the construction of the stadium in Nairobi.

The tourism sector further stands as another potential beneficiary of the athletics championship, particularly if Kenya converts the event into longer stays and combines it with safari, coastal and cultural tourism packages.

Tanzania moves to enforce mandatory visitor cover as Kenya dithers

Tanzania looks set to beat Kenya to the rollout of mandatory insurance for foreign visitors, with the neighbouring country gazetting rules amid court cases stalling the process in Kenya.

The Insurance (Inbound Travel Insurance) Regulations, 2026, gazetted on September 4, require foreigners entering mainland Tanzania through airports, seaports or land borders to have a valid inbound travel insurance policy.

The policy costs the equivalent of $44 (about Sh5,700) and is valid for up to 92 days from the date of arrival. It also allows multiple entries into mainland Tanzania during the validity period.

The impending rollout comes after Zanzibar introduced its own mandatory inbound travel insurance scheme in October 2024, also setting the premium at $44 and the validity period at up to 92 days.

The development looks set to leave Kenya behind its neighbour in implementing a compulsory insurance requirement for international visitors amid criticism that it would make destinations expensive for visitors.

International Air Transport Association (IATA) regional vice-president for Africa and the Middle East, Kamil Al-Awadhi, said recently the mandatory inbound travel insurance alongside levies and other charges on aviation is deepening the burden for visitors.

However, countries argue the cover benefits visitors since it includes emergency medical treatment, medical evacuation, repatriation and compensation for loss of luggage.

Zanzibar and Tanzania mainland rollout of the cover provides a regional example of integrating mandatory visitor insurance into border and travel systems. Kenya, Zanzibar and Tanzania mainland are among the region’s leading tourism markets.

Kenya has already established a legal framework for mandatory visitor health insurance and gazetted regulations in July but implementation has been slowed by a court challenge.

The government had set a minimum benefit package of $50,000 (about Sh6.4 million) for foreign visitors staying in Kenya for less than 12 months.

The $50,000 is the minimum value of insurance benefits and not the premium visitors will pay. Kenya has not prescribed a single premium for the cover, unlike Tanzania’s $44 charge.

Kenya’s minimum package includes medical expenses, emergency medical transportation, prescribed medicines, mental illness treatment and repatriation of mortal remains.

The cover must provide at least $20,000 (Sh2.59 million) for medical expenses and $25,000 (Sh3.24 million) for emergency medical transportation. It must provide $300 (Sh38,850) for prescribed medicines, $1,000 (Sh129,500) for mental illness and $5,000 (Sh647,500) for repatriation of mortal remains.

However, the High Court suspended the implementation following a petition challenging the government’s move, leaving the rollout in limbo as Tanzania works towards operationalizing its own scheme.

Petitioners challenged in court the Ministry of Health’s authority to impose the cover. They also alleged gaps in public participation and lack of transparency in picking participating insurers and service providers.

One case was filed in Marsabit with a hearing on September 16, 2026, while another one was filed in Nairobi and has a mention date of September 29. The roll-out cannot happen before these cases are heard and determined.

Counterfeit designer scents push Kenyans to pricier niche perfumes

Walk through any mall in Nairobi, and you will catch it before you see it: a wave of familiar designer scents trailing behind shoppers who paid a fraction of the real price.

The counterfeit perfume trade has grown so sophisticated that even seasoned buyers struggle to tell a fake Tommy Hilfiger or Gucci bottle from the original.

As the counterfeit luxury market grows, a shift toward niche fragrances is becoming increasingly visible, with distributors and sellers reporting a growing appetite for little-known brands.

Kenyan consumers are willing to spend twice what they would normally budget for perfume, even when the name on the bottle is unfamiliar.

“Three or four years ago, the uptake of niche fragrance by Kenyans was quite slow because of the price point, but also because these aren’t brands known by many. Right now, there is this sudden acceptability and recognition of niche house fragrance among Kenyans,” says David Oremo, General Manager at Maven Luxury, a distributor of luxury fragrances in East Africa.

According to the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA), footwear, apparel and fragrances, particularly luxury brands, remain among the most heavily counterfeited products in the Kenyan market.

Sh87 million counterfeits

In a crackdown by the agency in April this year, counterfeit shoes, clothing and fragrances were seized, with the fake items valued at Sh87 million out of a Sh201 million haul of counterfeit goods. Most of the seized products bore the marks of mass market brands such as Nike, Puma, Adidas, Gucci and Tommy Hilfiger.

“What we are seeing is a market driven by aspiration. People want to belong to a certain social class. When they cannot afford an international luxury brand, counterfeit steps in to fill the gap,” ACA Executive General Robi Kinga told the BDLife.

But in fragrance, the equation is changing. Mr Oremo attributes the shift partly to increased travel, social media and exposure to global fragrance trends.

“Fragrance is very personal. It has to smell right to you. Kenyans are becoming sophisticated by the day and are no longer interested in how big a brand name is, but in the quality, performance and distinctiveness of the fragrance.”

He also agrees the rise of counterfeits is another reason the niche business is booming.

“With the dupes flooding the market, especially of popular mass market luxury labels, we are seeing a surge in the uptake of niche house fragrances because very few of them are being counterfeited.”

Because niche fragrances are not popular, counterfeiters are hesitant to invest in creating dupes, since there is no ready market for them. Even then, creating a fake niche fragrance would be costly compared to a mass market one because of the complexity that goes into making them,” he adds.

Unlike apparel and footwear, Mr Oremo notes that consumers are less concerned about displaying a recognisable label and more interested in a scent that feels uniquely theirs.

“Many Kenyans don’t want to smell the same, even if they would not mind wearing clothes from the same brand for social status,” he says.

“Popular designer brands have easily become a target for counterfeiters because they are mass-produced alongside other products. You can see a Hugo Boss shirt and a Hugo Boss fragrance. Niche does not work like that. Brands that do niche specialise only in fragrance, which makes the engineering far more detailed. That is why they have an edge when it comes to offering distinct scents that leave a lasting impression and deliver longer performance.”

Niche houses also tend not to rely on mass marketing. Instead, many build their brands around communities of loyal consumers and word of mouth, an approach giving them an unexpected advantage in Kenya.

“With the fakes in the market being generally low quality, we are seeing more Kenyans willing to spend twice what they used to on a niche fragrance they like”

The best-sellers

Mr Oremo notes that a bottle of niche fragrance starting from Sh28,000, the entry price point for most niche brands, can typically deliver seven hours or more of longevity.

“You wear it while leaving the house, and you don’t need to carry it around and rush to the bathroom to reapply by midday,” he says.

According to Peter Gitau, Brand Lead at Cierra Perfumes luxury stores, Parfums de Marly (French), Montale Mancera (French), Xerjoff (Italian), Nishane (Turkish), Roja (English) and Initio (French) are the best-selling niche house fragrances among Kenyans.

“These are the top-of-mind niche fragrances that many Kenyan shoppers keep asking about,” he notes.

Mr Gitau agrees the Kenyan market is now more open to trying something different but says theire is a knock-off effect.

“While counterfeits have had an impact, the bigger driver I see is the sharp rise in the prices of designer fragrances. When a designer perfume starts costing almost as much as a niche one, consumers begin to question the value they are getting. At that point, someone may choose to pivot to niche because it offers more artistic expression.”

And Mr Oremo says this shift is already catching the attention of foreign niche houses keen to enter the Kenyan market. “What does that tell you? It tells you the market is there. People are willing to spend money for good scents,” he says.

Niche brands enter market

Last week, Australian niche fragrance brand Goldfield and Banks launched in Kenya. According to Nicolas Picard, the challenge was never simply finding consumers willing to pay a premium, but finding a retail environment capable of delivering the quality and brand experience expected of a luxury fragrance house.

“We need a certain level of quality and execution for the brand to actually represent that luxury segment we’re in. Therefore, we had to find the right partners,” he told the BDLife.

The brand has been in Kenya for five months, spent studying the market. “We took notice of Kenya’s growing fragrance culture. Kenya has a strong and increasingly youthful niche fragrance following, supported by consumers who are well travelled, active on social media and exposed to international trends. The clientele we’re getting is becoming younger and younger.”

Mr Picard adds that Kenyan consumers tend to like a strong scent, something that fits Goldfield and Banks’ identity. “Kenya has a very bold population. They like strong, loud fragrances that make them stand apart. They also don’t like smelling like the next person.”

The brand is launching with 10 fragrances, including its worldwide bestseller Ingenious Ginger, along with Silky Woods, Sunset Hour and Pacific Rock Moss. 100ml bottles retail at $220 (Sh29,000), while selected 50ml bottles cost between $150 (Sh19,000) and $160 (Sh21,000). Picard says the company is targeting a turnover of Sh90 million from Kenya within its first three years.

South Africa’s Vodacom Group fights to keep majority stake in Safaricom

South Africa’s Vodacom Group says it will file an appeal besides seeking a stay order to retain its majority ownership in Safaricom, after Kenya’s High Court nullified its acquisition of an extra 20 percent stake in the telco on June 30, 2026.

The court on Tuesday said the National Treasury concealed material information regarding the sale of its 15 percent stake in Safaricom, including the fact that it resulted in Vodacom taking a controlling 55 percent stake in the Nairobi Securities Exchange-listed firm.

The South African also simultaneously acquired a 5 percent stake in Safaricom from Vodafone Group, lifting its ownership from the previous 35 percent.

The government’s partial sale of its stake in Safaricom stake had already drawn legal action but the Attorney-General was granted an application to the Court of Appeal to lift a freeze on the deal on June 26, enabling the transaction to be closed two business days later.

The multinational says it will file an application to the Court of Appeal in the wake of the High Court’s decision.

‘Subsequent to the Appeal Order, the High Court of Kenya provided a judgment on a petition against the acquisition, which judgment was handed down on September 15, 2026. Vodacom will review the judgment, and its implications,’ the Midrand-based firm said in a market update on Tuesday.

‘As interim steps, an appeal against the decision will be lodged with the Court of Appeal, as well as an application to stay the matter until an appeal is heard.’

The government also says it will appeal the decision but its attempts to convince the court to suspend the judgment, pending appeal, was rejected.

Vodacom acquired the government’s shares through a block trade on the NSE on June 30, the same day it also bought Vodafone’s shares through its investment vehicle Vodafone Kenya Limited (VKL).

The High Court’s three-judge bench held that the deal had been presented as a partial divestiture when in reality it amounted to a takeover that gave Vodacom effective control of Safaricom.

The court declared the divestiture invalid, null and void, quashed all approvals relating to the transaction and ordered that the 15 percent stake be restored to the Government of Kenya on behalf of the people.

‘A declaration is hereby made that the partial divestiture of the 15 percent of the Government of Kenya shares in a camouflage merger or acquisition and takeover of Safaricom PLC is in contravention of the Constitution and the law,’ said the court.

The court directed the parties including Attorney General, Safaricom and Vodacom to file a substantive application seeking a stay of the judgment.

The court noted that under the arrangement, the South African multinational’s ownership in the Kenyan telco rose to 55 percent after taking full ownership VKL through which it holds the shares in the Kenyan telco.

The judges found that this critical information was not adequately disclosed to the public, the Cabinet or Parliament.

‘A declaration is hereby made that the partial divestiture of the 15 percent of the Government of Kenya shares in Safaricom PLC was marred with obscurities on the proposed buyer, misrepresentations and concealment of material information on the nature and effects of the partial divestiture in violation of the principles of integrity, transparency,’ said the court.

The court also raised concerns about national security, noting that Safaricom operates critical infrastructure, including election transmission systems, government payment platforms, mobile money services and stores the personal data of millions of Kenyans.

‘In the circumstances, even with regulatory safeguards, there is no guarantee that would prevent foreign and external influence or interference with the governance systems, personal security and data,’ the court said.

The judges added that any perception of external influence over election transmission systems could undermine public confidence in the democratic process. They held that transferring effective control of such infrastructure to a foreign entity without a prior national security assessment violated the government’s constitutional obligations.

How family feuds led to bankruptcy of Kamotho children

A bitter fallout between two children of Moi-era Cabinet minister John Joseph (JJ) Kamotho and their mother contributed to the financial distress that eventually culminated in the siblings being declared bankrupt over Sh4.83 million in legal fees.

The High Court declared Marianne Nyokabi Kamotho and David Waweru Kamotho bankrupt after they failed to settle legal fees owed to lawyer Paul Maingi Musyimi, who represented them in their long-running fight with their mother and sibling over the inheritance of the late politician’s Sh250 million estate.

Ms Nyokabi owes the lion’s share of the legal fees at Sh3,738,997, while Mr Waweru has an outstanding balance of Sh1,094,763.

Ms Nyokabi’s bankruptcy order was issued on January 30, 2026, with the court appointing the Official Receiver as trustee of her estate.

The petition against her was based on the Sh3.74 million debt and a statutory demand that she had failed to satisfy.

The siblings had been counting on proceeds from their father’s estate, including the sale of an Sh82 million Nairobi house, to help settle their debts.

But the money has not been unlocked, with a long-running feud between two factions of the Kamotho family continuing to delay distribution of the estate.

The Business Daily made several attempts to get a comment from the Kamothos on the row but was unsuccessful. Mr Waweru did not show up for an interview he had requested with the Business Daily on the matter last week.

The genesis of the family feud followed the death of the former Mathioya MP in a South African hospital on December 6, 2014.

Mr Kamotho, one of former President Daniel arap Moi’s longest-serving ministers, died without a will.

Since then, his widow, Eunice Wambui Kamotho, and his four children have been unable to agree on how to distribute his multimillion-shilling wealth, prompting prolonged court proceedings.

Besides Mr Waweru and Ms Nyokabi, the other children are Charles Githii Kamotho and James Mwai Kamotho.

Factions soon developed within the family as the heirs jostled over the estate, which included five parcels of land in Gacharage, Murang’a; land in Kakuzi; a house at Jadenville Country Homes; and the matrimonial home in Kitisuru, Nairobi.

The late politician also held shares in Safaricom, KenGen, Britam, Barclays and Sameer Africa, as well as a bank account at Standard Bank.

Mr Waweru and Ms Nyokabi were often on one side of the dispute, while their mother and Mr Githii were on the other.

But the bitterest fight was between the daughter and her mother, with the two at one point seeking competing court orders over the Kitisuru home.

On March 20, 2025, Ms Wambui sought the eviction of her daughter from the property, arguing that it was her matrimonial home and that she had a life interest in it. She also accused Ms Nyokabi of insulting her and starting repairs on the property without her consent.

Ms Nyokabi opposed the application, describing the property as a family home in which she was entitled to live as the late Kamotho’s daughter and co-administrator of the estate.

She also told the court that she lacked an alternative home and the financial means to secure decent accommodation, saying her resources had been depleted and she had suffered financial hardship.

The court found that Ms Wambui had a right to evict her daughter but dismissed the application because she had not complied with the statutory requirement to issue a three-month eviction notice.

The legal battles have made it difficult for the family to distribute the estate, leaving some beneficiaries, including Ms Nyokabi and Mr Waweru, short of liquid assets.

The siblings nevertheless invoked their claims to their father’s estate during the bankruptcy proceedings as evidence that they could meet their debts.

One of the properties at the centre of the succession dispute was the Sh82 million Jadenville Country Homes house, whose sale was approved by the court in 2022.

The court allowed Ms Wambui to sell the property to raise money for her upkeep and medical expenses. Half of the proceeds was to be shared equally among the four children, while the other half was to go to their mother.

Mr Waweru and Ms Nyokabi had opposed the sale, arguing that their mother did not need to dispose of the property because she received substantial rental income and a government pension following their father’s service as a minister.

They also objected to what they considered piecemeal distribution of the estate, arguing that the family should wait for confirmation of the grant before dividing the wealth.

The court nevertheless allowed the sale and directed how the proceeds would be divided.

The transaction, however, has not resolved the wider succession dispute, leaving the estate-and the money that the siblings hoped would help them settle their debts-tied up in years of litigation.

The bankruptcy proceedings have therefore added another layer to a family dispute that has stretched for more than a decade, turning a fight over the distribution of a wealthy politician’s estate into a financial crisis for two of his children.