Study: More than a third of PHL workers feel burnout

Employers need to look beyond recruitment and pay to retain workers, as 38 percent of Filipino employees reported chronic burnout, with workload stress and work-life balance among the key factors affecting workplace happiness, according to Jobstreet by SEEK.

The company’s Workplace Happiness Index: Philippines 2025 report found that one in four employed respondents felt neutral or unhappy with their jobs, highlighting challenges employers may need to address beyond filling vacancies.

Only 57 percent of respondents said they were happy with their current workload, while 42 percent said better work-life balance would improve their happiness at work.

Higher compensation ranked first among the factors workers cited, pointing to the importance of both pay and working conditions in employee satisfaction.

Jobstreet by SEEK said workers experiencing stress may hesitate to raise their concerns, allowing fatigue and disengagement to persist even as they continue fulfilling their responsibilities.

These issues may not immediately lead to resignations but can contribute to absenteeism, poor mental health outcomes and declining motivation, the report said.

For employers, addressing these concerns requires clear job expectations, consistent mentorship and career development opportunities, rather than focusing solely on recruitment.

The company also urged employers to foster open communication, conduct regular employee check-ins and provide support for mental well-being and work-life balance.

‘This report serves as the voice of our Filipino talent experiencing ‘silent struggles’ in their workplace,’ Jobstreet by SEEK’s managing director in the Philippines Dannah Majarocon said.

She said a more compassionate, people-centered approach could help employers strengthen employee morale and retention.

Jobstreet by SEEK also recommended workplace recognition programs and peer-support initiatives to help employees feel valued and connected to their teams.

China shadows US warship in PHL EEZ

China said on Tuesday it deployed naval forces to track and monitor a US warship that sailed on the waters off Sabina Shoal, that is within the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone, claiming that the ship allegedly entered waters adjacent to the feature without Beijing’s approval.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Southern Theater Command said the US littoral combat ship USS Charleston ‘illegally intruded’ into waters near Sabina Shoal, known in China as Xianbin Jiao, prompting Chinese forces to respond.

The PLA said it dispatched forces to track and monitor the US vessel ‘in accordance with laws and regulations’ and accused Washington of ‘infringing on China’s sovereignty and undermining regional stability.’

China further urged the United States to cease such operations, saying its forces remain on high alert to safeguard what Beijing describes as its sovereignty and maritime interests.

The US military had not immediately issued a public response to the Chinese statement.

Sabina Shoal, also known as Escoda Shoal, lies approximately 75 nautical miles west of Palawan and within the Philippines’ 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone. The maritime feature has become one of the most contentious flashpoints in the South China Sea amid recurring confrontations between Chinese and Philippine vessels.

Its strategic value stems from its location near major sea lanes and its proximity to Second Thomas or Ayungin Shoal, where the Philippines maintains a military outpost aboard the grounded BRP Sierra Madre. Analysts say control of the area enhances maritime surveillance and influence over vessel movements across the central portion of the South China Sea.

In an article published Tuesday, Chinese state-run newspaper Global Times said Sabina Shoal occupies a strategically important position because of its location along international shipping routes. The report also argued that the US operation reflected continued strategic competition between Washington and Beijing in the disputed waterway.

The latest incident comes amid heightened tensions in the South China Sea, where the Philippines, China and several other countries have overlapping territorial and maritime claims. China claims almost the entire South China Sea, a position rejected by a 2016 arbitral ruling that favored the Philippines under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Convene the NSC before Beijing makes its next move

CALLS to declare China’s ambassador Jing Quan persona non grata deserve more than a shouting match-rather, a meeting of the National Security Council (NSC).

The row began when Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro called Beijing a ‘regional troublemaker.’ Jing hit back a day later, saying China could ‘easily win’ if it chose to use force, but that it chooses peace. The latter also described relations between the two countries as ‘extremely sensitive.’

Many lawmakers heard a threat veiled in a reassurance. Senator Risa Hontiveros said the Chinese envoy should be declared persona non grata unless he clarified, and by the weekend other legislators were demanding his expulsion.

Whether that reading is fair hardly matters. What does is whether the government has measured what a further slide in relations with Beijing would cost.

We have been here before. Earlier this year, when similar calls surfaced, Malacañang said the President’s answer was ‘no.’ The Department of Foreign Affairs described expulsion as a last resort with ‘tremendous implications,’ and reciprocal action. Beijing has already signaled its own response: Its embassy said Jing would leave if Marcos asked, and that other Chinese diplomats would leave with him.

The legal authority is clear. Article 9 of the Vienna Convention lets a host state expel any diplomat at any time without explaining itself. What follows is less clear. Manila should expect Beijing to expel our ambassador in return. Embassies would stay open, and relations would formally survive, but the channels between the two governments would narrow just when they are most needed. In a crisis, less direct contact means more room for misreading and escalation.

Possible aftereffects

THE diplomatic fallout may be the lesser problem. The bigger exposure is economic, and it sits on the import side. In 2025, the Philippines bought $38.22 billion worth of goods from China-28.6 percent of its total imports-and that share has climbed in recent years.

Our country sold China about $9.3 billion-roughly 11 percent of its exports. That left a bilateral gap of nearly $29 billion, more than half of the country’s entire $49.72 billion trade deficit. In this relationship, Manila needs Chinese supply far more than Beijing needs Philippine goods.

Chinese capital is a thinner thread, but not a negligible one. Foreign investment approvals fell by half last year to P272.38 billion, with Singapore leading at P92.78 billion. Yet 189 Chinese firms operate inside the Philippine Economic Zone Authority areas, with cumulative investments of P47.3 billion and more than 46,000 jobs, according to the agency’s figures. Those are Filipino workers whose employers sit on the other side of this dispute.

So the vulnerability is not mainly lost sales or lost capital. It is the factories, builders and retailers that depend on Chinese components, materials and goods, and the jobs tied to Chinese-owned plants. Trade would not stop overnight, and the economy is more diversified than many assume. But a prolonged chill could delay orders, raise input costs, spook investors, and reduce Chinese tourism.

The NSC should ask which supply lines have no ready substitute, how quickly options could be found, and how much disruption key sectors can absorb before jobs and growth suffer. These are national-security questions, as much as economic ones.

Rivalry ripples

SAME goes for Filipinos living and working in mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau-among them professionals, teachers, domestic workers and business executives. No one is saying Beijing would target them, but responsible governments plan for contingencies, not just certainties. If the dispute drags on, will our consular posts have the people and resources to help a Filipino facing a legal, labor, or immigration problem?

Then, there is critical infrastructure. Rivalry between states now reaches the systems that keep a country running: power grids, telecommunications, Internet networks, banks and government databases. Do utilities, telcos, banks and agencies work from a common contingency framework? Could the country ride out a serious disruption to electricity or communications? A failure in either would quickly spread to banking, transport, emergency services, and government.

billboards do the job socmed

The information front deserves attention as well. Influence operations do not always try to persuade. Often the aim is simply to confuse, deepen divisions, and erode trust in institutions.

None of this may happen. The NSC’s task is not to forecast Beijing’s next move. Its task is to find the weak points, quantify the risks, and have responses ready before events dictate the pace.

The Philippines may well decide that defending its interests is worth the price. That is a legitimate choice. But statecraft takes more than resolve. If calls to expel Jing keep gaining ground, Filipinos are entitled to know the consequences to trade and investment, the exposure of our power and telecommunications networks, and the safety of our kababayans in China.

That’s what the NSC is for. Not after Beijing makes its next move, but before it does.

Austin GP: Antonelli’s title chase meets Verstappen’s resurgence

When I last covered the United States Grand Prix in Austin in 2023, Max Verstappen arrived with his third championship already secured in Qatar. This time, Kimi Antonelli comes to Texas with the title still open-and Mercedes with work to do before it can expect to win the race.

Madrid was my most recent stop with Formula One. Returning to the Circuit of the Americas will show how these cars respond to different demands: from the sustained banking of Madring’s La Monumental to the repeated changes of direction through Austin’s opening esses. Holding a balance through one long corner is one task. Settling the car quickly enough to commit to the next change of direction is another.

Mercedes has a particular reason to study the difference. The team judged its latest upgrade faster in Singapore, but acknowledged that finding the correct setup had become more difficult. Antonelli finished third, more than 24 seconds behind Verstappen. His championship lead grew, but Mercedes had not challenged for victory.

The United States Grand Prix, October 23-25, presents two separate questions: whether Antonelli can secure the championship, and whether Mercedes can give him the speed to do it with a victory.

Madring and COTA are close in length: 5.414 kilometres in Madrid against 5.513 in Austin. Their demands are less alike. Madrid combines street and permanent sections across 22 corners, including La Monumental’s 550 metres of sustained banking. Austin’s 20-turn layout moves from the uphill braking zone at Turn 1 into rapid direction changes, then through slower sections requiring traction and careful positioning.

Neither circuit is adequately described by its signature corner. Through COTA’s opening sequence, a correction can compromise the approach to the next turn. Later, a car that was responsive through the esses must provide enough rear grip to accelerate cleanly from the slower corners. Finding the best compromise matters more than producing one exceptional sector.

That compromise extends to the tyres.

For the Austin weekend, Formula One’s official tyre supplier Pirelli has selected the C2 hard, C3 medium and C4 soft compounds. The selection marks a return to a more conventional combination after the 2025 experiment that introduced an extra compound step between the hard and medium tyres.

Last year’s hardest C1 compound was not used in the race, with teams favouring one-stop strategies built around the softer C3 and C4 tyres. Pirelli’s return to the C2 as the hard compound could again make a single stop attractive, although the heat typically associated with the Texas weekend may introduce greater degradation and encourage alternative strategies.

According to Pirelli’s pre-race technical assessment, COTA places substantial demands on both tyre axles. The fast corners and rapid direction changes in the first sector place the front tyres under particular stress. Later in the lap, repeated acceleration out of slower corners generates thermal degradation, primarily affecting the rears.

The circuit’s asphalt is not especially abrasive, but the ageing surface presents another complication. A section between Turns 9 and 11 was resurfaced earlier this year. Elsewhere, Pirelli warns that tyre wear rather than graining could become an important consideration, particularly after several tyres reached high wear levels during last year’s race.

For Mercedes, this adds another layer to the question surrounding its upgraded car. Finding additional aerodynamic performance is only part of the job. The drivers must also be able to use that performance without placing excessive stress on the tyres over a full stint

Austin’s conventional weekend format gives engineers time to investigate. With no Sprint, Mercedes has three practice sessions to compare settings rather than the single session available before competitive running begins on a Sprint weekend.

After Singapore, trackside engineering director Andrew Shovlin said Antonelli’s updated package was clearly faster than the previous specification by Sunday. Toto Wolff acknowledged that accessing its performance was more difficult. Antonelli believed further improvement remained available through setup work.

The question is how much of that gain Mercedes can make available throughout a stint. A qualifying simulation offers an initial indication, but the longer runs must show whether the drivers can sustain the pace as fuel burns off and the tyres accumulate laps. A faster car is of limited benefit if keeping its balance manageable requires surrendering the improvement.

billboards do the job socmed

Pirelli’s compound selection gives Mercedes another variable to study. A car that performs well on the soft tyre over one qualifying lap may not respond in the same way on the medium or hard during the race. The relationship between car balance, tyre temperature and degradation could prove decisive, particularly if the expected one-stop strategy becomes marginal in higher temperatures.

Antonelli and George Russell approach that work from very different positions. Antonelli leads his teammate by 102 points. Based on the scheduled remaining races, he can clinch in Austin by winning, with Russell ninth or lower and Lewis Hamilton fifth or lower. Victory alone would not settle the championship.

Russell needs an immediate reversal. Ninth in Singapore followed a start from 19th after power-unit penalties. He recovered ground but could not pass Nico Hlkenberg’s Audi late in the race. Another afternoon spent limiting losses would do little to revive his title prospects.

For Antonelli, Singapore showed the value of recovering what the car could deliver. Fresh tyres helped him take third as Hamilton’s older tyres faded. Four track-limits incidents attracted scrutiny, but the stewards did not impose a time penalty. He could not match Verstappen or Charles Leclerc, yet still extended his championship lead.

Turn 12 is one of COTA’s principal passing opportunities, but the preparation begins at Turn 11. The hairpin feeds onto the long back straight. An attacker needs a clean exit to remain close enough to challenge under braking; gaining ground on entry is of limited value if it costs acceleration. A competitive lap in clean air will not reveal whether a driver can stay close through the hairpin and still apply power early enough to attack.

Nor does arriving ahead at Turn 12 necessarily complete the pass. The slower sequence that follows can sustain side-by-side racing. A driver who brakes later but leaves the car poorly positioned may have gained little by the next corner.

Turn 1 offers a different opening. Its broad entry and steep uphill approach accommodate several lines, particularly at the start. Defending the inside does not remove every outside option. For Antonelli, it is a place where retaining a position must be weighed against the consequences of contact.

A driver who loses ground through the esses must recover it before the next major braking opportunity. The preparation often determines whether a pass is available at all. That connects the setup work to Sunday’s racing: responsiveness keeps a rival within reach; traction and braking provide the opportunity to attack.

Verstappen won both the Sprint and Grand Prix in Singapore. On Sunday, he resisted Leclerc at the start, managed a radio problem and finished 7.335 seconds ahead of the Ferrari. Mercedes never mounted a comparable challenge.

That makes Red Bull a serious Austin prospect, not an automatic favourite. Verstappen acknowledged the change of demands after Singapore, noting COTA’s different character and bumpy surface. The question is whether the car’s recent improvement remains effective through a faster, more varied lap.

Singapore’s winning margin cannot simply be transferred to Texas. Red Bull must establish its advantage again, under different loads and across a different range of corners. Mercedes’ additional practice time also gives its engineers a better chance to respond.

Starts remain a concern. Team principal Laurent Mekies acknowledged that launches needed improvement after Leclerc challenged Verstappen off the line in Singapore. At COTA, the width of the approach to Turn 1 gives a rival space to exploit even a modest advantage. Pole would help without eliminating that vulnerability.

Verstappen also has less reason to settle for second. He has no comparable championship lead to preserve. If he and Antonelli meet on track, the same position can carry a different value for each driver.

Leclerc’s second place in Singapore demonstrated Ferrari’s competitiveness. Hamilton’s sixth showed how quickly a promising afternoon could deteriorate. He qualified third, missed the pit entry when called in under the Virtual Safety Car and subsequently chose to defend track position on ageing tyres. Antonelli, Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri all passed him.

Hamilton accepted responsibility. His finish should not be mistaken for proof that Ferrari lacked podium pace: Leclerc supplied the contrary evidence. The immediate task is to reproduce that competitiveness at a different circuit and convert it into two strong results.

More practice should improve Ferrari’s tyre assessment. Fred Vasseur said Singapore’s limited running had left uncertainty, with the soft compound proving stronger relative to the medium than expected. Austin requires fresh evidence, not assumptions carried from the previous race.

Pirelli’s analysis of the 2025 United States Grand Prix offers a useful reference. Thirteen drivers adopted the medium-soft combination, the most popular strategy of the race. Charles Leclerc was the exception among the podium finishers, starting on the soft compound to gain an early grip advantage.

That history may influence Ferrari’s preparations, but the 2026 tyres and conditions will require a fresh assessment. A softer starting compound could provide an advantage off the line, particularly on the uphill approach to Turn 1, while exposing the driver to greater degradation later in the stint.

Hamilton remains nine points behind Russell and eight ahead of Verstappen. Ferrari holds second in the constructors’ standings, with 444 points against Mercedes’ 578. Hamilton’s position and Ferrari’s constructors’ standing leave little room for another missed opportunity.

Norris described McLaren as fourth-fastest in Singapore and said upgrades were needed. Piastri was similarly restrained. Fourth and fifth recovered points, but neither driver suggested the team had solved its deficit to the leaders.

Ferrari needs to convert its pace into results from both cars. McLaren first needs to show that more speed is available.

It also needs both drivers contributing. McLaren leads Red Bull by seven points in the constructors’ standings, 339 to 332. Norris and Piastri’s Singapore Sprint collision prompted Andrea Stella to reiterate that the team’s interests must come first. Another internal incident would be costly while Verstappen is winning.

Haas returns to its home Grand Prix seventh in the constructors’ standings, seven points ahead of Audi. Oliver Bearman and Esteban Ocon finished 12th and 13th in Singapore, while Hlkenberg scored eighth.

Bearman felt another couple of tenths per lap could have brought points. Ocon reported insufficient grip and excessive sliding. Additional practice gives Haas time to investigate Ocon’s complaints while building on Bearman’s greater confidence in the car.

Further ahead, Racing Bulls has 100 points against Alpine’s 68. Liam Lawson’s seventh strengthened that advantage in Singapore. Pierre Gasly described rear-tyre and traction difficulties that prevented Alpine from converting qualifying speed into race points-a weakness COTA’s slower exits will examine again.

Pirelli expects track grip to be generally good, helped by the supporting categories, including Porsche Carrera Cup North America. But the choice between preserving tyre life and extracting maximum performance remains an important calculation for every team.

For Mercedes, the longer runs will show whether Antonelli can use the upgrade’s extra performance consistently while keeping the tyres within their operating window. Verstappen and Leclerc have already demonstrated what happens when Mercedes falls short.

Antonelli has enough of a championship advantage to accept a result short of victory. His team’s task is to give him a genuine choice.

In Austin, the stopwatch will measure the speed. The tyres may determine how long that speed can last.

Blackwater in mission impossible to reach quarterfinals

BLACKWATER is no longer seeking a miracle to enter the playoff round when it battles Barangay Ginebra San Miguel on Friday-the last day of eliminations of the Philippine Basketball Association Governors’ Cup-at the Ynares Sports Center in Antipolo City.

But for Bossing head coach Pat Aquino, a victory is more than enough in their 7:30 p.m. game against Ginebra-whether it’s by one point or more.

‘We need a miracle to make it happen, not just a miracle but an extraordinary phenomenon,’ Aquino told BusinessMirror on Thursday, referring to their inferior -37 quotient heading to the game where they need to win by 44 points against the Gin Kings to miraculously bag a quarterfinal berth.

Sitting at the bottom with a 3-6 win-loss record in Group B, Blackwater is just satisfied to finish the season on a high note.

‘We are not closing the door for such a possibility or such miracle, but a win is already huge for us even by one point.’

Ginebra, on the other hand, is enjoying a +30 quotient with their 4-5 record.

A victory over Blackwater will give them the third spot, but Ginebra must not lose by less than 24 points as Meralco (4-6) will automatically snatch the fourth spot with +7 quotient.

Ginebra will face the No. 2 team in Group A which might be San Miguel Beer (9-3).

Meanwhile, Rain or Shine (5-4) aims for No. 2 spot in Group B as it clashes against Phoenix Super LPG (5-4) at 5:15 pm. The loser of this match will slide to No. 4 facing the No. 1 team in Group A NLEX in best-of-five quarterfinals.

The No. 2 team in Group B will face No. 3 Converge team in Group A while Group B solo leader Magnolia is set to face Group A No. 4 finisher reigning champion TNT Tropang 5G in the best-of-five quarterfinals playoff.

Users of generative AI tools up by 57.2% – report

More than a third of the world’s population now uses generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools every month, while social media has reached nearly 70 percent of people worldwide, shifting online activity away from the traditional web, according to the latest global digital trends report.

The Digital 2027 report, released on Wednesday by creative agency We Are Social and media intelligence firm Meltwater, estimated that active users of generative AI tools have climbed to 3.24 billion, or 38.9 percent of the global population. That is an increase of 57.2 percent in the past 12 months, or 1.2 billion new users.

ChatGPT remains the leader in the generative AI market, with twice as many monthly active users as its nearest rival.

However, the report said rivals, such as Google’s Gemini and Anthropic’s Claude, are gaining ground. Active users of Gemini’s mobile app quadrupled over the past year, and its web user base is now more than 60 percent the size of ChatGPT’s.

Social media user interest will continue to grow. Statistics showed the addition of 151 million new identities, equivalent to 6.9 percent of the global population.

People are also spending more time on these platforms. The typical internet user increased time spent on social media and online video platforms by 3.8 percent over the past year, to an average of 19 hours and 18 minutes per week.

YouTube captured the largest share of total global social media time, followed closely by WhatsApp and Instagram. TikTok, however, led in average time spent per active user, at 1 hour and 55 minutes per day.

The report found that social platforms remain central to shopping decisions among young consumers, with 46.9 percent of internet users aged 16 to 24 relying on platforms such as Instagram and Facebook as their primary source of information when researching brands and potential purchases.

The report also found that the growth of AI and native mobile apps is cutting into traditional web use. Across the world’s top 10,000 web domains, total monthly traffic has declined by more than 10 percent since ChatGPT’s public launch, and total time spent on the web has fallen 11.2 percent in just the past 24 months.

Search engines, however, still hold an edge in brand discovery. Online adults remain 74 percent more likely to say they turn to search engines when researching brands than to an AI platform. The report noted that AI is not the only factor reshaping web behavior.

‘AI is changing how people discover brands, but social remains central to where people spend their time and form preferences. The conversations, recommendations and opinions people make, share online are increasingly informing the answers AI gives and the decisions people make,’ said Suzie Shaw, CEO of We Are Social Asia-Pacific (APAC).

‘For brands, that changes the game. You can optimize what you publish, but you don’t control what people say about you,’ Shaw added. ‘The brands that win won’t just be the ones that appear in AI-generated answers, but the ones people are genuinely interested in, talking about and recommending in the first place.’

Internet users globally now total 5.61 billion, or 73.9 percent of the world’s population. The typical online adult uses an average of 5.8 different channels to discover new brands.

Given this, advertisers are following audiences online. Digital ad spending rose 8.7 percent over the past year, with spending on social media advertising up 18 percent and influencer advertising up 15 percent.

Mimrah Mahmood, Meltwater’s APAC VP of enterprise sales, said brands in the region can no longer depend on a single platform given how widely digital habits differ across markets.

billboards do the job socmed

‘With generative AI adoption surging nearly 60 percent in the last year, the customer journey is being rewritten in real time, changing how people discover information and evaluate brands,’ Mahmood said.

He said marketers and communicators must move away from tracking channels in isolation and instead understand their total brand presence across news, social media, search and AI-powered platforms.

‘Because cultural context and language heavily shape how APAC audiences perceive brands, bringing together media, social, and AI intelligence is now essential for teams to spot emerging shifts and focus their efforts where it actually moves the needle,’ he said.

The 900-page report draws on data from GWI, Similarweb and Statista, among other sources.

In a lighter finding, it noted that cats continue to edge out dogs online, with Google searches returning 4.15 billion results for cats against 4.02 billion for dogs at the end of 2026.

Prosecution panel submits evidence vs Sara

THE House prosecution panel has formally submitted its evidence on Vice President Sara Z. Duterte’s alleged unexplained wealth ahead of the October 23 deadline, seeking to prevent procedural disputes from delaying the resumption of her impeachment trial on November 9.

Private prosecutor Lorna Kapunan said the panel deliberately filed its formal offer of evidence on Tuesday to give the defense time to submit comments and objections and allow the Senate Impeachment Court to resolve evidentiary issues before the next hearing.

The formal offer identifies the documentary and testimonial evidence the prosecution wants the senator-judges to admit, including financial records and testimony concerning assets, corporate interests and transactions allegedly involving Duterte and her husband, lawyer Manases Carpio.

‘It has not been a break for us, really, because, as everybody knows, we have a 10-day deadline to file our formal offer on the remaining article, which is unexplained wealth. And we filed it [Tuesday],’ Kapunan said in a TV interview.

She explained that the defense’s 10-day period for filing objections begins upon receipt of the prosecution’s submission, making an early filing crucial to keeping the trial on schedule.

‘Our deadline is supposed to be the day after tomorrow [October 23], but we filed it today only because the reckoning period for the defense starts from the time they receive it,’ Kapunan said.

Kapunan said the presiding officer must rule on the defense’s objections before the proceedings resume. She added that Duterte’s lawyers are required to identify their witnesses five days before the trial, allowing time for subpoenas to be issued and for the prosecution to prepare for cross-examination.

‘Five days before the trial, they have to name their witnesses. Five days before the trial,’ she stressed.

EU, Philippines conduct second security and defense dialogue

THE European Union and the Philippines recently held their second Security and Defense Dialogue in Manila.

During the dialogue on October 8, both parties reaffirmed their shared commitment to enhancing alignment on multilateral fora to uphold the rules-based international order.

They held substantive discussions on regional security dynamics, focusing on maritime security, including critical maritime infrastructure and freedom of navigation, and emphasized the importance of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea or UNCLOS.

The security and defense exchanges, along with the EU’s recent announcement of its first-ever European Peace Facility assistance measure in Asia-with a pound 15-million package for the Philippines-demonstrate the bloc’s strong commitment to promoting stability and security in the region.

Managing Director for Peace, Security and Defence, and European External Action Service Benedikta von Seherr-Thoss, and Foreign Affairs Undersecretary for Policy Leo Herrera-Lim jointly chaired the dialogue.

Teaching: A lifelong mission and legacy

LAST October 5, we celebrated World Teachers Day. The day went unnoticed without much fanfare. Sadly, it is quotidian as that: teachers are ordinary ‘unsung’ folks and, yet, they create all other professions, transforming and guiding those who choose the path to carry the torch of civilization forward.

Teachers share the greatest gift of knowledge to empower students for the betterment of humanity. Such nobility is not for the ordinary: it is for those whose profound mission is shaping the future, one mind at a time, by constantly outpouring their own knowledge, experience, patience, and spirit into others.

Teaching is not merely a job or a career path where competition for promotion, high recognition and huge wealth drives motivation. While many professions deal with tangible products or immediate results, teachers deal with the most precious human resources. The nobility of teaching is being selfless; giving one’s all without counting the cost.

I am a proud teacher.

Over five decades of active and stimulating engagements in various universities and corporations where I led and mentored thousands of students and employees to be the best of who they are and what they can do. I honed them to discover, invent and to grow.

I did not envision to be a teacher. I discovered my passion as an insight from the journey I took from the start; willed myself into it so that I could share and engage others to rise above themselves. That journey is its own reward.

From then on, I have not ceased to be a lifelong learner. My fruitful interactions with students made me whole. I was happy then and now. I do not only teach knowledge and skills; I share values that make life more meaningful for them.

Knowledge and skills are easily learned especially at this time and age; but life’s choices are lived metaphysically and requires full integrity.

The nobility of teaching

AT its core, teaching is an act of hope.

Every moment the teacher engages his students, they invest in their future that, alas, they may never see. They form character, not just teach facts and figures, but values, critical thinking, and sense of wonder. A great teacher creates an environment of mentoring, counseling, and cheerleading that make the unique sparks of students turn into flame. This requires an immense amount of empathy and resilience.

A teacher’s influence doesn’t end when the bell rings or when the semester concludes. It lives on in the decisions their students make, the careers they pursue, and the kindness they show others. In a constantly-changing world, the teacher remains a steady anchor, providing the foundation upon which all other professions are built. Doctors, engineers, and leaders all start in a classroom, guided by a teacher who believed in them. This is the enduring legacy of teaching.

Ultimately, to teach is to love. It is to love the truth, to love the process of discovery, and most importantly, to love the students. It is this love that transforms a simple lesson into a life-changing experience.

The nobility of the profession is not found in grand accolades or wealth, but in the quiet, transformative moments: a student finally understanding a difficult concept, a shy student finding their voice, or a graduate returning later to say: ‘Thank you for not giving up on me.’

These words, uttered in complete humility and denouement are just rewards money cannot value. Let me share some more from my former students.

billboards do the job socmed

A former MBA student, now based in Singapore, called me by phone and said: ‘Sir, I really appreciate the lessons of life you shared with us in MBA-to be the best of who I am and what I can do.’

‘I am sorry have somewhat forgotten the financial skills you expertly taught us, but these words of encouragement and hope are the most valuable and will stay forever. Thank you so much.’

A former law school student wrote: ‘Sir, this semester has been an absolute pleasure. The way you teach, the way you are able to insert jokes and inspiring messages even as you talk about a subject most of us find intimidating, has been one of the better things of this semester.’

‘We will forever treasure the lessons you’ve taught us, and how, in a big way, you’ve helped us face our fears. No more fears, just understanding and appreciation. Thank you very much, Sir.’

I had an accident that broke my right ankle four years ago. At midnight, I was wheeled into the emergency of a medical center in Pasig. The orthopedic surgeon came in.

He introduced himself saying, ‘Sir, do you remember me? I was your MBA-MD student in Finance.’ He lifted up my spirits and helped restore my walking ability.

It was my turn to say ‘Thank you, doctor!’

Dr Cesar Azurin Mansibang was a senior corporate executive, educator and Dean of the College of Accountancy of Dr. Yanga’s Colleges, Inc. and active officer and member of the Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The views and opinions he expressed herein do not necessarily represent the BusinessMirror.

Mapúa University joins IIOE Southeast Asia Task Force as Founding University Member

Mapúa University has been selected as a Founding University Member of the International Institute of Online Education (IIOE) Southeast Asia Task Force, following a highly competitive regional selection process involving 78 higher education institutions across ten Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) member countries.

The IIOE Southeast Asia Task Force brings together higher education institutions and regional partners to advance digital transformation and the responsible integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education across Southeast Asia.

The appointment was formally announced by the (SEAMEO) Secretariat in partnership with the International Centre for Higher Education Innovation under the auspices of UNESCO (UNESCO ICHEI). Mapúa’s participation was likewise endorsed by the Department of Education of the Philippines, further affirming University’s role in shaping the future of higher education within the region.

As a Founding University Member, Mapúa will serve an initial two-year term, collaborating with selected universities, SEAMEO Regional Centres, UNESCO ICHEI, and other regional partners. Through the Task Force, members will contribute to shaping regional priorities, sharing institutional and national perspectives, mobilizing expertise and networks, supporting program implementation and research initiatives, and strengthening the broader IIOE Southeast Asia University Network.

The selection reflects Mapúa’s demonstrated capabilities and commitment to digital transformation, AI innovation, and responsible and inclusive technology adoption. The regional process involved extensive eligibility screening, technical evaluation, and portfolio review, assessing institutions based on their vision and commitment to change, accomplishments in AI and digitalization, academic and technical capability. The final composition of the Task Force was also considered to ensure diverse representation across countries, institution types, and areas of expertise.

Being named as one of the founding members from a highly competitive pool of institutions across the region underscores the institution’s capability and potential to make significant contributions to the transformation of higher education in Southeast Asia.

The Task Force is envisioned as a collaborative platform dedicated to accelerating innovation in higher education through digital technologies, AI, and cross-border partnerships. By bringing together leading institutions across Southeast Asia, the initiative aims to promote knowledge-sharing, strengthen institutional capacities, and advance responsible and inclusive approaches to educational transformation.

Expanding Regional Engagement

As part of the Task Force’s inaugural activities, Mapúa has been invited to nominate one Senior Institutional Representative and one Student Representative to participate in the Korea-Southeast Asia University Leadership and Student Transformation Programme and the 4th Gumi Education Forum in the Republic of Korea in November 2026.

The fully funded program will convene university leaders and students from across Southeast Asia for regional planning sessions, institutional exchanges, engagement with Korean universities and industry partners. Participants will also take part in discussions on the future of higher education and have opportunities to share their institutions’ experiences and best practices with regional and international stakeholders.

Mapúa’s participation in the IIOE Southeast Asia Task Force reflects its commitment to innovation, responsible AI adoption, and international collaboration. As the University engages with regional and international partners through the initiative, it will continue contributing to the development of future-ready learning environments and the transformation of higher education across Southeast Asia.