A senior Barbados government minister is urging Caribbean countries to establish their own monitoring and evaluation systems reflecting the the realities of small island states.
Economic Affairs and Planning Minister, Marsha Caddle, told the inaugural launch of the Caribbean Development Bank’s (CDB) Caribbean Evaluation Space (CEvalSpace 2026) that the region needed to recognise the particular vulnerabilities of small island states when adopting evaluation frameworks designed for larger, wealthier countries.
The CDB has described CEvalSpace 2026 as the region’s first dedicated platform for strengthening evaluation and evidence-based policymaking across the Caribbean. The conference continues Wednesday with delegates discussing ‘AI, Data, and Power: Shaping the Future of Evaluation in the Caribbean and ‘From Data to Action: Unlocking Evidence Use in the Caribbean.’
Addressing the conference which provides the estimated 150 regional and international participants an opportunity to strengthen evaluation systems and practice across the Caribbean, Caddle said that a results framework copied wholesale from a G20 finance ministry is going to ask the wrong questions of the region’s public service, size, and history, serving populations that are as small, as interconnected, and exposed.
‘We are entitled, and I would say that we are obligated, to build monitoring and evaluation systems that are honestly ours and not borrowed ones that we are quietly hoping will fit,’ she said, noting that the monitoring and evaluation systems needed to belong to the Caribbean.
She said that gross domestic product (GDP) per capita alone does not adequately capture the vulnerability of small island states, especially those exposed to natural disasters.
‘A GDP per capita test on its own tells the world almost nothing about how exposed a country like ours is to a single hurricane wiping out a quarter of GDP in an afternoon,’ Caddle said, reiterating that international measures do not adequately account for small states’ ability to adapt to technological change.
The Economic Affairs and Planning Minister said Caribbean countries have spent years fighting to have their vulnerabilities recognised, including their exposure to natural disasters and other risks.
‘Small island states cannot allow our progress toward these goals to be measured entirely by indicators built for economies many times our size, with none of our exposure. We’ve had to fight for years,’ she said, adding that the CDB has been one of those institutions fighting for years for recognition of ‘our particular vulnerability to a single storm, to a narrow economic base, to a debt structure shaped by decades of borrowing to rebuild the same damaged infrastructure again.’
Caddle said that Caribbean countries could continue to be measured and financed according to standards developed elsewhere if they do not establish and defend their own resilience measures.
‘If we don’t build and defend our own resilience metrics and demonstrate our own capacity to build resilience ourselves and to show the world how to do so, we are going to keep being measured and financed by somebody else’s definition of what counts as vulnerable or what counts as resilience, and reporting our own SDG progress against a yardstick that was never really meant to see us clearly,’ she said.
During her address, she called for an honest evaluation of progress towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), a collection of 17 global targets adopted by the United Nations in 2015 as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure peace and prosperity.
She said such evaluation must be undertaken alongside better metrics designed for small, exposed economies.
‘As we approach 2030, I would ask this space to treat two tasks as equally urgent. First, the honest, rigorous evaluation of where we actually stand against these goals, wherever that evidence is uncomfortable, and second, the harder, longer work of making sure the instruments we use to measure ourselves were actually built with small, exposed, interconnected economies like ours in mind.’
Caddle said Caribbean states also need to build greater regional cooperation, warning against each country developing separate evaluation systems, data infrastructure and resilience indexes.
‘It is distinctly unhelpful to have a dozen or more small Caribbean states each trying to replicate the same institutional endeavour separately, when a shared one would serve us all better. I think that this also applies to evaluation and monitoring capacity, as much as it applies to any other function in a small state government.
‘We don’t each need to build from nothing our own fully independent school of evaluators. Even though we do all need to build into our work the practice of evaluation, but we don’t need to build our own fully separate data infrastructure, our own fully isolated resilience index,’ Caddle said, urging the development of a regional evaluation community.
‘We need a regional evaluation community that shares your methods, your people, and hard-won lessons the way this space is trying to do this week,’ Caddle said, adding that the regional approach could allow successful monitoring frameworks and expertise to be adapted across countries rather than being recreated from scratch.
‘Where a monitoring framework that works in one jurisdiction gets adapted and not reinvented in the next, where an evaluator that has been trained in one island, one small state, can be useful, can work, can bring their knowledge and expertise to be in another, where the region itself becomes a unit of learning, and becomes a space where we demonstrate to the world what works well, not just the sum of a few countries’ separate national efforts.’
She said that this evaluation should not only focus on whether individual projects achieve their intended results, but whether the systems behind them can deliver consistently.
‘Are the frameworks, the mechanisms, the systems that produce these projects and these results year after year actually built to work reliably? This goes back to one of your three core pillars of your strategy, which has to do with the strength of institutions and systems.
‘So, do these systems actually work reliably? Were they built to work reliably, or did this project succeed in spite of a process that could just as easily fail on the next occasion?’
‘A results framework that only ever evaluates individual projects will keep telling you the same reassuring story about the ones that happen to go well, while the mechanism underneath them stays exactly as fragile as it was before.’
Caddle said that data collection must lead to action, arguing that it’s pointless to measure a problem if there is no intention to respond to the findings.
‘Every indicator in a national evaluation framework should be able to answer the question: If this number comes back bad, what am I going to do about it? And if nobody can answer that, the indicator is decoration. It’s not evidence.’