Doha podium finish lightens up Nakaayi

Halimah Nakaayi felt at home and largely relieved after she produced a season best (SB) performance at the Wanda Diamond League (DL) leg in Doha, Qatar on Friday night.

On the back of a disappointing day in California, USA during the previous weekend, Nakaayi bounced back to post a third-place finish over the women’s 800 metres in the Suheim bin Hamad Stadium in Doha.

‘I am so very happy to be competing here!’ Nakaayi said after posting a time of one minute and 58.41 seconds.

‘I have the best memories from Doha, because being here always reminds me of the world title I won back in 2019. Whenever I am here I feel as if I need to defend my title, but finishing in the top three is okay too,’ Nakaayi added.

The result sparked huge confidence in Nakaayi considering she has spent a greater of the build-up to her season with strategic focus on endurance.

A lover of the inside lane, Nakaayi was tucked in early behind pace setter Dutch Lisanne de Witte, who took the field through 400 metres in 56.56 seconds.

Upon the bell, eventual race winner American Addison Wiley got ahead of Nakaayi and the duo surged forward. It was inside the home stretch that Ethiopia’s Tsige Dugume came through lane 2 to beat Nakaayi to second place in 1:58.08.

Already ahead, Wiley had won her first outdoor two-lap race of the season in a time of 1:57.98.

The result for the 2019 world champion Nakaayi came moments after Uganda Athletics (UAt) named her as part of the athletics team that will represent the country at the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, Scotland next month.

Nakaayi is among the eight female athletes in a 17-member group named by UAt. The cast also includes two-time 3000 metres steeplechase Olympic medalist Peruth Chemutai and impressive long-distance runner Joy Cheptoyek.

Kenya-based Cheptoyek picked a silver medal at the World Athletics Cross-Country Championships in Florida, USA in January.

The more experienced Oscar Chelimo will lead the men’s group that comprises a bunch of rising stars like Keneth Kiprop, Dan Kibet and long jumper David Berkham Otim.

DOHA DIAMOND LEAGUE

WOMEN’S 800 METRES RESULT

1 Addison Wiley (USA) 1:57.98

2 Tsige Duguma (ETH) 1:58.08

3 Halimah Nakaayi (UGA) 1:58:41

UGANDA ATHLETICS TEAM TO COMMONWEALTH GAMES

Women: Maureen Banura and Shida Leni (400 Metres), Halimah Nakaayi (800 Metres), Knight Aciru (1500 Metres), Peruth Chemutai (3000 Metres Steeplechase), Rebecca Chelangat and Esther Chebet (5000 Metres), Joy Cheptoyek (10000 Metres)

Men: Haron Adoli and Kenneth Omuka (400 Metres), Silas Chemutai (Mile), Oscar Chelimo, Dominic Kiprop, Dan Kibet and Keneth Kiprop (5000 Metres), Harbert Kibet (10000 Metres), David Berkham Otim (Long Jump)

Officials: Paul Okello (Coach / Manager), Jimmy Issamat (Coach), Quinto Oding (Coach / Physiotherapist), Suzan Laker (Administrator)

UOC court NFT Consults to develop human resource in sports

The ongoing process that requires national sports organisations to be registered by National Council of Sports (NCS) will come with extended challenges.

Suddenly federations that have been operating just within Kampala “will need a countrywide structure (to meet the elements of the law that require them to have operations in at least 50 to 75 percent of the districts in Uganda),” according to Uganda Olympic Committee (UOC) president Donald Rukare.

However, questions linger on whether the existing sports ecosystem has enough know-how within to handle this growth.

Meanwhile, the sector still struggles with untrained administrators and elite athletes retire with no pathway into the life after. Also, since sports is not considered a viable career sector, a lot of employable talent goes to serve in other sectors.

It is from this background and more that UOC, a convening authority for organizations and individuals in the sports sector, is partnering with human resource firm NFT Consults to pilot a National Sports Employment and Talent Development Initiative (NSETDI).

“This is a timely concept. Call it an internship programme on positive steroids that will create a pathway for national sports employment.

“NFT wants to help us identify (employable) talent, develop it, and look for the requisite placement in the work market. Our people, say in marketing and sales, would like to have that one year of help to develop their talent and we would also like to leverage on NFT’s expertize, knowledge, and connections,” Rukare said.

UOC and Uganda Athletics general secretary Beatrice Ayikoru added that “many of us serving in sports are volunteers and would like to beef up our human resource to help with the day-to-day tasks of the federations. We are open to see how best we can work with each other.”

NFT Consult brings 21 years of deep expertise in talent placement, training design, stakeholder engagement, and programme management across public and private sectors in 12 countries.

“Uganda stands at a pivotal moment. With one of Africa’s youngest populations, a rapidly expanding sports sector, co-hosting rights for Afcon (Africa Cup of Nations) 2027, and deep connections to the global Olympic movement, the country has every ingredient needed to transform sport from an activity into an industry. NSETDI is designed to make that transformation real,” Elizabeth Ntege, the chief executive officer of NFT Consult, said.

Opportunities

The initiative, they believe, could create 5,000 meaningful careers for young Ugandans in the sports economy by 2030.

Those targeted include; transitioning athletes, sports-adjacent graduates, those not in education or employment, women in sport, sports administrators, plus refugees and displaced youth.

NSETDI maps nine career pathway domains in which these jobs can be created. These include; sports development which would target sports officers and the media, business and managements targeting agents and other professionals in sport, elite performance support designed for nutritionists and analysts among others, events and hospitality, leisure and fitness industry, integrity and anti-doping, technology and data, media and content economy, e-sports and gaming.

NFT and UOC – which provides internship, sports administration and management courses, plus athlete career development programmes – also believe that Afcon 2027, which will be co-hosted by Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania, could create time-bound demand for thousands of trained sports professionals.

The Olympic movement (IOC, Anoca, Olympic Solidarity, and the Olympic Refuge Foundation) also has active funding programmes targeting career development initiatives and, according to NFT’s proposal “are also actively seeking models for sports workforce development that can be scaled across Africa.”

UOC is a proven employer as it retains some of its best interns. Imagine if the whole sports sector had the capacity to do the same.

“Uganda’s sports sector is trapped in a paradox. It produces world-class athletes but cannot produce the workforce needed to sustain, professionalise, or economically develop the sector. In other instances, employers take advantage of people in sports because they have passion and are willing to serve for anything. We need to professionalize,” Ntege said.

Cry for Lukwago and others, but the real tears are for Uganda

The spate of abductions Ugandans have witnessed since 2016 has now reached alarming proportions. People are living in fear, especially those supporting the Opposition. While social media has created the illusion of free speech, those speaking out sometimes have to use fake names. They know the chances of facing dire consequences are high. At first, many believed abductions targeted individuals posing a threat to national security. The State could argue, with reason, that it was resorting to extreme measures to protect everyone.

But as the government continues to lose popularity, abduction has become a tool to silence the Opposition. It now seems anyone who dares challenge those wielding real power risks being abducted. Worryingly, security forces have inflicted physical and mental torture on victims, sometimes leading to death. Several cases have been documented. The most recent involved a 22-year-old woman named Irene Nakibuuka. She was reportedly abducted on election day in January, tortured and later released – only to die weeks later. The alleged abduction and torture exacerbated her underlying conditions.

On Monday, it was former Kampala Mayor Erias Lukwago’s turn. He is one of the senior lawyers representing Dr Kizza Besigye, who was abducted in Nairobi, Kenya in November 2024 along with his aide, Obeid Lutale, and transferred to Uganda to face treason charges. The case against Dr Besigye now looks highly questionable because nearly every Ugandan capable of independent judgment is asking why the State has failed to conduct a proper trial if, as it claims, it has incontrovertible evidence against him and co-defendants.

Mr Lukwago has worked tremendously hard to ensure Dr Besigye gets justice, but to no avail. There is nothing he has done that contravenes the law. In fact, it is the government that has used questionable means in its handling of the case, including arraigning him before a military court, a move his lawyers successfully challenged in the Supreme Court. Even if Mr Lukwago had committed a crime, the government would be obliged to use lawful means of arrest. Instead, armed men believed to be operatives of the Special Forces Command (SFC) abducted him.

A pertinent question many Ugandans are asking is why a lawyer or any law-abiding citizen should be abducted instead of being arrested. The abductions we have witnessed are intended to humiliate those targeted. Mr Lukwago’s wife told reporters that when she tried to stop the armed men from abducting her husband, her arm was twisted and she was kicked to the floor. Her story is reminiscent of what happened to Barbie [Barbra Kyagulanyi], the wife of Opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi, aka Bobi Wine. When security forces stormed their home in January, they smashed doors, climbed into the ceiling, pulled her hair and partially undressed her. The couple have since fled the country and is currently living in the United States.

Individuals ordering these abductions appear to operate above the law. When Mr Lukwago was abducted, the Commander of the Defence Forces, Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, posted humiliating photos that he claimed are of Lukwago on his X page. Some have cast doubt on the authenticity of the images, but even if they are fake, the intent appears to have been to humiliate him. The real problem for Mr Lukwago and dozens of Ugandans languishing in illegal detention centres is that they have no effective recourse to justice. In Kitalya, many Opposition supporters, especially those backing the National Unity Platform, have been held without trial, some for years.

This impunity should worry every Ugandan. If a lawyer and prominent Opposition figure can be abducted in broad daylight and held illegally, then ordinary citizens are at a much bigger risk. We claim to be a democracy. But the truth is we are an autocracy with a capital A.

What lessons can we pick from Muganga’s debacle?

In the recent vetting process in Parliament, the provisions of Uganda’s law on dual citizenship were tested to the core. Appointed by the President as Minister of State for Internal Affairs, Dr Lawrence Muganga (PhD), the vice chancellor of Victoria University, was turned down by Parliament’s Appointments Committee on citizenship grounds, specifically that the academic held dual citizenship, and perhaps more.

Ongoing public commentary on social and print media has since framed the matter in starkly different lights: legal purism versus ethnic discrimination, strict statutory compliance versus presidential prerogative, national security versus regional affiliations. Dr Muganga himself alleged that ‘what I experienced in that Committee was not parliamentary oversight. It was hatred. It was discrimination. It was racism.’

Many Ugandans of Rwandan descent probably saw in his rejection the shadow of historical prejudice of Banyarwanda, who are a cross-border ethnicity, being made to feel like outsiders in their own country. But before we rush to label this as xenophobia, we must separate the law from sentiment and identity from eligibility.

Does Uganda’s legal framework provide for dual citizenship or multiple citizenship?

Our Constitution, as amended in 2005, permits dual citizenship, the simultaneous possession of two citizenships, one of which must be Ugandan, as explicitly defined in the Uganda Citizenship and Immigration Control (Amendment) Act of 2009. Not three, not more. A person holding three passports, as was alleged of Dr Muganga (Uganda, Canada, and Rwanda), would, therefore, fall outside the legal provisions Parliament designed.

Is the Fifth Schedule enshrined a barrier?

Article 15(7) of the Constitution empowers Parliament to prescribe which State offices a dual citizen is not qualified to hold. Parliament exercised that power through the Fifth Schedule of the 2009 Amendment Act, which explicitly lists the President, Vice President, Prime Minister, and Cabinet ministers among the positions barred to dual citizens.

The reasoning behind this restriction, captured in the 2009 parliamentary Hansard, revolved around loyalty and security. Then Chua County Member of Parliament (MP) Livingstone Okello Okello asked a question that still echoes today: ‘I wonder what would happen if I belonged to two countries and the two countries went to war. Which one will I support?’ Charles Angiro of Erute North warned of persons ‘who will be recruited to spy either in Uganda or outside.’ These anxieties, however imperfect as predictors of individual conduct, shaped a law that simultaneously expanded citizenship rights and drew boundaries around the most sensitive organs of State.

So, did Parliament’s Appointment Committee act lawfully by red-flagging Dr Muganga?

Whether one agrees with the Fifth Schedule or not, it is the law. The Uganda Law Society (ULS) emphasised that eligibility for high public office must be assessed strictly within the constitutional framework.

Four other ministerial nominees who faced dual citizenship issues were approved after providing proof of renunciation. Dr Muganga, by contrast, was reportedly unable to satisfy the committee on the status of his Canadian and alleged Rwandan citizenships.

Moreover, the Internal Affairs ministry to which he was appointed oversees immigration and citizenship, the very docket in which dual allegiances raise the most concerns.

What I would fault the vetting process on is their failure, at the outset, to ask the basic question: Is there a legal barrier? Not having done that, they missed the wood for the trees. In the event, the Appointments Committee applied the law as written. The rejection was not fundamentally based on xenophobia toward his Rwandan heritage, but on a strict statutory bar against dual and a fortiori multiple citizens holding such ministerial office.

Is the capacity to serve about character of the individual?

Character and qualifications are the true test of fitness for office. Even sole Ugandan nationals can harbour conflicts of interest, to the extent of betraying the country. The vetting process exists precisely to assess the integrity, judgment, and loyalty of nominees.

If a dual citizen, or even a triple citizen, were it legal, can satisfy that scrutiny, why should the law bar him or her? Remember, Dr Muganga, as vice chancellors of one of our universities, was at the helm of an institution trusted and expected to contribute to strategic national interests.

The 2009 Parliament, in my opinion, took a legal-come-constitutional sledgehammer to what might have been addressed with a vetting scalpel. The result is a law that captures many who are not of the ilk the drafters feared. The barrier to ministerial appointment for dual nationals is a blunt instrument.

The character of the nominee, as vetted by the appointing authority, is a far better metric. The vetting tools at the disposal of the appointing authority far exceed the anxieties and suspicions, entrenched in the Fifth Schedule, in screening out individuals who pose a threat to national security and self-interest.

As our nation is increasingly acquiring in its stock dual nationals, especially among the elite, we deprive ourselves of their contribution to governance if we are punitively restrictive to their participation by identity rather than competence.

What about the regional dimension and the hurdle to integration?

The Muganga case raises a question far larger than one man’s appointment. It forces us to confront the awkward gap between our regional integration project and our national instincts. The East African Community Common Market Protocol guarantees free movement of persons, labour, and capital. We aspire to an East African Political Federation, invoking the vision of our founding fathers from independence. Yet when a highly qualified Ugandan of Rwandan descent is nominated for ministerial office, the public response reveals a nation still deeply entrenched in national insulation. Will the same level of suspicion fall on Ugandans whose second nationality is that of a former coloniser as that of another colonised regional neighbour with whom we are pursuing a political project of federation?

The mere fact of a Rwandan name was enough to fuel suspicion, regardless of the legal status of his passport. This is the deeper tragedy of the Muganga affair. Parliament acted within the law, but the societal fallout-the ethnic polarisation, the wounded sense of belonging among Ugandans of Rwandan descent-reveals that East Africans are not yet psychologically ready for the integration we claim to want. Free movement of persons is not the same as free access to political power. The former is an economic convenience; the latter is a profound transfer of sovereign trust. That transfer, as the Muganga case demonstrates, remains a bridge too far for many. If the East African Political Federation is to become more than a summit communiqué, we must cultivate a genuine East African identity that renders the national citizenship of a sister state unremarkable and not threatening.

Should we think deeply about remoulding the blunt instrument then?

The solution is not to ignore the law. Parliament was right to apply the Fifth Schedule as it stands. But the deeper question is whether the Fifth Schedule should stand at all, at least as it applies to citizens of EAC partner states. If we are serious about regional integration, we must eventually ask whether a Ugandan with dual citizenship and cross-border ethnicity, additionally holding the citizenship of a sister EC country, is truly a greater threat to national security than a Ugandan of purely indigenous heritage who chooses to betray his country.

The due diligence of the appointing authority should prevail, given the efficacy of the vetting process for issues of national security. The legal barrier to appointing dual nationals in ministerial office should be re-examined and perhaps repealed. To do this, we must look beyond the letter of the law and draft a new framework that more fairly delivers the spirit of the law, to be enshrined in the vetting tools of the appointing authority, and used for screening all appointments, dual citizen or not.

But until the law changes, we must apply it faithfully and be honest about its implications for our unfinished journey toward a truly united East Africa.

Francis Kamulegeya: ‘You got that promotion at work, and then what?’

There is a particular kind of confidence that settles on a man who has already won the arguments that matter. Mr Francis Kamulegeya carries it well. At the Fairway Hotel in Kampala on a recent evening, he sits before a room of young tax professionals, comprising of lawyers, accountants, people with MBAs and fresh ambitions, and tells them, without any drama, that credentials will open a door, competence will earn you a seat, but it is character that makes you stay in the room.

To understand where Mr Kamulegeya ended up, you have to start where he began: Masaka, 1967, in a home where his mother Josephine ran a licensed Enguli gin distillery. He grew up in the shadow of Idi Amin, with the military barracks so close they complicated his childhood. He left at eleven, just after the war that ended that particular chapter of Uganda’s misery. He went to Namasagali College, then Makerere University, to study agriculture from 1987 to 1990. Botany. Crop science. Entomology. He can still walk into a room, spot a plant, and tell you it’s Lantana camara. These are not skills that appear on any tax advisory brief.

They are, however, the skills of someone trained to read a system, to understand what something actually is, not just what it’s called. That habit of mind would travel everywhere with him. After graduating, he became a maize trader in Mbiriizi, a town in the southern part of the Central Region of Uganda (Lwengo District). His edge was that he could bite through a grain with his front teeth and tell you the moisture content. He did this for six months. Then he left for England. Between 1991 and 1992, Mr Kamulegeya did a tour of what he calls ‘every job that exists in this hotel’. He cooked potatoes. He cleaned toilets.

He drove a minibus. He worked as a lifeguard. One afternoon when a colleague didn’t show, he put on a white apron and white hat and served lunch to schoolchildren as the dinner lady and got paid double for the double shift. He was raising £5,400 (currently about Shs26.37 million) to enrol in college. Within 18 months, he had more than he needed. ‘For young professionals, it’s very, very important that you get into the habit of distinguishing who you are from what you do, so that when what you do changes, you do not lose your identity,’ he says.

He enrolled in college, qualified as an accountant in 1994, joined PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) London in 1996, and encountered a reform to the UK tax system called self-assessment. Something in his brain lit up and never quite went off again. He sat the exams of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, passed them, and became the first Ugandan ever to qualify as a UK Chartered Tax Advisor.

The poor cousin of audits

In 2000, PwC sent him to Uganda. The Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) had only been created in 1991. Value Added Tax (VAT) had been introduced as recently as 1996, replacing a patchwork of sales taxes, and was barely four years old. Many staff had simply been transferred from customs when the institution was set up. The big accounting firms in Kampala called themselves auditing firms. Tax, as Mr Kamulegeya puts it, was ‘a poor cousin of audits.’ He had seen something different. He had lived in a system where tax consulting was its own serious profession and the relationship between advisor and revenue authority was one of adversarial respect.

He walked into Uganda and saw, simultaneously, a problem and an enormous opportunity. Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s late partner and one of the more formidable minds in American finance, spent decades warning against what he called ‘man with a hammer syndrome’, who is the specialist who interprets every problem through a single lens. His antidote was a ‘latticework of mental models,’ drawing from biology, physics, psychology, and law simultaneously. Munger built a multi-billion-dollar fortune on cross-disciplinary thinking. Mr Kamulegeya built Uganda’s modern tax profession on something very similar, and arrived at it via botany, maize trading, and dinner lady shifts in Croydon.

‘Tax sits at the interface of almost everything,’ he says. ‘If you look at it just from a technical perspective and you stay in that very narrow lane, you are going to miss out.’ He built the PwC Uganda tax practice from seven people into a dominant market force, sending specialists abroad for years before the market knew it needed them: Crystal Kabajwara to the UK for transfer pricing, Pamela Natamba for oil and gas, and Trevor Bwanika to South Africa for international tax and mergers. Then he turned his attention to the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) itself. In 2004, a new Financial Institutions Act required banks to raise their minimum capital.

Mr Kamulegeya saw a solution URA had never encountered: issue bonus shares, using retained reserves to capitalise the banks. Legal under company law, standard in the UK, completely new in Uganda. The Revenue Authority said: bonus shares are dividends, and dividends are taxable. Mr Kamulegeya said: No; retained reserves already belong to the shareholders. Reissuing them as shares changes the form, not the substance. He won. URA promptly amended the Income Tax Act to define dividends to include bonus shares. Look at Section 2 today; it is there because of this fight. When the other side changes the law in response to your argument, it means your argument worked.

In 2010, Zain International BV, a Netherlands company, sold its pan-African mobile operations to Bharti Airtel in a deal worth $10.7 billion (Shs39.04 trillion). URA raised an $85 million (Shs310.16 billion) capital gains tax assessment on Zain’s Ugandan interests. Mr Kamulegeya took the other side. His instrument was surgical: the Uganda-Netherlands double taxation treaty, he told them, means no capital gain arises here.

You do not have the right to tax this. ‘A few of them,’ he says, with characteristic restraint, ‘that was the first time they knew about the treaty’. The case became one of the most-watched tax disputes in East African history, permanently changing how Uganda thinks about double taxation agreements and how multinationals structure investment through offshore holding companies.

Inclusion

In 2003, Mr Kamulegeya was a senior manager appearing on television to analyse the national budget. Then he ran into Moses Kirangwa (now deceased). Mr Kirangwa was a childhood friend from Masaka. They had grown up in the same village, played Gogolo (also known as the Rainbow Slide) as barefoot boys. Then Mr Kamulegeya left for Kampala, for England, and for PwC. Mr Kirangwa stayed. He was had an hearing impairment. He had never gone to school, not because he couldn’t learn, but because the system had decided there was no place for him. He was a cobbler, working from a bench on a street in Masaka.

When they reconnected after 25 years, communicating through an interpreter, Mr Kirangwa told Mr Kamulegeya something he has been acting on ever since: the difference between us is education. ‘Here I was, senior manager on the TV analysing the budget and people thinking I’m important, and this guy who I grew up with in the village told me that basically, if I didn’t go to school, I could be like him. He told me that because he had never seen me for the last 23 years, he had also assumed that I’d died.’

In 2005, Mr Kamulegeya co-founded the Masaka School for the Deaf with his late sister, Sophia Kafeero, with teachers, classrooms, a curriculum, and a plan. More than 1,200 deaf learners have since passed through it. Seventeen have graduated from university, according to his narration. There is now a vocational training institute alongside it, and a coffee farm where students are taught agriculture.

The man who once bit through maize grains to read their moisture content is now teaching deaf children to grow coffee. He also runs Time to Play, a children’s centre he opened in 2009 after his daughters visiting from England asked their house help, Annette, to take them to ‘the park’, and Annette, interpreting this sensibly for Kampala, offered them a tour of taxi parks. The misunderstanding, Mr Kamulegeya felt, was actionable. For years on Sundays, he would slip into the SpongeBob costume and work the floor. Nobody knew it was the Country Senior Partner of PwC Uganda inside the foam suit.

Retirement

In 2022, after 27 years at PwC, 12 as Country Senior Partner, eight on the PwC Africa Governance Board, the first Ugandan to serve on that body, Mr Kamulegeya left. He refuses to call it retirement. ‘I never ever wanted to be pushed out by a system simply because of a number. At 60 years of age, that’s the retirement age at PwC. But what happens to me at 60? I’ve been doing very, very well. So, I’m not going to just sit there waiting for the clock to tick.’

He left at the height of it. This is, among people who build careers, almost impossibly rare. He went to Thailand, came back looking 10 years younger, and built what he calls his second half; five board roles, including Chairman of IandM Bank Uganda, and a memoir, ‘And Then What? Reflections on Life, Leadership, and Meaning Beyond Success’, launched in April 2026. The question in the title is the most demanding one you can ask yourself. It prevents you from mistaking a milestone for a destination. You get the degree, and then what? You get the promotion, and then what?

More importantly, it is the question you ask once you have, by any reasonable measure, already succeeded. You’ve changed the law multiple times, built a school, mentored a generation. And then what? ‘If everything you’re doing is for yourself, it’s likely to end with you. And that would be very unfortunate. But if you do things that are going to endure, because your time is finite, it’s going to be long, but it’s very finite; you’ll continue.’ Back at the Fairway Hotel, the young professionals are still in the room.

This is one of ‘The Tax Nights’ organised by Edwin Echiba, a tax lawyer, on the first Thursday of the month. All of them have been in the presence of something increasingly rare: a man who built something significant, knows what he built, and is not confused about why. He wants to be remembered, he says, as the person who made a positive difference in whoever he met. ‘There’s no point holding knowledge without sharing it,’ he says. ‘Nobody knows what you know until you share it. And whenever you play it forward, it keeps going.’

Court orders URA staff to pay colleague Shs100m over WhatsApp defamation

The High Court has ordered a Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) staff member to pay a fellow employee Shs100 million in damages for defaming him through messages posted on a URA Senior Management WhatsApp group.

In a judgment delivered on June 17th, Justice Isaac Bonny Teko found that James Abola, a senior officer in URA’s Staff Compliance Department, defamed customs officer Nicholas Jjengo by circulating unverified allegations linking him to a shooting incident and suggesting he had pursued and attacked another man over a woman.

‘A declaration is issued that the defendant’s (Abola) publications of September 18, 2022, concerning the plaintiff (Jjengo) on the URA senior management WhatsApp forum were defamatory of the plaintiff (Jjengo),’ ruled Justice Teko.

Adding, ‘The defendant shall pay the plaintiff general damages for libel in the sum of Shs70m. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff exemplary damages in the sum of Shs30m.’

The court awarded Jjengo Shs70 million in general damages and Shs30 million in punitive damages, bringing the total award to Shs100 million. Abola was also ordered to issue a written apology within 14 days of the judgment on the same WhatsApp platform and was permanently restrained from making similar defamatory statements against his colleague.

‘The defendant (Abola) shall, within fourteen days from the date of this judgment, issue a written apology to the plaintiff (Jjengo), and publish the same on the URA Senior Management WhatsApp forum,’ the judge held.

The dispute arose from messages posted on September 18, 2022, in the URA Senior Management WhatsApp forum. In one of the messages, Abola informed senior managers that police in Kasangati were looking for Jjengo Nicholas, a Customs Officer who had allegedly fired three bullets at victims the previous night.

A second message went further, claiming that Jjengo had followed another man’s vehicle and opened fire after a woman allegedly chose to ride in the victim’s car instead of his following a social outing.

The judge explained that, however, qualified privilege protects responsible communication made in good faith; it does not protect reckless embellishment, sensationalism, or publication made with indifference to truth.

” The defendant’s (Abola) first message may have been closer to a preliminary management alert. The difficulty arises with the second message. The Defendant moved from reporting that police were looking for the Plaintiff (Jjengo) in relation to a firearm incident to circulating a narrative that the Plaintiff had pursued a victim over a woman from an outing and shot at the victim’s car. That narrative was grave, colourful, sensational and personally destructive,’ Justice Teko held.

Jjengo sued, arguing that the statements falsely portrayed him as a criminal, a violent individual, and an immoral person, thereby damaging his reputation among URA’s top leadership.

In his defence, Abola had noted that he had received the information from a police officer attached to the Staff Compliance Division and shared it in good faith as part of his official duties. He argued that the communication was made on an occasion of qualified privilege because it concerned a matter of legitimate interest to URA management.

However, Justice Teko held that while senior management had a legitimate interest in receiving information about serious allegations involving a staff member, the protection of qualified privilege did not extend to reckless and sensational publications.

“The natural and ordinary meaning of that message is that the Plaintiff was wanted by police for shooting at victims. That is a serious imputation of criminality and violence,” the judge held.

The court further observed that the second message portrayed Jjengo as immoral, reckless, violent, and unfit for trust by suggesting that he had acted out of jealousy involving a woman described in the publication as a skirt.

Justice Teko noted that evidence showed Jjengo’s supervisor, James Malinzi, had contacted the plaintiff to verify the allegations and subsequently forwarded his telephone number to Abola so that he could establish the facts directly. Despite this opportunity, the court found that Abola failed to carry out meaningful verification before circulating the damaging narrative.

“The fact that investigations were ongoing should have made him more cautious…,” Justice Teko said.

He added that although Abola repeatedly stated that the matter was merely alleged and still under investigation, that disclaimer did not excuse the publication of serious accusations to an influential audience.

“Defamation may be committed by repetition of allegations. A person who republishes defamatory allegations cannot escape liability merely by saying that the matter is alleged,” the judge ruled.

The court found that Abola’s conduct demonstrated malice in the legal sense through reckless disregard for the truth and indifference to the impact of the statements on Jjengo’s reputation.

In assessing damages, Justice Teko acknowledged that the allegations were grave because they accused Jjengo of criminal conduct, violence, and moral impropriety. He also considered the fact that the statements were circulated among URA’s highest-ranking managers.

At the same time, the judge noted that the publication was limited to a restricted management forum and that there was no evidence Jjengo was dismissed, demoted, or denied promotion as a result of the allegations.

The judge further held that the defamatory messages caused sufficient harm to warrant substantial compensation and vindication.

Pirates survive Heathens scare to reach another final

Stanbic Black Pirates survived a spirited Heathens fightback to secure their place in the 2026 Uganda Rugby Premiership final after edging through on 36-30 on aggregate after a tense semifinal second leg at King’s Park Arena on Saturday afternoon.

Holding a 15-3 advantage from the first leg and unbeaten in Bweyogerere for two seasons, Pirates appeared firmly in control heading into the return fixture.

But record 17-time champions Heathens arrived determined to overturn the deficit and pushed the Sailors all the way before falling agonizingly short.

The day had begun with a heavier purpose. Pirates spent the mid-morning and early afternoon in discussion about mob violence, an issue that was brought into sharp focus by the death of their big shirt.7 Sydney Gongodyo a fortnight ago.

By kick-off, grief had turned to purpose as the squad went in determined to write a fitting chapter for a player whose career was cut short at 27.

Heathens struck first, winning a turnover penalty after overpowering Humphrey Tashobya at the breakdown. Mathew Musasizi’s effort drifted wide but he made amends minutes later to open the scoring.

Pirates hit back through Roy Kizito who finished off a slick move started by Conrad Wanyama and carried on by Timothy Kisiga, who found Kizito on the blindside for a diving try under pressure. Musasizi kept Heathens ticking with another penalty after they opted for the posts over a maul.

Heathens came close to a try soon after, only for Alex Aturinda to hold up the ball over the line. Kisiga’s loose restart fell kindly for Joseph Oyet, who composed himself for a drop goal from inside his own half. A string of Pirates errors then gifted Musasizi a fifth penalty, sending Heathens into a 12-5 lead at the break.

Kisiga returned sharper after the interval, slotting two penalties to narrow the gap before converting a Haruna Muhammad try. Pirates surged further when Aturinda exploited space off the restart, and Haruna produced the score of the match, slicing through five defenders with a dazzling burst.

Heathens responded through Patrick Okello, converted by Malcom Okello, before Jude Jjuuko crashed over deep in injury time. Malcom’s conversion made it 27-21 on the night, with Pirates’ aggregate lead trimmed to single figures. Heathens threw everything at the line in the closing exchanges, but Pirates’ defence held until Kisiga booted the ball into touch to settle the contest.

Pirates now turn their attention to Saturday’s final against Buffaloes at King’s Park, a fixture they will carry into with both heavy hearts and renewed purpose.

UGANDA RUGBY PREMIERSHIP

Semifinal results

Pirates 21-27 Heathens

(Pirates won 36-30 on aggregate)

Final: Pirates vs. Buffaloes, Kings Park Arena

Man suspected to be police officer brutally killed, motorcycle stolen in Jinja ambush

Shock and fear have gripped residents of Mutai Village along the Jinja-Kamuli Highway following the gruesome murder of an unidentified man suspected to be a police officer.

The deceased was discovered lying lifeless by the roadside early Friday morning by residents heading to their gardens at dawn. The victim was found in a pool of blood with a shattered helmet nearby, drawing panic and large crowds to the scene.

Preliminary police investigations indicate that the victim was ambushed during the night by unknown assailants. Because the victim’s motorcycle was missing from the scene, detectives believe he was assaulted and robbed before being killed.

During the examination of the body, investigators recovered a Uganda Police Force T-shirt, raising strong suspicions regarding his profession. However, no identification documents were found on him.

Detectives were further puzzled by a unique detail: the victim was wearing multiple jackets at the time of his death. Near the body, police recovered two wooden sticks believed to be the murder weapons, alongside clothing items suspected to belong to the assailants. A sniffer dog was deployed to track the attackers, though no immediate leads were established.

The incident has intensified local outcries over a sharp rise in violent crime along the highway, particularly in the Nsuube and Kagoma stretches. Local leaders note that criminals frequently exploit the dark, forested areas bordering the road to ambush vulnerable travellers.

“This place has become a death trap,” said Rajab Kakande, the Defence Secretary of Mutai Village. “Criminals hide in the forest and attack unsuspecting travellers along the highway. We have repeatedly raised concerns, and the stretch from Jinja Roundabout to Kamuli urgently needs increased security deployment.”

The boda boda community, which frequently utilizes the route at night, expressed deep vulnerability following the attack.

Salim Muwaata, the chairman of boda boda riders in Jinja District, confirmed that the area has evolved into a criminal hotspot.

“Many riders now live in fear as attacks are becoming frequent, especially at night. We are calling for increased patrols to protect road users,” Muwaata urged.

The brutal killing has left the Mutai community deeply shaken, with many questioning how such a violent assault could occur unnoticed along a major highway.

By press time, the body had been transported to the Buwenge Health Centre IV mortuary for a postmortem examination. Police have intensified efforts to formally identify the deceased, establish his connection to law enforcement, and track down the fleeing suspects.

Kigezi leaders sound alarm over shrinking bamboo cover in Echuya Forest

Local leaders in Kigezi sub-region have raised concerns over the decreasing bamboo forest cover in Echuya Forest Reserve and are calling for urgent intervention to reverse the trend.

Echuya Forest Reserve sits on the boundary of Kisoro and Rubanda districts and for decades has been known as a bamboo forest because bamboo trees dominated over other species. The reserve covers about 3,403 hectares, with 2,701 hectares in Rubanda and the rest in Kisoro.

It is also habitat for about 10 monkey and baboon species, and over 300 bird species including the highly endangered Grauer’s Rush Warbler. The forest is a key stopover for bird-watching tourists heading to Mgahinga National Park and Bwindi Impenetrable Forest for gorilla tracking.

Recently, most spots that used to host bamboo have been taken over by other tree species. Monkeys and baboons that were always seen climbing bamboo trees next to the Kabale-Kisoro highway are now rarely spotted.

Joseph Nizeye Wa-Senkoko, LCIII chairperson of Kanaba sub-county in Kisoro and member of the Echuya Collaborative Forest Management Committee, said government needs to consider replanting bamboo because it is key in conserving water that feeds major streams flowing into Lake Bunyonyi.

‘While it’s true that bamboo population in Echuya forest reserve is reducing because of colonization by emerging other tree species, there is need for the government and its development partners to initiate a drive of replanting bamboo trees in the area as a way of conserving the biodiversity of the forest. If the bamboo trees are not saved from extinction, wild animals that include monkeys and baboons which have been feeding on bamboo shoots and serving as tourist attractions may disappear,’ Mr Nizeye said.

He added that although residents were encouraged to domesticate bamboo for handicrafts, beehives, furniture, charcoal and building materials, the loss of bamboo in Echuya would trigger a water crisis.

‘Once bamboo trees completely disappear from Echuya forest reserve, there will be a water crisis in the region since bamboo has been instrumental in holding the natural water that serves the community and the wildlife living in the area,’ he said.

Haruna Mutabazi, vice chairperson of the CFM committee in Muko Sub-county, Rubanda, blamed the National Forestry Authority for failing to control illegal bamboo harvesting by investors setting up tourism camps, which has created space for other species.

‘We appeal to the central government to intervene if bamboo tree species are to be saved from extinction in Echuya forest reserve. NFA has disregarded the role of CFM committee members to an extent that they do not invite us for Echuya forest management meetings. CFM committees together with Nature Uganda played a great role in saving Echuya forest from selfish individuals that wanted to introduce Eucalyptus tree species from South Africa while others wanted to use it as Irish potato gardens. The central government should put in place stringent measures to stop illegal bamboo tree harvesting to avoid its extinction,’ Mr Mutabazi said.

Executive Director of NFA, Stuart Maniraguha, said about 30% of bamboo in Echuya has been lost because bamboo is a grass that cannot grow under a forest canopy. When covered, it dries out.

‘What is happening is that nature is trying to redefine and that means that our strict protection of that forest is what would be possible leading to the loss/disappearance of the bamboo. Because if you allow people to do harvesting, then you create gaps that would give in light that will favor bamboo growth. When we realized this trend, in 2021/2022 we started sustainable bamboo harvesting and management and we zoned out areas that were purely under bamboo and we started pruning and thinning activities. We cut out the dry bamboo to allow the new shoots to come up,’ Mr Maniraguha said.

He said the forest is undergoing natural colonization by indigenous species like Macaranga, a process called succession. NFA is now focused on areas that still have pure bamboo, targeting 500 hectares. ‘In 2023/2024, we restored about 80 hectares of bamboo in Bufundi Sub-county in Rubanda district while in Muko Sub-county in Rubanda and Kanaba Sub-county in Kisoro district we did liberation tending i.e. removing all climbers on bamboo and this was done where we found pure bamboo stands,’ he added.

Mr Maniraguha said sustainable harvesting is the only way to keep Echuya’s natural bamboo, locally called ‘Omurugano’. ‘If we strictly close Echuya forest without interventions of such nature then ecology will take its course and the succession will be done and we shall lose the bamboo and grass thus having a tropical forest with those high tropical tree species,’ he said. He added that NFA has renewed CFM committee contracts because they are key stakeholders in forest management.

In March, Kabale University and NFA signed a memorandum of understanding to establish a field research station in Echuya to promote conservation and practical training. Dr Rogers Akatwijuka, Associate Dean of Agriculture and Environmental Science at Kabale University, said the Shs1 billion station will carry out long-term ecological monitoring, conservation education and tourism impact assessment.

‘The objectives include the provision of opportunities to university staff and students to undertake research in Echuya forest ecology, biodiversity conservation, tourism planning and management as well as socio-economic impacts of the protected area,’ Dr Akatwijuka said. Research will focus on forest ecology, climate change, watershed management and ecosystem changes.

Former Kisoro LCV chairperson Abel Bizimana welcomed the move, saying studies will help conserve Echuya, believed to be the water catchment area for crater lakes in Kisoro, Rubanda and Kabale.

‘I implore Kabale University researchers to take keen interest in establishing why certain tree species have emerged in Echuya forest reserve taking up space and overshadowing the bamboo forest cover that has been a characteristic of Echuya forest reserve,’ Mr Bizimana said. He added that the planned takeover of Echuya by Uganda Wildlife Authority as a national park will boost conservation based on research findings.

Uganda’s SGR gets green light with largest-ever Shs2.6 trillion Islamic Development Bank financing package

The Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Executive Board has approved EUR 650.75 million (approximately Shs2.6 trillion) in financing for Uganda’s Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) project. This marks the largest single-project funding ever approved by the bank for Uganda.

The historic milestone was reached on the sidelines of the 51st IsDB Group Board of Governors’ Annual Meetings, held in Baku, Azerbaijan, from June 16 to 19, 2026, under the theme, ‘Regional Integration for Sustainable Prosperity.’

Dr Ramathan Ggoobi, the Permanent Secretary and Secretary to the Treasury (PSST), who led the Ugandan delegation as Temporary Governor, affirmed the government’s commitment to achieving full financial closure for the multi-billion-shilling railway project by November 2026.

The SGR is a strategic flagship venture aimed at modernizing Uganda’s transport infrastructure, reducing freight costs, and improving regional trade links with neighboring East African countries.

According to official details, the new IsDB funding will target critical infrastructural nodes along the network. Specifically, it will finance the construction of the 553-meter Jinja Nile Bridge, the 2.12-kilometer Mbuya-Kampala tunnel, and six major stations including Tororo, Iganga, Jinja, Lugazi, Kampala East, and Kampala City. Additionally, the funds will construct three mechanical workshops in Kampala East, Jinja, and Tororo.

By the end of May 2026, Uganda and the IsDB maintained eight active public operations (loans and grants) valued at USD 896.55 million, heavily dominated by the Integrated Transport Infrastructure Services Program.

Other ongoing IsDB-funded projects in the country span crucial sectors, including the upgrading of several national roads (such as the Muyembe-Nakapiripirit and Rwenkunye-Apac-Lira-Acholibur routes), the construction of the Masindi Port Bridge, irrigation schemes in Unyama, Namalu, and Sippi, vocational education, and the establishment of regional oncology centers in Arua and Mbale.

Speaking at the Governors’ Round Table, Dr. Ggoobi commended the bank for launching the IsDB Concessional Fund (ICF) in 2026. The fund aims to boost concessional financing to 15 per cent of annual approvals, bridging the gap between rising global debt and sustainable development.

“This fund is crucial in light of declining traditional foreign aid flows, both in volume and reliability, which has widened the financing gap,” Dr Ggoobi noted.

He urged multilateral lenders to reform, calling for a global financial architecture that is more inclusive, adaptive, and responsive to the needs of member countries.