A high-profile dialogue to commemorate the United Nations International Day in Support of Victims of Torture descended into chaos on Friday, June 26, after officials from the Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC) clashed with opposition politicians and human rights activists over the handling of torture discussions.
The drama, which saw several participants storm out of the meeting prematurely, erupted during the national commemoration event held in Kampala. The spark was ignited when the UHRC sought to prevent participants from naming individual victims or discussing specific, high-profile cases of ongoing torture in the country.
The confrontation began during the tail-end of the public dialogue when Mr. Harold Kaija, the deputy Secretary General of the People’s Front for Freedom (PFF), accused the panel discussants of “speaking with an almost closed mouth” and deliberately evading the country’s most pressing human rights realities.
Mr. Kaija argued that it was hypocritical for the Commission to gather and speak in platitudes while members of his party, including political activist Sam Mugumya and PFF President Erias Lukwago, continue to endure severe state-vetted brutality.
“Sam Mugumya, who previously spent eight years in a Congolese prison, was abducted in Mbarara in August last year, and to date, we don’t have any trace of where he is. We have received reports that he can’t even walk,” Mr. Kaija charged. “As I speak, our party president, Erias Lukwago, is at Mulago Hospital-not by choice, but following that gruesome abduction which you all witnessed. Yet, all of you here are talking in tongues.”
Before Mr. Kaija could conclude his remarks, the session moderator, Ms. Pauline Nansamba-who serves as the UHRC Director for Complaints, Investigations, and Legal Services-interrupted and blocked him from continuing.
“As UHRC, we are handling those cases on a separate basis, so here we advise that you don’t start naming individual cases,” Ms. Nansamba cautioned.
The intervention further infuriated Mr. Kaija, who questioned the purpose of the dialogue if stakeholders were being gagged from addressing real-time events. Retorting that those currently enabling the torture of the opposition would one day find themselves victims of the same system, Mr. Kaija handed over the microphone and stormed out of the hall.
Ms. Winfred Mugambwa, an activist with Ecofeminist, took the floor next, echoing Mr. Kaija’s frustrations. She accused the Commission of actively suppressing an honest conversation on structural torture.
Defending the Commission’s stance, Ms. Nansamba implored participants to stick to the day’s official theme: “Taking stock of the successes and challenges met in the protection and promotion of the freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment.”
The dialogue featured representatives from the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF), Uganda Prisons Service (UPS), academia, and torture survivors, who were invited to evaluate Uganda’s progress in eradicating the vice.
Maj. Gerald Bamwitirebye, the Head of Human Rights for the UPDF, defended the army’s track record, stating that institutional mechanisms have been established to handle excesses.
“We have a complaints desk, a psychosocial department, a human rights department, and compensation arrangements established at the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs/UPDF National Referral Hospital. Human rights adherence is also fully integrated into our training schools,” Maj. Bamwitirebye said.
Assistant Commissioner of Prisons (ACP) Natukunda Aliyo highlighted the strain on the correctional system, noting that the Uganda Prisons Service currently houses 82,785 prisoners-comprising 46.1 percent remands and 56 percent convicts-managed by 23,334 warders.
“We are governed by Article 221 and Cap 325 of the Prisons Act, which mandates us to respect the people we keep and align with international human rights standards. We also actively partner with external organisations to ensure compliance,” ACP Aliyo said.
In a speech delivered by Commission member Mr. Omara Apitta Lamex, UHRC Chairperson Ms. Mariam Wangadya urged citizens to reject all forms of dehumanising acts.
“Article 24 explicitly states that no person shall be subjected to any form of torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, and Article 44 classifies the right to freedom from torture as a non-derogable right,” she stated.
UHRC Registrar, Ms. Phiona Birungi Kemigisha, added that the Commission remains committed to promptly investigating complaints and delivering timely verdicts for victims.
The fractious dialogue coincided with a nationwide court boycott orchestrated by lawyers under the Uganda Law Society (ULS).
Advocates across the country downed their tools on Friday, accusing the judiciary of failing to protect legal practitioners who have increasingly become targets of state intimidation, torture, and human rights abuses while executing their professional duties.
“We have joined members of the Uganda Law Society to strike against the way advocates are being treated while carrying out their work,” said advocate Kato Tumusiime. “This is not just about lawyers representing victims of torture and human rights violations; it is about every advocate because we have all become targets.”
The UN International Day in Support of Victims of Torture was established by the UN General Assembly in 1997 and is observed globally every June 26.
While Uganda enacted the progressive Prevention and Prohibition of Torture Act in 2012 to strengthen its legal frameworks, civil society organizations and human rights defenders maintain that a lack of political will and poor implementation have allowed cases of enforced disappearances and state-sanctioned torture to escalate.