Category: Daily Trust

Manchester United extended their Premier League resurgence on Saturday with a thrilling 4-2 win over Brighton and Hove Albion, sealing three consecutive league victories for the first time in 20 months.

Matheus Cunha opened his United account with a calm finish before Casemiro’s deflected strike doubled the lead.

Bryan Mbeumo’s brace later ensured the result, despite a late scare from former Red Devil Danny Welbeck and Charalampos Kostoulas.

SPONSOR AD

The win marked a significant turnaround for United, who had lost their last three home meetings with Brighton.

Meanwhile, Chelsea’s inconsistency continued as they fell 2-1 to Sunderland at Stamford Bridge, conceding in stoppage time.

Alejandro Garnacho’s early goal against his former club looked to have set the tone, but Wilson Isidor equalised before Chemsdine Talbi’s dramatic late winner silenced the home crowd.

The contrasting results leave United climbing toward the top four, while Chelsea’s hopes of breaking into the Champions League spots took another hit in a frustrating evening for the Blues.

Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi, the Ooni of Ife, and Oba Abimbola Owoade, the Alaafin of Oyo, have ended their rift, which led to bitter exchanges.

The feud of the monarchs, who preside over revered stools in Yorubaland, recently made headlines.

At the peak of the crisis, the Alaafin issued a 48-hour ultimatum to the Ooni to reverse the conferment of the title Okanlomo of Yorubaland (or Okanlomo Oodua) on the Bada of Ibadan designate, Chief Dotun Sanusi.

SPONSOR AD

Owoade argued that the Ooni’s instrument of office restricts his authority to three council areas in Osun State and that he acted ‘unlawfully, derogatorily, and in contempt of the apex court.’

He warned that unless the title is revoked within 48 hours, the Ooni should be prepared to face unspecified ‘consequences.’

Responding through his media team, the Ooni had dismissed the ultimatum as an ’empty threat’.

The development reopened a long-running rivalry between the Oyo and Ife thrones.

Ile-Ife is widely acknowledged as the ancestral home of the Yoruba people.

But on Friday, billionaire businessman, Kessington Adebutu, famously known as ‘Baba Ijebu’, reconciled the duo during his 90th birthday celebration at Eko Hotel, Lagos.

However, a mild drama ensued when both monarchs were called on stage to give a speech during the ceremony.

The Ooni had finished giving his speech before handing over the microphone to the Alaafin. But the Alaafin positioned the microphone to his aides, who used a handkerchief to cover it before the monarch used it to speak.

But in a joint communiqué signed by the monarchs and witnessed by Adebutu, both of them agreed to sheathe their swords for a ‘defining chapter’ in Yoruba history.

They also agreed for the creation of the Joint Council for Yoruba Unity, which they said aims to strengthen peace, cultural preservation, and socioeconomic growth across Yorubaland.

The formation of the Joint Council, it was said, signals a new era of collaboration between the two most influential Yoruba monarchs.

‘Today marks a turning point. We reaffirm our dedication to harmony, respect, and brotherhood among all Yoruba sons and daughters’, it reads.

Traditional rulers, cultural custodians, and Yoruba leaders were present, discussing reconciliation, cooperation, and inter-kingdom relations.

Both monarchs offered prayers for peace and prosperity across Yorubaland, Nigeria, and Africa.

Adebutu described the renewed royal bond as ‘a milestone that will consolidate unity and development among the Yoruba people.’

A former Senate leader, Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, has described the journey of Nigeria from independence till date as passing through shifting fortunes.

Speaking on ‘The Exchange’ podcast hosted by the former spokesman of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) Femi Soneye, the former lawmaker, who turns 70 soon, said being born just four years before independence allowed him to witness the full arc of Nigeria’s history – from the high hopes of nationhood to the turbulence that followed.

Ndoma-Egba recalled the immense excitement of October 1, 1960 and the widespread belief that ‘everything will be fine’ as the country was free.

SPONSOR AD

He said the early post-independence years, particularly in the mid-1960s, were marked by optimism and impressive economic performance, with Nigeria ranked among the fastest-growing economies in the world, and the Eastern Region specifically cited as the global leader in growth by 1965.

That optimism, however, was shattered by political tensions and the military coup of January 15, 1966, which ushered in the civil war. Ndoma-Egba said he found himself ‘right in the centre’ of the three-year conflict. In the aftermath, the country rallied round General Yakubu Gowon’s policy of ‘reconciliation, rehabilitation and reconstruction,’ guided by the spirit of ‘no victor, no vanquished.’

The post-war era saw another period of economic promise when Nigeria’s major challenge was famously described as ‘not money, but how to spend it.’

Ndoma-Egba reminisced about his university days when students enjoyed a pampered life with made beds, laundry services and efficient public institutions, reflecting a time of national affluence.

However, successive military interventions soon reversed those gains. New, unsettling vocabulary such as ‘retrenchment’ entered public discourse, while the proliferation of states – from 12 to 19, then 21, and finally, 36, coincided with deepening economic woes.

‘The problem, which was once how to spend money, shifted to how to find the money,’ he observed, capturing the transformation from post-war prosperity to present-day hardship.

According to Ndoma-Egba, the experiences that would typically span several generations in other countries – independence, civil war, oil boom and prolonged military rule – have all unfolded within one Nigerian lifetime.

‘All these diverse, sometimes contradictory experiences, put together make my life in Nigeria the most exciting. It has been a cocktail of the good, the bad and the ugly, all in one lifetime,’ he said.

Access Holdings Plc Group has announced its half-year audited financial results for the period ended June 30, 2025, posting N2.5 trillion.

The Group’s financial results for the half year ended June 30, 2025, reflect the resilience of its business model, the diversification of revenue streams, and the steady progress to the execution of its five-year strategic plan.

A statement issued yesterday by the Company’s Secretary, Sunday Ekwochi, said, ‘Gross earnings increased by 13.8% year-on-year to N2.5 trillion in H1 2025 from N2.2 trillion in H1 2024, driven by strong growth in interest income which increased by 38.9% year-on-year to N2.0 trillion from N1.5 billion in H1 2024.

SPONSOR AD

‘Net interest income also increased by 91.8% year-on-year to N984.6 billion in H1 2025 from N513.4 billion in H1 2024.’

He said’Complementing this performance was a growth in net fees and commission income, which increased by 16.1% year-on-year to N237.7billion in H1 2025 from N204.7 billion in H1 2024.’

According to the statement, ‘Profit before tax (PBT) and profit after tax (PAT) closed at N320.6 billion and N215.9 billion respectively underscoring the strength and resilience of our business model in the markets we operate in.’

It added that, ‘Key balance sheet indicators remain strong with total assets, customer deposits, loans and advances, and shareholders’ equity closing at N42.4 trillion, N22.9 trillion, N13.2 trillion N3.8 trillion respectively.

‘The Banking group demonstrated resilient performance in H1 2025. Interest income grew by 38.7% year-on-year to N2.0 trillion in H1 2025 from N1.5 trillion in H1 2024. Net interest income increased by 85%, from N536.7 billion in H1 2024 to N992.7 billion in H1 2025. Fee and commission income increased by 27% to N294.9 in H1 2025 from N232.5 billion in H1 2024 driven by increased transaction volumes. Profit before tax (PBT) and profit after tax (PAT) closed at N303.0 billion and N199.3 billion respectively.

‘Banking group subsidiaries contributed 65% to the Banking group’s profit before tax (PBT) in H1 2025. This result highlights our journey towards sustainable performance and execution across our key African and international markets.

‘The Group’s non-banking subsidiaries maintained a strong growth momentum. For Access – ARM Pensions, financial performance was robust, with revenue up 29.9% to N21.0 billion and profit before tax up 65.1% to N13.1 billion. The business delivered a solid ROAE of 48.1%, a cost-to-income ratio of 35.1%, and a PBT margin of 62.5%, underscoring strong operational efficiency and profitability.

‘Hydrogen Payments recorded a 40.5% growth in top-line revenue compared to H1 2024. Profit before tax (PBT) grew by 273% year-on-year. The total transaction value processed increased by 211%, reaching N41.1 trillion in H1 2025, up from N13.8 trillion in H1 2024.

‘Access Insurance Brokers has sustained strong momentum, recording a 125% year-on-year increase in gross written premium, 146% growth in revenue, and a 161% improvement in profit before tax (PBT).

‘Oxygen X, the Group’s digital lending arm, has sustained strong momentum since launch in Q3 2024, delivering N5.4 billion in revenue and N2.2 billion in profit before tax in H1 2025.

‘Access Holdings’ businesses are well-positioned to deepen market penetration, expand product offerings, and leverage cross-sell opportunities across the Group to drive continued growth and profitability’, the statement said.

The statement further added that the group’s focus remains on driving prudent growth and continued execution of its strategic priorities, scaling its digital and transaction-led income streams, increasing revenue diversification, embedding efficiency, innovation, and disciplined portfolio management across all areas of the business. It will also continue to uphold the highest standards of risk and governance discipline to ensure sustainable profitability.

‘Access Holdings remains confident that it will continue to deliver sustainable value and returns to its shareholders. Its long-term objective is to build a stronger, more agile Group that consistently delivers superior returns, fosters innovation-driven growth, and optimises portfolio performance to create inclusive value across its markets while reaffirming investor confidence in the strength and future of Access Holdings.

‘The Group appreciates the continued trust and support of its shareholders, customers, and employees. Together, the Group is building a stronger future’, the statement said.

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Kebbi State has rejected the reported nomination of Kabiru Tanimu Turaki as the party’s National Chairman, citing lack of consultation with stakeholders in the North West zone.

Daily Trust had reported how some PDP leaders from the Northern part of the country, including governors, unanimously endorsed former Minister of Special Duties, Tanimu Turaki, as their consensus candidate for the position of national chairman ahead of the party’s November convention.

However, Adamawa State Governor, Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, after a meeting of Northern PDP leaders held on Wednesday night in Abuja, clarified that the endorsement did not preclude other aspirants from contesting.

SPONSOR AD

But while addressing journalists in Birnin Kebbi on Saturday, the PDP publicity secretary in State, Sani Dododo, rejected the endorsement.

He noted that the decision to reject Tanimu as PDP’s national chairman was based on the speculations that he was handpicked for the position without consultation and any input from key stakeholders in the northwest region.

He said, ‘The decision of the party was that the North West zone should be allowed to select its own candidate for the position in line with the party’s zoning arrangement.’

Dododo added that the party’s leadership in the state had distanced itself from Turaki’s reported nomination because they did not consult with PDP members in the state before throwing his hat into the ring.

He urged the party’s national working committee (NWC) to permit the North West to produce its own consensus candidate.

‘The North West elders should be allowed to sit down, deliberate, and produce a candidate that will represent the zone,’ he said.

The National Economic Council (NEC) has appointed the governor of Enugu State, Dr Peter Mbah, as the chairman of the committee for the overhaul of training institutions for security agencies across the country.

This followed the endorsement of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s proposal for a sweeping overhaul of security training facilities across the country, as submitted to the 152nd meeting of NEC at the Presidential Villa, Abuja on Thursday.

To give life to this vision, NEC unanimously resolved to place Governor Mbah at the helm of the committee, which also has Governors Uba Sani (Kaduna), Dapo Abiodun (Ogun), Kefas Agbu (Taraba), Umoh Eno (Akwa Ibom), Dauda Lawal (Zamfara) and Abdullahi Sule (Nasarawa) as members, and former Inspector-General of Police Baba Usman as secretary.

SPONSOR AD

Addressing the NEC, President Tinubu underscored the urgency and import of the task, saying, ‘We have to make the conditions of the training facilities more conducive for both the trainers and trainees.’

The committee has one month to deliver a blueprint for the renovation and modernisation of training institutions for the Nigeria Police Force and sister security agencies in line with President Tinubu’s commitment to transforming the security sector.

Meanwhile, Governor Mbah’s appointment places him at the centre of Nigeria’s new push to strengthen national security architecture through improved training, facilities and conditions for personnel.

His leadership is expected to translate federal government’s vision into actionable reforms that will reverse years of decay in security training institutions across the country.

Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf of Kano State has issued an Executive Order mandating the traditional councils to continue organising annual Durbar festivals.

The governor disclosed this while inaugurating the maiden edition of the Kano Festival of Arts and Culture (KanFest), popularly known in Hausa as Kalankuwa, on Saturday.

He called for the revival and preservation of the state’s centuries-old cultural heritage.

SPONSOR AD

At the official opening ceremony which held at the Kano Trade Fair Complex, Governor Yusuf said the festival marked ‘a milestone in the history of our beloved state,’ describing Kano as a city ‘deeply rooted in history, arts, culture, and heritage’ that has stood for centuries as a centre of learning, commerce, creativity and civilisation.

‘The craftsmanship of our people, the richness of our traditions, and the resilience of our forefathers are what made Kano the pride of the Sudan region and a reference point on Africa’s cultural map,’ the governor stated.

Yusuf recalled that even before his election, his administration had pledged in its blueprint to revive and reposition the state’s cultural and tourism sector as part of efforts to restore the dignity of the people, strengthen identity, and generate new economic opportunities.

He listed a series of ongoing projects aimed at preserving Kano’s historical and cultural heritage.

Among them are the rehabilitation of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism complex, the upgrading of the History and Culture Bureau into a world-class research and documentation centre, and the restoration of key historical monuments, including Gidan Dan Hausa, Gidan Rumfa, and the ancient Kofar Mata dye pits, one of the oldest surviving traditional dyeing centres in the world.

‘We have also commenced the reconstruction of the collapsed Gidan Makama monument, a critical part of Kano’s architectural and colonial history, and modernisation of the Magwan leather hub to empower local artisans and boost competitiveness of our leather industry,’ Yusuf said.

The governor also announced plans to restore the ancient city walls and gates of Kano, which he described as ‘a 700-year-old symbol of unity, strength and civilisation.’

‘Our goal is to preserve it as an enduring heritage and a source of pride for future generations,’ he added.

Governor Yusuf disclosed that the UNESCO recognition of the Kano Durbar Festival as one of the world’s intangible cultural heritages had prompted his administration to issue an Executive Order mandating the four emirates – Kano, Rano, Gaya, and Karaye to continue organising their annual Durbar festivals.

‘This recognition places Kano on the global stage and reaffirms the importance of our traditional institutions in promoting peace, unity, and cultural identity. The state government and all 44 local governments will continue to support the emirates to sustain this proud tradition,’ he declared.

Governor Yusuf said beyond preserving history, the revitalisation of culture and tourism remains part of his administration’s strategy to create jobs and drive economic diversification.

‘Culture is not a relic of the past; it is a living asset for future generations. We will continue to promote arts, culture, and tradition as vital instruments of social cohesion, youth engagement, and economic growth,’ he said.

Earlier in his opening remarks, Deputy Governor Aminu Abdussalam Gwarzo described the festival as ‘a journey through our collective identity,’ and a platform to rediscover, preserve, and promote the indigenous values that have distinguished Kano and its people for centuries.

He noted that KanFest would feature exhibitions, performances, art displays, storytelling, and music, aimed at showcasing both tradition and innovation while creating opportunities for artists, artisans, and creative youth to connect with investors and cultural influencers.

‘Our administration recognises that culture is not just entertainment – it is a driver of economic growth, social harmony, and tourism development,’ Gwarzo added.

Also speaking at the event, the Rwandan Ambassador to Nigeria, Mr. Christophe Bazivamo, commended the Kano State Government for hosting the festival, describing it as ‘a historic initiative that reawakens Africa’s cultural pride and strengthens the continent’s shared identity.

‘By returning to our roots and traditions, we are building a strong foundation for unity, dignity, and resilience,’ he said, adding that Rwanda and Nigeria share deep cultural and economic ties.

The event was attended by top government officials, members of the diplomatic corps, traditional rulers, business leaders, and cultural enthusiasts from within and outside Nigeria.

Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria, has debunked a social media video alleging that the institution was involved in developing a nuclear weapon for Nigeria.

In a statement issued to newsmen in Zaria, Awwal Umar, Director, University’s Directorate of Public Affairs, described the viral video as misleading, aimed at misinforming the public about Nigeria’s peaceful nuclear energy programme.

The statement said the video falsely claimed that Nigerian scientists in the 1980s secretly enriched weapons-grade uranium in Kaduna and that ABU researchers obtained centrifuge equipment from the AQ Khan network in Pakistan.

SPONSOR AD

Describing the allegations as baseless, the university stressed that most of its scientists at the Centre for Energy Research and Training (CERT) were still undergoing training abroad in the 1980s and could not have participated in uranium enrichment.

The statement further noted that the university had no connection with the AQ Khan network and had never received any equipment for the construction of a centrifuge or nuclear device.

It stated that by 1987, the only nuclear facility at the university was a 14 MeV Neutron Generator, which became operational in 1988.

‘Nigeria’s first nuclear reactor (NIRR-1) was established much later in 1996 under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Cooperation Programme and commissioned in 2004,’ it said.

The statement stressed that Nigeria’s nuclear activities had always been open and pursued strictly for peaceful purposes, in line with the country’s obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Pelindaba Treaty, which prohibit the development of nuclear weapons.

The statement reaffirmed that the Centre for Energy Research and Training, established in 1976, operates in collaboration with the IAEA and international partners from the U.S., Russia, and China.

It further explained that the center has never engaged in any secret weapons programme.

‘ABU has always pursued peaceful applications of nuclear science and technology for national development,’ the statement said.

It recalled that the university’s founder, Sir Ahmadu Bello, had demonstrated early interest in peaceful atomic research following his visit to the Museum of Atomic Energy at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the U.S. in 1960, two years before ABU was established.

The management restated its commitment to advancing science and technology for the benefit of humanity and to upholding Nigeria’s international obligations on the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

The global legal profession has undergone a digital revolution that has transformed the dissemination of legal knowledge and created a new class of legal commentators.

Looking at the positive side of the discourse, these online engagements have improved public legal education and stimulated civic interest. They have simultaneously opened avenues for ethical violations and political manipulation.

This piece explores the ethical dangers of social media advocacy among legal practitioners, particularly those lawyers in politics who weaponize digital platforms for partisan advantage.

SPONSOR AD

Drawing from the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), legal ethics literature, and political communication theory, it argues that the misuse of social media by lawyers undermines both the dignity of the legal profession and public confidence in the justice system.

Before the rise of social media, mainstream print and broadcast media were subtly used to promote certain lawyers in Nigeria. Though ethically questionable, such practices were limited and relatively contained. Some lawyers even masqueraded as freedom fighters to gain media attention, an act contrary to the profession’s tradition of confidentiality, moderation, and moral rectitude.

Today, social media has dramatically widened the scope and complexity of professional ethics, blurring the line between legal advocacy and populist agitation. Nigerian lawyers now occupy visible spaces on platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, commenting on judicial decisions, constitutional disputes, and political controversies. While this visibility enhances legal literacy, it also risks trivializing the law when driven by sensationalism or partisanship.

The ‘social media lawyer’ thus represents both innovation and peril, an intersection between enlightenment and ethical decay. Lord Atkin once observed that freedom of expression concerning public affairs must not degenerate into conduct that undermines the administration of justice.

In this new digital order, the lawyer must carefully navigate between the right to free speech and the duty to preserve the profession’s dignity. The Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (2023), effective from 2024, sets out clear ethical obligations.

Rule 1 mandates that ‘a lawyer shall uphold and observe the rule of law and promote and foster the cause of justice.’ Rules 39, 46, and 47 emphasize moderation in advertising, prohibit solicitation, and warn against prejudicial public commentary on pending matters. Yet, these ethical boundaries are routinely violated on social media.

As the late Hon. Justice Chukwudifu Oputa once remarked, ‘The legal profession rests on pillars of trust and moral rectitude; once these collapse, the temple of justice trembles.’

In Aristotelian rhetoric, ethos denotes moral credibility and integrity, describing it as the act of persuasion through character.

Within the legal context, it represents the inner compass guiding a lawyer’s conduct beyond codified rules. Lawyers are not merely advocates; they are custodians of justice whose public expressions must reflect dignity, restraint, and respect for institutions.

Lord Denning captured this ethos succinctly when he declared: ‘The lawyer is not a mere mouthpiece of his client, but a minister in the temple of justice.’ His erudite postulation on the lawyer’s ethos on honesty, duty, and the pursuit of justice can not be overemphasized. When lawyers abandon this sacred ethos in pursuit of social validation, they cease to serve justice and instead serve vanity.

Historically, lawyers like Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, Chief Rotimi Williams, and Chief Gani Fawehinmi contributed to nation-building through principled engagement.

However, the contemporary digital lawyer faces a moral dilemma, balancing professional impartiality with political expediency. Social media has magnified this tension. It offers instant access to public audiences while tempting some lawyers to manipulate legal discourse for partisan gain. The result is the emergence of the lawyer-politician as a digital gladiator, trading legal ethics for political capital.

Through online narratives, lawyer- politicians project themselves as defenders of democracy while subtly discrediting opponents or judicial processes. This weaponization manifests in several ways, viz. applying narrative manipulation in framing court judgments being politically motivated to incite public outrage, adopting trial by hashtag using trending discussions to influence ongoing cases or intimidate judges, selective legalism by quoting constitutional provisions out of context to suit political objectives, and delegitimization of the Bench by suggesting judicial compromise without evidence, thereby discrediting the judiciary.

These antics are antithetical to lawyers’ ethical obligations as officers of the court. The Supreme Court emphasized in Okike v. LPDC (2005) 15 NWLR (Pt. 949) 471, that professional misconduct includes ‘any behavior likely to bring the legal profession into disrepute.’ The Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) is empowered to sanction such conduct, even in the digital space.

A troubling trend has emerged in Nigeria’s political landscape, where lawyers serving as elected or appointed officials now deploy social media to consolidate influence, justify policies, and shape public opinion.

As trained lawyers and political actors, they have become communicators of legality, framing partisan positions in the language of constitutional authority. Their communication style often invokes statutes and judicial precedent to confer legitimacy on political agendas.

Continued online

Online supporters amplify such pronouncements, packaging them as definitive legal interpretations. In this way, the lawyer’s voice becomes a tool of political legitimacy, while politics acquires a veneer of legal authority. The consequence is a dangerous fusion of legal credibility with political narrative, where professional aura is exploited to validate political messaging. Across Nigeria, this ‘trending game’ of digital influence rewards visibility over substance and loyalty over objectivity, erasing the ethical line between legal commentary and propaganda.

From an ethical standpoint, this development violates Rule 1 of the RPC, which requires lawyers to uphold the rule of law and avoid conduct unbecoming of the profession.

When lawyers in government or politics use social media to advertise themselves, attack judicial officers, or issue partisan commentary on pending cases, they cast doubt on the integrity of the justice system.

To mitigate these dangers, the following measures are recommended: Firstly, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) should issue explicit social media guidelines for lawyers, particularly those in public or political positions. Secondly, media literacy, political neutrality, and responsible communication should form part of professional training. Lastly, the LPDC should actively sanction unethical online conduct, while the Bar must correct misinformation and mentor younger lawyers in digital decorum and professional ethos.

It is imperative to note that the intersection of law, politics, and technology represents both progress and peril. While social media empowers lawyers to educate the public, it also tempts them toward vanity, bias, and manipulation.

Those who weaponize social media for partisan advantage inflict grave harm on the justice system they are sworn to uphold. The digital lawyer must balance freedom of expression with professional restraint. The future of the legal profession depends not on how loud a lawyer’s voice sounds online but on how ethically it resonates in defence of justice.

In conclusion, even when Lord Atkin’s dissenting judgment in the 1936 case of AMALGAMATED PRESS V. ATTORNEY GENERAL is largely acceptable that justice is not a cloistered virtue; she must be allowed to suffer the scrutiny of respectful, even though outspoken, comments of ordinary men. The lawyer must not forget his ethos in pursuit of echo, and once this happens on the contrary, he ceases to be the conscience of justice and becomes its caricature.

Ahiakwo, a lawyer, wrote from Calabar, Cross River State.

Marriage is often regarded as the beginning of a beautiful journey – and for many, it is.

For some women, the moment the wedding bells fade, a different kind of pressure sets in: the expectation to conceive immediately.

But not every woman is ready. Not because she doesn’t want to be a mother, but because she is unsure of what lies ahead in her new marriage.

How does this decision affect the marriage, the couple, and society at large?

Join us on this episode of The Bearing to find out.