The House of Representatives adhoc committee investigating the existence and inclusion of the purported Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) in the Federal Government’s budget framework has cleared the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, of any wrongdoing in connection with the controversial council.
The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Adamu Gagdi (APC, Plateau) disclosed this yesterday while presenting the preliminary findings of the committee to journalists at the National Assembly, Abuja.
The committee was constituted by the House following the adoption of Resolution 68/07/2026 on July 8, 2026, to investigate the circumstances surrounding the inclusion of the ‘fictitious’ PFIPC in the federal budget framework and determine its legal status, funding, activities and persons connected to it.
Among the institutions invited by the committee during the investigative hearings were the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), State House, Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning, Budget Office of the Federation, Federal Ministry of Finance and Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
Others included the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Office of the National Security Adviser, Nigeria Police Force, Department of State Services, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission and the Federal Road Safety Corps.
Gagdi stressed that the findings were preliminary and did not constitute the committee’s final report or the final position of the House.
Daily Trust reports that the purported Director General of the council, Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, had accused Gbajabiamila of demanding a 48 per cent kickback from N27.3bn take-off grant allegedly approved for the PFIPC. He also claimed to have paid N400m to Gbajabiamila through a proxy to secure the appointment.
However, Gbajabiamila denied ever meeting or communicating with Adeyemi or authorising anyone to act on his behalf and subsequently filed N15bn defamation suit against him.
In the suit, he is seeking N10bn in general damages, N5bn in aggravated damages, N200m as the cost of the action, and an order directing Adeyemi to publish a full retraction and apology in five national dailies.
Gbajabiamila acted promptly, says panel
Presenting the committee’s preliminary findings, Gagdi said there was no evidence that Gbajabiamila authorised, established, approved or participated in the activities of the ‘phantom’ council.
Rather, the committee said documentary evidence showed that the Chief of Staff took steps to alert relevant security and law enforcement agencies after concerns about the organisation were brought to his attention.
According to the committee, official correspondence showed that concerns about the purported organisation had previously been brought to Gbajabiamila’s attention.
It said that following an alert from the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC) over suspected fraud and misuse of institutional materials, the Chief of Staff acted within one day by communicating with the police, National Security Adviser, Department of State Services and anti-corruption agencies and initiating administrative verification.
The committee said further concerns, including those surrounding a proposed World Investment Summit, prompted additional communications requesting investigation and appropriate action.
‘Documentary evidence before the committee does not establish that the Chief of Staff authorised, approved, established or participated in the purported organisation,’ the committee said.
It consequently commended Gbajabiamila for his response to the alerts and recommended that his timely interventions be formally acknowledged.
58 bank accounts, 12 entities linked to ‘DG’
The committee said its preliminary findings linked about 58 bank accounts as well as 12 companies, foundations and other entities to Adeyemi.
It also identified what it described as institutional lapses within government agencies, including the Budget Office of the Federation and the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, in relation to the recognition and processing of documents connected to the purported organisation.
Among the entities uncovered include Confederation of United Nations Youths, FCT Investment Promotion Agency and Public-Private Partnership, Foreign Investment Promotion Agency, United Nations Youth Global Agency, United Nations Youth Global Foundation, World United Nations Youth Global Foundation, World Entrepreneurship University Limited, World Enterprise University Limited, FCT Investment Promotion Act, FCT Promotion Agency and Olubadan of Ibadan Foundation.
The panel observed that similarities in names, objectives, management structures, signatories and banking relationships raised concerns that multiple organisations might have been created or deployed using government, international, investment, educational, charitable and United Nations-related identities to create credibility.
However, the committee stressed that it had not concluded that every account, entity or transaction identified was unlawful.
The committee said it was reconciling registration records, account mandates, beneficial ownership information, signatories and transaction histories to establish the true nature and control of the accounts and entities.
The panel said its findings were based on oral testimony, documentary evidence, financial records and submissions received from relevant institutions and individuals.
‘PFIPC does not exist in law’
The committee said its investigations so far found no valid Act of the National Assembly, gazetted enactment, presidential executive order or other lawful instrument establishing the PFIPC.
It said none of the competent federal authorities had produced an authentic record showing that the organisation was created, approved or authorised by the President, Federal Executive Council, National Assembly or any other legally empowered institution.
The committee also observed that the organisation operated under different descriptions, including the PFIPC and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.
It said the inconsistent nomenclature, alongside the documentary evidence before it, undermined any claim that the organisation was a legitimate federal institution.
The lawmakers said they examined a document purporting to appoint Adeyemi as Director General of the organisation and allegedly bearing the authority and signature of the Chief of Staff to the President.
According to the committee, evidence from the State House established that no such appointment was made or approved by the Presidency.
It said Gbajabiamila neither issued nor signed the letter and that the letterhead was not an authentic State House letterhead.
The panel also noted that the purported reference number was found to be inconsistent with the official referencing system of the State House, while the format and language of the letter differed materially from genuine official correspondence.
‘The committee therefore preliminarily concluded that the appointment letter was fabricated and falsely attributed to the Presidency.’
It also examined a purported approval for the take-off of the organisation and a document described as ‘Presidential Executive Order No. 5 of 24 February 2026’.
The panel said available evidence indicated that the documents did not emanate from the Presidency or any competent federal authority.
It described the alleged fabrication of an executive order as particularly serious because such an instrument carries the authority of the President.
The committee further said a document presented as an Act of the National Assembly establishing the purported organisation was never enacted by Parliament.
It described the alleged act as an affront to the legislative authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The panel said no individual or organisation could lawfully manufacture legislative authority by editing or fabricating a document and presenting it as an enactment of parliament.
The committee said it also uncovered a letter dated November 7, 2024, purportedly from the State House and addressed to the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, requesting an administrative code for the PFIPC.
The letter was allegedly signed by one Akambi Adewale, described as ‘Director, Administration and Support Services’ for the Permanent Secretary.
However, the committee said State House evidence showed that the office cited in the letter did not exist. It also said no official known as Akambi Adewale served in the purported capacity and that the letter was neither issued nor authorised by the State House.
The committee said fictitious names, offices and designations appeared to have been used to mislead a key financial institution of the federal government.
Budget Office, AGF accused of institutional lapses
The panel accused the Budget Office of the Federation and the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation of possible institutional lapses in their dealings with the phony council.
The committee said although the Budget Office claimed to have been presented with documents purporting to establish the organisation as a federal institution, verification of the legal existence of an organisation should be a fundamental prerequisite before its recognition within the federal budget framework.
The committee said it was reviewing relevant correspondence, electronic records, approvals and actions to establish whether the lapses resulted from administrative weakness, negligence, circumvention of procedure, unauthorised facilitation or active complicity.
The panel similarly questioned the circumstances surrounding the response of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation (OAGF) to the purported request for an administrative code.
The OAGF, according to the committee, confirmed that its response was an authentic communication, although the request that prompted it was allegedly forged.
The committee described the incident as a serious administrative and security lapse and said it would determine whether negligence, failure to follow verification procedures, breach of correspondence protocols or deliberate facilitation was involved.
‘Fake agency office at Federal Secretariat not officially allocated’
The committee’s investigation also revealed that the PFIPC occupied office space within the Federal Secretariat Complex without being allocated the facility by the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.
The committee said evidence indicated that part of accommodation earlier allocated to the Office of the SGF was subsequently made available to the council by some officers without lawful authority.
It said the occupation of the facility was significant because it could have strengthened the organisation’s claim that it was a legitimate federal agency.
The panel said that the identities and responsibilities of officials involved in the alleged unauthorised allocation are still being investigated.
The panel also said that about 39 people were represented as employees of the council across junior, intermediate and senior cadres.
It, however, said it was still investigating their recruitment, appointment letters, identity cards, salaries and allowances.
N400m alleged transaction under investigation
Meanwhile, the committee said it has received complaints from individuals and organisations who claimed to have been deceived, offered jobs, promised contracts or investment opportunities, or induced to make payments based on representations that the PFIPC was a legitimate federal institution.
Of particular concern, it said, was the complaint of a company that alleged that Adeyemi induced it to pay about N400 million in four instalments.
The company allegedly made the payments on the understanding that it would receive a contract involving the renovation, furnishing or improvement of a residence purportedly allocated to Adeyemi in his capacity as the Director General.
The committee said it was tracing the payment destinations, identifying account holders and beneficial owners, verifying the ownership and status of the property and determining whether any public officer or other person participated in or benefited from the transaction.
It said that if established through competent investigative and judicial processes, the conduct could disclose offences including fraudulent misrepresentation, obtaining money by false pretence, impersonation, conspiracy and forgery.
Beyond the alleged activities of the individuals and entities under investigation, the committee said it had identified systemic weaknesses within government institutions.
These included deficiencies in verifying the lawful existence of government institutions, creation and administration of budget and administrative codes, authentication and custody of official correspondence, verification of presidential appointments, allocation of government accommodation and processing of official number plates.
Panel’s recommendations
Pending the conclusion of the investigation, the committee, among others, recommended that all ministries, departments and agencies should refrain from recognising or transacting with the PFIPC or any related entity whose legal status had not been independently verified.
The panel urged financial institutions and investigative agencies to preserve all relevant account records, transaction histories, mandates and beneficial ownership information connected to the persons and entities under investigation. It further recommended that security and anti-corruption agencies conclude their investigations and coordinate evidence in accordance with the law.
The committee called for the preservation of relevant documentary and electronic evidence, including websites, devices, correspondence, properties and institutional records.
It also recommended enhanced authentication procedures by the Budget Office and Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation for new institutions, budget codes, administrative codes and correspondence purportedly emanating from the Presidency or other high offices.
The panel proposed the establishment or strengthening of a centralised digital verification platform through which the legal existence and status of federal ministries, departments and agencies could be authenticated.
It further recommended an audit of office allocations within Federal Secretariat complexes and a review by the Federal Road Safety Corps of procedures for issuing official and special number plates.
The committee urged relevant agencies to trace, preserve, freeze and recover proceeds of any unlawful activity where supported by evidence and authorised by law.
Reps committee should have given Adeyemi fair hearing – CHRICED
The Executive Director of the Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education (CHRICED), Dr Ibrahim Zikrullahi, has accused the House of Representatives committee investigating the PFIPC of lacking fairness and objectivity.
Zikrullahi said the committee’s decision to announce the discovery of 58 bank accounts and 12 entities allegedly linked to Adeyemi without giving him an opportunity to respond raised questions about the credibility of the investigation.
CHRICED executive director said due process was a constitutional requirement and should not be treated as a favour to anyone under investigation.
‘A man’s head cannot be shaved in his absence,’ he said.