The combined after-tax income of Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Atty. Manases Carpio, from 2007 to 2025 was nearly as high as Duterte’s declared net worth for 2025, the prosecution panel said on Thursday.
During Day 36 of Duterte’s impeachment trial, private prosecutor Erwin Matib asked Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) chief of staff Atty. Anne Loraine Garcia-Marquez what Duterte and Carpio’s income after taxes was from 2007 to 2025. The BIR official said it was P85,343,803.23.
Matib pointed out that the couple’s income after taxes was almost as high as the vice president’s declared net worth for 2025, which was P98,656,131.20.
‘So, Your Honors, we respectfully manifest that the total combined income after taxes of VP Sara and Atty. Carpio for the years 2007 to 2025 amounts to P85,343,803.23. However, their declared net worth in respondent’s 2025 SALN is P98,656,131.20,’ Matib said.
‘So just with this, there is a gap already; there’s a difference,’ he added.
Counsel for the respondent, Kristine Ferrer, objected, saying the SALN had not been testified to.
Senate Impeachment Court Presiding Officer Francis Escudero pointed out that Duterte’s SALN had been testified to, but by a different witness.
However, Escudero agreed that the witness was not competent to testify on Duterte’s SALN, urging Matib to avoid testifying on the witness’s behalf.
‘I think you have a witness; you will be calling a witness that will be testifying to that, if I get the definition of forensic analysis correctly,’ Escudero said.
‘But kindly avoid that insofar as this witness is concerned and similarly, a similar ruling was made by the chair in regard to the Honorable (Lordan) Suan’s direct examination referring to SALNs in relation to insurance officials,’ he added.
Ferrer also moved to strike Matib’s statements about the SALN of the vice president from the record, but Escudero allowed them to remain as long as the prosecutor would not do it again.
Garcia-Marquez was presented hours after the impeachment trial resumed at 10 a.m., as the prosecution initially asked that financial forensic analyst Atty. Alexander Cabrera be presented first rather than the BIR official.
Public prosecutor and Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon, co-team leader for Article II of the Articles of Impeachment, made the request as Matib, who was in charge of examining Garcia-Marquez, was sick.
Lead counsel for the respondent, Sheila Sison, questioned the prosecution panel’s apparent call for them to adjust.
Sison said it would be unfair if Escudero went ahead with his decision to allow the prosecution to present Cabrera first.
Several senator-judges urged Escudero to consider all manifestations, with Senator-judge Vicente Sotto III saying that the trial should be postponed for the meantime.
Escudero agreed, deciding that the Senate would hold its legislative session first before resuming the trial at around 2:30 p.m.
At the resumption, Escudero said the court would call on Ridon to ask whether Matib was available to present the BIR witness.
If Matib was still indisposed and the prosecution did not elect another lawyer to present the BIR representative, Escudero said they would suspend the trial early and resume on Friday with the BIR witness.
Matib showed up to conduct the direct examination of the BIR witness.
Duterte is being tried before the Senate Impeachment Court over four main allegations. The prosecution has finished discussing two of the Articles of Impeachment and is now focusing on presenting evidence for Article II, or her alleged unexplained wealth and failure to disclose these in her SALN.
Discussions have shifted to Duterte’s bank accounts after the prosecution’s witness, Anti-Money Laundering Council Executive Director Ronel Buenaventura, testified on Monday that the council had indeed flagged several transactions involving Duterte and her relatives worth P4.4 billion.