Another allegedly anomalous government deal, this time involving body-worn cameras amounting to nearly P1 million each, surfaced at a Senate hearing on Thursday.
As the Senate subcommittee on finance tackled the proposed 2026 budget of the Department of Transportation, Sen. Raffy Tulfo confronted the Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) regarding its procurement of 191 body-worn cameras in 2020, amounting to a total of P168 million.
‘Let me give you a clue – one unit costs ?879,000. That’s for a single body-worn camera,’ Tulfo said when PPA General Manager Jay Santiago asked for time to check their records.
According to Tulfo, he has documents showing that the body-worn cameras were purchased by the PPA from Boston Home Incorporated, a company with only a paid-up capital of P10 million, based on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s records. Upon checking the address of Boston, Tulfo said they found out that it was only holding office in an apartment.
Article continues after this advertisement
Santiago initially explained that these body-worn cameras were ‘integrated ‘into their regular surveillance system, being used by their port police.
But Tulfo was not satisfied with Santiago’s explanation.
‘Okay, integrated camera and all, but to cost P879,000? Come on,’ the senator said.
Tulso also revealed that the same company was previously flagged down by the Commission on Audit after it sold defective equipment to the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB).
‘If only you had checked and visited this office, you would have seen that it’s just an apartment, why would we buy hundreds of millions worth of cameras from them? And if you had just done a background check, you would have found out that they had sold defective equipment to the EMB,’ he said in Filipino.
But Santiago defended the agency’s purchase of the body-worn cameras, saying it was in accordance with Republic Act No. 9184 known as the ‘Government Procurement Reform Act.’
‘And just like with other procurements of the Ports Authority, Your Honor – whether for infrastructure, goods, or equipment – we do not make advance payments,’ the PPA head said.
‘Sir, what we’re talking about here is extreme overpricing – this is immoral and highly scandalous,’ Tulfo answered.
Santiago further explained that these were not ordinary cameras as they also come with servers.
Still, Tulfo said the nearly P1 million cost per unit was more expensive than the P135,000 body-worn camera bought by the Philippine National Police.
‘Go to Shopee – it’s ?6,000, all in. But this one costs ?1 million?’ the senator later said and prodded DOTr acting chief Giovanni Lopez to investigate ‘this anomaly.’
‘Secretary, the transaction involving Boston Home is very anomalous. Please investigate – heads must roll,’ Tulfo said.
Lopez, for his part, gave his commitment that he would look into it.
In a statement later released to the media, Santiago clarified that the project, which was undertaken in two phases, amounted to a total of P337 million. Phase 1 of the project, costing P168.8 million, was awarded in 2020 while the second phase, awarded in 2021, was valued at P168.68 million.
The ?168.68 million deal, according to Santiago, was for 164 cameras, which he said was below the ?170 million approved budget for the project.
The contract, he said, also covered not just the cameras but ‘the entire surveillance and evidence-management ecosystem for deployment across 22 Port Management Offices nationwide.’
Regarding the issue of the supplier’s paid-up capital and use of an apartment, the PPA chief noted that it ‘fully satisfied all eligibility requirements during post-qualification.’
Pertinent documents from the Government Procurement Policy Board likewise confirmed that it was not blacklisted by any government entity during the time of procurement in 2020, according to Santiago.
‘At the time of post-qualification, there were no adverse records or blacklisting orders against Boston Home, Inc. The company met all statutory and documentary requirements,’ he stressed.
‘PPA reaffirms that the 2020 Body-Worn Camera (Phase I and II) project followed an open and competitive bidding process, not negotiated procurement,’ Santiago further said.
Also during the hearing, Tulfo asked the PPA about its supposed purchase of six mobile X-ray machines.
Santiago, however, said the transaction did not push through because he was not satisfied after personally inspecting the equipment.