This series infuriated me so deeply that I am completely bypassing my usual subsections and layout. Instead, you are getting this critique in one continuous, unfiltered, and exhaustive take. Yes, my writing can veer into long-form. That is the mark of a traditionally trained, old-school entertainment columnist-someone born into the craft, trained by the best, who comes from a long lineage of journalists, authors, and writers, and who is now thriving in today’s rapid-fire digital mainstream media landscape. I am a rare hybrid writer. Appreciate and enjoy my perspective; entertainment columnists like me do not come around often.
* * *
Now, this is where I draw the line between a casual viewer and a longtime comic book collector and reader. Let us kick off this discussion by saying there is a fine, often microscopic line between subverting superhero tropes for prestige television and fundamentally misunderstanding the emotional architecture of a comic book icon. With HBO’s heavily anticipated DCU series ‘Lanterns’, creators Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof, and Tom King have traded the shimmering, expansive cosmic theater of the Green Lantern Corps for a damp, nihilistic, and aggressively bleak ‘True Detective-style’ procedural set in the muddy trenches of Rushville, Nebraska.
While the series boasts pristine cinematography and a slow-burn atmospheric dread, it commits an unforgivable narrative sin in its treatment of its protagonist. Under the guise of ‘grounded realism,’ ‘Lanterns’ doesn’t just deconstruct the legendary Emerald Knight (played by Kyle Chandler); it structurally dismantles him with mean-spirited, almost spiteful storytelling that alienates longtime comic book readers, collectors, purists and structural storytellers alike.
This alienating approach is baked directly into the show’s jarring structural gambit. From its opening frames, ‘Lanterns’ drops the shocking revelation that Hal Jordan is already dead in the present-day 2026 timeline. Instead of experiencing his journey firsthand, we are forced to view the ‘legend’ through two deeply unsatisfying lenses: fragmented, bitter 2016 flashbacks of Hal training a green ‘John Stewart’ (Aaron Pierre), or via the ‘Halogram’-a digital backup of his consciousness floating around a decade later. For a legendary comic book character defined by overcoming great fear, this narrative choice feels like a major step backward.
To put it bluntly, the writers have fundamentally trapped ‘Hal Jordan’ in a cage of perpetual regression by completely robbing him of his agency. This is definitely not the ‘Hal Jordan’ we know! The version encountered in the meat of this story is no longer that fearless, cocky, yet deeply empathetic test pilot who conquers terror through sheer willpower. Instead, the creative brain trust behind this narrative has reduced him to a washed-up, emotionally abusive relic. Why do they misinterpret cynicism as maturity? It is truly disheartening to see a comic book character historically defined by unyielding optimism forced into the bleak box of toxic veteran tropes.
What makes this regression even more tragic is how the script weaponizes the town of Rushville against Hal’s legacy. Rather than viewing him as a cosmic peacekeeper or a global vanguard, the narrative dictates that the townspeople harbor a radioactive resentment toward him for the events of 2016. Hal is literally framed as a localized disaster zone! The storytelling goes completely out of its way to emphasize that this version of Hal couldn’t work with John, couldn’t save the day without leaving a trail of emotional wreckage, and ultimately met an ignominious end on a set of high school bleachers. Talk about a total disservice to the character!
This glaring structural flaw exposes the story’s central, zero-sum game. For some reason, the narrative insists that elevating ‘John Stewart’ requires the total comic book character assassination of ‘Hal Jordan’. But here is the thing: Aaron Pierre delivers a magnificent, measured, and deeply compelling performance as John! He is an exceptionally strong comic book character in his own right, and he absolutely does not need Hal to be reduced to a broken, unlikable husk just to look like a hero. ‘John Stewart’ can stand tall on his own merits without tearing down a legend!
Yes, it is worth repeating that a comic book character’s legacy should never be compromised for the sake of forced edginess. But in the penultimate episode of HBO’s ‘Lanterns’, titled ‘The Jordan Boys Legacy,’ the showrunners present a profound irony that is simply impossible to ignore.
Enter the ‘Halogram’-a digital snapshot of Hal’s mind captured from the early 2000s. Paradoxically, this digital ghost radiates the exact charm, earnestness, and heroism that the writers systematically stripped away from his living, breathing counterpart. When critics and longtime fans rightfully noted that this tech backup was a far more faithful and superior representation of the legendary hero, it completely exposed the core flaw of the entire series. The showrunners clearly knew exactly how to write a proper ‘Hal Jordan’: they just consciously, and seemingly spitefully, chose not to.
Reducing ‘Hal Jordan’ – the absolute paradigm of unwavering willpower who proved he could overcome the deepest dark-to a miserable, pathetic steppingstone is a massive, unforgivable misstep. ‘Lanterns’ might find some success as a raw, rain-slicked crime procedural, but as the foundation of a grand new superhero mythology, its treatment of its central pillar feels less like a creative subversion and more like an intentional desecration of a legendary legacy. ‘Hal Jordan’ deserved a soaring narrative that reached for the stars. Instead, HBO chose to bury him in the dirt.