AT LEAST 23 unusual names-some resembling those of public figures and others referring to food-appeared on Tuesday on selected acknowledgement receipts submitted by the Office of the Vice President (OVP) to support its confidential fund expenditures in 2023.
Commission on Audit (COA) Supervising Auditor Xylene Mae Del Campo confirmed before the Senate Impeachment Court that the receipts presented by the prosecution were among the documents submitted by the OVP to the Intelligence and Confidential Funds Audit Office (ICFAO) in response to audit observations.
‘During the evaluation, I organized the acknowledgment receipts according to the date they were issued, the nature of the expense and the amount involved,’ Del Campo testified.
For the first two quarters of 2023, the prosecution said Del Campo’s tabulations covered 1,049 acknowledgement receipts-519 from the first quarter and 530 from the second.
The selected receipts bore names including Pia Piattos-Lim, Ralph Josh Bacon, Anne Ongpauco, Heart Santiago, Feonna Villegas, Beth Revilla, Clarisse Hontiveros, Jose Diokno Jr., Diane Maple Lapid and John A. Lapid Jr.
Documents presented in court showed expenses of P140,000 under Piattos-Lim for the purchase of information,P150,000 under Bacon for the same purpose, P250,000 under Santiago for supplies and P500,000 under Villegas for an expense described as medical and food assistance.
For the third quarter, covering July 14 to September 30, the names presented included Beverly Claire Pampano, Matthew N. Keso, Nova Santos, Salah Casim, Renan Piatos, Xiaome Ocho, Jay Kamote, Miggy Mango, Kokoy Villamin, ‘Contis, Connor Adrian,’ Honeylet Camille Sy, Kristine Applegate Estrada and Denise Tanya Escudero.
The corresponding receipts included P250,000 under Keso, P200,000 under Kamote, P50,000 under Mango and P120,000 under Escudero. The stated purposes included the purchase of information or supplies and the payment of rewards.
Del Campo clarified that ICFAO conducted only a compliance audit and did not verify whether the named recipients were real individuals or were connected to similarly named public figures.
‘At ICFAO, we conduct compliance audits,’ she said. ‘We examine whether the transactions comply with the Joint Circular and whether the liquidation documents are complete and properly prepared.’
The auditor also distinguished between an allowable expense and a transaction that was adequately supported by documentation.
‘Yes, under Section 4.8.1, the purchase of information is an allowable expense,’ Del Campo said.
For the purchase of supplies, however, she said the acknowledgment receipts did not indicate where the items were purchased or how they were used.
‘For the acknowledgment receipts covering the purchase of supplies, I requested additional documentation to establish that the money was actually used to buy supplies,’ she testified.
The OVP also submitted an April 4, 2024 certification signed by Col. Raymund Dante P. Lachica, along with Protective Intelligence Operations Reports, to support the payment of rewards. The certification referred to surveillance and intelligence-gathering activities conducted in 127 areas during the first quarter and 111 areas during the second quarter.
Del Campo said the reports contained information about vice-presidential engagements, probable threats and operational timelines. However, they did not show the specific results needed to justify the payment of rewards.
‘I did not find any particular accomplishments that would warrant the payment of rewards,’ she said.
‘The certification only contained a general statement that there were no untoward incidents,’ Del Campo added. ‘But that was not sufficient.’
For the third quarter, Del Campo identified four issues raised in an August 8, 2024 Audit Observation Memorandum: the absence of documentary evidence of payment; P35 million in reward payments without proof of successful intelligence-gathering or surveillance; failure to specify confidential activities in the physical and financial plan; and an unsigned receipt portion of the disbursement voucher.
During an earlier Senate impeachment court hearing, defense counsel declined to categorically state whether the controversial names that previously surfaced-including Mary Grace Piattos-belonged to real individuals or were merely aliases.
Violated
Meanwhile, the alleged transfer of confidential fund cash by OVP Special Disbursing Officer Gina Acosta to security officer Col. Raymund Dante P. Lachica violated government audit rules, Del Campo said.
Del Campo said Acosta admitted during a November 2024 House hearing that, upon Duterte’s instructions, she turned over confidential fund cash advances to Lachica, then head of the Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group.
‘This directly violated the Joint Circular, specifically Item 6.1.1,’ Del Campo said.
The circular prohibits transferring confidential fund cash advances from one accountable officer to another. Such funds must be handled by a duly designated and bonded special disbursing officer or agency head.
Based on Acosta’s testimony and COA’s review of the OVP’s records, Del Campo prepared a Notice of Disallowance covering three quarterly releases of P125 million each, totaling P375 million.
The audit also cited P62 million in reward payments without proof of successful intelligence or surveillance activities and P199 million in supplies and medical and food aid that could not be adequately verified. Auditors also found a P300,000 information payment dated before the corresponding cash advance was released.
Del Campo said the OVP’s certifications and intelligence operations reports failed to identify specific accomplishments justifying the reward payments.
The notice named Duterte, Acosta, OVP Chief Accountant Julieta Villadelrey and Lachica as responsible for the questioned transactions. Duterte was included because she approved the transactions and use of the cash advances, Del Campo said.
Ordered
Also, Del Ocampo said the COA ordered the return of P448.287 million-nearly 90% of the P500 million in confidential funds spent by the OVP-due to irregular transactions, unsupported expenses, and auditing violations.
Del Campo testified that Duterte and other officials were held accountable for the disallowed funds. The amount includes P73.287 million from the OVP’s December 2022 confidential fund and the entire P375 million released during the first three quarters of 2023.
COA found that millions in reward payments lacked proof of successful intelligence or surveillance activities. Purchases of equipment, supplies, and medical and food assistance were also unsupported by sufficient receipts or evidence of their intended use.
Auditors further found that confidential fund cash advances were transferred to Lachica, who was not the OVP’s designated special disbursing officer. COA said this violated Joint Circular No. 2015-01 and made the transactions irregular.
Duterte was held accountable because she allegedly approved the transactions and use of the cash advances. Former OVP special disbursing officer Gina Acosta, chief accountant Julieta Villadelrey, and Lachica were also named accountable officials.
The OVP’s appeal concerning the P73.287-million disallowance remains pending, while it may still appeal the P375-million disallowance before the COA Commission Proper.