The Commonwealth Lawyers Association (CLA) has strongly condemned the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) over the recent arrest of prominent opposition figure and lawyer Erias Lukwago, warning that the military’s actions threaten the fundamental fabric of the rule of law in Uganda.
In a scathing international statement issued on Friday, June 26, 2026, the CLA voiced grave concerns regarding the escalating state interference in the high-stakes treason trial of veteran opposition leader Dr Kizza Besigye and his co-accused, Hajj Obeid Lutale.
Mr Lukwago, who serves as the joint leading defense counsel for the duo, was detained by the UPDF on June 15, 2026. In a rapid succession of events that has drawn international scrutiny, his co-lead counsel, seasoned Kenyan lawyer Martha Karua-who is authorized to practice in Uganda-was subsequently denied entry into the country and held incommunicado at Entebbe International Airport.
The international legal body stated that the targeted actions against Mr Lukwago and Ms Karua represent a gross violation of established international standards guarding the independence of the legal profession.
“The right to legal representation is a cornerstone of the rule of law and a fundamental guarantee of a fair trial,” the CLA statement reads. “The targeting of defense counsel – through arrest, detention, or charge – in connection with their representation of a client strikes at the heart of the administration of justice.”
The CLA threw its weight behind an earlier protest by the Uganda Law Society (ULS), reinforcing that the military has absolutely “no role whatsoever in intimidating, threatening, or arresting members of the Bar for performing their constitutional and professional duties.”
The ongoing treason trial against Dr Besigye, a four-time presidential contender, has kept the political climate tense. Legal analysts view the state’s aggressive maneuvering against the defense team as an attempt to cripple the opposition leader’s legal shield. By cutting off access to regional legal heavyweights like Karua and locking up local counsel like Lukwago, the state faces accusations of undermining judicial fairness.
To anchor its rebuke, the CLA cited multiple international covenants that Uganda is a party to, including Clause 16 of the United Nations Principles on the Role of Lawyers. The UN charter explicitly mandates that governments ensure lawyers can perform their functions without harassment and are free to travel and consult with clients both at home and abroad.
Furthermore, the association referenced the 2023 Commonwealth Declaration of Goa and the International Bar Association Standards, both of which strictly prohibit administrative, civil, or penal sanctions against legal practitioners for doing their jobs.
“No lawyer shall suffer or be threatened with penal, civil, administrative, economic or other sanctions or harassment by reason of his or her having legitimately advised or represented any client or client’s cause.” – Principle 8, International Bar Association Standards
The CLA has joined local advocates in calling upon the Chief Justice of Uganda to step in and forcefully guarantee the security of all counsel, judges, and litigants under Article 128 of the Constitution of Uganda, which protects judicial independence.
The international body concluded with a firm list of demands to the Ugandan authorities, insisting that the government:
Ensure the treason trial of Dr. Kizza Besigye and Hajji Obeid Lutale proceeds without any further interference with their legal team.
Uphold the independence of the legal profession to act without fear or favor.
Take immediate legal action against any state actors or individuals who impede lawyers from discharging their professional duties.
Comply fully with international obligations to uphold the rule of law.
The Commonwealth Lawyers Association is a London-based international non-profit organization that promotes the rule of law across Commonwealth member states, ensuring that independent legal professions can serve the public with integrity.
As pressure mounts from both domestic law societies and global watchdogs, the judiciary faces a critical test in reining in military overreach within civilian courts.