On dynamics of LC1 polls

On Tuesday, July 28, Ugandans elected village (zone) leaders, marking the end of the 2026 electoral cycle. The Local Council One (LC1) is the lowest geographical unit in Uganda. In rural areas, it is designated as a village (zone in urban centres).

There is no government administrative presence at LC1 Level. That makes the LC1 chairperson and his/her executive committee the nerve end of the government. In LC1 elections, voters line behind candidates (of their choice). No secret ballot.

But it takes more than courage for one to vote against the candidature of a husband, a close friend, relative, business partner or benefactor by lining behind his or her opponent.

In Kiburara, we had smooth elections (save for the heartfelt loss of my nephew; we are okay). Kiburara is composed of four zones, namely Kamuruli, Rwembya, Kisanga and Kirembo.

National Resistance Movement (NRM) candidate Ronald Muuke took Kamuruli, defeating the Forum for Democratic Change (FDC)-incumbent Jehuyad Kabwana.

My nephew Emmy Kasenya (NRM-incumbent) lost to Musa Kuule (FDC) in Rwembya, while Mr Saad Kabundu (NRM) was re-elected to lead Kirembo. Kisanga Village was taken by Mr Abdulaziz Zain Baluku (NRM). I have known John since 1979. We both went to Kisinga Primary School, doing the daily 16km (to-and-fro) distance on bare foot from Kirembo to Kisinga. As adults, John and I have been helping each other.

However, it should be stated that the mechanics of our friendship’s osmotic capillarity placed me on the gravitational upper end, to wit: his third wife lives rent-free in our house. John’s third wife also has access (for use) to five acres of our modest family land. In short, John is my man.

But John and his third wife didn’t vote for my nephew, who lost the race by a margin of one vote. If John and his third wife had voted for my nephew, he (my nephew) would have won the race by a margin of one vote. Funny: John’s first and second wives voted for my nephew.

As a human being, my instinct is to punish John. Indeed, I refused to give audience to his third wife; she had come to remind me of my pledge of financial support to her university-student son.

I personally regard the leadership at village level critical in determining an environment under which individuals can realise their aspirations.

According to the law, the role of LC1 leadership is to: assist in maintenance of law, order and security; initiate, encourage, support and participate in self-help projects; mobilise people, material and technical assistance in relation to the self-help projects.

Other roles are: oversee activities undertaken by the government and NGO’s in their area; enact by-laws; vet, recommend persons wishing to join the security forces.

Given the above, the best LC1 chairperson is, therefore, one who: recognises his or her limitations and dispose him or herself to work with others; is humble and cares about the welfare of others, especially the weak; is not ambitious for personal gain; doesn’t use ethnicity, political party or religious affiliation as a basis for determining the value of others.

For me, the best LC1 chairperson is the one able to link the needs, opportunities and challenges in his/ her community with those of people in other parts of the country.

Leopard still on the prowl as human-wildlife conflicts soar

What Mr Eriya Mugabi, 18, last remembers is being struck fiercely by the paw of the big cat. The sheer force that the leopard exerted on his head was overwhelming. Mr Mugabi immediately passed out once he hit the ground. When the teenager woke up, he was occupying one of the beds at Kiryandongo Hospital. His elder brother, Richard Mutebi, who also faced off with the big cat in the April 2, 2026 incident was not as lucky. The injuries he suffered were fatal. He was pronounced dead shortly after being wheeled into the hospital.

The human-wildlife conflict that played out at Bujjabe Village, Nakitoma Sub-county in Nakasongola District spanned no more than two minutes per various eyewitness accounts. Recent parliamentary oversight reports indicate that Uganda records nearly 7,000 annual incidents, up from 2,000 cases five years prior. There is a lot of speculation as to how a big cat ended up in a eucalyptus forest at one of Nakasongola District’s nondescript villages. Nakitoma Sub-county has five villages-Bujjabe inclusive-that border the Zziwa Rhino and Wildlife Sanctuary. Many believe that the leopard escaped from the sanctuary.

Mr George William Musisi, 66, was the first to come into contact with the leopard. The grandfather of Mutebi and Mugabi was just 80 metres from his abode when the life-changing episode started to play out. ‘I had gone to collect some firewood at about 5pm on April 2, 2026 when I saw the leopard next to the dry piece of wood that I tried to pluck from a tree branch near the eucalyptus forest that is just a few metres away from my home. I made an alarm that attracted my two grandchildren to the forest,’ he told the Weekend Monitor.

Deadly intervention

Mutebi was the first to respond. Unbeknownst to Mutebi, a big cat was charging at him. His panic-stricken grandfather had only managed to run to a nearby garden before suddenly losing consciousness. It didn’t take long for the leopard to overpower and maul Mutebi. Mr Mugabi, who also attempted to spring to the rescue of his elder brother, was no match. Responders found the two youth lying in a pool of blood, fighting for their lives. ‘I did not know that these two children had responded to my alarm. I wouldn’t have advised them to attack the Leopard because we were not prepared to fight such a wild creature,’ Mr Musisi, the grandfather of the two youth, said.

After evacuation to Kiryandongo Hospital, a distance of about 35km from Bujjabe Village, Mr Mugabi was referred to Mulago National Referral Hospital. The life-threatening injuries he suffered necessitated major surgery at a higher medical facility. Mr Mugabi spent five weeks bed-ridden at Mulago before being discharged. While he is happy, if not lucky, to be alive, he still faces excruciating pain. Both literally and metaphorically. ‘I feel great pain in the sides of my neck and often find it difficult to turn my neck. The deep wounds inflicted on my body including the neck, the back side, the hands are yet to heal. I can’t lift any heavy object and turn my neck. I pray that my family gets the prescribed drugs to ensure that my health gets better,’ he disclosed in a recent interview with the Weekend Monitor.

Spot of bother

The incident has since left the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) in a spot of bother at one of the country’s sleepy districts. The leadership at Nakitoma Sub-county in Nakasongola District claim that five villages that border the Zziwa Rhino and Wildlife Sanctuary live in a big scare after the attack. When the UWA team dispatched from Kampala City got to Nakitoma, three days after the attack, it failed to track down the big cat. Since then, residents in Nakitoma Sub-county’s villages, including Bujaabe, Kokkoba, Kyamukonda, Kasozi and Bugalamwa, have been on tenterhooks as the whereabouts of the leopard are unknown to date.

The residents are also demanding a quicker compensation process for the family that not only lost a dear but has a survivor victim who badly needs further medical treatment. Mr Godfrey Lutalo Muwonge, the former Nakitoma Sub-county chairperson, who has been in contact with the UWA team, the delays in compensating victims that have lost property, including gardens destroyed by wild animals, is a reality. ‘My appeal to UWA is quick response. We don’t want to lose the life of the 18-year old whose relatives are struggling to access the prescribed drugs that are very expensive,’ he said.

Mr Muwonge added: ‘The 18-year old mauled by a leopard needs financial help. UWA recently gave the family the compensation forms to fill and get the required documentation needed for compensation, but the process is often delayed by officials that fail to assess the situation and help the affected communities.’ Mr Bashir Hanji, the UWA spokesperson, confirmed that the Authority is aware of the Nakitoma incident. He said UWA extended some help including assistance to the bereaved family. The compensation process had also been initiated, he further disclosed.

Funding gaps

While human-wildlife incidents are on the increase in the country, the 11th Parliament heard in February that the Uganda Wildlife Compensation Scheme is running on fumes. The House Committee on Tourism, Trade and Industry reported that a paltry Shs3.9 billion out of a possible Shs7 billion had been remitted to the scheme. ”The law is clear that two percent of revenue collected by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) must be allocated to the Compensation Fund yet this has not been done. As a result, victims are left without the support they are entitled to,” the Committee report reads in part. Discrepancies in pay-outs were also illuminated.

Whereas the law prescribes a maximum payment of Shs20 million for deaths, the Committee ‘observed glaring inconsistencies in the compensation process’. The absence of a ‘clear formula’ meant that while some victims received Shs10 million, others got Shs28.7 million. A section of conservationists and wildlife experts said the conflict between humans and wildlife in Uganda has been on the increase in recent years because of the growing human population. The growing numbers have exerted pressure on the wildlife natural habitat. Mr George Livingstone Gizamba, a conservationist and founder member of Safe for Nature Love (SNL), told the Weekend Monitor that several of the human-wildlife conflict incidents are never officially recorded but remain a big concern in Uganda.

Security fencing

While human deaths have been met with shock, as they should be, there has been a conspicuous silence about wildlife deaths due to human activities like encroachments. In the report of the Parliamentary Committee on Tourism, Trade and Industry, the slow progress in installing electric fences around Queen Elizabeth National Park (spanning 100.5km) and Murchison Falls National Park (spanning 153.5km) was captured. The Committee noted that leaving vast sections of the area unprotected leaves several communities vulnerable to attacks such as the one that claimed Mutebi’s life.

Conservationists said there should be a delicate balance with the ultimate goal supposed to be co-existence with wildlife. In April of 2022, a first was registered after three lions were electrocuted at Queen Elizabeth National Park’s protected area, Rubirizi District. In 2019, President Museveni commissioned an electric wire fence in Queen Elizabeth National Park in Rubirizi District. It was then piloted under the auspices of Space for Giants and the government of Uganda (UWA).

The electric fence has since been extended to other parts of the park in Kasese District. The fence comprises wires that connect through treated wooden pillars. Untampered with, the pillars, which are about five feet high, can last between 30 and 40 years. The wires are connected to constant solar-generated electricity and fitted with live spikes that protrude either side of the mainline. The fence emits a repulsing current that scares the approaching animal away.

’It’s important in life that we all learn how to lose’

The lunchtime crowd is beginning to swell at Golden Tulip Hotel in Kampala. Business executives drift in and out of meetings. Waiters weave through the dining area carrying trays of food.

Through the windows, the city stretches toward the horizon, bustling with the urgency that defines Uganda’s capital.

At a quiet table sits Ms Pauline Nantongo Kalunda, executive director of ECOTRUST, one of Uganda’s best-known conservation organisations.

Over the next two hours, our conversation moves effortlessly from climate change to basketball, from faith to failure, from conservation policy to the lessons she learned teaching Sunday school.

The first question is perhaps the simplest. Who is Pauline Nantongo Kalunda? The answer arrives without hesitation. ‘I am a scientist, a christian and a Ugandan. That’s it.’

The response is striking in its brevity. For someone who has spent more than three decades working in conservation and community development, overseeing programmes that have touched tens of thousands of households across Uganda, there is no lengthy recitation of achievements.

Instead, the simplicity appears deliberate. As the conversation unfolds, it becomes clear that Ms Kalunda is less interested in titles than in purpose.

Scientist by accident

Ms Kalunda never intended to build a career in conservation. Like several bright students of her generation, she had her sights set on medicine. ‘I started out thinking of going to medical school,’ she said.

But life had other plans. The grades she obtained at the time determined which faculty she would join at university, and instead of medicine she found herself admitted to the Faculty of Forestry.

She had no idea what the future held. Yet the unexpected detour would shape the course of her life. Rather than dwelling on disappointment, she embraced the opportunity before her.

‘From a long time ago, you throw something at me and I try to optimise whatever it is that has been thrown at me.’ Ms Kalunda studied zoology and psychology and later pursued business administration.

Along the way, she worked with Wildlife Clubs of Uganda and Nature Uganda, organisations she describes as foundational to her professional development.

Those experiences exposed her to both ends of the conservation spectrum. On one hand were local communities, schools and farmers.

On the other were international conversations about species conservation, ecosystems and environmental policy. It was a combination that helped her understand how local actions connect to global challenges.

Lessons from the court

Long before she became a conservation leader, Ms Kalunda was an athlete. Basketball was her sport of choice. Rugby, however, proved a much shorter adventure.

Laughing at the memory, she recounted how she briefly joined efforts to help train a developing women’s rugby side. The experience would last three matches.

‘In the first game, I played and I think because we were big and tall, the kids were fearing us,’ she said.

By the second game, one of the younger players had successfully tackled her. ‘In the third game, it was bloody. I decided no.’

The rugby chapter ended there. ‘I was coming from basketball. As much as someone touches you, the whistle blows. And here is someone bringing you down and throwing you like you’re a bag of potatoes and there will be no whistle.’

Yet sport left a lasting mark on her outlook. She believes every child should experience competitive sport, not necessarily to become a champion but to learn lessons that classrooms often cannot teach. ‘You learn that injustices exist, but they don’t define you,’ she said. ‘You also learn to lose honourably.’

Learning to lose Failure, Ms Kalunda said, has never frightened her. That attitude is unusual in a world where careers are often measured by victories, promotions and awards.

For her, success lies not only in outcomes but also in what is learned along the way. ‘I don’t fear failure that much,’ she said.

When a proposal is rejected or a competition lost, she chooses to focus on what was gained rather than what was missed. ‘I’m able to appreciate the small gains I’ve made, even if I’ve not achieved the prize.’

Perhaps the clearest example came during a difficult moment in her career. An idea she had helped develop achieved success, but another individual was receiving most of the recognition. The situation frustrated her.

Seeking advice, she turned to a friend. His response changed her perspective. ‘He asked me, ‘when you were all coming up with this idea, what was it for?” The answer was simple: to benefit a community. The friend then asked whether the community was still benefiting. When Ms Kalunda answered in the affirmative, the matter was settled. ‘He said, ‘Rest your case’.’ The lesson has remained with her ever since. ‘Whatever vision you had is being executed. If another person finds it important to get credit, that is noise.’ She pauses before repeating the phrase. ‘That is noise.’

Understanding people

One of the recurring themes throughout lunch is people. For all her scientific training, Ms Kalunda speaks as much about human behaviour as she does about forests or climate change.

Teaching Sunday school, playing team sports and working with communities across Uganda taught her to observe people closely.

Someone may be rude, difficult or even unpleasant. That does not mean they lack talent. ‘There are times I’m in a meeting and then I say, ‘this is going to end like this,” she said.

Others may disagree, but she has learned to read body language, reactions and motivations. Those observations have become one of her most valuable leadership tools.

What farmers know

Much of ECOTRUST’s work revolves around smallholder farmers. Yet Ms Kalunda is quick to challenge the assumption that development organisations are always the teachers.

‘The other ones are actually good teachers. So, it’s a two-way street,’ she said. She described farmers as natural innovators, constantly experimenting and adapting to changing circumstances.

The challenge, she explained, is often one of translation. Farmers possess practical knowledge built through experience. Scientists and investors operate in technical language.

Her role frequently involves bridging those worlds. ‘What we do, we technically specify what they do, so that investors can invest in it.’

The admiration is evident. Over the years, she has repeatedly encountered examples of ingenuity that challenge conventional assumptions about rural communities. One story stands out.

A smallholder farmer initially planted trees for timber production. Years later, he discovered that the leaves from those same trees were in demand for herbal medicine. Instead of waiting decades for timber revenues, he began harvesting leaves regularly.

‘Every two weeks I get a lot more money than I will ever get from timber,’ the farmer told her. The lesson was profound. ‘There are lots of opportunities around us,’ Ms Kalunda said.

Faith as a compass

Throughout the conversation, faith emerges as the thread connecting every aspect of Ms Kalunda’s life. For her, Christianity is not separate from work. It shapes how she approaches leadership, conflict and success. ‘Everything that you do, do it as unto the Lord,’ she said.

That principle influences both effort and integrity. ‘If you’re doing it for God, then you really had better give it your all.’ Faith also provides a sense of security.

‘At some point in time, I decided I am a child of the Most High God,’ she said. ‘You have to do so much to bring me down.’ The conviction is neither boastful nor defensive. Rather, it reflects an inner confidence that allows her to navigate setbacks without being consumed by them.

Beyond climate change

As lunch progresses, the conversation shifts to climate change. For Ms Kalunda, one of the greatest challenges is that many people do not realise how deeply it affects their lives. ‘They don’t know,’ she said repeatedly.

‘They don’t know why the prices of food in the market are changing. They don’t know that it has a relationship with drought. They don’t know that it has a relationship with flood. Uganda’s dependence on natural resources makes it particularly vulnerable.

Changes in rainfall, disease patterns and agricultural productivity are already affecting communities. She pointed to highland areas where malaria was once rare but is now increasingly common as temperatures rise.

Climate change, she argued, is not merely an environmental issue. It affects health, food security, incomes and economic development. Yet she believes solutions exist. The first step is protecting ecosystems that already shield communities from climate shocks. The second is recognising that conservation and economic development are not opposing goals.

The future of conservation

As coffee cups are cleared and lunch draws to a close, Ms Kalunda returns to a theme that has surfaced repeatedly throughout the conversation. Conservation, she said, cannot rely solely on goodwill. People must see value in protecting nature.

‘The Ecotrust model is based on landscape restoration as a business,’ she explained. ‘Not because they are saving the world. But because it makes economic sense to do so.’

It is an approach that has helped thousands of households improve their livelihoods while restoring degraded landscapes. And it reflects a broader philosophy that seems to define her career.

Whether discussing conservation, leadership or personal growth, Ms Kalunda consistently rejects the idea that success belongs only to those who stand in the spotlight. What matters, she insists, is whether the mission is achieved.

Kyegegwa hit by surge in murders as police deploy special tactics

Kyegegwa District experienced a disturbing surge in murders in July, with more than five people being killed and several others left with serious injuries, raising fresh concerns about public safety and security.

Many of the victims were reportedly attacked inside their homes by unknown assailants.

According to the 2025 Annual Police Crime Report, the district registered 65 murder cases, the highest in the Rwenzori West policing region. This was an increase from 57 cases in 2024 and 43 cases in 2023.

Residents say that during July alone, at least nine people were murdered in separate incidents across the district while others are still nursing wounds.

Couple hacked to death

The latest incident occurred on July 21 at Kitende Village in Kibuye Parish, where a couple was found murdered in their home.

According to the Rwenzori West Regional Police spokesperson, SP Vincent Twesige, the victims were identified as Mutesa Donati, 53, a Rwandan national and peasant farmer, and Kyalisiima Beatrice, also known as Muhawenimana Maria, also a Rwandan national.

Police say unknown assailants attacked the couple during the night while they were asleep and stabbed them to death using a sharp object.

“The suspects stabbed them with an unidentified sharp weapon while they were asleep on their mattress. The male deceased sustained stab injuries to both ears, while the female sustained injuries to the left ear, above the left eye and on the head,” Twesige said.

He said police established that the attackers stole the couple’s mobile phones and SIM cards but left behind other valuable property, including a motorcycle and tailoring machines.

Just days before the Kitende murders, another couple, Ismeal Arituha and Aisha Nasolo, were killed in a similar nighttime attack in Muhangi Village, also in Kegegwa sub-county.

The Muhangi Village murder incident later turned chaotic after police tracked a suspect using a sniffer dog. As officers attempted to arrest the suspect, an angry crowd allegedly tried to lynch him.

Police fired live bullets to disperse the mob, fatally shooting a resident identified only as Emmanuel, who later passed on.

Twesige said the deceased died after sustaining gunshot injuries during the confrontation.

Mr William Kagooha, a relative of the Muhangi victims, said the children raised the alarm.

“When we reached their home, we found both of them tied with ropes on their hands and legs before they were killed,” Kagooha said.

On July 1 in Bulingo B Village, a family of four survived after neighbors responded to their cries. Attackers broke into Bigaruraho Ronald’s home at 4 a.m. with an axe. His wife Kansime Elizabeth and daughters Kabajulizi Immaculate and Kembabazi Juliet were seriously injured. Their 12-year-old son, Kusima Joseph, escaped and alerted authorities.

“Their 12-year-old son, Kusima Joseph, managed to escape and raised an alarm, alerting neighbors and the GISO of Kyegegwa Sub-county, who reported the matter to Kyegegwa Police Station,” Twesige said. Police recovered a blood-stained axe. The injured were taken to Mubende Regional Referral Hospital.

Leaders call for vigilance Local leaders say the attacks are spreading.

“We are asking our people to remain vigilant because every family is now worried. Our leaders should strengthen security and protect residents… We now fear that they can strike at any time,” said Mr. Steven Baguma, a local leader.

Mr Rashid Musinguzi, chairperson of Kyegegwa sub-county, confirmed four deaths in two incidents in his area.

“The first incident happened in Muhangi Village where we lost a couple. Another attack occurred in Kabweza where more people were killed. Some suspects have since been arrested and remain in detention,” he said.

He said village security committees of about 10 members each have been formed to patrol with security personnel. He urged residents to report suspicious people, avoid late-night movement, and check homes before sleeping.

In response, Rwenzori West Regional Police Commander SSP Joab Wabwire camped in Kyegegwa for five days with other officers.

“We could not continue sitting in Fort Portal while people were being killed. We decided to come to Kyegegwa to reinforce our security teams and end the crime. During the five-day operation, we arrested several suspects who will be arraigned before court. We have also received valuable support from residents and local leaders,” Wabwire said.

He said police have intensified day and night patrols and community sensitisation. According to him, no new murder cases have been reported in the last two weeks.

Residents, however, say they want sustained police presence to prevent another wave of attacks.

Who gets left behind?: Inside higher education funding gap

Each year, between 140,000 and 165,000 students complete A-Level (Senior Six) in Uganda, according to the Uganda National Examinations Board (Uneb), with many of them aspiring to join university or other tertiary institutions. Yet for a large share of these graduates, that ambition ends at the classroom door.

Despite the growing number of secondary school leavers, research shows that less than 10 percent transition to university, with cost emerging as one of the most decisive barriers. Tuition fees in some private universities now reach as high as Shs6 million per semester, placing higher education beyond the reach of many academically qualified students. As a result, access to university is increasingly being determined not by merit, but by financial capacity. This leaves a significant pool of talent unable to advance beyond secondary education, deepening inequality in higher learning opportunities.

Equity concerns

Mr Patrick Kaboyo, the national secretary of the Federation of Non-State Education Institutions, says Uganda’s higher education financing model is increasingly raising concerns around fairness, access, and long-term impact. He argues that while government support through scholarships and the Students’ Loan Scheme remains important, the system is still largely driven by merit-based selection-an approach that can disadvantage students from less-resourced backgrounds.

Mr Kaboyo adds that learners from better-performing schools and wealthier households often have an advantage in competitive selection, leaving equally capable but poorer students behind. ‘We need to ask whether the system is truly reaching those who need it most,’ he says, adding that a stronger focus on financial need would improve equity in public sponsorship. He also raises concerns about transparency, arguing that many scholarship opportunities are not widely publicised.

According to him, better information sharing would widen access and improve trust in the allocation process. Beyond access, Mr Kaboyo calls for a stronger focus on outcomes, questioning whether Uganda is tracking the long-term impact of its investment in higher education. ‘We need to know, for the last 10 or 20 years, who are these beneficiaries and are they adding value to national development?’ he says. He suggests a comprehensive audit of scholarship and loan beneficiaries to assess whether graduates are entering priority sectors, warning that without such tracking, the country risks producing graduates whose skills do not translate into national needs.

Govt financing channels

The government, however, maintains that it is actively working to expand and refine access to higher education funding. Ms Kedrace Turyagyenda, the permanent secretary at the Ministry of Education and Sports, says state support is delivered through two main channels: government scholarships and the Students’ Loan Scheme. ‘As [the] Government of Uganda, we have two main ways of supporting young people who are joining higher education,’ she explains, adding that support extends to both universities and technical institutions.

Ms Turyagyenda says government scholarships are awarded through merit, sports excellence, and the district quota system. ‘Each district has a number of students who can join universities and other tertiary institutions on government sponsorship,’ she says. For students who cannot afford higher education, the Students’ Loan Scheme offers an alternative pathway. The Education ministry’s top accounting officer explains that selection is strictly based on financial vulnerability at the family, community, and individual level. Beneficiaries study under the scheme and repay the loans after graduation, following a grace period.

External scholarships, partnerships

Beyond domestic funding, Uganda also benefits from externally funded scholarships through partners such as the Commonwealth framework, the United Kingdom (UK), India, and the Mastercard Foundation Scholars Programme. Bilateral partnerships have also expanded opportunities, including the Government of Algeria scholarship programme, which recently flagged off 53 students, bringing total beneficiaries to about 253 this academic year. Ms Turyagyenda says such opportunities are first received through official channels before being released to the public. ‘Once we get them, we put them out in the media or on our website, and people compete for them,’ she says. However, she notes that many external scholarships are concentrated at postgraduate level, limiting opportunities for undergraduate students who make up the majority of A-Level leavers.

Rising demand, funding pressure

Despite these interventions, demand for higher education funding continues to exceed available support. The challenge is compounded by broader education financing constraints, even as the government maintains free primary and secondary education under the Universal Primary Education (UPE) and the Universal Secondary Education (USE) initiatives. Stakeholders note that the capitation grant-currently about Shs20,000 per pupil under UPE-remains insufficient to meet rising operational costs, affecting learning quality and preparedness for university. As more students complete A-Level each year, the financial burden increasingly shifts to families at the most critical transition point. For many, entry into university is no longer determined solely by academic performance, but by ability to pay.

The bigger question

The debate over higher education financing is therefore shifting beyond access to deeper questions of fairness, transparency, and national return on investment. As Uganda expands participation in education, stakeholders argue that the challenge ahead is not only how many students reach university, but whether the system that supports them is equitable, transparent, and sustainable enough to deliver long-term development impact.

Canadian consultant remanded in Uganda over Shs5.5b gold fraud

A 64-year-old Canadian national has been remanded to Luzira Prison by the Chief Magistrate’s Court in Kampala over allegations of obtaining $1.5 million (about Shs5.56 billion) by false pretences and illegal mineral dealing.

The accused, Michel Faille-a consultant residing at Mestil Hotel in Nsambya, Kampala-on Friday appeared before Chief Magistrate Ritah Neumbe Kidasa and denied the charges leveled against him.

According to the charge sheet, Faille, alongside others still at large, allegedly obtained the money from Abdulkadir Mohamed Nur between July and October 2025 at Acacia Mall in Kamwokya, Kampala. Prosecutors contend that the suspects falsely claimed they would facilitate the shipment of 16 tonnes of gold to Dubai, a transaction that never materialized.

In the second count, the prosecution alleges that during the same period, Faille and his accomplices were found in possession of 740 kilograms of suspected gold nuggets in Kololo, Kampala, without a valid mineral dealer’s licence-a violation of the Mining and Minerals Act, 2022.

State Prosecutor Ms. Grace Amy Namuganza informed the court that police inquiries into the matter are still incomplete.

“Investigations are still ongoing,” Ms. Namuganza told the court as she requested an adjournment to allow detectives time to conclude their work.

Chief Magistrate Neumbe granted the state’s request and remanded Faille until August 12, 2026, when the matter will return to court for mention and an update on the progress of investigations.

“You are hereby remanded until August 12 for the mention of your case,” Ms. Neumbe ruled.

Prosecution added that security agencies are actively hunting for other suspects linked to the scheme who remain at large.

The development highlights Uganda’s ongoing crackdown on fraudulent gold transactions-a sector that has faced heightened scrutiny from law enforcement following a surge in fake export deals targeting foreign and local investors.

What next after Uganda’s bond yields keep falling?

There is a particular kind of confidence a Finance ministry displays when it starts turning down free money. Not literally free, of course because the Bank of Uganda (BoU) still pays for every shilling it borrows, but when a government is offered nearly nine times more cash than it asked for and still says no to the majority of it, that is a signal worth reading carefully.

July 2026, the opening month of Uganda’s new financial year, offered four such signals in a row. To understand July, it helps to know what came before it. The 2025/2026 fiscal year (FY) was an election year, and Uganda’s bond market behaved the way election-year bond markets tend to: nervously, then expensively. Yields on the long end of the curve touched 17.7 to17.9 percent at auction and briefly cleared 18 percent on the secondary market. Investors were, in effect, being paid a hefty political-risk premium to hold 15, 20 and 25-year government paper through a contested electoral cycle.

A slow unwind

The Government of Uganda (GoU), meanwhile, was in no position to argue: its domestic financing needs were large (a Shs72 trillion budget, later topped up with a roughly Shs10 trillion supplementary), donor grants were declining, and it needed the market to show up. It did. Auctions were oversubscribed almost without exception, and the GoU accepted, on average, roughly 13 percent more than it had originally offered across the year. That appetite front-loaded itself.

Uganda issued heavily in the first half of the fiscal year and then, tellingly, skipped a bond auction altogether in December and pulled back acceptance sharply through January and March, as coupon payments and maturities came due and the Treasury managed its own cash-flow pressure rather than the market’s. Then came a wrinkle nobody had priced for. By January 2026, with the election behind it and roughly 90 percent of its financing needs already met, the government’s cost of borrowing began falling fast.

The 20-year touched 14.7 percent in January, a startling six-month drop from the 2025 peaks. Then the Iran war escalated in February and March, the dollar strengthened, offshore investors, who had built their Ugandan sovereign holdings back up to nearly 15 percent of the market by December, began heading for the exits, and yields snapped back up into the 15 to16 percent range, where they largely stayed through the first half of 2026. As Janet Anayo, an investment analyst at Old Mutual Investment Group Uganda, put it: ‘That Iran war escalated, in February, March… you’d see that there was a bit of volatility in the fixed income market. Part of that was that these offshore investors were exiting some of these positions.’

July, dissected

Against that backdrop, July’s four auctions that include two, five and 15-year bonds on the 1st; Treasury bills on the 8th; three, 10 and 20-year bonds on the 15th; and two, five, 15 and 25-year bonds again on the 29th, read more like a government pressing its advantage. The numbers, taken together, show that across the month, the BoU offered a combined Shs3.73 trillion of paper. Investors tendered Shs8.79 trillion, 2.36 times over-subscribed. The GoU accepted just Shs3.85 trillion, meaning it turned away roughly Shs4.93 trillion that investors were actively trying to hand it.

More interesting than the aggregate is the shape of the curve within the month. Three tenors were reopened twice in July, and all three priced lower the second time. The two-year fell from 12.800 percent (1 July) to 12.500 percent (29 July), down 30 basis points. The five-year fell from 14.700 percent to 14.250 percent, down 45 basis points, even as its tender book nearly doubled, from Shs824 billion to Shs1.06 trillion. The 15-year fell from 15.750 percent to 15.650 percent, down 10 basis points The short and belly of the curve, in other words, are still compressing, and doing so with demand accelerating rather than tapering off, a signature of a market conditioned to expect further easing.

The long end also tells something. The 25-year bond, the same 16 percent-coupon, 2050-maturity paper first floated in August 2025, cleared at exactly 16.000 percent on July 29, having traded, according to secondary-market levels in June, around 15.93 percent. That is a small but real reversal: seven basis points higher, not lower, after weeks of apparent softening. It is also barely above where the 20-year cleared two weeks earlier, at 15.950 percent, an unusually flat spread for 500 basis points of extra duration risk. Meanwhile the 10-year, at 15.450 percent, is essentially unchanged from where it was trading roughly six weeks earlier at 15.44 percent.

This means that Uganda’s front end is still easing decisively, its belly has stabilised, and its very long end has stopped falling and shown its first flicker of resistance. That divergence matters for how one reads the ‘taper.’ Government’s declared preference, as Susan Namaganda, a fixed income expert noted, is unambiguous. At borrowing costs of 16 to17 percent, ‘that’s really expensive debt for the government of Uganda as they’re running the country,’ and the state ‘wants to start tapering… maybe we can go down to the 14 percent ranges, 13 percent ranges.’ The July data shows that ambition is being realised at the short end and stalling, for now, at the long end, precisely where offshore investors, still skittish after February’s exodus, exert the most pricing power.

The architecture

None of this is accidental. The 2026/2027 auction calendar, published just before the fiscal year began, was engineered with exactly this dynamic in mind. Treasury bill auctions were cut from twice a month to once, a change Ms Namaganda linked directly to the State’s declining appetite for short-dated rollover risk. ‘Now for this particular calendar the government is saying, no, we no longer want that much of the short money, we want longer-term money,’ she noted. Several long-dated benchmarks are also being deliberately retired. The three-year bond used in July’s auction, which is the 15.550 percent paper maturing July 2028, is scheduled to stop being reissued around August, replaced by a fresh 3-year benchmark from September.

The 15-year (15.800 percent, maturing 2039) and 20-year (15.000 percent, maturing 2043) bonds sold in July face the same fate around August and September. Ms Namaganda’s explanation was that: ‘Since these particular bonds, especially the 20 and 15-year bond, ever since they issued them out, they have been appearing on the calendars non-stop… the government has also accumulated an outstanding debt on those particular [maturities].’ A bond switch is also scheduled for March 2027, giving holders of the August 2029 bond the option, not obligation, to roll into fresh paper, a tool Ms Namaganda described as designed to relieve exactly the kind of maturity-clustering pressure that a large single redemption date creates: ‘It is not a must to switch your bond.’

There is also a longer-term financing story sitting underneath all of this. Ms Anayo flagged Uganda’s approaching oil production, expected to commence in the second half of 2026, as a structural reason for the government to want cheaper domestic debt now. A new external revenue stream reduces the urgency to keep paying elevated coupons to attract Treasury demand. ‘The government wants to diversify away from expensive shilling-denominated borrowing to be able to reduce the rate at which they are borrowing,’ Ms Namaganda noted. That, combined with public debt sitting at roughly 53 percent of GDP and a Fitch rating of B+ with a stable outlook, figures which Ms Anayo cited as the credit backdrop investors should be weighing against the yields. This gives the government both the incentive and, so far, the credibility to keep rejecting bids rather than chase the market up.

What to watch

Owing to this, two things are worth tracking into August and beyond.

First, whether the roughly Shs900 billion rejected at the 25-year auction alone, plus the hundreds of billions turned away across the rest of July, resurfaces, as expected, at the mid-August auction covering the 20-year, 10-year and 3-year bonds.

A further oversubscription there would confirm that July’s discipline is sustainable rather than a one-month anomaly.

Second, whether the long end’s slight uptick on July 29 was noise or the start of a genuine re-steepening, as the market prices in the retirement of the current 15- and 20-year benchmarks and waits to see what coupon the replacement bonds carry in September.

If the pattern of the last financial year is any guide, heavy front-loaded issuance early, followed by a deliberate pullback once financing needs are largely met, investors would not assume July’s rejection rates persist unchanged all year.

One month in, the government has already cut yields on three bonds it didn’t have to reopen, and the long end hasn’t punished it for trying.

In July 2026, at least, Uganda’s Treasury was setting the terms, not taking them.

The shutdown is over. The real test for Uganda begins now

For four weeks, this weekly column and others appearing in the Weekend Monitor have been absent. The reason is well known.

The government, unhappy with the way Daily Monitor and its sister broadcasters – NTV, Spark TV, KFM and Ddembe FM – covered it, moved to shut them down temporarily. People who care about press freedom and free speech – and the role they play in fostering democracy – expressed serious concerns.

The government had its compelling reasons for the action it took, just like the people who were concerned. The good news is that all five outlets have resumed operations.

Discerning news consumers are now going to watch closely and see if the reporting, commentary and opinions will change.

My guess is that they will. The reason is simple. A newspaper, radio or TV station that is closed for good does absolutely nothing.

But one that has been forced into self-censorship can, at the very least, report something that people want to know. Ideally, news outlets should report freely.

Governments in many places are concerned about what they call critical or biased reporting. Many do take drastic action against the press.

But the solution to this problem, assuming it is a problem, does not have to be heavy-handedness. Nordic countries are a good place to start.

Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden are, in my humble opinion, the best examples you can cite when talking about countries that are politically well managed. True, in developing countries, many people are wowed by the United States and the UK.

Both are favourite destinations for those wishing to emigrate, and part of the reason has to do with their official language: English.

However, neither does better than Nordic countries across a range of indexes measuring anything from happiness to corruption to human development.

Their performance is exceptional, and they have every reason to say that politics really works for ordinary people. Being a politician in these countries generally means working for the good of the country. And the results are impressive.

Mention the UNDP Human Development Index (HDI), for example, and you will find Nordic countries consistently rank among the highest.

The index covers nearly 200 countries and is a measure combining life expectancy, education and income per person into a single score ranking countries’ development.

Nordic countries have consistently dominated the top 10 slots for years. They do the same on the Corruption Perceptions Index by the Berlin-based Transparency International.

On the 2025 Index, for example, Denmark had the highest score: 89/100, followed by Finland, with 88/100. Uganda’s score has remained in the 20s for more than 10 years.

The CPI ranks 182 countries and territories worldwide by their perceived levels of public sector corruption. The results are given on a scale of 0, which means a country is highly corrupt to 100, which means almost zero corruption.

Two other indexes on which Nordic countries are star performers are the World Happiness Report and World Press Freedom Index.

The five countries consistently rank at or near the top. The government says it is fighting corruption. Some believe it. It moves to investigate some key public figures over allegations of corruption and then leaves the public guessing about what will be done next, with many speculating that even if incriminating evidence is found, they will never be tried.

How then can such a government improve its score on the Corruption Perceptions Index? To catch up with Nordic countries, Uganda needs actions, not words. And more importantly, it should regard the media as a key ally.

Why Monitor brand is irreplaceable

I must start with an obvious disclaimer. The arguments I make here, as with all opinion writings, are entirely my views, expressed in the exercise of the inalienable right to free speech, a core provision in Uganda’s Bill of Rights.

I have written this ‘Majority Report’ column for eight years, uncensored. It is an honour. My editors have never dictated what I should and shouldn’t write about. No topic is proscribed. This has been the track record of Daily Monitor, called The Monitor in its first 10 years until 2002 – a platform for independent thought and a space for bold journalism.

No other media outlet in contemporary Uganda has sustained this standing so consistently and this long.

Yet, for a whole month until early this week, this newspaper and all its sister outlets under the Nation Media Group, Uganda (NMG-U) were summarily shut down by Ugandan authorities.

I cannot speak to the circumstances of such an extreme measure, and I know nothing about the conditions and compromises that led to reopening. But as a writer I am delighted I can write this column again.

As a citizen I am deeply relieved that our country’s most influential media company has returned to business despite the damage and losses incurred, and a newspaper many trust for independent and informative content is back on the stands and online.

The Monitor brand occupies an unmatched place in Uganda’s civic and political sphere; it is irreplaceable. Shutting it down for a month, the third time and the longest this has happened, leaves a chilling impact on media freedom. It also puts a stain on Uganda’s investment and tourism image.

Daily Monitor has held the line of critical reporting and public-interest journalism in ways no other media outlet has, earning public trust and earnest respect hard to quantify or monetise.

Consider, for example, that during the shutdown, Uganda Radio Network published a report of a survey with some instructive results. While not totally representative, across the country the survey found that newspaper circulation of other papers had plummeted because of the absence of Daily Monitor on the stands.

This was quite revealing. Equally intriguing but perhaps unsurprising, readers interviewed expressed sentiments of withdrawal from mainstream news consumption altogether and a shift to social media now that they couldn’t access Daily Monitor.

Stark irony

This is a stark irony.

Strangling a credible and established media house, one that operates with important institutional guardrails and editorial gatekeeping, necessarily creates a void that is easily exploitable for unprofessional and potentially dangerous information dissemination.

This is now utterly hard to regulate or stop in the era of unfettered social media, clickbaits, algorithms and individuals who selfishly pursue personal attention out of which they make money.

Whatever grievances Uganda’s leadership may have against NMG-U, constructive dialogue is a more prudent strategy.

There is a popular but false perception that Daily Monitor is anti-government. Far from it. Except for doing what any serious and independent media house is expected to do, that is, report critically and independently, Daily Monitor (and before it, The Monitor) has for more than three decades been one of the NRM’s most important strategic allies.

Mr Philip Wafula Oguttu, The Monitor’s founding editor-in-chief, was in fact a card-carrying member of President Museveni’s Uganda People’s Movement, the predecessor to the NRM and knew Mr Museveni very personally.

The Monitor consistently provided intellectual and political support to the government’s embrace of neoliberal economic policies that were implemented throughout the 1990s when it could have done the exact opposite had it been, indeed, ‘anti-government’.

Better still, at a time when the NRM faced global scrutiny over its democratic credentials having banned political party activities, The Monitor newspaper provided priceless political legitimacy as the foremost point of reference in making the case that Uganda was a free and democratic country.

This, of course, was always only part of the story, but in the quest for a democratic society there is no gainsaying the value of having a media house that runs on an independent editorial posture and provides space for ideas and arguments very critical of the ruling government as Daily Monitor has done for decades.

Whatever lies ahead in the post-shutdown era, whether the paper’s fidelity to its editorial values takes a knock, the Monitor brand, name and edge shall endure.

Govt to roll out biometric system to monitor bus drivers after deadly crashes

The government is coming up with a new digitalised system to bring errant drivers to order and curb road crashes that have plagued the transport sector.

The development comes after a bus crash claimed the lives of 24 pupils of King David Junior School at Kaserem, along the Kapchorwa-Mbale Road in eastern Uganda on July 16.

A week earlier, another bus carrying students and teachers from Mwebaze High School collided with a train at Namumira railway crossing in Mukono, killing one and injuring multitudes, prompting the government to suspend all school educational trips.

The Commissioner Transport Regulation and Safety in the Ministry of Works, Mr Winstone Katushabe, says they have discovered that most drivers drive for longer hours, with some driving from as far as Kisoro in Western Uganda to Kampala, and immediately jump into another bus to Soroti or Mbale in Eastern Uganda.

‘We are coming up with a new system which is now in the initial stages of being tested, where we have biometric logins to specifically help us to deal with drivers’ fatigue and speed,’ Mr Katushabe said on Thursday.

He was leading a team from Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) and the Directorate of Traffic on a spot check of Kisenyi Bus Terminal as part of their mandate to do routine monitoring, supervision and confirm compliance.

He explained that the driver will have to log-in from the bus terminals, and that bus owners, management of the park, and police are going to be trained on how to navigate the process.

‘Verification of police at checkpoints will be through biometric check-in and then login. When a driver leaves, say, Kampala at 9am, we don’t expect him or her in Lukaya at 10am as that will mean he or she was speeding.

‘But also, it will tell us if you drove from Mbale to Kampala, and will be seen driving from Kampala to Kisoro when you are supposed to be resting. All these are going to help us to deal with fatigue, driver behavior, speed, and enable passengers to travel well,’ he added.

Mr Katushabe said they have held a meeting with the leadership of Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) to that effect, and agreed that buses only load passengers in gazetted parks, not ‘gazetted garages’.

He said the impromptu operation followed several complaints from the general public and recent crashes, especially by buses which lack route charts and passenger service vehicles (PSVs), among other statutory requirements.

‘We sampled about two-three cases and found that they didn’t comply with the statutory requirements; some of the drivers ran away, and a number of brokers were found fighting at the entrance of the bus terminal for passengers,’ he said.

‘You find the passenger in a bus and the luggage is in a different bus; or a passenger has children who are being loaded in a different bus from the one the parent is boarding,’ said Mr Katushabe.

The operation further revealed persistent lapses in the transport sector, including issuing of fake tickets allegedly by the elusive brokers, prompting a directive from Mr Katushabe that every bus company should have uniformed guides.

Mr Saturday Muhwezi, the General Manager of Kisenyi Bus Terminal, said they have set up a seven-member committee that will see two uniformed guides allocated at each bus to curb the errant brokers.