Fuel costs, quarantines drive up Uganda’s meat prices

Meat prices in several cities and towns in Uganda have skyrocketed, leaving many consumers feeling the pinch.

In the cities of Lira and Jinja, a kilogram of beef now costs between Shs18,000 and Shs 20,000, up from Shs 16,000-Shs 17,000 previously.

In Lira, goat meat is being sold at Shs 20,000 up from Shs 16,000 and beef is going for Shs 18,000 up from Shs 14,000. In Jinja, goat meat is even pricier, retailing at between Shs 22,000 and Shs 25,000 per kilogram.

Traders are pointing fingers at escalating transport costs, livestock quarantines, and stiff competition from regional buyers.

Mr Moses Mukajjanga, chairperson of Mafubira Slaughter House, blames rising fuel prices for the increased cost of transporting animals to slaughter facilities.

‘The cost of transporting animals has gone up because of the increase in fuel prices, and this has directly affected the price of meat,” he says.

“Some areas are under quarantine because many animals are sick. This has reduced the number of animals reaching the market and pushed prices higher.”

The shortage of livestock is also driving prices up. Mr Ronald Mutabi Byarugaba, general secretary of the Jinja City Abattoir, notes that slaughter numbers have decreased, with butchers now slaughtering only about eight cows and 20 goats daily, down from 14 cows and 26 goats previously.

According to Mr Mukajjanga, many traders are now sourcing animals from the Teso Sub-region, particularly Soroti District, to meet demand in Jinja and neighbouring areas.

Mr Abdallah Bogere, a meat dealer at Nile Market in Njeru Municipality in Buikwe District, says: “One of the major factors behind the price increase is fuel. We source most of our animals from the Teso sub-region, which is quite far, making transport costs very high.”

He notes that diesel prices, currently averaging about Shs6,500 per litre, have significantly increased the cost of moving livestock from cattle-producing areas to slaughterhouses and markets.

Mr Bogere also points to growing competition from buyers from Kenya and South Sudan, who are willing to pay higher prices for livestock, thereby driving up costs for local traders.

“The demand from Kenyan and South Sudanese buyers has intensified competition for animals. This pushes livestock prices up even before they reach our markets,” he said.

According to Mr Bogere, traders selling beef at around Shs 18,000 per kilogramme are likely sourcing animals from nearby areas, enabling them to keep transport costs relatively low.

Mr Musa Yuma, a butcher operating in Adjumani Town, says meat prices have remained stable for now, but consumers should expect an increase in the coming weeks due to a shortage of cattle and rising transportation costs.

According to Yuma, a kilo of beef currently sells at Shs 16, 000. However, he notes that the limited supply of cattle in the area, coupled with the high cost of fuel, is making it increasingly difficult for butchers to maintain current prices.

“At the moment, a kilo of meat costs Shs 16, 000. In the past, livestock traders would bring cows to us and we would simply buy them. These days, I have to travel into the villages myself in search of cattle,’ he says.

‘Sometimes I spend an entire day looking for a cow without success, yet the following day I must buy fuel again for my motorcycle and continue the search.”

He says the situation has been worsened by the absence of an established livestock market in the Madi Sub-region, forcing butchers to move from one area to another in search of animals for slaughter.

In Arua City, locals have for several months been buying a kilo of meat at Shs 20,000. Ms Fortunate Candiru, a resident, says: ‘It is now over five months that meat is now at Shs 20,000. I have reduced meat consumption because with the seven people I have, one kilo is not enough.’

She notes that there has been an unexplained reason for the increment.

‘In West Nile, we do not have commercial pastoralists. Many people keep cattle for their own consumption, especially for cultural or funerals. So, I usually see cattle being transported from Lira or from Western Uganda.’

Mr Muhammad Alio, who works at a butcher, says: ‘Prices of cattle and transport costs are high. So, this has made many people increase their prices from Shs 16,000 to Shs 20,000. Even then, sometimes, you may make losses because few people are now buying meat.’

‘What is helping us is now the fridges because there is now a reliable power supply. But some people do not like to buy meat stored in fridges, they want fresh meat because they are used to it,’ he adds.

Mr Sulaiman Ssempijja, a butcher on Idi Amin road in Arua City, says animals have become so expensive from where they buy them from.

“A bull we used to sell at Shs 800,000 in Lango, Nakasongola and Western Uganda, now it goes for Shs 1 million and above. Additionally, transporters are also charging us highly under the pretext that fuel prices are up. So, what do you expect us to do?” he charges.

In Yumbe, Dr Neckyon Mukasa Matinda, the Yumbe District veterinary officer, says the prices of meat have gone up due to the reduction of supply of animals.

He says the current price of meat in Yumbe is Shs 18,000 for beef and Shs 20,000 for goat meat.

‘We were getting animals from the Balalo at a fair price. Since they were chased, this created the scarcity of animals for sale. The cost of production of animals has gone very high in terms of labour, veterinary services and some inputs of production for animals has also gone very high,’ Dr Mukasa explains.

He adds that the region depends on places like Nakasongola for supply of animals and people from DR Congo come to buy animals from Yumbe. As a result, people have basically hiked the prices of animals.

‘The hiking of the animals’ prices and their products to me is a very good thing for farmers. People must begin to go and look after animals so that they also sell them at a good price,’ he says.

In Mbale, residents are expressing concern over the continued rise in meat prices, saying the increasing costs are making it difficult for many families to afford a balanced diet.

In the markets and several butcheries across the city, a kilogram of beef now costs between Shs18, 000 and Shs20, 000 depending on the location and quality of the meat.

Goat meat also costs now at Shs20, 000 per kilogram while liver is being sold at the same price.

Many consumers say they have been forced to reduce the amount of meat they buy or switch to cheaper alternatives due to the high prices.

“I have taken time without buying meat because the price is high,” Mr Asuman Gidudu, a resident of Mbale City said.

Butchers attribute the price increase to the rising cost of livestock, transportation expenses and reduced supply of animals on the market.

In Gulu City, the situation is different. Meat prices have largely remained the same except for pork due to the scarcity of pigs.

A kilogram of goat meat has stagnated at between Shs17,000 and Shs18,000, while beef is sold at Shs16,000 per kilogram across most parts of the city.

In Mpigi, consumers across several trading centres are grappling with rising meat prices, with a kilogram now selling at more than Shs20,000.

A survey conducted in Kayabwe Town Council, Bujuuko and Kammengo trading centres found that butchers have adjusted prices upwards in recent months, citing increased operational costs.

Sheikh Jumah Magatto, a resident of Jjandira Cell, Kayabwe Ward in Kayabwe Town Council, attributes the high beef prices to the increasing cost of fuel.

“The biggest challenge is fuel. Transporting animals from farms to slaughter points and later to markets has become very expensive. These costs are eventually passed on to the final consumers,” he says.

Richard Mugoya, a butcher in Nama Sub-county, Mukono District, says the increase in meat prices is largely driven by high transport costs.

‘I sell meat at Shs 20,000 per kilo because transporting it is expensive. With fuel prices continuing to rise, I may be forced to increase the price further,’ Mugoya explained.

Another butcher in Mukono Town, Junior Mugenyi, says meat prices depend on the cost at which they purchase it from abattoirs.

‘The prices we charge are determined by how much we buy the meat. When we go to the abattoir, the price they sell to us affects how we sell to our clients,’ he says.

In Kabale, the situation is the same. Here a kilo of goat meat and mutton has increased from Shs13,000 to Shs20,000.

The chairman of Meat and Cattle Traders Association at Kabale Main Abattoir, Mr Jackson Nasiima, says there is a ban of cattle movement from the neighbouring district of Ntungamo, which has been their main source of supply of cattle.

In Ankole Sub-region, meat prices remain at Shs 18,000 (cows meat) and Shs 20, 000 (goat) in most districts such as Ibanda, Ntungamo, Isingiro, Mbarara, Bushenyi and Kiruhura save for Mbarara City where beef has increased from Shs 18,000 to Shs 20000 and goat meat from Shs 20,000 to Shs 22,000.

Mr Musa Asiimwe who owns a butcher at Mbarara Central says: “Because of the increase in fuel prices transporting animals has become expensive. This is the reason we have increased the prices of meat.”

How Kampala lost 56% of its wetlands in 3 decades

Kampala’s wetlands have dwindled dramatically in just three decades, shrinking from 3,201 hectares in 1994 to 1,388 hectares in 2024, representing a staggering loss of over 56 percent, a new report shows. The decline of Kampala’s wetlands is not just a loss of land covered by water but a threat to the city’s resilience against flooding, water purification, and biodiversity, according to environmentalists and physical planners. This information is contained in the 2025 Kampala City Wetlands Situation Report, conducted by Subamu Investments Limited, a firm contracted by the government to evaluate the wetlands’ status.

Researchers and government officials attribute the decline to increased human encroachment for settlements, industrial development, and agriculture. They warn that this is exacerbated by weak enforcement of protective laws and inadequate or absent urban planning in rapidly expanding areas. ‘The wetlands in Kampala have largely declined since 1994 to date, and we’ve lost about 2,000 hectares of land to this, a representation of about 56 percent of that total acreage of the wetlands since 1994,’ Dr Ivan Bamweyana, a consultant with Subamu, revealed.

Most affected

Dr Bamweyana said Lubigi is the most affected wetland of the eight in Kampala, with 21,249 buildings, while Namalusu is the least affected because of its aggressive flooding. The wetlands evaluated include Lubigi, Nakivubo, Kinawataka, Kansanga Ggabba, Kalidubi, Walufumbe, Kyetinda and Namalusu.

In an interview , the consultant attributed the loss of wetlands to a combination of factors. ‘There have been major causes: people taking up land to settle there, and people developing industries there,’ he said. ‘This [decline] can [also] be attributed to the population pressure, people requiring new areas to settle, and people being unguided on what a wetland is or being uneducated about what our wetland is,’ he added.

The report indicates that the number of buildings in wetlands nearly tripled, rising from 20,958 in 2004 to 56,679 in 2024. The firm said they used satellite imagery, aerial photography, and field surveys to come up with the report. The KCCA Deputy Director of Land Use Planning and Development, Mr Ivan Katongole, points to the complex issue of land ownership as a key driver. ‘The landholding system vests some wetlands in private hands,’ he said, explaining that many constructions on wetlands are informal and unapproved.

‘Our approval system requires that people should not construct in wetlands, but because of these private holdings, there is informal development of land, where people assume that they’re exerting their right to use the properties that belong to them,’ he added. Mr Katongole also highlights the pressure for urban growth, noting that some wetlands, deemed ‘vanquished’ by a policy committee on the environment, have been approved for industrial development.

‘The other one is the pressure for growth and development of the city, where you find that due to gross growth pressures, some areas have even been formally approved for development,’ he explained. ‘You’ve heard about vanquished wetlands? There is a policy committee on environment which at some point declared some wetlands vanquished, and so often those ones are used for industrial development,’ he added.

Political challenges

Mr Katongole also highlights that political challenges further complicate enforcement, particularly in informal settlements on wetland fringes. ‘We also have the political pressure. It’s very hard to implement some of our development control measures in some of the informal settlements. Most of these are within or on the fringes of wetlands,’ he added. Mr Vincent Barugahare, the assistant commissioner for wetlands at the Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE), blamed poor planning for exacerbating the crisis.

‘In Wakiso, where I stay, there’s no plan. People settle, and the government only intervenes after decades,’ he said. He stressed the need for coordinated planning between Kampala and neighbouring Wakiso to prevent contradictory policies. Mr Barugahare also laments the attitude and orientation of people, adding that many Ugandans prioritise short-term gains over long-term sustainability. ‘In this country, there are two categories of Ugandans: there are those who look at the future, we think about how our children will be but there are those who have read too much the Bible and they think they will get a good life somewhere else, and that is the biggest number. I deal with enforcement but Ugandans are not the right people to deal with,’ he said.

Mr Katongole said KCCA would demolish some of these structures to save the environment. ‘We are going to see that we try to bring some of these structures down, especially those that are in very fragile ecosystems within the city. So, we are not taking this issue lying down,’ he added. The industrial push has further strained wetlands, with developments such as the Namanve Industrial Park encroaching on these ecosystems. Ms Evelyn Anite, while still serving as the State minister for Investment and Privatisation, said the government had resolved that the next industrial park would be built on dry land not wetlands, to protect the environment. Ms Anite is now a senior presidential adviser.

Gen Muhoozi given one week to file defence in Besigye death threats case

The High Court in Kampala has directed Chief of Defence Forces (CDF) Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba to file his defence within one week in a case in which jailed opposition politician Dr Kizza Besigye accuses him of issuing death threats and making prejudicial public statements against him.

Justice Emmanuel Baguma on Thursday ordered Gen. Muhoozi, the Attorney General, and two Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) officers-Col Peter Ahibisibwe and Lt Col Ephraim Byaruhanga-to respond to the application by June 18.

“The respondent (Gen. Muhoozi), take note, is given one week to file a reply by June 18,” Justice Baguma directed.

Also to file their defense within one week are the Attorney General and two officers of the Uganda Peoples’ Defense Forces (UPDF); Col Peter Ahibisibwe and Lt Col Ephraim Byaruhanga, whom Dr Besigye accuses of participating in his alleged abduction from Nairobi and subsequent transfer to Uganda in 2024.

Further, the judge ordered Dr Besigye’s lawyers to file any rejoinder by June 25, before setting June 30 as the date for hearing the application.

“…Then hearing will be on June 30,” Justice Baguma held.

During the proceedings, one of Besigye’s lawyers, Mr Eron Kiiza, requested written orders to facilitate service of court documents on the respondents.

“I have fixed this matter for hearing,” the judge responded before rising from the Bench and walking away.

The response appeared to dissatisfy some of Dr Besigye’s supporters who had packed the courtroom, prompting them to break into songs criticising the presiding judge.

‘Twamuganye Baguma Twamuganye, Twamuganye Baguma Twamuganye…literally meaning, we have refused justice Baguma, we have refused him.’ they chanted on

The application before the Criminal Division of the High Court was filed by Dr Besigye and his co-applicant, Hajj Obeid Lutale Kamulegeya, on Monday. The two are currently facing treason-related charges before the High Court.

In the application, Dr Besigye contends that Gen. Muhoozi, who is also President Museveni’s son, has repeatedly used his X social media account to make statements threatening him and commenting on his guilt before the conclusion of judicial proceedings.

According to court documents, Dr Besigye argues that the statements amount to interference with his constitutional rights and undermine his entitlement to a fair hearing before an independent and impartial court.

“The 1st respondent’s adverse and prejudicial public statements threatening death, violence, torture and execution, and characterising the 1st applicant as a criminal, individually and cumulatively, give rise to violations of, and continuing threats to, human rights and freedoms,” the application states.

The former four-time presidential candidate further argues that public declarations of guilt by a senior military officer could prejudice ongoing court proceedings.

“Public pronouncements of guilt, and of a predetermined fatal outcome, made by such a figure while assessors are yet to be empanelled and witnesses heard, contaminate the atmosphere of an independent and impartial court and pressure the trial court,” the court documents add.

Among the social media posts cited in the application is one allegedly published on January 16, 2025, stating: “We will hang KB on Heroes’ Day. That’s the best day for him to die.”

Another post allegedly made on February 19, 2026, reportedly stated: “Besigye wanted to kill Mzee, so as far as we are concerned, UPDF, he is a dead man walking.”

A third post allegedly suggested that Dr Besigye could either be hanged or shot.

Dr Besigye is seeking declarations that the statements by the CDF violated his constitutional rights and that the treason and misprision of treason charges brought against him are inconsistent with principles of fair trial, human rights, the rule of law and extradition law.

The application also raises allegations surrounding the circumstances of his arrest in Nairobi, Kenya, in November 2024.

According to court filings, Dr Besigye and Mr Lutale were in Nairobi attending a book launch hosted by Kenyan opposition politician and former Justice minister Martha Karua when they were allegedly abducted by Ugandan security operatives and transferred to Uganda without undergoing formal extradition proceedings.

The applicants further allege that upon arrival in Uganda, they were detained at Makindye Military Barracks, denied access to lawyers, family members, and medical personnel, and subjected to violations of their constitutional rights.

The Attorney General, Gen Muhoozi, and the other respondents are yet to file their responses to the allegations.

The matter will return to court on June 30 for a hearing.

Museveni’s 40 budgets, 9 ministers since 1986

When President Museveni seized power in 1986, Uganda’s economy was in ruins, damaged by years of political disturbance, a collapsing shilling, and a financial system barely holding together.

He was emerging from a five-year guerrilla war that had destroyed all tenets of economic progress, hundreds of thousands of people had died in the war and infrastructure was in shambles. The war had disrupted crop production and marketing. The roads were in an acute state of disrepair; manufacturing activity had virtually ground to a halt; water and electric power supplies were unreliable and many Ugandans had fled to exile.

Back in Kabale District, a five-year-old boy named Henry Musasizi Ariganyira was just beginning life. Today, that same man stands at the helm of Uganda’s Treasury as Finance Minister. His appointment in May closes a long arc of economic stewardship that has seen nine different Finance ministers serve under Museveni, shaping 40 national budgets and attempting to steady Uganda’s complex economy. Each minister inherited the same burden: rebuild trust, enforce fiscal discipline, and reduce reliance on foreign funding and loans.

But behind the budgets and balance sheets lies varied stories of individuals who came with energy to change and impress both their master, President Museveni, and the general public. Some lasted long enough to leave a mark, while others had stints as short as just a budget cycle.

The first experiment: A minister taking on the ruins

Uganda’s post-war government began with Prof Ponsiano Serumaga Mulema as its first Finance minister in 1986 in Mr Museveni’s first 12-member Cabinet sworn in after the National Resistance Army (NRA) overran Kampala in January 1986. He was an unusual choice in a Cabinet dominated by former guerrilla fighters. He was reportedly linked to the Democratic Party and was not among the fighters who had just emerged from the bush. No wonder, his time in office was brief, lasting only six months, and reading only one Budget speech.

Building the foundations

Dr Crispus Walter Kiyonga, the current Second Deputy Prime Minister and Deputy Leader of Government Business in Parliament, took over at a time when Uganda needed structure more than slogans. A medical doctor by profession, he helped lay the groundwork for modern revenue collection, including the establishment of the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA), a turning point in formalising tax administration. Dr Kiyonga, one of the cadres of Museveni’s party from the 1980s understood his dream more than Prof Mulema did. Dr Kiyonga, who was replaced by Jehoash Mayanja Nkangi in February 1992, brought in policies, including the currency reform of 1987 in which the shilling was devalued by knocking off two zeros and taking off 30 percent. A million shillings was reduced to Shs7,000. Other reforms included the structural adjustment policy, as well as divestiture and privatisation.

Mayanja Nkangi deepened these reforms. His era is remembered for strict fiscal discipline and a push for price stability, working closely with Bank of Uganda technocrats such as Emmanuel Tumusiime-Mutebile, who in 1992, was appointed Permanent Secretary in the newly merged Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, a consolidation he had strongly advocated for. The merger strengthened policy coordination and fiscal discipline, setting Uganda on a path toward macroeconomic stability. He later became the Governor of Bank of Uganda from 2001 until his death in 2022. Under his watch, the Bank of Uganda Act (1993) was passed, which strengthened central bank independence and insulated monetary policy from political interference. Nkangi’s tenure ended in 1998 and he was replaced by Gerald Sendawula.

Winning donor confidence

Ssendaula inherited a more stable but still fragile economy from Mayanja Nkangi. Ssendaula’s tenure, between 1998 and 2005, is widely credited with strengthening Uganda’s credibility in the eyes of international lenders such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. During a recent interview, Sendawula, acknowledging that the size of the economy has expanded, said managing with fewer resources required discipline, transparency, and coordination with development partners. He said clear communication about available resources helped stakeholders align expectations with reality.

He said the main challenge then was limited access to external financing, dependence on donor support, maintaining discipline in expenditure, and balancing competing demands across sectors, saying despite these pressures, strong accountability and careful planning helped sustain the system. It was a period of rebuilding trust; both at home and abroad.

Expanding access, deepening reform

Prof Ezra Suruma, who took on from Sendawula in 2005, pushed Uganda further into financial inclusion. His legacy is tied to the expansion of Savings and Credit Cooperative Organisations (Saccos), bringing formal credit closer to ordinary Ugandans and rural communities. He was replaced by Syda Namirembe Bbumba in February 2009, earning herself the honour of being Uganda’s first female Finance minister. She took over the ministry amid rising inflation pressures and her firm monetary stance helped stabilise the economy and earned her continental recognition as African Finance Minister of the Year in 2010. She lasted only two years and was replaced by another experienced woman, Maria Kiwanuka.

The Budget for a changing nation

Ms Kiwanuka inherited a shifting economy and focused on aligning national spending with long-term development goals. Her budgets emphasised infrastructure growth and youth employment at a time when Uganda’s population was rapidly expanding. It was during her tenure, between 2011 and 2015, that the country started allocating a big chunk of money to infrastructure development, especially roads. Although started in 2006, the Uganda National Roads Authority under Mr Sebugga Kimeze and later Ms Allen Kagina gained more prominence and received more funding.

The long tenure: Stability, shocks, and strain

Mr Matia Kasaija’s 11-year stewardship became one of the longest in Uganda’s post-independence economic history. He entered office at 71 in 2015 and exited at 82, just last month, overseeing a period marked by both bold investments and significant shocks. Before becoming full minister, he served in various roles, including State Minister for Finance (Planning) and State minister for Internal Affairs. Earlier in his career, he held positions in the private sector and public administration, including managing the Departed Asians Property Custodian Board (1987-1990).

Under his watch, Uganda saw major infrastructure projects such as the Entebbe-Kampala Expressway and the revival of Uganda Airlines, a national symbol of ambition, but one later weighed down by governance and financial challenges. His most challenging period was the Covid-19 pandemic.

The pandemic hit like a fiscal earthquake, closing borders, grounding flights, collapsing tourism, and choking trade. In response, government rolled out large-scale recovery programmes such as Emyooga and the Parish Development Model (PDM), aimed at lifting household incomes and stimulating grassroots enterprise.

But the recovery came at a cost: rising public debt, tighter fiscal space, and growing pressure on the cost of living.

A new era begins

Now, the responsibility shifts to Henry Musasizi.

A trained accountant and seasoned legislator, Musasizi’s journey began quietly, working at Caritas Kabale and later AMREF before entering politics in 2011. From there, he rose steadily: three consecutive terms as MP for Rubanda East, chairing Parliament’s Finance Committee, and later serving as State Minister for Finance. His academic credentials include a Bachelor of Commerce from Makerere University and an MBA from Heriot-Watt University. He steps into office at a moment of mounting fiscal pressure: a Shs84.3 trillion National Budget for FY2026/2027, much of which is already earmarked for debt servicing and recurrent expenditure.

Economists warn that while the Budget reflects ambition, it leaves limited space for transformative investment. ‘The Shs84.3 trillion Budget reflects government’s ambition to finance its development agenda, but it also exposes the growing pressure on Uganda’s finances,’ said Timothy Chemonges of the Centre for Policy Analysis (CEPA). A significant portion, he added, will go toward debt servicing; crowding out sectors that directly improve livelihoods.

Musasizi’s first major parliamentary test came swiftly: defending a pound 168.9 million loan (about Shs734 billion) for solar-powered irrigation projects, approved shortly after presentation and a day before he read his first Budget as Minister of Finance.

The weight of the office

Uganda’s Finance ministry has never been just about numbers. It has been about survival, ambition, and political endurance. From a shattered economy in 1986 to today’s trillion-shilling budgets, nine ministers have carried the same burden; each shaping a different chapter of Uganda’s economic story. Now, Musasizi inherits not just a ministry, but a test of whether Uganda’s growth can finally outpace its pressures.

Why is my 360-degree camera showing distorted images?

Hello Joshua, a 360-degree camera system does not rely on a single camera. Instead, it uses multiple wide-angle cameras positioned around the vehicle, typically at the front grille, rear number plate area, and beneath each side mirror. These cameras capture different views of the surroundings, and the vehicle’s software combines, or ‘stitches,’ the images together to create a seamless bird’s-eye view around the car.

Because the system depends on multiple cameras and sophisticated software, even minor issues can cause image distortion. One of the most common causes is dirty or obstructed camera lenses. Since the cameras are mounted low on the vehicle, they are constantly exposed to dust, mud, rainwater, and road debris.

Even a small amount of dirt, a fingerprint, or water droplets on a single lens can interfere with image quality. When one camera provides a compromised image, the software struggles to blend it with the others, resulting in warped lines, stretched objects, or mismatched angles. This problem is particularly common in Uganda, where dusty roads and rainy conditions frequently affect vehicle-mounted cameras.

Another major cause of distortion is camera miscalibration. The system requires each camera to remain precisely aligned at a fixed angle. A slight shift in position can affect the accuracy of the stitched image. Misalignment can occur after hitting potholes, brushing curbs during parking, or even following suspension repairs and wheel alignment work. Although such incidents may appear minor, a movement of just a few millimetres can distort the composite image. Drivers may notice that the vehicle appears off-centre on the display or that surrounding objects look stretched or incorrectly positioned.

In some cases, displayed distances may not accurately reflect real-world distances, creating potential risks while parking or reversing. Correcting calibration issues usually requires specialised diagnostic equipment and professional workshop assistance.

Stitching errors

Software-related image stitching errors can also contribute to distortion. Modern 360-degree camera systems rely heavily on software to merge multiple video feeds into a single image. If there is a software glitch, an incomplete system update, or a problem within the infotainment system, the processing of camera images may be affected.

Distortion may appear intermittently, particularly when starting the vehicle, changing gears, or operating other electronic systems. In some cases, performing a system reset or installing a software update can resolve the issue.

Persistent problems, however, may indicate deeper calibration or hardware faults. Hardware failure is another possibility.

Each camera contains sensitive electronic components that can deteriorate over time. Moisture ingress is a common concern, especially during heavy rains or when seals around camera housings begin to fail. Water entering the camera can cause internal fogging, blurred images, or intermittent distortion.

Electrical problems such as poor grounding, damaged wiring, or voltage fluctuations may also affect image quality and synchronisation between cameras. A useful clue is when distortion affects only one section of the 360-degree view while the remaining sections appear normal. This often suggests a fault with a single camera rather than the entire system.

Although a distorted image may indicate that the system is still technically functioning, its effectiveness depends on accuracy and precision. Even small distortions can cause drivers to misjudge distances and obstacles, reducing the safety benefits of the technology. This is particularly important in tight parking situations where centimetres can make a significant difference.

If your 360-degree camera display appears distorted, start by thoroughly cleaning all camera lenses, including the front, rear, and side-mirror units. If the image returns to normal, dirt was likely the cause.

If the problem remains, have the system professionally inspected and recalibrated.

Should calibration fail to resolve the issue, technicians should examine individual cameras for moisture damage, wiring faults, or sensor deterioration. Early diagnosis and repair will help restore accurate imaging and maintain the system’s reliability.

Government unveils FY2026/27 budget priorities spending

The Government has unveiled its budget priorities for the Financial Year 2026/27, committing trillions of shillings to key sectors aimed at accelerating economic transformation under the Ten-Fold Growth Strategy through the Agro-Industrialisation, Tourism, Minerals, and Science (ATMS) framework.

The financial year 2026/27 budget, which was presented on June 11 at the Kololo Ceremonial Grounds by the Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Mr Henry Musasizi who presented the budget, said the budget places significant emphasis on agriculture, industrialisation, infrastructure development, human capital, and value addition, while introducing several tax measures to boost domestic revenue mobilisation.

Agriculture Receives Record Funding

The Government has allocated Shs 2.26 trillion to the Agro-Industrialisation Programme, marking the highest funding ever provided to the sector.

Key interventions include agricultural research and innovation, commercialisation of the anti-tick vaccine, expansion of irrigation and water for production, recruitment and facilitation of extension workers, provision of quality agricultural inputs, post-harvest handling and storage facilities, agro-processing and value addition, quality assurance, and market expansion.

The objective is to transition Uganda from exporting raw agricultural commodities to exporting processed and value-added products.

Tourism Sector Gets Shs 567 Billion

To strengthen Uganda’s position as a tourism and investment destination, the Government has allocated Shs 567.32 billion to the tourism sector.

Priority areas include branding and marketing Uganda internationally, tourism infrastructure development, construction of highway sanitation facilities and refreshment centres, hospitality training and standards enforcement, wildlife conservation, health tourism, and economic diplomacy.

Focus on Mineral-Based Industrial Development

The Government has allocated Shs 473.51 billion for mineral-based industrial development, mining, and the oil and gas sector.

The funding will support continued mineral exploration and certification, capitalisation of the Uganda National Mining Company, establishment of mineral markets and buying centres, operationalisation of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), and development of the national oil refinery.

Officials say the goal is to transform Uganda’s mineral wealth into industrial wealth through value addition and processing.

Digital Transformation and Innovation

Government investment in digital infrastructure continues to yield results. During the year, an additional 879 kilometres of fibre optic cable were installed, bringing the national fibre backbone to approximately 62,941 kilometres.

Internet costs have declined from $70 to $35 per megabit per second, while mobile internet subscriptions now stand at 18.5 million. Smartphone connections have reached 20 million and total mobile telephone subscriptions have risen to 57.3 million.

Mobile money transactions increased by 29 percent to Shs 392.7 trillion during the year ending March 2026, while active mobile money accounts reached 36.7 million.

For FY2026/27, the Government has allocated Shs 1.14 trillion to Science, Technology and Innovation (STI), ICT, and the creative industries.

Priority projects include commercialisation of innovations such as Kiira Motors vehicles, Dei BioPharma products, coffee and banana value-added products, establishment of a Hi-Tech City, expansion of research and development, digital infrastructure growth, business process outsourcing (BPO), expansion of free-to-air television coverage, and strengthening intellectual property protection.

Security and Rule of Law Receive Shs 10.21 Trillion

Government has allocated Shs 10.21 trillion to security, governance, and rule of law institutions.

The funding will support modernisation of the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF), completion of the National Referral Military Hospital and UPDF Headquarters, strengthening border security, counter-terrorism operations, community policing, cybersecurity, immigration services, anti-corruption efforts, and cattle restocking in Acholi, Lango, and Teso sub-regions.

Infrastructure Development Remains a Priority

Transport Sector

The Government has allocated Shs 8.79 trillion for transport infrastructure development. Key projects include construction of the Malaba-Kampala Standard Gauge Railway, rehabilitation of the Meter Gauge Railway, construction and maintenance of roads and bridges, expansion of water transport systems, operationalisation of Kabalega International Airport, upgrading regional aerodromes, and expansion of Uganda Airlines.

Energy Sector

A total of Shs 2.07 trillion has been earmarked for energy development.

The funds will support construction of the 380-megawatt Kiba Hydroelectric Power Plant, a floating solar power facility at Isimba, utility-scale solar projects in Elgon and Acholi, preparatory work for nuclear energy generation in Buyende, expansion of transmission networks, rural electrification, and industrial power connections.

Investing in Human Capital (Health Sector)

The Government has allocated Shs 5.23 trillion to the health sector. Priority areas include maternal and child health, nutrition, immunisation, prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases, provision of essential medicines, specialised healthcare services, emergency response systems, and efforts toward Universal Health Coverage.

Government also reaffirmed its commitment to increasing domestic financing for essential medicines to reduce dependence on donor support.

Water and Sanitation

To expand access to safe water and sanitation services, the Government has allocated Shs 1.013 trillion.

Currently, the government says 71 percent of households have access to improved water sources, with coverage standing at 68 percent in rural areas and 74.5 percent in urban areas.

Education, Skills and Sports

The education sector will receive Shs 6.66 trillion. Priority interventions include expanding access to quality Universal Primary Education (UPE) and Universal Secondary Education (USE), strengthening STEM and vocational education, improving teacher welfare and training, curriculum reforms, support for public universities and research institutions, and completion of sports infrastructure ahead of AFCON 2027.

The Government has also allocated an additional Shs 568.65 billion for salary enhancements for primary school teachers and arts teachers in secondary schools and BTVET institutions.

Social Protection

A total of Shs 173.55 billion has been allocated to social protection programmes. The funds will support economic empowerment initiatives, labour standards enforcement, youth employment programmes, women’s economic participation, social protection systems, and establishment of a Labour Market Information System.

Overall, the Government has allocated Shs 13.56 trillion to health, education, water and sanitation, and social protection.

Manufacturing and Industrial Development

The Government has allocated Shs 1.03 trillion to manufacturing and industrial development.

In this sector, Priority interventions include additional capitalisation of the Uganda Development Corporation (UDC), industrial park development, value addition to agricultural and mineral products, market access for locally manufactured goods, strengthening Special Economic Zones, and establishment of regional industrial incubation hubs.

The number of formal factories in Uganda has risen to 10,437, with 690 operating within industrial parks.

Environmental Protection and Disaster Preparedness

To strengthen environmental conservation and climate resilience, the Government has allocated Shs 494.08 billion.

The funds will support protection of 1.26 million hectares of forests and wetlands, restoration of 10,000 hectares of degraded wetlands, demarcation of riverbanks and lakeshores, and enhancement of weather forecasting and early warning systems.

An additional Shs 361.88 billion has been allocated to the Contingency Fund for disaster response.

Justice and Parliament Funding

Government has allocated Shs 665.55 billion for administration of justice, focusing on recruitment of judicial officers, reduction of case backlog, court digitisation, anti-corruption efforts, and expansion of access to justice.

Parliament has been allocated Shs 1.23 trillion to support its constitutional roles of legislation, appropriation, oversight, and representation.

CSOs warn Shs84 trillion budget may deliver little relief to Ugandans

Economists and budget analysts have warned that the proposed Shs84.3 trillion budget for the 2026/27 financial year may have a limited impact on the lives of ordinary Ugandans despite being the largest in the country’s history.

They argue that a significant share of the budget will be consumed by debt servicing and long-term industrialisation programmes, leaving limited resources for sectors that directly address household welfare and the rising cost of living.

Civil Society Budget Advocacy Group executive director Julius Mukunda says the budget reflects ambitions to accelerate industrialisation, infrastructure development, and wealth creation.

However, he questions whether the budget is affordable, sustainable, and capable of delivering meaningful results.

Centre for Policy Analysis executive director Timothy Chemonges shares similar concerns, saying the budget highlights development ambitions while exposing growing pressure on public finances.

Debt burden

Mukunda says public debt had reached Shs130.22 trillion by January 2026, noting that of the proposed Shs84.3 trillion budget, debt servicing alone is projected to consume Shs33.4 trillion, representing nearly 40 percent of total expenditure.

For every Shs100 collected in taxes, he says, Shs25 goes to interest payments alone, warning that increasing debt obligations are crowding out spending on critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and agriculture.

Prioritising livelihoods

Both Mukunda and Chemonges argue that government should emphasize sectors that directly improve household incomes and living standards.

Chemonges says agriculture, health, education, and job creation should receive greater attention because they have the most direct impact on livelihoods.

He argues that the success of the budget should be measured by improvements in citizens’ daily lives and not its overall size.

On his part, Mukunda notes that agriculture remains the primary source of livelihood for more than 60 percent of Ugandans but still faces a Shs273b funding gap for zonal mechanisation centres and breeding hatcheries.

He also highlights a Shs20b funding shortfall required to operationalise 158 constituency ambulances, arguing that the gap reflects misplaced spending priorities.

The education sector faces similar challenges, with Mukunda pointing out that the National Curriculum Development Centre requires Shs3.5b to complete the stalled A-Level syllabus review, while Uganda National Examinations Board needs Shs11.8b to train examiners on the new secondary school curriculum.

However, Mukunda says these relatively modest funding requirements remain unmet as debt servicing consumes an increasing share of public resources.

Pushing the alternative approach

The concerns raised by civil society mirror proposals previously advanced by the Opposition.

In April, Leader of Opposition Joel Ssenyonyi unveiled an alternative budget framework under the theme Safeguarding Lives, Livelihoods and Institutions, arguing that a leaner Shs71.4 trillion budget would be more realistic and better suited to address the challenges faced by Ugandans.

Public concern has also intensified following government’s decision to discontinue payments to medical interns, with some fearing that the decision could place additional pressure on already overstretched public health facilities.

Some see opportunity

Not everyone shares the doubtful outlook for the budget themed: Full monetisation of Uganda’s economy through commercial agriculture, industrialisation, expanding services, digital transformation, and market access.

Serere District Woman MP Esther Lucy Achom says the budget presents opportunities for Ugandans to increase their incomes in line with the ten-fold growth agenda, noting that programmes such as Emyooga and Parish Development Model will help to lift communities out of poverty if implemented effectively.

She also points to allocations for agro-industrialisation, tourism, and mineral development as evidence that government is investing in productive sectors, even as she acknowledges concerns about the growing debt burden.

Security destroys several litres of illicit waragi in Moroto

The police, backed by area local leaders led by Moroto Resident District Commissioner Benson Kwikiriza, on Thursday conducted a court-ordered disposal of 160 jerricans of illicit Waragi at Moroto District Headquarters.

The exercise was carried out in line with Presidential Executive Order No. 3 of 2021, which prohibits the manufacture, sale, and consumption of illicit alcohol.

Speaking during the disposal, RDC Moroto Benson Kwikiriza said, “This exercise is carried out every three months by court order. Illicit Waragi has continued to claim lives and destroy families across the Karamoja Sub-Region. We commend our security forces for their vigilance in impounding and destroying these dangerous products.’

Moroto Region Police Spokesperson, Mr Mike Longole, said that security remains committed to ridding Karamoja of illicit Waragi.

He explained that this is aimed at protecting public health and maintaining law and order across the Karamoja sub-region.

He attributed rampant cases of domestic violence in the area to the uncontrolled consumption of the illicit waragi.

Mexico, South Africa replay the 2010 W. Cup opener

Sixteen years after the sound of vuvuzelas announced the arrival of the first Fifa World Cup on African soil, Mexico and South Africa will once again step into the spotlight to open football’s biggest tournament.

When the 2026 Fifa World Cup kicks off at the iconic Azteca Stadium on Thursday night, it will revive memories of June 11, 2010, when the same two nations met in Johannesburg. That match ended 1-1, with Siphiwe Tshabalala’s thunderous strike for Bafana Bafana becoming one of the most iconic opening goals in World Cup history before Rafael Márquez rescued a draw for Mexico.

This time, the script is reversed. In 2010 South Africa were hosts welcoming Mexico. In 2026, Mexico are the hosts extending the invitation to South Africa.

Yet the sense of history remains unmistakable. Fifa described the fixture as football “looking over its shoulder” as the same opponents reunite to raise the curtain on the global showpiece once again.

History repeats

The repeat is one of the more remarkable coincidences in World Cup history.

According to Fifa records, Mexico and South Africa are reprising the exact opening fixture from 2010, making it one of the rare occasions that a World Cup curtain-raiser has been repeated.

Football supporters were quick to notice the similarity after the draw was made, with many describing the fixture as “running it back from 2010” and the “world’s longest two-legged tie.”

While rare, World Cup opening matches have crossed paths before.

The most notable example involved Brazil and Mexico. The two countries featured in opening-day encounters on three occasions between 1950 and 1962, a consequence of the tournament format at the time, when multiple matches were played simultaneously on the opening day. Brazil won all three meetings.

However, the Mexico-South Africa reunion stands apart because it recreates the exact official curtain-raiser of a previous World Cup.

Since Fifa adopted the modern format of a single showcase opening match, such repetitions have become extraordinarily uncommon.

Full Circle for Broos

The occasion also carries personal significance for South Africa coach Hugo Broos.

The Belgian leads his side to Mexico City knowing he had previously played at the Azteca Stadium during the 1986 World Cup when Belgium faced Mexico. Four decades later, he returns to the same venue as South Africa’s head coach in another World Cup opener.

For Broos, who has indicated that he plans to retire after the tournament, it is a fitting full-circle moment.

Tshabalala’s shadow

No discussion of the fixture can escape the shadow of Tshabalala’s goal.

The left-footed strike against Mexico in 2010 remains one of the defining images of modern World Cups. Fifa has repeatedly highlighted the goal as a symbol of South Africa’s historic tournament and a moment that captured the imagination of football fans worldwide.

Whether the sequel can produce another moment as memorable remains to be seen.

But as the lights come on at the Azteca, football will witness something rare, the continuation of a story that began 16 years ago in Johannesburg.

2026 Fifa World Cup

Opening match

Mexico vs South Africa

Venue: Azteca Stadium

Date: June 11, 2026

Time: 10:00pm

NOTES

Previous World Cup Meeting: Opening match, South Africa 2010

2010 Result: South Africa 1-1 Mexico

2010 Scorers: Siphiwe Tshabalala (S. Africa), Rafael Márquez (Mexico)

Previous repeated W. Cup opening-day matchups

1950, 1954, 1962: Brazil vs Mexico

2010, 2026: Mexico vs South Africa

America sneezing, World Cup catches a cold

The 23rd Fifa World Cup kicks off in Mexico City on Thursday but the headlines are mostly being made off the pitch in the United States of America (USA).

The football audience and world at large has been left in awe in the past weeks in the wake of implementation of tough restrictions to officials, fans and players before kick-off.

Artan stunned

The USA will stage 78 of the 104 matches of the expanded 48-team World Cup but the travel restrictions are biting more than expected.

The refusal of Somalian referee Omar Artan into the USA by immigration authorities at Miami International Airport in Florida has struck the world to the core.

Somalia is among the 20 countries under a total travel ban by the President Donald Trump II’s government but Artan, who was voted as 2025 Confederation of African Football (Caf) men’s referee of the year, had a valid U.S visa.

‘Fifa is not involved in host country immigration processes, including visa adjudications, and has been informed by authorities that Mr. Artan’s status will not be changed at present,’ Fifa said in a statement.

‘In line with previous Fifa events, a host government ultimately determines who receives a visa and who is admitted into their country.’

Fans aggrieved

That’s only a piece of the several barricades the global football audience is facing with getting access into the USA.

‘Every few hours, it’s another story. Another story about fans being denied, players denied, officials denied, journalists denied, now refs?’ retired Arsenal FC and England striker Ian Wright said in a video via social media platform TikTok.

Fans from Africa seeking to support their countries at the World Cup have faced a mountain to climb. Ivory Coast, Senegalese and Moroccan fans have topped the list for visa rejections to the World Cup.

Both West African countries are facing partial bans, with restrictions to getting the B-visa type through which, B-1 covers business (meetings, conferences) and B-2 for tourism (vacations and medical treatment).

At the height of the matter, the world was reminded that Morocco under Sultan Mohammed III was the first nation in the world to officially recognize the newly independent USA in 1777.

Meanwhile, the ongoing diplomatic row with Iran and the USA is not over yet. As missiles fly across the Middle East, 26 Iranian squad players were issued late U.S visas ahead of their Group G business in California but a dozen support staff were denied.

Journalist woes

In the broader scale of things, accredited Iranian journalists and colleagues from some African countries have been denied visas too.

International Sports Press Association (AIPS) president Gianni Merlo expressed these concerns about U.S’ tight immigration laws to FIFA’s director of media relations Bryan Swanson and Fifa’s head of media operations Jochen Steinhoff.

‘Politicians always say that sport unites and builds bridges between young people in countries in conflict, but in this case, we are going in the opposite direction,’ Merlo’s letter said.

A foreign media representative non-immigrant U.S visa type I has most, including Uganda’s Clive Kyazze, with single entry into the USA.

However, it has journalists at a disadvantage for example Ivory Coast who face Germany in Toronto, Canada yet matches against Ecuador on June 14 and Curacao on June 25 are scheduled for the Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, USA.

Senegal too will face France and Norway at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey yet their last Group I match against Iraq will be in Toronto and they may need to return to the USA for the knockout stage.

Tunisia’s first two matches will be in Mexico but they wrap up Group F against the Netherlands in Kansas City, Missouri.

Meanwhile, Kyazze and a bunch of other accredited journalists from DRC and Uganda face a 21-day barrier out of their home countries and temporary visa restrictions to the USA, in the wake of the Ebola virus outbreak.

Those who have made it through to the USA, such as Senegal and Iraq teams, have been subjected to heavy security scrutiny, leaving the world stunned again.

But the hiked prices for match tickets as well as high transport costs for trains and cabs await fans too. ‘It’s actually not funny, something has to be said. Most expensive (World Cup match) tickets ever, expensive accommodation, transport through the roof,’ television football pundit Wright reacted.

Is this how the hosts behave, really for the greatest tournament in the world? Is this the spirit of football?’ he added. America is sneezing and the World Cup is catching a rare cold.

CHALLENGES TO THE WORLD CUP

High Costs: Tickets to group-stage matches are pricey, those for opening matches easily cost upwards of $600 to $2,000 each.

Accommodation and Logistics: Fans in different host cities face inflated accommodation rates for a 40-day tournament.

Immigration Policies: Strict border screenings and present visa barriers are keeping fans, media and officials out

Massive Distances: The tournament will be played across three vast North American countries, evoking costly cross-country flights or long drives between stadiums.